• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:52
CEST 16:52
KST 23:52
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four0BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET6Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)80Weekly Cups (Sept 29-Oct 5): MaxPax triples up3
StarCraft 2
General
The New Patch Killed Mech! Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy herO joins T1 Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun Tenacious Turtle Tussle Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
BSL Season 21 BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW caster Sayle BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET
Tourneys
[ASL20] Semifinal B Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN
Strategy
Current Meta BW - ajfirecracker Strategy & Training Relatively freeroll strategies Siegecraft - a new perspective
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Men's Fashion Thread Sex and weight loss
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Series you have seen recently... Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Heroism of Pepe the Fro…
Peanutsc
Rocket League: Traits, Abili…
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1470 users

[D] Terran play in bigger maps? - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 13 14 15 Next All
WickedBit
Profile Joined August 2010
United States343 Posts
February 04 2011 22:36 GMT
#81
Wow! I'm not sure I understand all this talk about terran not able to macro. Players in the GSL like MVP,Jinro etc got there due to good macro. There seem to be a ton of strategies that are as yet unexplored from Terrans since their 1 or 2 base timing pushes are so strong. So far P and Z have not had an option apart from somehow surviving till late game where most terran players seem to have a problem. But as others have shown that is not a problem with the race but rather due to terrans unfamiliarity being there. Of course larger maps mean that current 3100+ master league terrans would soon start losing to zerg/protoss of greater skill instead of pulling of wins against them... Maybe that is what is behind all these alarmist posts from terrans in TL.
mahnini
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
United States6862 Posts
February 04 2011 22:36 GMT
#82
On February 05 2011 07:30 FrostedMiniWeet wrote:
So you're afraid that Terran might be at some sort of disadvantage? I find that somewhat funny considering Zerg players have been playing with map disadvantages since release, and now that there is a possibility that Terran might have some this concerns you? I think people forgot the diversity of the Terran race, and the shear number of unexplored strategies. This is why Terran's continue to succeed despite all the nerfs, they simply have so many options available that the race is still somewhat unexplored compared to Zerg and to a lesser extent Protoss. I'm confident that Terrans WILL find successful strategies on large maps, it will just be completely different from current play styles because there is currently no drive to create them. Necessity is the mother of innovation, and Terran are the masters of Strategic innovation hands down.

terran aggression has been nerfed for small maps, zerg defense has been buffed for small maps. what that usually means is zerg is able to defend on very short notice and relatively quickly, terran's attack options on the other hand have been delayed because they were exceptionally strong on small maps. now if we take these stipulations and apply them to a larger map, zerg can still defend and has more time to, but terran attacks will be delayed due to distance.

how it actually pans out is still to be seen but it was definitely a mistake to balance sc2 on blizzard ladder maps if larger maps are what the community wants.
the world's a playground. you know that when you're a kid, but somewhere along the way everyone forgets it.
Bagi
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6799 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-04 22:40:23
February 04 2011 22:38 GMT
#83
On February 05 2011 07:30 FrostedMiniWeet wrote:
So you're afraid that Terran might be at some sort of disadvantage? I find that somewhat funny considering Zerg players have been playing with map disadvantages since release, and now that there is a possibility that Terran might have some this concerns you? I think people forgot the diversity of the Terran race, and the shear number of unexplored strategies. This is why Terran's continue to succeed despite all the nerfs, they simply have so many options available that the race is still somewhat unexplored compared to Zerg and to a lesser extent Protoss. I'm confident that Terrans WILL find successful strategies on large maps, it will just be completely different from current play styles because there is currently no drive to create them. Necessity is the mother of innovation, and Terran are the masters of Strategic innovation hands down.

To be honest, your post is alot of fluff but no real proof that terran would excel in macro games. Unexplored strategies? Masters of strategic innovation? Do these statements really have any weight to them? Terrans are using pretty much the same units and strategies they did at release, even after the nerfs.

I mean, I hope you are right, I'm just not convinced. And neither should anyone else be until we actually see alot of meaningful terran macro innovation.
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-04 22:44:39
February 04 2011 22:38 GMT
#84
Terran will have to learn to rely on using strats other than early aggression and all-ins for an early advantage. I don't think it's a problem, Terran has such good tech that is rarely used because of how easy it is to get stuck on marines and marauders all game long.

