• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 17:31
CEST 23:31
KST 06:31
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation5$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced2Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles5[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ i aint gon lie to u bruh... [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Summer Games Done Quick 2024!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 613 users

MLG extended Series Poll - Page 72

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 70 71 72
jobber123rd
Profile Joined December 2011
United States501 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-04 16:22:38
November 04 2012 16:17 GMT
#1421
On November 04 2012 13:03 Hrrrrm wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2012 12:27 jobber123rd wrote:
On November 04 2012 12:10 emythrel wrote:
On November 04 2012 11:47 NOOBALOPSE wrote:
Create a poll for what should replace it. I think if it's 2:1, perhaps something with the map choice could be the advantage that the player gets. If it's 2:0 I think the winner should get a 1 point lead.


MLG already had to creat the most convoluted bracket system ever just to keep their baby while not pissing off the players and fans of sc2 too much. Now you can only have an extended series in group play and the semi-finals of the champ bracket.

They did this by completely changing the bracket system so that there are two completely separate brackets of both winners and losers that only ever allow people to play again in the event they both make the semi finals. Instead of doing the simple thing and just removing extended series and having the usual double elim rules (the player from losers has to win 2 bo3's to win the finals) they just made shit more complicated and stupid.

Basically, MLG knows that they players and fans don't like the extended series, but its a hallmark of MLG so they won't get rid of it completely so instead they create a more complex system so as to avoid the situation as much as possible.


The splitting of the Championship bracket wasn't to protect extended series. It was done in order to make the Grand Final a straight Bo7 always, which arguably makes for a better spectacle than either true DE Grand Final or extended series Grand Final. The NCAA made a similar move for their Division I baseball tournament (College World Series) in 1988, in order to have a final that was more predictable (in terms of length) for spectators and television networks.


The reason why the Grand Final couldn't be a straight up Bo7 was because of Extended Series. I'm sorry man, when you as an organization continue to stand up for your "unique" rule but then do everything in your power to change the format of your tournament so that your "unique" rule doesn't have an affect in the most important game in the tournament, it's quite frankly bullshit. If the Grand Finals isn't worthy of an Extended Series match then NOTHING is.


Again, the split was not so that extended series wouldn't have an effect on the Grand Final -- it's so that double elimination would not be a factor. True Double Elimination finals preserve the format of a single DE bracket, but as an event that's supposed to be the climax of the tournament (from a neutral viewer's perspective), the Grand Final is pretty imbalanced (Winners Bracket player has a 75% chance to win, assuming each game is 50/50). I agree that extended series Grand Finals did not do anything to solve this (especially with the rematch carryover rules), but what MLG did here was remove double elimination from the end of tournament altogether, in order to have the familiar and popular single decisive Bo7.

I suppose you could also argue to make the Championship Bracket single elimination in its entirety -- after all, if the Grand Finals isn't worthy of double elimination, then nothing is . As it is now, it's almost there already, as for 90% of the players, it is single elimination. You'd have to weaken the reward for winning the group somewhat (only one shot in the Champ Bracket instead of two, and only guaranteed Top 8 finish instead of top 6), but with a small change, it could be done.

BTW, since I have some time to kill, here's the equity that the advantaged player has with some of the match formats used to reconcile WB/LB (assuming 50/50 games). I was wondering just how much of an advantage extended series and true DE gave relative to each other (and straight-up matches), because in tournament LR threads, I'd often read posts about how people feel about game advantages, but nothing about the raw impact of the advantage. (Edit: Oops! I hadn't seen Markwerf's post on the previous page! )


Extended Bo7 rematch starting from 2-0: 81.25%
Extended Bo9 rematch starting from 2-0: 77.34375%
True double elimination Bo3 or Bo5 (LB player must win two series): 75%
Extended Bo7 rematch starting from 2-1: 68.75%
Extended Bo9 rematch starting from 2-1: 65.625%
Bo7 starting from 1-0: 65.625%
Initial Bo3 into extended Bo7 (LB player must win both series): 62.5%
Initial Bo5 into extended Bo9 (LB player must win both series): 60.7421875%
[And of course, a single BoX from 0-0 would be 50%.]


