Reaction Time Test - Page 10
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Ksyper
Bulgaria665 Posts
| ||
tuestresfat
2555 Posts
![]() I'm just that good. | ||
emythrel
United Kingdom2599 Posts
| ||
whatthefat
United States918 Posts
On March 29 2011 02:30 TimeSpiral wrote: 140 ish to 165 ish is AVG for me. Of course, I saved the first one I did which is now logged as 176, or something :/ Screenshot of the 140 session + Show Spoiler + ![]() Techniques: (1) Use your peripheral vision. Sensitivity to "movement" or "sudden changes" in your surroundings is higher in your peripheral vision. (2) Program a reaction, not a command. Feedback into your routine, "click on change," and your body will react automatically. (3) Don't sit down and say, "okay, when is it going to change, oh! there it is! I should click ..." Your score will be bad. (4) To avoid concentration, blur your eyes a tiny bit out of focus. (5) Mitigate unnecessary resistance and setup a little "tension." Make sure the pivot of your wrist is not touching anything, but is "floating." This will allow you to snap-release the tension for a faster (read: more accurate) reaction. Looking at your profile there, you have at least one pre-emptive score. http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/userstats.php?uid=2138266 Given what is known in the reaction time literature, I'd be very surprised if you could achieve the same average over > 20 trials without at least one click before a stimulus appears, i.e., the "don't click until you see green again" message. | ||
LittLeD
Sweden7973 Posts
On March 28 2011 20:34 Jintetsu wrote: 220 im 3,4k master EDIT: lol did sum random clicking like the guy that got 18 ms, and i managed to get better! ![]() didnt think it was possible, but it obviously was Pff, I can beat that. Brb | ||
Lomo
Germany137 Posts
| ||
Geegeez
Canada226 Posts
| ||
Robje
Netherlands1044 Posts
![]() ![]() | ||
bebe01
Korea (South)512 Posts
| ||
TimeSpiral
United States1010 Posts
On March 29 2011 03:33 whatthefat wrote: Looking at your profile there, you have at least one pre-emptive score. http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime/userstats.php?uid=2138266 Given what is known in the reaction time literature, I'd be very surprised if you could achieve the same average over > 20 trials without at least one click before a stimulus appears, i.e., the "don't click until you see green again" message. Yeah, anything less than 100ms is referred to by that site as "preemptive," or "lucky." And for the most part, I agree, but I do not rule out the possibility of those instances being largely pre-conscious reactions. I can tell you that those super low scores, like "50" or so were me "trusting," in the reaction and just letting it happen. It was not me spamming the button and getting lucky. To elaborate, when you look at the color green there is a series of pre-conscious routines triggered. Your brain grabs all the relevant data pertaining the the environmental signal, examines the array of values, and then informs your consciousness which allows for the cognition of green, or; you being aware of green. To put it in simpler terms; your brain perceives and processes green before you are aware that you are seeing green. You can absolutely react prior to conscious awareness. You do it every day, all day. I'm using the perception of green as an example because it is directly relative to the reaction speed test, however, you can really use anything you are familiar with; tree, car, sign, word, name, whatever ... I've done the test four or five times, typically averaging 140 - 165 ish. I'd say the number of "preemptive" scores is roughly 50/50 with the "don't click until you see green again" response. | ||
Topazas
Lithuania86 Posts
| ||
Kryptonite
United States155 Posts
| ||
muzzy
United States640 Posts
Diamond... Interesting test, but shows no real correlation to SC2 skill. | ||
MnMADsOuL
2 Posts
| ||
XsebT
Denmark2980 Posts
I'm averaging at around 190. | ||
whatthefat
United States918 Posts
On March 29 2011 04:16 TimeSpiral wrote: Yeah, anything less than 100ms is referred to by that site as "preemptive," or "lucky." And for the most part, I agree, but I do not rule out the possibility of those instances being largely pre-conscious reactions. I can tell you that those super low scores, like "50" or so were me "trusting," in the reaction and just letting it happen. It was not me spamming the button and getting lucky. To elaborate, when you look at the color green there is a series of pre-conscious routines triggered. Your brain grabs all the relevant data pertaining the the environmental signal, examines the array of values, and then informs your consciousness which allows for the cognition of green, or; you being aware of green. To put it in simpler terms; your brain perceives and processes green before you are aware that you are seeing green. You can absolutely react prior to conscious awareness. You do it every day, all day. I'm using the perception of green as an example because it is directly relative to the reaction speed test, however, you can really use anything you are familiar with; tree, car, sign, word, name, whatever ... I've done the test four or five times, typically averaging 140 - 165 ish. I'd say the number of "preemptive" scores is roughly 50/50 with the "don't click until you see green again" response. If you're regularly getting a "don't click until you see green again" then you're guessing to some extent, whether consciously or not. There have been a bazillion studies on human reaction times, and what you're describing is regularly seen. Without any guessing, it's not possible for humans to respond much more quickly than 200ms. | ||
Octothorpe
United States52 Posts
| ||
AcrossFiveJulys
United States3612 Posts
| ||
divito
Canada1213 Posts
| ||
Marl
United States692 Posts
| ||
| ||