EPTnew "GM League"? - Page 10
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Zacsafus
England255 Posts
| ||
|
kXn
254 Posts
...league | ||
|
epicopter
Canada177 Posts
On October 23 2010 02:10 Zacsafus wrote: Just think, if flash transfers over to sc2 and gets into GM league he will be, Grand Master Flash! :O:O:O:O Mind blown. | ||
|
zoOv
Australia269 Posts
On October 23 2010 02:11 kXn wrote: DOUBLE RAINBOOOOOOOOW... ...league Hahaha yes! Listen to this song everytime playing run ling run | ||
|
a176
Canada6688 Posts
| ||
|
throttled
United States382 Posts
| ||
|
ElitePlaying
Greenland25 Posts
| ||
|
Neeka
United States49 Posts
On October 22 2010 16:31 Macavity wrote: Grand Master League is such a dumb name. I preferred 'pro league' myself. Players already naturally refer to it that way now when they say, "I am in diamond, but I am nowhere near pro level." I would hope the new league to be a more traditional ladder. No bonus pool please. I'm not so sure I like the idea of 'invitation only'. That would make it more like an 'elite club' than anything. What will likely happen is that Blizzard will promote only willing players that can be easily exploited for E-sports revenue. And by exploit, I mean it in the full sense of the word. I can see Blizzard saying, "Relax kid. Don't go to college. Keep working your pizza delivery job. Just keep playing Starcraft 2 really well so we can keep getting revenue off your games (revenue you won't see except for a pinch because young kids are financially stupid and can be manipulated)." That is my fear of what will happen. Pizza guys make a lot of money. Dave Ramsey approves | ||
|
Senorcuidado
United States700 Posts
| ||
|
Neeka
United States49 Posts
| ||
|
ROOTheognis
United States4482 Posts
On October 23 2010 02:34 Neeka wrote: Are they going to at least nerf the bonus pool at the highest level? No need to. If you win a game you win 5 pts... if you lose you lose 30 pts.  | ||
|
Malminos
United States321 Posts
double rainbow > rainbow | ||
|
viraltouch
United States299 Posts
| ||
|
SchAmToo
United States1141 Posts
On October 23 2010 02:55 YoiChiBow wrote: No need to. If you win a game you win 5 pts... if you lose you lose 30 pts. They tried that same method for Star Wars Galaxies' Jedi...it didn't work so well, hahaha | ||
|
Agh
United States986 Posts
| ||
|
TedJustice
Canada1324 Posts
On October 23 2010 04:00 Agh wrote: I just really hope they don't make it similar to what they had in place in war3. Search times are bad already at random hours considering how popular the game is, so Ladders looks downhill. Hopefully you'll still be able to match others despite being in the league, else this is a terrible and bad idea. You aren't always matched against someone in your own league. | ||
|
Parodoxx
United States549 Posts
| ||
|
lim1017
Canada1278 Posts
Theres no way theres enough skilled players to fill a league at the level where most of the MLG/IEM players are playing at. if a league was composed of the top 100/200 at any one time there would be like 25/50 players on.. and how many of them would be searching for a match? make it top 500/1000 and your going to end up with a whole bunch of jobbers... keep in mind ~1800 points gets you into the top 500 in NA... | ||
|
billyX333
United States1360 Posts
| ||
|
TheGeo
United States51 Posts
| ||
| ||