The extended ones have been in effect at MLG at one point or another in the past year (the Bo9 finals rules, for example, were in effect at the Winter Championship). I don't know if the 1-0 format has been used in any major tournaments lately, but it's a suggestion that's brought up here at times.

In any case, it's the switch from round-robin Pools to double-elimination bracket Groups that has brought about all these extended series in this tournament, and restarted the discussion about them here. I have to agree that starting from 0-2 in a Bo7 is a fairly dire position, and IMO too much of a handicap, especially in a situation where both players are in the Losers Bracket (but presently, that can only happen in Groups, where nobody gets eliminated from the tournament). Personally, I'd prefer it if they dropped match history carryover, but used the non-rematch Group Final and Champ Semifinal rules (initial Bo3 (or 5) starting from 0-0, transitioning into "extended" Bo7 (or 9) if the losers bracket player wins) for all Group Finals and Championship Semifinals. There's still a clear advantage to the winners bracket player, but it's not as heavy as true DE, as the WB player cannot advance with fewer map wins.
"I'm always going to survive. Only reason I can't survive is if I'm dead or something." --Mike Tyson
NeMeSiS3
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Canada2972 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-04 17:02:45
November 04 2012 16:50 GMT
#1422
On November 04 2012 22:45 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
2-0 is just frankly to big of a lead. A more realistic format would be if you win 2-0 in a previous series, you get a 1-0 lead + first map pick, if you get 2-1 you get map pick. The 2-0 is just crushing and imo ruins the game.


except flash was behind 2-1 and came back in one of the most epic series of sc2 ever[/QUOTE]

Hate this thought process... "Look heres a single example!" Remember the DRG finals? Or the other 90% of games that play through extended series and are a waste of time for the viewer?

The 2-0 lead is ridiculous and only a very few exceptions ever pass it noticed.

EDIT: Keeping the first bit because it looks like I was replying to myself, I actually messed up the quote tags

On November 04 2012 23:35 MisterTea wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2012 22:45 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
2-0 is just frankly to big of a lead. A more realistic format would be if you win 2-0 in a previous series, you get a 1-0 lead + first map pick, if you get 2-1 you get map pick. The 2-0 is just crushing and imo ruins the game.


except flash was behind 2-1 and came back in one of the most epic series of sc2 ever


: P what I was replying too haha
FoTG fighting!
leveller
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Sweden1840 Posts
November 04 2012 16:56 GMT
#1423
Lol, why keep something which fans are 80% against. Its pretty clear its unpopular.
RainMore
Profile Joined December 2010
98 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-04 17:04:12
November 04 2012 16:57 GMT
#1424
Player A loses to Player B 2-0.
Player B loses to Player C 2-0.

Player A meets up with Player B later.

Player B needs to win 2 games and can lose 3. Player A needs to win 4 games and can lose 1. How is that fair? They both lost 1 set already but now because they met before Player B needs to lose 2 additional sets while Player A needs to only lose 1 (aka in a double elimination format B needs to be eliminated 3 times instead of just twice).

It's a massive advantage that doesn't belong in a double elimination format. The whole point of the double elimination format is that it prevents the better player from getting knocked out due to BO loses or one or two mistakes. The extended series does nothing to further that purpose.

Granted when someone who hasn't lost at all meets up with someone who has then the reverse applies. The winner hasn't lost a single set, so should have an advantage going into the games since the other person has. However that advantage could be something like they get to pick the maps, or start 1-0 up, ignore match history and make the winner only have to win one of two best of 3s, or whatever is deemded the best solution (how about getting the players to provide suggestions and vote on them so that the players themselves decide what's fair?).
NeMeSiS3
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Canada2972 Posts
November 04 2012 17:07 GMT
#1425
On a funnier note, anyone watching Dallas right now for Rain vs Naniwa see Naniwa struggling to drink the Redbull drink? he was sipping, looking at camera, sipping, looking at camera and then took a chug and cringed. I laughed a good bit, it almost looked like when someone drinks straight vodka: D funny.
FoTG fighting!
Deckkie
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Netherlands1595 Posts
November 04 2012 17:10 GMT
#1426
On November 05 2012 02:07 NeMeSiS3 wrote:
On a funnier note, anyone watching Dallas right now for Rain vs Naniwa see Naniwa struggling to drink the Redbull drink? he was sipping, looking at camera, sipping, looking at camera and then took a chug and cringed. I laughed a good bit, it almost looked like when someone drinks straight vodka: D funny.


