iGware Hacking [ you decide ] reps included. - Page 5

On March 12 2011 13:56 KaluGOSU wrote:
Wow, I figured this kid hacked. I played him on ladder a few times, analyzed the replays and he had some weird timings, never scouted or scanned me either. It was just too weird, also knowing he's a top player, they usually scan to see where your opponents army is, not once did he scan.. I'm very glad that someone pointed this out. Appreciate it Protech

iGware is very bm too >__>

On March 12 2011 13:50 PinkPrincess wrote:
Yes cFChosen, that's me.

I do not share my account with anyone, however. We've nearly got Sorcery set up streaming, but it's like dragging a horse through mud with how bad he is at these tech things

On March 12 2011 13:59 Liquid`HuK wrote:
from my limited experience with both of them they have no honor so it wouldnt surprise me if both or either of them hacked/cheated whatever. all the same tho without solid concrete proof i would point fingers.

On March 12 2011 13:59 Liquid`HuK wrote:
from my limited experience with both of them they have no honor so it wouldnt surprise me if both or either of them hacked/cheated whatever. all the same tho without solid concrete proof i would point fingers.

On March 12 2011 14:01 Greenworld wrote:
Ok the thing is , this is very pathetic and if this threat is not locked soon i am disapointed. It's clear that in game 1 he didn't map hack someone posted here a really good "what and why he did that scenario".

I watched the 2'nd game and what to they see a z massing zerlings , the problem most of you come up with is why is he making so many bunkers but let's think you go for :
ling-roches - they have roches+marines - they win
ling+mutas- you do some initial damage with the mutas but after they have marines + lots of minerals from the salvaged bunkers - they win
ling+ling ... you lose
ling+banelings = only way to really defend is bunkers.

and let's not forget maybe they know your style , maybe you are not as good as you think especially after watching the first replay where it's JUST ...... Let's say he is a hacker ... well those replays don't prove anything , so in my eyes he is not guilty and you are just pathetic unless you come with good profs.

Oh and my other question is when do mutas come when you have taken your natural ? at around what time ? - and don't tell me they had no ideea your partner took his natural ... he walked that queen all the way from the main base to kill an overlord to hide mutas , worth it if it was at the natural MAYBE .... ?

And the most important defense for the last game , because i repeat the others are pathetic ... MAYBE they know your playstile and that's pretty clear.

I know hackers are a problem , but sometimes some of us rage so much because we consider the opponent a retard and only way he could have placed a engineering bay at that time is he hacked , no way he knew i was going dts ... considering i had 2 gases and i have low amount of units or why did he make an observer then or why did he move a part of his army next to his mineral line or why did he make a viking or ... the list can go on : IT"S CALLED GAME SENSE and knowing your opponent and what they can do and what they usually do.
Sorry this was long but the few that try to defend compared to the ones that AAAAA hacker is amazing considering they don't watch the replays.

On March 12 2011 14:05 Flashback- wrote:
I know sorcery used to play on NeverDawn and got to the top20 on the blizzard top200 around october, but hasn't played a game on it since then. Is that account banned? lol

On March 12 2011 13:59 Liquid`HuK wrote:
from my limited experience with both of them they have no honor so it wouldnt surprise me if both or either of them hacked/cheated whatever. all the same tho without solid concrete proof i would'nt point fingers.

On March 12 2011 14:04 Utinni wrote:
Actually. Everyone vote him into NASL so I can watch him fail.

On March 12 2011 14:04 Utinni wrote:
Actually. Everyone vote him into NASL so I can watch him fail.