EPT
MorroW playing Zerg? - Page 25
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Hellbike
39 Posts
| ||
|
Queldur
France26 Posts
+ What the fuck all his game in Zerg take less than 10minutes | ||
|
MorroW
Sweden3522 Posts
On September 29 2010 21:56 Weavel wrote: Comon morrow post replaypack already! yesterdays games  some terran games all replays didnt get included in here so sry bout that [url blocked] (dont expect good games at all lol) On September 29 2010 21:59 Queldur wrote: Why morrow build a 16 Hatch and no pool in ZvZ ? + What the fuck all his game in Zerg take less than 10minutes cause i have to learn the mu from scratch? like day9 days, the best losses r to get completely demolished and say "well obviously i need earlier pool!". this is my method aswell :D | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Queldur
France26 Posts
| ||
|
imperator-xy
Germany1377 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
|
noD
2230 Posts
So I think a game can be fun being easy, if it still takes skill ... Even poker in theory requires luck, but the same good players play against thousands and thousands and ends up in top32, just like gsl and other tourneys ... | ||
|
zerious
Canada3803 Posts
On September 29 2010 21:47 Amadi wrote: As a zerg player, I can understand. He probably got paired with someone slightly below himself in skill level and lost after seeing the opponent do a dozen mistakes, quality of which would mean autoloss if the opponent was playing Zerg. They still won't, as Zerg will still be exceedingly unbalanced at lower levels of play where players do not have 850 APS. APS standing for actions per second. Where that "lower levels of play" encompasses some 99.99% of the total population of sc2. lmfao 850 APS? i think you mean APM | ||
|
JrK
United States283 Posts
| ||
|
Gont
Germany239 Posts
 looking forward to watch u in some tournaments | ||
|
Hellbike
39 Posts
On September 29 2010 22:03 noD wrote: Even poker in theory requires luck, but the same good players play against thousands and thousands and ends up in top32, just like gsl and other tourneys ... This is crazy people talk, sc2 is more luck based than poker in long run. On September 29 2010 22:01 Koshi wrote: I am starting to respect Terran/Morrow more due this thread and Idra less. I think we should think about closing. It just seems that Idra would like to have Morrow's balls hanging over fireplace. | ||
|
We Are Here
Australia1810 Posts
| ||
|
awha
Denmark1358 Posts
On September 29 2010 22:01 Koshi wrote: I am starting to respect Terran/Morrow more due this thread and Idra less. I think we should think about closing. Im starting to change like you aswell. It will be interesting to see if other top (terran) players share the view of MorroW and what will become of it. | ||
|
-Archangel-
Croatia7457 Posts
Like many Zerg out there I was pissed at you after IEM finals. But after this topic I am now neutral and if you do stick to Zerg and keep practicing and play tournaments as Zerg I am going to be your No1 fan (currently Sen is the one I love most of all Zerg). | ||
|
Ryps
Romania2740 Posts
On September 29 2010 21:44 MorroW wrote: YES, here is the real question people. this is the exact question ive been walking around with in my pocket after 5 days of beta. this is the exact thing i want to figure out by testing out zerg, is it harder or is sc2 in general just too easy this topic is what i value far beyond any balance, who is better than who, is the game fun to watch discussions I guess you guys never played warcraft 3. The game has alot of the mechanics sc2 has, but no one said it was too easy. Your army was alot smaller and to kill things you had to surround them, it was really micro intensive. IMO warcraft 3 was easier on the players but there was a clear gap between good and bad players. So sc2 is a game with a future, but your comparing it with BW and not the other RTS played out there. (which puts a big burden on sc2) | ||
|
Arakash
Germany124 Posts
On September 29 2010 22:01 Koshi wrote: I am starting to respect Terran/Morrow more due this thread and Idra less. I think we should think about closing. /signed. Nothing to add here :X | ||
|
Tonyoh
France218 Posts
Best of luck... | ||
|
aRRR
Netherlands21 Posts
I guess you guys never played warcraft 3. The game has alot of the mechanics sc2 has, but no one said it was too easy. Your army was alot smaller and to kill things you had to surround them, it was really micro intensive. IMO warcraft 3 was easier on the players but there was a clear gap between good and bad players. So sc2 is a game with a future, but your comparing it with BW and not the other RTS played out there. (which puts a big burden on sc2) SC2 is no where near as micro intensive as WC3, so you can't compare those two. Plus I personally would not like SC2 to be at a similar level of that of WC3. Be that gameplay wise or the competitive scene wise. | ||
|
Abdiel
52 Posts
| ||
sirius89
Germany45 Posts
Those are some insane skills. Looking forward for some Zerg replays. | ||
| ||
