SOTG is far closer to The Monday Night Club in that they discuss recent events rather than going over highlights...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b019pkyy/5_live_Sport_The_Monday_Night_Club_23_01_2012/
Forum Index > SC2 General |
MVTaylor
United Kingdom2893 Posts
January 27 2012 15:14 GMT
#40601
SOTG is far closer to The Monday Night Club in that they discuss recent events rather than going over highlights... http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b019pkyy/5_live_Sport_The_Monday_Night_Club_23_01_2012/ | ||
Sombrero
United Kingdom134 Posts
January 27 2012 15:18 GMT
#40602
I was the first caller on the show last night and I would like to thank you for both the compliments and the criticisms in the questions that I asked last night. I hope in the future if I get the chance to ask another set of questions and I will take on the criticism that people have given regarding my questions and go forward from here. Just to make a point about the statement I made about why would you want to ask the guests on the show about strategy. The reason I made this point is there are many outlets online, team liquid forums as an example, where many relatively high level players can comment on strategy and balance; whereas there is only one place where you can talk to Day[9], Tyler, JP and Artosis on a pretty personal level. Why would you squander your ability to talk to these legends by asking them about strategy that in a years time will be obsolete? Would you rather not know about their personal thoughts, aspirations and other interesting points that are pertinent to the history of starcraft 2 as a whole or their individual stories? Sombrero. | ||
Gunter
United States38 Posts
January 27 2012 15:20 GMT
#40603
On January 28 2012 00:13 KadaverBB wrote: At roughly 1:27:50 on the youtube video tyler makes a shoutout to "a good website" . I rewatched that part like 5 times but i still can not make out what website he is talking about. In my brain it sounds like "leftwrong.com" but i guess thats not it XD Someone please tell me how the site is called, the stuff tyler is talking about sounds interesting ![]() he was talking about lesswrong.com | ||
FreudianTrip
Switzerland1983 Posts
January 27 2012 15:25 GMT
#40604
On January 27 2012 23:20 CallousCarter wrote: Show nested quote + On January 27 2012 21:35 FreudianTrip wrote: Please don't use MOTD as a good example of analytical play. It's awful. No research. All clichés. Get paid a massive amount of money for Alan Shearer to say, "He'll be dissapointed with that." Of course he will Alan he just conceded a goal. "ex-footballer and TalkSport pundit Stan Collymore put it at the beginning of the season: "stale, clichéd, smug pap". And little seems to have changed" "he described the core cast of Shearer, Alan Hansen, Mark Lawrenson and anchorman Gary Lineker as a "golfing clique with a passing interest in football". It's difficult to disagree – many viewers were left questioning whether Lineker et al, went to South Africa this summer to talk about the World Cup, or to giggle awkwardly between themselves when it became apparent they knew little about teams that weren't England, Brazil or Spain." Alan Shearer called Lee Dixon a nerd and a teachers pet for knowing a Slovakian midfielder, that midfielder? Marek Hamsik one of the finest central midfielders in the world. Fucking retarded. The problem is these shows breed ignorance because they never bothered researching when they first started and they got views regardless, so why should they research now? It's not going to up the viewers so why bother? I still enjoy MOTD. I know what you're saying about Lineker and co, i think they all get paid far too much and there are occasions when it feels like you're peeking through a window at a circle jirk. Of course none of them live up to motty's standards even when they are analysing the game but none of this invalidates my previous points about SoTG. Oh and P.S don't bring that rat faced bastard Gary Neville into this things can only go south. ROFL, Liverpool fan I assume? I hated him as a player (Arsenal fan here) but he's pretty much the only pundit with an actual opinion. God it was awful when Jamie Redknapp was the only one there. 'He's a top top player' 'My cousin Fwankie Lampard is d best in da world' 'Harry knows what he's doing.' AND DON'T GET ME STARTED ON THAT FUCKING THOMPSONS ADVERT. Fucking awful. And finally, as StarVe said above, the ESV weekly provides consistently awesome Korean players. Last week there were 12 code S and 21 code A participants. Just QFTing this because I mean, what higher level competitive testing can you have than this? Especially since Diamond and the map-making team are very open to criticism and fixing imbalances. Hell I think DonRaeGu was just talking to them the other day about some issues he had with one of the chokes on Cloud Kingdom. | ||
FreudianTrip
Switzerland1983 Posts
January 27 2012 15:28 GMT
#40605
On January 28 2012 00:14 mvtaylor wrote: Comparing SOTG to MOTD is a horrible analogy. SOTG is far closer to The Monday Night Club in that they discuss recent events rather than going over highlights... http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b019pkyy/5_live_Sport_The_Monday_Night_Club_23_01_2012/ Is Marcotti still on that. The man's a genius. Although I must way when I'm looking for a round-up of recent events I go for Football Weekly. But then again I like puns. While I was looking for that link I just found out Wilshere is out for the rest of the season. Our fucking medical team is a joke. I'd have every last one of them shot. | ||