And where did the idea that terran has to have mobility to expand come from? From what I've seen, slow mech pushes are still incredibly strong, and because of their cost efficiency, allow for all sorts of defensive structures to go down like Sensor towers (an incredibly underused structure) and missile turrets to stop harass. Hellions are incredibly fast too, and maybe terran air will get more use now other than the occasional banshee harass, medivacs for only drops/healing and vikings to stop other people from using air. Banshees are great as part of an army composition with awesome dps, and Battlecruisers could see more use on a bigger map where you have more time to tech due to rush distance and don't feel like you have to be AS aggressive.

Plus, in large spread out maps, nukes might see more use due to how spread out things are (harder to figure out where it's coming down etc.)
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
Oceaniax
Profile Joined June 2010
146 Posts
February 04 2011 22:43 GMT
#85
On February 05 2011 07:26 MegaBUD wrote:
We need that early harass more than any other race... we have to do economic damage.

Toss and even more zerg, can sit passively in their base macroing... We cant affort that.

Oh well... enjoy 5min all in and mass marines before the 10min mark.

User was temp banned for this post.


I don't want to get into a bitching fest here, but have you considered that the reason toss and zerg macro early against terrans is because their early harrassment tools are widely considered to be all-inish?

Terran has lower risk when associated with harassment options in terms of being behind in economy and investing in unecessary tech, so it's become quite viable (and even optimal) to perform these attacks, since the risk/reward ratio is signifigantly safer.

Two rax, reactor hellion, BF hellion drop, banshee harass, stimmed marine drops, and positional play like tank/thor drops are hard to predict, inflict signifigant damage, and are inexpensive enough in both time and resources to allow macro play in tandem.
Nightfall.589
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada766 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-04 22:49:29
February 04 2011 22:47 GMT
#86
On February 05 2011 07:33 Somnolence wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2011 06:57 VanGarde wrote:
The elitist misconception that terran players do not want larger maps because they all universally suck at macro while zerg and protoss players are just so much better is really getting annoying.

There are countless good macro terrans, most top level terrans even on the ladder play macro games. The problem is that the way terran plays off zerg and protoss makes it fare worse on larger and on more open maps. Terran players do not hate TvZ on shakuras because we all just do not know how to expand a third time. We hate TvZ on shakuras because we don't know how to expand a third and fourth time and still be able to fend off the muta ball when you have the ridiculous run distance between the expansion down at the xel naga tower and the one on the highground behind the destructible rocks.

The fact that larger, more open maps most certainly favor zerg over terran has nothing to do with skill and everything to do with the mechanics of the races. But as long as there are banelings, infestors and the ability to spread creep over the entire map, terran has to play an immobile style against zerg, which means you are fucked on a large map.


I love Starcraft and I love TL but these kind of points make TL balance threads equivalent in quality to Battle.NET cesspool



Which points? The ones where VanGarde is calling out people posting nothing but "Jinro" and "Terran just need to learn to macro, they've 2-based for the past 6 months"?

Or the Open Map -> Disadvantage for Terran one?

I'd like to see larger maps, just because close positions is ridicilous for zerg to deal with. However, all of his points are quite valid. (Definitely more valid then blanket criticism of them, with no counter-arguments to support it)
Proof by Legislation: An entire body of (sort-of) elected officials is more correct than all of the known laws of physics, math and science as a whole. -Scott McIntyre
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-04 22:47:59
February 04 2011 22:47 GMT
#87


I don't want to get into a bitching fest here, but have you considered that the reason toss and zerg macro early against terrans is because their early harrassment tools are widely considered to be all-inish?

Terran has lower risk when associated with harassment options in terms of being behind in economy and investing in unecessary tech, so it's become quite viable (and even optimal) to perform these attacks, since the risk/reward ratio is signifigantly safer.

Two rax, reactor hellion, BF hellion drop, banshee harass, stimmed marine drops, and positional play like tank/thor drops are hard to predict, inflict signifigant damage, and are inexpensive enough in both time and resources to allow macro play in tandem.


Like Oceanix said here, Terran has the best harassment units in the entire game, and the most cost efficient. He didn't even mention reapers, which I've seen mid-late game a few times in small numbers used to snipe very important tech structures while tanks defend. A lot of terran units are fantastic on large maps that just haven't been getting used.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
Drium
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
United States888 Posts
February 04 2011 22:48 GMT
#88
So what you're saying is, bigger maps will benefit the race that is currently weakest the most, the race that is currently in the middle less, and the race that is currently the strongest the least?

