I guess this is good for them, but not so much for the rest of us.
Hopefully the season will start to be shorter like Browder planned (3-4 or so per year) =D
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10366 Posts
I guess this is good for them, but not so much for the rest of us. Hopefully the season will start to be shorter like Browder planned (3-4 or so per year) =D | ||
|
uberism
Canada271 Posts
| ||
|
Rizell
Sweden237 Posts
| ||
|
uberism
Canada271 Posts
The only way to "inflate it" is to get better... | ||
|
Joedaddy
United States1948 Posts
I understand "win/loss doesnt mean a thing" but lets be real. Do you really think SuperMenke is better than Catz? Edit: I'm just wondering how in the world blizz's mmr system measured that SuperMenke has higher mmr than Catz. | ||
|
Pervect
1280 Posts
On April 13 2011 15:58 Joedaddy wrote: how in the hell is some guy named supermenke in GM with a losing record and catz isn't in it at all? I understand "win/loss doesnt mean a thing" but lets be real. Do you really think SuperMenke is better than Catz? Edit: I'm just wondering how in the world blizz's mmr system measured that SuperMenke has higher mmr than Catz. SuperMenke was only about 2k points with 64% win ratio in season 1. So he had a good MMR coming from there, but that coupled with his bad winrate so far I fail to see how he's top 200 MMR or however the system decides to place in grandmasters. | ||
|
Contrail
38 Posts
if you eg. if play in korea for a ladder season and then you move to america, you have to wait 2 ladder seasons to reach grandmaster | ||
|
Snowbear
Korea (South)1925 Posts
On April 13 2011 17:43 Contrail wrote: i dont like the system if you eg. if play in korea for a ladder season and then you move to america, you have to wait 2 ladder seasons to reach grandmaster I wonder if it actually matters. If you get good enough, you will face grandmaster players whole the time, while you are still in masters. I don't think good players care about their league. Ladder is decent practice for them, but that should be it. | ||
|
Earthness2000
Canada30 Posts
With all the cheese happening in masters league last night, it's absolutely ridiculous how this GM placement happened. Blizzard HAS to have a games-played floor for GM otherwise this whole thing is pointless. What's the point of a top 200 league when players who have been top 200 since the list started haven't made GM? This whole fiasco is just another reason why I don't understand MMR being hidden, ESPECIALLY in masters league. Does anyone else think the points system is completely and utterly pointless? EDIT: You can also add thisisjimmy to the growing list of people that didn't make GM (as of this posting) and should have. | ||
|
Contrail
38 Posts
On April 13 2011 17:52 Dente wrote: Show nested quote + On April 13 2011 17:43 Contrail wrote: i dont like the system if you eg. if play in korea for a ladder season and then you move to america, you have to wait 2 ladder seasons to reach grandmaster I wonder if it actually matters. If you get good enough, you will face grandmaster players whole the time, while you are still in masters. I don't think good players care about their league. Ladder is decent practice for them, but that should be it. They could use grandmaster as pre-reqs to tournaments, or more likely as qualifying for battle-net finals at blizzcon. | ||
|
teh_longinator
Canada725 Posts
Just sayin', there are TONS of better players in the North American server! | ||
|
SpiDaH
France198 Posts
| ||
|
Nihilnovi
Sweden696 Posts
| ||
|
pycho
Paraguay372 Posts
On April 13 2011 18:24 Nihilnovi wrote: What's wrong with just having a top 200 ladder based on MMR.. This is GM league so dumb and unintuitive , prone to abuse and in no way representative of the best players in their respective regions because of it's innate flaws and ease of being abused. dont get what u are trying to say here, why is it dumb? why is it bad if its based on MMR? or are u just angry becouse u didnt got in.....? | ||
|
Nihilnovi
Sweden696 Posts
On April 13 2011 18:28 pycho wrote: Show nested quote + On April 13 2011 18:24 Nihilnovi wrote: What's wrong with just having a top 200 ladder based on MMR.. This is GM league so dumb and unintuitive , prone to abuse and in no way representative of the best players in their respective regions because of it's innate flaws and ease of being abused. dont get what u are trying to say here, why is it dumb? why is it bad if its based on MMR? or are u just angry becouse u didnt got in.....? You are either trolling me or you don't know how to read(not ment in a offensive way), in either case, I WANT a top 200 ladder based on MMR, not a GM league that updates 1 time a season. To be more specific, a real live top 200 ladder page updated LIVE based on MMR. | ||
|
rjT.
Italy295 Posts
| ||
|
Defacer
Canada5052 Posts
| ||
|
Earthness2000
Canada30 Posts
| ||
|
Contrail
38 Posts
| ||
|
Earthness2000
Canada30 Posts
On April 13 2011 18:42 Contrail wrote: im sure blizzard will change it in time I don't think they're going to change anything for this season, which means we have 3 months of a pointless GM league. Before anyone starts: Yes, I know there's some in there that deserve it, but it's still pointless if it's not a true depiction of top 200 skill level. | ||
| ||
StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • practicex StarCraft: Brood War• AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel • sooper7s League of Legends |
|
WardiTV Invitational
PiGosaur Cup
WardiTV Invitational
The PondCast
OSC
OSC
All Star Teams
INnoVation vs soO
sOs vs Scarlett
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
All Star Teams
MMA vs DongRaeGu
Rogue vs Oliveira
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] OSC
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
|
|
|