Makenshi
Sweden2105 Posts
January 27 2012 15:34 GMT
#40606
Can't believe we get a 2 hour show every week which is just so entertaining and good... ! Edit: Tho Call-ins still suck bigtime | ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
January 27 2012 15:38 GMT
#40607
On January 27 2012 23:50 ChaosTerran wrote: I'd love if they could just talk about every matchup for 10 minutes. Recent metagem shifts, new strategies, possible imbalances, etc.. Just dedicate 10 minutes to TvZ, 10 minutes to TvP and 10 minutes to PvZ and then 5 minutes per mirror match. Yes I do realize that this would be 45 minutes of stategy talk, but then just cut the call-ins and do strategy talk instead. Last episode (last week) you guys were talking about PvP for 30-40 minutes and yes it was boring for most of us,simply because it was only interesting for protoss players, for zergs and terrans it was absolutely boring and there was no point in listening to that. But when you talk about all the matchups, then it's much more interesting for everybody, maybe there's a protoss that has a bad PvZ and wants to hear what you guys think about the matchup and the strategies used by both sides, or a terran who has problems with tvp, or a zerg who has problems with zvt. I would love if you could talk about strategies, I mean for god's sake you guys have day9 and artosis on the same show, together with incontrol and tyler... why not let them talk about strategies, day9 and artosis are top level commentators and you have both of them on the same show, but you guys rather talk about drama and things that everyone of us can read on reddit anyway. There's nothing informative about SOTG, all the information we get from the show is already on reddit, the only way I'll keep watching the show is if you guys start to discuss the actual game, because that is something I can't read on reddit. I can't go to reddit and read day9's opinion on PvZ or what Artosis thinks about the metagame in TvP. That is something that would give people an actual reason to watch the show. Many people think like you but already gave up on this fight. It is their show after all. But lately I have only been listening to SOTG because iNcontroL, Artosis and Tyler are amazing to listen to, JP is a great host for this show and sometimes for the special guest. But the content of the show should be better, it is like that newspaper with the naked girl on page 2, world problems on page 3 and the sensational stories from 4 page till the end. I still love SotG, I will always keep listening, but please try to keep it SCII related and don't try to cheapen the product for viewers. Or maybe that is the show. I don't know. | ||
MVTaylor
United Kingdom2893 Posts
January 27 2012 15:41 GMT
#40608
On January 28 2012 00:28 FreudianTrip wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2012 00:14 mvtaylor wrote: Comparing SOTG to MOTD is a horrible analogy. SOTG is far closer to The Monday Night Club in that they discuss recent events rather than going over highlights... http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b019pkyy/5_live_Sport_The_Monday_Night_Club_23_01_2012/ Is Marcotti still on that. The man's a genius. Although I must way when I'm looking for a round-up of recent events I go for Football Weekly. But then again I like puns. While I was looking for that link I just found out Wilshere is out for the rest of the season. Our fucking medical team is a joke. I'd have every last one of them shot. I don't honestly know, I don't make it something I have to check every week, rather I just know it's a well produced show in a format far closer to that SOTG than MOTD and I have no idea why people were using it as comparison. Yeah I've got to be honest your medical team is a shambles, if RVP decides to fall over a twig again any time soon then it doesn't look to great for you guys... plus it's another player I'll have to get out of my fantasy team. As a Spurs fan though I do find it all amazing this season, never had us placing so highly before the season started and if we can get through some big games in the next few weeks we'll pretty much have third / top 4 nailed on. | ||
Arisen
United States2382 Posts
January 27 2012 15:45 GMT
#40609
On January 28 2012 00:18 Sombrero wrote: Why would you squander your ability to talk to these legends by asking them about strategy that in a years time will be obsolete? Would you rather not know about their personal thoughts, aspirations and other interesting points that are pertinent to the history of starcraft 2 as a whole or their individual stories? \ Once again, I never said these questions are bad, I'm fine with hearing stories and views pertaining to esports from some of my favorite players and ex players. However, don't say questions about strategy are squandering an opportunity. The main advantage to having a pro athlete on this type of show is they can give you their unique perspective into their respective sport. Do you ever see a player interview on espn and they don't talk about the game? No. They talk about why they did this, what they felt went wrong, how pre