My god! This must be stopped!
KwanROLLLLLLLED
FrostedMiniWeet
Profile Joined July 2009
United States636 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-04 22:50:45
February 04 2011 22:49 GMT
#89
On February 05 2011 07:38 Bagi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2011 07:30 FrostedMiniWeet wrote:
So you're afraid that Terran might be at some sort of disadvantage? I find that somewhat funny considering Zerg players have been playing with map disadvantages since release, and now that there is a possibility that Terran might have some this concerns you? I think people forgot the diversity of the Terran race, and the shear number of unexplored strategies. This is why Terran's continue to succeed despite all the nerfs, they simply have so many options available that the race is still somewhat unexplored compared to Zerg and to a lesser extent Protoss. I'm confident that Terrans WILL find successful strategies on large maps, it will just be completely different from current play styles because there is currently no drive to create them. Necessity is the mother of innovation, and Terran are the masters of Strategic innovation hands down.

To be honest, your post is alot of fluff but no real proof that terran would excel in macro games. Unexplored strategies? Masters of strategic innovation? Do these statements really have any weight to them? Terrans are using pretty much the same units and strategies they did at release, even after the nerfs.

I mean, I hope you are right, I'm just not convinced. And neither should anyone else be until we actually see alot of meaningful terran macro innovation.


Is it really such a problem if Terran do end up disadvantaged? They have been in the map pool advantage seat since release, and if they do end up being disadvantaged, then Blizzard can balance patch from there. I'm just saying its not the end of the world if suddenly Terrans have some map pool disadvantages for a while, and may actually do them some good, as they will be forced to stretch the race to its maximum potential, which I feel like is not happening at the moment as there is really no need or incentive to explore those kinds of playstyles with the strength of rush based all-ins.
Zarahtra
Profile Joined May 2010
Iceland4053 Posts
February 04 2011 22:49 GMT
#90
I think us terrans will definitely need to figure out new strategies. Whether there are any that can combat the macro mechanics of Z/P is yet to be seen.

Atleast for the start we'll be seeing a lot more hellions/drops I think. If those units can effect the early game well enough, terran might be fine.

Other than that, I'm fearful. No matter what anyone says, terrans t3 is weaker than z/p and the reason is obviously that terran can get theirs a lot earlier than z/p, but it still leaves the fact that in a 200/200 army the terran t3 units are rather lackluster. I'm more afraid of TvP though, since when toss gets rolling it's almost impossible to stop. Zerg is similar, but atleast the 300/200 will be slower due to distance, so it might give the terran enough time to gather himself for the next confrontation(aswell as in general it's easier to do drops/hellion roast on zerg than toss).

I think balance patches will have to follow the map size change though, mainly changing the supply cost of the tank to 2 from 3. But I mean it's anyone's guess right now, maybe we've just been missing something incredibly obvious all this time... Or bigger maps gives us some advantage that isn't easily noticeable...
Chise
Profile Joined December 2010
Japan507 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-04 22:50:59
February 04 2011 22:49 GMT
#91
I kind of feel that Terran lategame only feels weak because of the current metagame.
Terran has a lot more ways to harass than Protoss and Zerg, yet the way most Terrans play is still by going for straight attacks where they mostly use T1/T1,5 units, that are supposed to lose to T3 units. Harassing will become even stronger on larger maps. I can't tell for sure if this kind of playstyle will be good for Terran, but it sounds like a possibility to me.
GinDo
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
3327 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-04 22:58:00
February 04 2011 22:52 GMT
#92
All you talk about is punishing FEs. Bigger Maps means its easier for you to FE your self. Derr.

Many people are scared to play the Macro Terran game because they've dwelled to long on Bio Spam. Its gonna be hard as personally i believe Terran it the hardest race to play macro style because of our production style, but i would rather play the hard race then the QQ OP Race.

Heck we might even get some L8 game buff come HOTs, but w/e in the end its just a game. HF


EDIT:
P.S. Ever played +3 Base Mech Terran? Its Frikkin Scary. Or +3 Terran Air? Imagine +6 Starport Pumping Banshees and harassing everywhere. L8 game Terran is an unexplored region, and i hope these more Turtle +3 base maps promote that. Not only will it kill alot of gimmicky 1 base plays, but will also allow the macro Terran which depends on 3 or more bases, which has beec limited by crap maps with difficult thirds and backdoors.
ⱩŦ ƑⱠẬ$Ħ / ƩǤ ɈƩẬƉØƝǤ [ɌȻ] / ȊṂ.ṂṼⱣ / ẬȻƩɌ.ȊƝƝØṼẬŦȊØƝ / ẬȻƩɌ.ϟȻẬɌⱠƩŦŦ ϟⱠẬɎƩɌϟ ȻⱠẬƝ
FrostedMiniWeet
Profile Joined July 2009
United States636 Posts
February 04 2011 22:53 GMT
#93
Terran can sustain so many different play styles its quite amazing actually. I think they'll adapt rather quickly.
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-04 22:56:18
February 04 2011 22:54 GMT
#94
I really wish people would stop using the term tier to describe units, every unit in the game has a purpose in end game play and is useful in some way (or should be). Further, there's a world of difference between a zealot at the start of the game and a zealot with charge after twilight council and upgrade time. There's an incredible leap in usefulness from a zergling to a zergling with speed and attack speed upgrades from hive tech. Every unit is weak against some other unit and strong against some other, and ideally, at end game, units will have changed from their early game forms (like marines with 3/3 ups, stim and combat shields).