Yes I agree, I think Extended series are unfair as well.
Always look on the bright side of life
Prplppleatr
Profile Joined May 2011
United States1518 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-04 17:39:29
November 04 2012 17:36 GMT
#1427
My 2 cents.

Since MLG wants Double Elim, I think an 'extended series' of sorts is needed in the 'finals'. Obviously, we wouldn't have extended series with out double elim.

Why?
Because the point is so that the player from the WB is not disadvantaged.

Yes, the losers bracket player had to play more game(s), but that is the essence of a double elim competition. Ie. if a player makes a mistake they can make up for it.

For example, Player X beats Player Y in the WB final, 2-0. Player Y comes back to make it to the grand final (he got a 2nd chance). So, imo, Player X should have some sort of an advantage in the final. If the WB player did not get an advantage and the grand final were, again, a BO3 and Player Y won 2-1; I (and player X) would be upset because X has won 3 games overall and Y has only won 2, yet Y wins.

I like the idea of using the previous score and the game becoming a BO7 with that score (Player X already earned those wins). So, Player X would start 2-0 in the BO7. This way you cannot have the previously stayed problem of the player winning more games, overall, and still lose. The WB player will get an advantage of sorts (2nd chance) and he will keep the wins he already earned.

However, the way MLG does their semifinal rule - a BO3, if LB player wins then it's another BO7 - I don't like and gives too many games. If the player from the LB wins the initial BO3, then why not do as I say and keep the score but make it a BO7. The WB player is getting a 2nd chance, like the LB player did, and the LB player gets to keep the victories he already earned.
🥇 Prediction Contest - Mess with the best, die like the rest.
NeMeSiS3
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Canada2972 Posts
November 04 2012 17:40 GMT
#1428
You know what's honestly WAY worse than extended series? This awful obnoxious fucking music they\re playing in their LONG wait times. Holy fucking music, kill me now. It's like something you'd hear on an old episode of Friends. Honestly mute it everytime action stops so I don't get some house/techno/pop shit mix thing that is hard enough to describe let alone listen to.
FoTG fighting!
jobber123rd
Profile Joined December 2011
United States501 Posts
November 04 2012 18:02 GMT
#1429
On November 05 2012 02:36 Prplppleatr wrote:
My 2 cents.

Since MLG wants Double Elim, I think an 'extended series' of sorts is needed in the 'finals'. Obviously, we wouldn't have extended series with out double elim.

Why?
Because the point is so that the player from the WB is not disadvantaged.

Yes, the losers bracket player had to play more game(s), but that is the essence of a double elim competition. Ie. if a player makes a mistake they can make up for it.

For example, Player X beats Player Y in the WB final, 2-0. Player Y comes back to make it to the grand final (he got a 2nd chance). So, imo, Player X should have some sort of an advantage in the final. If the WB player did not get an advantage and the grand final were, again, a BO3 and Player Y won 2-1; I (and player X) would be upset because X has won 3 games overall and Y has only won 2, yet Y wins.

I like the idea of using the previous score and the game becoming a BO7 with that score (Player X already earned those wins). So, Player X would start 2-0 in the BO7. This way you cannot have the previously stayed problem of the player winning more games, overall, and still lose. The WB player will get an advantage of sorts (2nd chance) and he will keep the wins he already earned.

However, the way MLG does their semifinal rule - a BO3, if LB player wins then it's another BO7 - I don't like and gives too many games. If the player from the LB wins the initial BO3, then why not do as I say and keep the score but make it a BO7. The WB player is getting a 2nd chance, like the LB player did, and the LB player gets to keep the victories he already earned.