match stuff contributed, etc. Also, saying that these type of questions should be relegated to strategy forums, etc is not a good perspective to have, imo, because even a lot of those "high level" players don't really know anything about the game in comparison to some of the guests. Some random high masters player does not give you the same perspective as a pro player who's fulltime job it is to think/study this game. So while I think that yes, your type of questions have value, I think strategy questions and questions about the game at large have at least equal value. I want people to love the game FOR the game. I want to be able to call in and ask tyler how he feels about some brilliant move SaSe did and how his ingame information led him to that choice. If Stephano is on the call I want to be able to ask him the stylistic difference of his zvt style and the standard and hw to exploit the advantages and hedge on his weaknesses. I want to be able to ask iNcontroL about some crazy timing or opener he did and ask what reads he had to doing that and what is planned transition was and how/why the other player stopped it, etc. The focus should be on the game just as much as it is on the stuff around the game. While, yes, you'll always have some shit strategy questions, you'll always hav esome shit drama questions too (What are your guys' saleries?!) Just my 2 cents. | ||
FreudianTrip
Switzerland1983 Posts
January 27 2012 15:56 GMT
#40610
On January 28 2012 00:41 mvtaylor wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2012 00:28 FreudianTrip wrote: On January 28 2012 00:14 mvtaylor wrote: Comparing SOTG to MOTD is a horrible analogy. SOTG is far closer to The Monday Night Club in that they discuss recent events rather than going over highlights... http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b019pkyy/5_live_Sport_The_Monday_Night_Club_23_01_2012/ Is Marcotti still on that. The man's a genius. Although I must way when I'm looking for a round-up of recent events I go for Football Weekly. But then again I like puns. While I was looking for that link I just found out Wilshere is out for the rest of the season. Our fucking medical team is a joke. I'd have every last one of them shot. I don't honestly know, I don't make it something I have to check every week, rather I just know it's a well produced show in a format far closer to that SOTG than MOTD and I have no idea why people were using it as comparison. Yeah I've got to be honest your medical team is a shambles, if RVP decides to fall over a twig again any time soon then it doesn't look to great for you guys... plus it's another player I'll have to get out of my fantasy team. As a Spurs fan though I do find it all amazing this season, never had us placing so highly before the season started and if we can get through some big games in the next few weeks we'll pretty much have third / top 4 nailed on. Let's hope you have lasagne come the end of the season again! ![]() | ||
Sombrero
United Kingdom134 Posts
January 27 2012 15:58 GMT
#40611
On January 28 2012 00:45 Arisen wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2012 00:18 Sombrero wrote: Why would you squander your ability to talk to these legends by asking them about strategy that in a years time will be obsolete? Would you rather not know about their personal thoughts, aspirations and other interesting points that are pertinent to the history of starcraft 2 as a whole or their individual stories? \ Once again, I never said these questions are bad, I'm fine with hearing stories and views pertaining to esports from some of my favorite players and ex players. However, don't say questions about strategy are squandering an opportunity. The main advantage to having a pro athlete on this type of show is they can give you their unique perspective into their respective sport. Do you ever see a player interview on espn and they don't talk about the game? No. They talk about why they did this, what they felt went wrong, how pre match stuff contributed, etc. Also, saying that these type of questions should be relegated to strategy forums, etc is not a good perspective to have, imo, because even a lot of those "high level" players don't really know anything about the game in comparison to some of the guests. Some random high masters player does not give you the same perspective as a pro player who's fulltime job it is to think/study this game. So while I think that yes, your type of questions have value, I think strategy questions and questions about the game at large have at least equal value. I want people to love the game FOR the game. I want to be able to call in and ask tyler how he feels about some brilliant move SaSe did and how his ingame information led him to that choice. If Stephano is on the call I want to be able to ask him the stylistic difference of his zvt style and the standard and hw to exploit the advantages and hedge on his weaknesses. I want to be able to ask iNcontroL about some crazy timing or opener he did and ask what reads he had to doing that and what is planned transition was and how/why the other player stopped it, etc. The focus should be on the game just as much as it is on the stuff around the game. While, yes, you'll always have some shit strategy questions, you'll always hav esome shit drama questions too (What are your guys' saleries?!) Just my 2 cents. I hear what you say and I agree that there are times and places for strategy talk with these high levels of players but the large majority of callers that call in on the show only bring the level of content down; they want to talk about strategies that are either out dated/not applicable on a skill level greater than gold or are unable to articulate themselves in a manner befitting of a human being. If the strategy section was pre-planned or callers screened before hand I would love to hear the players talk about strategy at such a high level, until that point it is more detrimental to the quality of the show to have a random coin flip when talking about strategy. Andrew. | ||
