On October 16 2011 01:39 Valashu wrote: Game knowledge is immensely important to me, if a caster makes stupid mistakes or starts repeating the obvious you've lost me as a viewer. (for example I can't watch TB cast, I just start getting annoyed)
I remember there was a BW casting contest and the hardest part was making the right predictions and explaining what each player has in mind / is trying to do.. what happened to that?
There's sort of a minimum level of casting knowledge I like to see, otherwise they're going to struggle to say anything interesting about the game and make me cringe whenever they say something really wrong. Same as any other sports commentator really. Even if one is the shouty excited one and the other is the calm analysis one, they both still have to know the basics for it to work. And I'd go with dry knowledgeable delivery over excited ignorant delivery anyday. Which is why I tend not to enjoy Totalbiscuit's casts, though I've also heard worse. Anyone remember the guy who filled in on one of the first SC2 GSLs and thought a Terran player misclicked and destroyed his own bunker?
I honestly think she understands the game better than wolf or moletrap ever did. I find that it bothers me quite a bit when the caster is saying something that is completely wrong, or making wild conjecture with bad justification.
On October 16 2011 01:49 hipsterHobbit wrote: Other people's perception is your reality.
There's a fallacy if I've ever heard one.
Are your ears burning, TB?
I'm glad you're reading this thread, because I wanted to say, it doesn't bother me if a caster does not have the absolute best analysis (although I much prefer analystical casters). What really makes me mute a stream is if a caster thinks they know way more than they do. HD, CatsPajamas, Moletrap are examples of casters who constantly make bad predictions and try to analyze above their ability, whereas someone like TotalBiscuit at least understands his level and doesn't try to sound like he's a pro SC2 player. It's way better to state the obvious than to state things that are downright wrong.
On October 16 2011 01:49 hipsterHobbit wrote: Other people's perception is your reality.
There's a fallacy if I've ever heard one.
Are your ears burning, TB?
I'm glad you're reading this thread, because I wanted to say, it doesn't bother me if a caster does not have the absolute best analysis (although I much prefer analystical casters). What really makes me mute a stream is if a caster thinks they know way more than they do. HD, CatsPajamas, Moletrap are examples of casters who constantly make bad predictions and try to analyze above their ability, whereas someone like TotalBiscuit at least understands his level and doesn't try to sound like he's a pro SC2 player. It's way better to state the obvious than to state things that are downright wrong.
Tasteless has some pretty darn good game knowledge, and he's pretty darn good at providing analysis as well.
If, in a casting duo, only one of the casters is doing analysis, they'll tend to miss things, or over-think a situation, if you have a second intelligent caster there to pick-up the slack and provide alternative opinions, the analysis is much more interesting.
Someone with no game knowledge tends to be quite boring to listen to, with the exception being James "2GD" Harding, the most awesome of the awesome people in the world. TLO + 2GD = best casting duo ever to grace the face of this wonderful blue planet we call Earth.
One reason the "entertainment" caster needs some starting game knowledge is that they need to ask the "analysis" caster questions about what's going on, for the benefit of the audience. If the knowledge isn't there, they'll ask a really stupid question that tells the audience nothing and which will then throw the other caster off. Same thing if they made a big deal over some fairly meaningless engagement or harassment kills. And finally its nice to have a *bit* of back and forth analytical debate during the quiet periods of a match, which doesn't work if only half the casting duo can keep up.
Edit : Just to give some examples from this cast.
1:40 TB doesn't seem to know about the mineral trick, so the other caster has to correct him. Though he doesn't really explain it himself either. 2:40 On the plus side he makes a gas steal sound much more exciting than it really is 4:30 TB's comment "he really needs to split up his lings" when its chasing the surviving hellion. But...he doesn't split them, nothing bad seems to come of it, and I'm not sure if it was an accurate thing to say. 7:05 TB says "<the zerg> will be able to go in and kill a number of SCVs" when all he's got is like half a dozen nearly dead lings and the Terran has an MMM force and some hellions parked right beside the mineral line. Its hard to tell but I doubt he managed to kill a single worker.
The problem is that once I spot a few mistakes like these from a caster, I start doubting all the other things they say. When I'm kinda relying on them to explain stuff for me. Atleast in this case TB has a co-caster to bail him out when he says something incorrect.