That is the current MLG rule for non-rematch Group Finals and Championship Semifinals. They don't reset the score for the BO7 -- they continue from where the BO3 ended.


3. If the Players scheduled to play each other in a Group Final Match or a Championship Bracket Semifinal Match have not yet played against each other in the specific Stage of the Event, an initial Best of 3 Games Match must be played. If the Player who came from the Winners Bracket wins the initial Match, they will advance. If the Player who came from the Losers Bracket wins the initial Match, the Match will expand to a Best of 7, include the initial Match, and pick up where that Match left off. For example, if the Losers Bracket Player beat the Winners Bracket Player 2 Games to 0 in the initial Match, the Best of 7 will resume with Game 3 and the Losers Bracket Player leading 2 Games to 0. The winner of a Group Play Final or Championship Bracket Semifinal Best of 7 will advance.


Source
"I'm always going to survive. Only reason I can't survive is if I'm dead or something." --Mike Tyson
Prplppleatr
Profile Joined May 2011
United States1518 Posts
November 04 2012 18:11 GMT
#1430
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 05 2012 03:02 jobber123rd wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 05 2012 02:36 Prplppleatr wrote:
My 2 cents.

Since MLG wants Double Elim, I think an 'extended series' of sorts is needed in the 'finals'. Obviously, we wouldn't have extended series with out double elim.

Why?
Because the point is so that the player from the WB is not disadvantaged.

Yes, the losers bracket player had to play more game(s), but that is the essence of a double elim competition. Ie. if a player makes a mistake they can make up for it.

For example, Player X beats Player Y in the WB final, 2-0. Player Y comes back to make it to the grand final (he got a 2nd chance). So, imo, Player X should have some sort of an advantage in the final. If the WB player did not get an advantage and the grand final were, again, a BO3 and Player Y won 2-1; I (and player X) would be upset because X has won 3 games overall and Y has only won 2, yet Y wins.

I like the idea of using the previous score and the game becoming a BO7 with that score (Player X already earned those wins). So, Player X would start 2-0 in the BO7. This way you cannot have the previously stayed problem of the player winning more games, overall, and still lose. The WB player will get an advantage of sorts (2nd chance) and he will keep the wins he already earned.

However, the way MLG does their semifinal rule - a BO3, if LB player wins then it's another BO7 - I don't like and gives too many games. If the player from the LB wins the initial BO3, then why not do as I say and keep the score but make it a BO7. The WB player is getting a 2nd chance, like the LB player did, and the LB player gets to keep the victories he already earned.


That is the current MLG rule for non-rematch Group Finals and Championship Semifinals. They don't reset the score for the BO7 -- they continue from where the BO3 ended.

Show nested quote +

3. If the Players scheduled to play each other in a Group Final Match or a Championship Bracket Semifinal Match have not yet played against each other in the specific Stage of the Event, an initial Best of 3 Games Match must be played. If the Player who came from the Winners Bracket wins the initial Match, they will advance. If the Player who came from the Losers Bracket wins the initial Match, the Match will expand to a Best of 7, include the initial Match, and pick up where that Match left off. For example, if the Losers Bracket Player beat the Winners Bracket Player 2 Games to 0 in the initial Match, the Best of 7 will resume with Game 3 and the Losers Bracket Player leading 2 Games to 0. The winner of a Group Play Final or Championship Bracket Semifinal Best of 7 will advance.


Source


Ah, I misread it. So I really do agree
🥇 Prediction Contest - Mess with the best, die like the rest.
Jankisa
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Croatia536 Posts
November 04 2012 20:58 GMT
#1431
I really don't understand MLG, it's so weird, it's almost like they know extended series is stupid, but just won't let go so they won't admit that they have been making a mistake for 2 years now. Not to mention that they are the only tournament in the world that has it as a rule, just mind boggling.

They try to rearrange brackets so that finals are rigged to make it impossible for extended series to occur, wile gimping semifinals terribly in an overwhelming chance for it to be unfair and produce bad games with a more rested player having an advantage. It's like they were praying for the person from the losers bracket originally to win the lb finals so there won't be extended, but it backfired terribly by pitting Bomber vs Leenock (2-0 advantage for Leenock) and Flash vs Life (again 2-0 advantage for Flash).