The structure a unit is produced from is meaningless in the end game, the only distinction between tech requirements is how early in the game they can be produced.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
Bagi
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6799 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-04 22:58:23
February 04 2011 22:55 GMT
#95
On February 05 2011 07:49 FrostedMiniWeet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2011 07:38 Bagi wrote:
On February 05 2011 07:30 FrostedMiniWeet wrote:
So you're afraid that Terran might be at some sort of disadvantage? I find that somewhat funny considering Zerg players have been playing with map disadvantages since release, and now that there is a possibility that Terran might have some this concerns you? I think people forgot the diversity of the Terran race, and the shear number of unexplored strategies. This is why Terran's continue to succeed despite all the nerfs, they simply have so many options available that the race is still somewhat unexplored compared to Zerg and to a lesser extent Protoss. I'm confident that Terrans WILL find successful strategies on large maps, it will just be completely different from current play styles because there is currently no drive to create them. Necessity is the mother of innovation, and Terran are the masters of Strategic innovation hands down.

To be honest, your post is alot of fluff but no real proof that terran would excel in macro games. Unexplored strategies? Masters of strategic innovation? Do these statements really have any weight to them? Terrans are using pretty much the same units and strategies they did at release, even after the nerfs.

I mean, I hope you are right, I'm just not convinced. And neither should anyone else be until we actually see alot of meaningful terran macro innovation.


Is it really such a problem if Terran do end up disadvantaged? They have been in the map pool advantage seat since release, and if they do end up being disadvantaged, then Blizzard can balance patch from there. I'm just saying its not the end of the world if suddenly Terrans have some map pool disadvantages for a while, and may actually do them some good, as they will be forced to stretch the race to its maximum potential, which I feel like is not happening at the moment as there is really no need or incentive to explore those kinds of playstyles with the strength of rush based all-ins.

Taking an antagonistic view to the problem isnt going to help anyone. Terran does not "deserve" to be underpowered just because they've had a good run so far. What matters is getting a balanced end product.

People advocate big maps for a more balanced game, but if introducing bigger maps creates more imbalanced than it solves, is it really worth it? I just think its a problem that could be acknowledged before rushing into the pool of big maps.
MajorityofOne
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada2506 Posts
February 04 2011 22:57 GMT
#96
On February 05 2011 07:48 Lysdexia wrote:
So what you're saying is, bigger maps will benefit the race that is currently weakest the most, the race that is currently in the middle less, and the race that is currently the strongest the least?

My god! This must be stopped!


I lol'd
Somnolence
Profile Joined August 2010
Lithuania127 Posts
February 04 2011 22:58 GMT
#97
Which points? The ones where VanGarde is calling out people posting nothing but "Jinro" and "Terran just need to learn to macro, they've 2-based for the past 6 months"?

Or the Open Map -> Disadvantage for Terran one?


ALL of them. When you click on any balance thread you can assume that majority of the posts will be like that and any good posts or insight from the pros will be buried under this trash.
Ownos
Profile Joined July 2010
United States2147 Posts
February 04 2011 22:58 GMT
#98
On February 05 2011 07:36 mahnini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 05 2011 07:30 FrostedMiniWeet wrote:
So you're afraid that Terran might be at some sort of disadvantage? I find that somewhat funny considering Zerg players have been playing with map disadvantages since release, and now that there is a possibility that Terran might have some this concerns you? I think people forgot the diversity of the Terran race, and the shear number of unexplored strategies. This is why Terran's continue to succeed despite all the nerfs, they simply have so many options available that the race is still somewhat unexplored compared to Zerg and to a lesser extent Protoss. I'm confident that Terrans WILL find successful strategies on large maps, it will just be completely different from current play styles because there is currently no drive to create them. Necessity is the mother of innovation, and Terran are the masters of Strategic innovation hands down.

terran aggression has been nerfed for small maps, zerg defense has been buffed for small maps. what that usually means is zerg is able to defend on very short notice and relatively quickly, terran's attack options on the other hand have been delayed because they were exceptionally strong on small maps. now if we take these stipulations and apply them to a larger map, zerg can still defend and has more time to, but terran attacks will be delayed due to distance.

how it actually pans out is still to be seen but it was definitely a mistake to balance sc2 on blizzard ladder maps if larger maps are what the community wants.