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
January 27 2012 16:21 GMT
#40612
On January 28 2012 00:11 Antoine wrote: Show nested quote + On January 27 2012 23:02 Seraphone wrote: On January 27 2012 22:27 TumNarDok wrote: On January 27 2012 09:38 Antoine wrote: On January 27 2012 09:36 sevia wrote: Atlantis spaceship and sanshorn mist have not underwent thorough testing. However many pros are practicing on and playing games on these maps, which is something they should touch on. Hey man, this link might help educate you: http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/sc2-korean/maps/490_ESV_Sanshorn_Mists_AE/games Hope that helps! And you can add to that the fact that Sanshorn is used n the RO32 in ESL Go4SC2, 2 times a week and in RO32 , Playhem Dailys, twice a day. Summa summarum 16*16= 256 games per WEEK on this map with masters and grandmasters players. Atlantis Spaceship is only in the mappool of Playhem so it wont be played often, thats granted but its also a IPL map put into there for the purpose so the players can test it out which can be done RO8 forward. - Now seeing that some of the panelists were not familiar with the maps gets to show how much in their own bubble of SC2 they live in (I'd call it the GSL/MLG bubbleworld). I will express my sincere hope that this is not the case for the PRO players, teams and their management who have to do their homework on new maps because you will see them in mappools for 2012. People don't have endless hours a week to watch Sc2. So obviously they are going to watch GSL, MLG and IPL content as it features the best players. That's not what the issue is. GSL has only had code S until last night; there's more than enough time to watch other tournaments. MLG hasn't had anything for months, so obviously that doesn't interfere. IPL stuff includes these maps, so if anything it's more clear that they AREN'T watching it at all. And finally, as StarVe said above, the ESV weekly provides consistently awesome Korean players. Last week there were 12 code S and 21 code A participants. I'm curious. Artosis said he watches probably more SC2 than anybody. What exactly is he watching all this time? Is it just ladder streams? Yeah, this one of very few issues I have with Artosis, or rather points where he could improve upon. He is in Korea, the Starcraft mecca and he is certainly very aware of his status in the community and pays close attention that he's portrayed as the most knowledgeable (foreign) person in terms of Starcraft players, teams and generally everything esports-related in and about Korea. That is not a bad thing, we really need someone who fulfills that role, someone who knows everything about players and their styles, who knows who's up-and-coming, who has potential and who is falling into a slump and has background info on a lot of things. Only, I'm kinda getting the feeling that Artosis, is not really in a position to do that to such an extent anymore. Again, I don't want to sound like a dick, because that's totally not my intention, I'm really happy that we have a caster like Artosis in Korea to bring us the amazing games and incredible entertainment which GSL provides and it would not nearly be the same if he ever chose not to do it anymore. Plus, he had a kid and it's completely understandable that it takes a large amount of time away from your normal life as you knew it before. It's just, probably ever since additional casters were hired by GOM and Tastosis didn't have to cast everything anymore, it seems like Artosis is getting more and more focused on Code S (still, understandable, since it's the only thing he casts except for the occasional GSTL) and to a lesser extent foreign tournaments and less and less focused on everything below Code S (preliminaries, Code A, Up & Down matches), which causes that he only really seems to know a lot about players who've been Code S stalwarts while still oozing the vibe of 'I know everything about everyone'. And that's something I am a bit sad about, because this is the one thing I would like from someone like Artosis in addition to his great casting: bringing us great knowledge about many different players from Korea. I remember when Sage, his proclaimed favourite protoss player at that point qualified for the GSL for the first time since one of the open seasons through the preliminaries and a few days or weeks later when they talked about the brackets on SOTG, he was like 'Wow, Sage is in Code A? I didn't know that, GOM must have given him a free spot!'