I can only try to imagine how will 15-yo Life cope with having to play a guy that destroyed him 2 hours ago again, but now with 0-2 disadvantage.

This MLG was amazing, and the stupidity of people who insist on having extended series in are doing they're best to ruin it.
So, are you a pessimist? - On my better days. Are you a nihilist? - Not as much as I should be.
Jaegan
Profile Joined November 2011
United States11 Posts
November 04 2012 21:31 GMT
#1432
The good thing about extended series is that you can't be knocked out by someone you have a winning record against, which makes complete intuitive sense. That being said, starting down 0-2 would suck terribly. I'm not sure where the balance between the two lies, but I would love to see it.
boomudead1
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States186 Posts
November 04 2012 22:49 GMT
#1433
this system is so lame. flash won 2 games. then another 2. then life won 4. thats 4-4. life advances. whack...
blade55555
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States17423 Posts
November 04 2012 22:52 GMT
#1434
On November 05 2012 07:49 boomudead1 wrote:
this system is so lame. flash won 2 games. then another 2. then life won 4. thats 4-4. life advances. whack...

What? Flash went 2 4 vs life they only played 6 games this mlg. He started with a 2 0 lead in the series he lost.
When I think of something else, something will go here
Markwerf
Profile Joined March 2010
Netherlands3728 Posts
November 04 2012 23:26 GMT
#1435
On November 05 2012 07:52 blade55555 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 05 2012 07:49 boomudead1 wrote:
this system is so lame. flash won 2 games. then another 2. then life won 4. thats 4-4. life advances. whack...

What? Flash went 2 4 vs life they only played 6 games this mlg. He started with a 2 0 lead in the series he lost.


Some people are not too bright, but all this confusion about the format should be some warning about why the MLG format just stinks. People showing up late for games is also an indirect results of it's overly complicated structure.


RaiZ
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
2813 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-06 14:48:03
November 06 2012 14:46 GMT
#1436
On November 04 2012 13:25 silent_owl wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 04 2012 11:53 RaiZ wrote:
On November 04 2012 10:50 illidanx wrote:
On November 04 2012 10:45 Fenrax wrote:
On November 04 2012 10:41 lord_nibbler wrote:
How the hell is it unfair?
You may not like it but it certainly not unfair!


Because the loser already had to go thorugh additional games to get back to there so they should be on equal footing again. They both lost the same amount of series so they should be on equal footing again.


QFT.

How the fuk is that unfair ? The loser already lost against the winner and you want to give the loser a 2nd chance ? This one is unfair. THERE must be at least some kind of disadvantage.


Yes and that disadvantage is the fact that the loser already had to play ADDITIONAL MATCHES!

So what ? Don't lose. Be glad you aren't eliminated already past the pool's stage (exception being the open bracket since they have no pool's phase) because i know fuk tons of tournaments where there are only a single elimination bracket. Seriously it's like hearing newbies complaining about ladder's anxiety comapred to masters / gm where they simply don't give a flying fuck. I don't know why I'm still reading this thread lol.
Peace.

Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth. Oscar Wilde
Prev 1 70 71 72
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 29m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JuggernautJason98
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 666
Dewaltoss 88
Aegong 25
League of Legends
Grubby4366
Counter-Strike
fl0m737
Stewie2K498
flusha460
sgares102
taco 33
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe111
PPMD47
Liquid`Ken0
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu600
Other Games
C9.Mang0525
mouzStarbuck243
Sick52
ViBE31
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick49663
StarCraft 2
angryscii 25
Other Games
BasetradeTV16
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta34
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22396
• Ler99
League of Legends
• Jankos2457
Other Games
• Scarra2896
• imaqtpie1845
• Shiphtur483
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
2h 29m
The PondCast
12h 29m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
18h 29m
WardiTV European League
18h 29m
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
1d 2h
RSL Revival
1d 12h
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
[ Show More ]
FEL
3 days
FEL
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.