On October 16 2011 04:51 Monkeyballs25 wrote: One reason the "entertainment" caster needs some starting game knowledge is that they need to ask the "analysis" caster questions about what's going on, for the benefit of the audience. If the knowledge isn't there, they'll ask a really stupid question that tells the audience nothing and which will then throw the other caster off. Same thing if they made a big deal over some fairly meaningless engagement or harassment kills. And finally its nice to have a *bit* of back and forth analytical debate during the quiet periods of a match, which doesn't work if only half the casting duo can keep up.
Edit : Just to give some examples from this cast. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkiVJHmknhU 1:40 TB doesn't seem to know about the mineral trick, so the other caster has to correct him. Though he doesn't really explain it himself either. 2:40 On the plus side he makes a gas steal sound much more exciting than it really is 4:30 TB's comment "he really needs to split up his lings" when its chasing the surviving hellion. But...he doesn't split them, nothing bad seems to come of it, and I'm not sure if it was an accurate thing to say. 7:05 TB says "<the zerg> will be able to go in and kill a number of SCVs" when all he's got is like half a dozen nearly dead lings and the Terran has an MMM force and some hellions parked right beside the mineral line. Its hard to tell but I doubt he managed to kill a single worker.
The problem is that once I spot a few mistakes like these from a caster, I start doubting all the other things they say. When I'm kinda relying on them to explain stuff for me. Atleast in this case TB has a co-caster to bail him out when he says something incorrect.
Again It comes down perrsonal preferences. Imo those are not the biggest deal in the world. Yeh the mineral line thing was a bit stupid, but besides I feel that those comments are somewhat standard for most play-by-play casters.
Still the most important thing is that the caster isn't trying to do things that he or she does not have the abilities to do, aka trying to analyze the game you dont understand (which I claimed Doa is doing).
After having heard Djwheat and JP cast Marineking vs Goswser, I think game knowledge is absolutely THE most important thing to have for at least 1 caster. JP assumed the game was won for Goswser when he was about to baneling bust marineking, when I was convinced marineking had enough. 20 seconds after Zerg decided not to bust, marineking stimmed down his ramp and took out the army + 8 baneligns which was supposedly gonna give Goswser the free win. They just don't realise that 4 marauders and 7 marines defeats 8 roaches with stim and medivacs.
They also thought Goswser had a huge lead after the natural was lifted when Zerg was on a hatch tech roach baneling whilst Terran had full tech, and lost very few scvs.
I think if your job is casting a game you have to know the game at least at master level.It is disappointing to see some casters are totally clueless about game and say wrong stuff all the time.
Bitterdam is definitely one of the best, simply through raw chemistry, game knowledge and beautiful voices. They are also very honest, and won't say random stuff like 'i think he might be ok here', and are happy to admit their mistakes. They bring a hint of racial bias which is good because it keeps the interaction going, and have very nice 'excited' voices.
On October 16 2011 20:14 Silentenigma wrote: I think if your job is casting a game you have to know the game at least at master level.It is disappointing to see some casters are totally clueless about game and say wrong stuff all the time.
There needs to be at least one person in the caster duo who knows the game at a master level. If the play-by-play guy brings a lot of ENV and is good at asking the right questions to the analytical caster, he is imo fine.
Casters definitely have to at least have a decent amount of game knowledge when it comes to them explaining the state of the matchup to us which they are casting. It really separates the best from the rest, because I for one, do not enjoy listening to a caster who seems clueless as to what is going on. But I have to say, some casters just have that air to them, that no matter what their level of understanding, one always enjoys watching them cast. This is where the personality factor comes into play.
Something that really bothers me though is when I happen upon a rather popular caster's battle.net profile and see that they are gold level or sometimes even lower. I mean, how can we trust their views when they cannot even play the game at higher levels than gold (which is pretty low already in my opinion). So yes, I do believe that casters really have to better their game when explaining the analytical doodads to us.
Game knowledge is pretty important. It really sucks when people are predicting wrong. Or when the casters think someone is WAYYY Ahead. I guess if sc2 was more mainstream and were getting random viewers then you would need to be entertained. But I feel like most of the people watching sc2 streams are sc2 players so they know whats up.Entertaining people like djwheat are fine casters as long as they have someone with good game knowledge there with them.