. You can clearly notice that he doesn't watch Code A and even Up & Down games quite a lot of the time, too, if you listen to the casts or SOTG shows when players are being discussed who haven't been in Code S for ages, but have shown a significant rise in skill lately or just won a lot more games recently, Artosis often is oblivious to it. Yesterday would have been a good time to talk about ST_Parting in the Code S RO16 groups, about his success and chances as the only player coming from Code A still alive in the tournament, but all we got was just something along the lines of "I don't really think anyone thinks Parting can advance here" from JP. Stuff like that is just something I would like to see from someone who's in a position like Artosis is, and it does hurt a bit when he knows so much more about the game itself than a random person on a forum and then sometimes a random person on the forums who watches GSL and a bit of other Korean tournaments like ESV Weekly and the KSL seems to know much more about a large amount of players and seems to have watched a lot more games from all these players. It shouldn't be that way. It really shouldn't. That said, I hope it's not perceived as a whine post or as a stupid "he lost his passion" argument, because that's not what it's supposed to be, it's just something that's bugged me for a bit and I really think we need someone who fulfills the role I described to also bring Korean players who really deserve it to the attention of the mainstream SC2 audience. At the moment, I think the caster who is most knowledgeable about the Korean players as a whole is Orb, and the ESV Weekly still doesn't get nearly as many viewers as it should, because as a tournament it's one of the biggest sources of great play and entertainment out there for me as a viewer. I just think that people like Artosis could do much much more for educating the viewers about the Korean players, because he lives in Korea and has a more direct connection to the scene, and that is what I hope for. | ||
Techno
1900 Posts
January 27 2012 16:33 GMT
#40613
On January 28 2012 00:18 Sombrero wrote: Hey Guys, I was the first caller on the show last night and I would like to thank you for both the compliments and the criticisms in the questions that I asked last night. I hope in the future if I get the chance to ask another set of questions and I will take on the criticism that people have given regarding my questions and go forward from here. Just to make a point about the statement I made about why would you want to ask the guests on the show about strategy. The reason I made this point is there are many outlets online, team liquid forums as an example, where many relatively high level players can comment on strategy and balance; whereas there is only one place where you can talk to Day[9], Tyler, JP and Artosis on a pretty personal level. Why would you squander your ability to talk to these legends by asking them about strategy that in a years time will be obsolete? Would you rather not know about their personal thoughts, aspirations and other interesting points that are pertinent to the history of starcraft 2 as a whole or their individual stories? Sombrero. Good job, mate. (am i doing this british thing right?) | ||
Talin
Montenegro10532 Posts
January 27 2012 16:42 GMT
#40614
It seemed genuine and honest and generally relaxed, with the hosts being more themselves than I've seen them on sotg in a long time, it had that old vibe of "guys hanging out" the early shows had. Also bonus points for that awesome person who asked awesome questions near the end and for keeping the Indy gradient overlay. <3 | ||
BleaK_
Norway593 Posts
January 27 2012 16:44 GMT
#40615
On January 28 2012 00:18 Sombrero wrote: Hey Guys, I was the first caller on the show last night and I would like to thank you for both the compliments and the criticisms in the questions that I asked last night. I hope in the future if I get the chance to ask another set of questions and I will take on the criticism that people have given regarding my questions and go forward from here. Just to make a point about the statement I made about why would you want to ask the guests on the show about strategy. The reason I made this point is there are many outlets online, team liquid forums as an example, where many relatively high level players can comment on strategy and balance; whereas there is only one place where you can talk to Day[9], Tyler, JP and Artosis on a pretty personal level. Why would you squander your ability to talk to these legends by asking them about strategy that in a years time will be obsolete? Would you rather not know about their personal thoughts, aspirations and other interesting points that are pertinent to the history of starcraft 2 as a whole or their individual stories? Sombrero. Keep staying classy! | ||
kazansky
Germany931 Posts
January 27 2012 18:15 GMT
#40616
Reason one is of course the brilliant questions of Sombrero. Cut the call ins, let guys like him ask question that are worth to be asked instead. Or get someone to filter questions beforehand if JP can't do all the work, but please go back where the show was once and asked questions that are preselected and therefore interesting. Reason two was the very pleasant athmosphere, a good distribution of topics, and no unneccessary overpassionate oppinion exchange. Again, great job JP! | ||
haffy
United Kingdom430 Posts
January 27 2012 18:22 GMT
#40617