Trying to balance the game off imbalanced maps. I really have no idea what is going on at Blizzard. It's like Blizzard balance team has no control over the maps so whenever they're asked about maps they're like "durr make your own maps?" I guess maybe the idea was to balance the game across a variety of maps. At least they're finally making an attempt to address the map issue.
...deeper and deeper into the bowels of El Diablo
Zarahtra
Profile Joined May 2010
Iceland4053 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-02-04 23:06:50
February 04 2011 23:04 GMT
#99
On February 05 2011 07:49 Chise wrote:
I kind of feel that Terran lategame only feels weak because of the current metagame.
Terran has a lot more ways to harass than Protoss and Zerg, yet the way most Terrans play is still by going for straight attacks where they mostly use T1/T1,5 units, that are supposed to lose to T3 units. Harassing will become even stronger on larger maps. I can't tell for sure if this kind of playstyle will be good for Terran, but it sounds like a possibility to me.

What annoys me a bit when talking about terran is the fact z/p think terran players actually want to use rine/rauder. The problem is, further down the line, there is very little to be thrilled getting. This acts differently between the MUs.

TvP:
Ghost good
Tank sucks
Raven good
Banshee good, though a bit niche
Thor decent but slow
BC bad

TvZ:
Ghost bad(if they fixed shift+snipe it'd be sooo awesome...)
Tank good
Raven niche good
Banshee niche good
Thor good for 1 role, controlling surrounding air space/forcing multi box(ugh always forget the term )
BC bad

There's nothing really that we've got that makes me think "ohh if I get this unit, I'm in good shape". Heck I'm by far more turned on by my +attack upgrades than any of those units. Especially TvZ, we don't have anything except t1 to deal with mutas anyway(ok thors guarded by turrets...) so that forces t1 anyway(and on bigger maps = mutas are better, so go figure...).

Edit: Btw I'm glad we're getting bigger maps. I just don't think it's very bright balancing the races to small maps and then expecting everything to be fine on huge maps.
Somnolence
Profile Joined August 2010
Lithuania127 Posts
February 04 2011 23:04 GMT
#100
People advocate big maps for a more balanced game, but if introducing bigger maps creates more imbalanced than it solves, is it really worth it? I just think its a problem that could be acknowledged before rushing into the pool of big maps.


It is simple, really. If e-sports need longer matches and only bigger maps can provide them then we need to start using them and balance the game around them.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 13 14 15 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 8m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 525
LamboSC2 176
sas.Sziky 20
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 41496
Calm 10541
Hyuk 5060
Bisu 3040
GuemChi 2480
Horang2 2480
Sea 2013
Flash 1868
Jaedong 1206
Larva 616
[ Show more ]
Soma 612
EffOrt 595
Light 427
Mong 406
Soulkey 311
Mini 310
actioN 274
Snow 268
Hyun 195
TY 171
hero 158
Pusan 105
JYJ80
ggaemo 62
Barracks 62
sorry 52
Mind 46
Killer 44
Rush 36
scan(afreeca) 32
Aegong 32
Terrorterran 26
Noble 23
ToSsGirL 23
soO 20
Movie 18
SilentControl 14
Bale 12
Sacsri 11
Rock 10
yabsab 8
HiyA 6
Shine 6
Dota 2
Gorgc6729
qojqva3834
Dendi1181
420jenkins409
XaKoH 376
canceldota32
Counter-Strike
byalli531
markeloff177
edward42
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor219
Other Games
singsing2525
hiko1394
B2W.Neo879
Sick449
Hui .399
Lowko338
Liquid`VortiX134
XcaliburYe91
ArmadaUGS77
Mew2King42
KnowMe26
Trikslyr2
trigger1
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL488
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 62
• poizon28 21
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2856
League of Legends
• Nemesis10320
• TFBlade675
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
1h 8m
Replay Cast
8h 8m
WardiTV Invitational
20h 8m
WardiTV Invitational
23h 38m
PiGosaur Monday
1d 9h
Replay Cast
1d 19h
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Wardi Open
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.