EPTNASL schedule change - Page 2
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Jacuzzi
United States528 Posts
| ||
|
Tyree
1508 Posts
Sometimes people think that all criticism = trolling, but that is not always the case, ive seen plenty of fine people right here on TL.net offer geniune great ideas and ways to help them on their way. They arent burrying their heads in the sand and yelling "WE ARE RIGHT! STOP TROLLING UR WRONG!" and that is a great sign | ||
|
Zealotdriver
United States1557 Posts
| ||
NonY
8748 Posts
From now on we will continue to film according to our regular schedule but we will allow players to postpone their match by one day if they need to reschedule because of major LAN events. This isn't a solution for me, for example, for my conflict with MLG Columbus. | ||
|
ihavetofartosis
1277 Posts
| ||
|
zhurai
United States5660 Posts
are there vods? | ||
|
SpiZe
Canada3640 Posts
| ||
|
Keeler
United States313 Posts
 lol | ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
On April 15 2011 09:06 Liquid`Tyler wrote: This isn't a solution for me, for example, for my conflict with MLG Columbus. Hmm. Would "pre-poning" your match by a day help? | ||
|
ExPresident
United States215 Posts
Keep it up. I'm enjoying the games! | ||
|
NonY
8748 Posts
On April 15 2011 09:08 TheTenthDoc wrote: Hmm. Would "pre-poning" your match by a day help? Nah I'd need two days. On Thursday afternoon I'll be traveling. | ||
|
MrChex
United States2 Posts
On April 15 2011 09:11 MrChex wrote: Interesting. NASL has been live for two days and they are already running into issues. It is not like there was any precedence for this failure. You could respect the league you signed up for and wait a day to travel and find a LAN to play in. | ||
|
NeonPeon
93 Posts
| ||
|
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
On April 15 2011 09:10 Liquid`Tyler wrote: Nah I'd need two days. On Thursday afternoon I'll be traveling. Yikes. I don't envy NASL having to sort these scheduling conflicts especially around MLG time. I really hope they don't end up forcing to you to play during MLG itself or just giving you a loss... | ||
|
Argolis
Canada211 Posts
The NASL has it's issues that people are quick to be critical of, but it also has it's strengths. And I feel that the open communication and amazing website they have already up and running are a great base for them to communicate their plans to the community. I feel the transparency professionalism that have been demonstrated by the league and it's staff are a testament to the commitment they have made to bring us a quality league. We can only hope they listen the community's feedback and continue to improve over the next 3(+) seasons. | ||
|
rolfe
United Kingdom1266 Posts
| ||
|
Der_Magen
182 Posts
but i think a much more elegant solution to all these problems would be to simply cast the replays - scheduling would be way easier and more flexible - there would be no awkward transitions like when gretorp and diggity where hyping a game that was never going to happen. i also can imagine that i might be quite awkward for the whole production team to make a broadcast where one game happens after another out of the live cast where there are obviously some unexpected pauses between the games imho a live replay cast has much less issues and seems easier to produce than a prerecorded live cast that has been cut together ( which is also way worse than a prerecorded replay cast) | ||
|
bibbaly
98 Posts
This is YOUR tournament and YOUR money that you are putting up. If the players want to blow that off then penalize them rather than cater. They made the decision to play in the NASL no one put a gun to their head and said play or else, so if they cant show up on time that is their problem and their fault for losing out on the wondrous prize pool. | ||
|
Aequos
Canada606 Posts
On April 15 2011 09:14 Der_Magen wrote: good thing that the NASL changed something about their production process... the way it was handled before would have led to many great macthes not being played but i think a much more elegant solution to all these problems would be to simply cast the replays - scheduling would be way easier and more flexible - there would be no awkward transitions like when gretorp and diggity where hyping a game that was never going to happen. i also can imagine that i might be quite awkward for the whole production team to make a broadcast where one game happens after another out of the live cast where there are obviously some unexpected pauses between the games imho a live replay cast has much less issues and seems easier to produce than a prerecorded live cast that has been cut together ( which is also way worse than a prerecorded replay cast) People were really upset when it was first suggested that they cast replays - in this case, it really is a sort of lose-lose situation. I do hope they can work something out for Tyler, I really want to see his games. | ||
|
SinCitta
Germany2127 Posts
So Naniwa does not gain negative points. Is there a policy for that? Because it seems very arbitrary. If so, will the same happen to White-Ra retroactively? As far as I know White-Ra had better reasons for his absence. Additionally, which message did Naniwa not get? The one which said that the postponement was fine for Strelok? Why is laddering a reason for default-loss (or tie...)? Could be part of his "rest" as laddering is nothing serious and you can relax while doing it. Kinda strange that Dignitas manager had no objections on awarding the game to Strelok. | ||
| ||