On January 28 2012 00:25 FreudianTrip wrote: Show nested quote + On January 27 2012 23:20 CallousCarter wrote: On January 27 2012 21:35 FreudianTrip wrote: Please don't use MOTD as a good example of analytical play. It's awful. No research. All clichés. Get paid a massive amount of money for Alan Shearer to say, "He'll be dissapointed with that." Of course he will Alan he just conceded a goal. "ex-footballer and TalkSport pundit Stan Collymore put it at the beginning of the season: "stale, clichéd, smug pap". And little seems to have changed" "he described the core cast of Shearer, Alan Hansen, Mark Lawrenson and anchorman Gary Lineker as a "golfing clique with a passing interest in football". It's difficult to disagree – many viewers were left questioning whether Lineker et al, went to South Africa this summer to talk about the World Cup, or to giggle awkwardly between themselves when it became apparent they knew little about teams that weren't England, Brazil or Spain." Alan Shearer called Lee Dixon a nerd and a teachers pet for knowing a Slovakian midfielder, that midfielder? Marek Hamsik one of the finest central midfielders in the world. Fucking retarded. The problem is these shows breed ignorance because they never bothered researching when they first started and they got views regardless, so why should they research now? It's not going to up the viewers so why bother? I still enjoy MOTD. I know what you're saying about Lineker and co, i think they all get paid far too much and there are occasions when it feels like you're peeking through a window at a circle jirk. Of course none of them live up to motty's standards even when they are analysing the game but none of this invalidates my previous points about SoTG. Oh and P.S don't bring that rat faced bastard Gary Neville into this things can only go south. ROFL, Liverpool fan I assume? I hated him as a player (Arsenal fan here) but he's pretty much the only pundit with an actual opinion. God it was awful when Jamie Redknapp was the only one there. 'He's a top top player' 'My cousin Fwankie Lampard is d best in da world' 'Harry knows what he's doing.' AND DON'T GET ME STARTED ON THAT FUCKING THOMPSONS ADVERT. Fucking awful. Show nested quote + And finally, as StarVe said above, the ESV weekly provides consistently awesome Korean players. Last week there were 12 code S and 21 code A participants. Just QFTing this because I mean, what higher level competitive testing can you have than this? Especially since Diamond and the map-making team are very open to criticism and fixing imbalances. Hell I think DonRaeGu was just talking to them the other day about some issues he had with one of the chokes on Cloud Kingdom. Do you have to be a Liverpool fan to hate Gary Neville? Most people I know hate him as well. Also Alan Shearer is not being paid enough in my opinion. | ||
darkmighty
Brazil48 Posts
January 27 2012 18:26 GMT
#40618
On August 19 2010 14:50 LancerStarcraft wrote: @Question Zerg players QQ vs. Actual balance issues Why does ZvZ always turn into baneling wars? Imagine how it would become with burrowed baneling movement. ZvZ would be the most affected me thinks, because terran has shredder. | ||
SeaSwift
Scotland4486 Posts
January 27 2012 18:34 GMT
#40619
On January 28 2012 01:21 StarVe wrote: Show nested quote + On January 28 2012 00:11 Antoine wrote: On January 27 2012 23:02 Seraphone wrote: On January 27 2012 22:27 TumNarDok wrote: On January 27 2012 09:38 Antoine wrote: On January 27 2012 09:36 sevia wrote: Atlantis spaceship and sanshorn mist have not underwent thorough testing. However many pros are practicing on and playing games on these maps, which is something they should touch on. Hey man, this link might help educate you: http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/sc2-korean/maps/490_ESV_Sanshorn_Mists_AE/games Hope that helps! And you can add to that the fact that Sanshorn is used n the RO32 in ESL Go4SC2, 2 times a week and in RO32 , Playhem Dailys, twice a day. Summa summarum 16*16= 256 games per WEEK on this map with masters and grandmasters players. Atlantis Spaceship is only in the mappool of Playhem so it wont be played often, thats granted but its also a IPL map put into there for the purpose so the players can test it out which can be done RO8 forward. - Now seeing that some of the panelists were not familiar with the maps gets to show how much in their own bubble of SC2 they live in (I'd call it the GSL/MLG bubbleworld). I will express my sincere hope that this is not the case for the PRO players, teams and their management who have to do their homework on new maps because you will see them in mappools for 2012. People don't have endless hours a week to watch Sc2. So obviously they are going to watch GSL, MLG and IPL content as it features the best players. That's not what the issue is. GSL has only had code S until last night; there's more than enough time to watch other tournaments. MLG hasn't had anything for months, so obviously that doesn't interfere. IPL stuff includes these maps, so if anything it's more clear that they AREN'T watching it at all. And finally, as StarVe said above, the ESV weekly provides consistently awesome Korean players. Last week there were 12 code S and 21 code A participants. I'm curious. Artosis said he watches probably more SC2 than anybody. What exactly is he watching all this time? Is it just ladder streams? Yeah, this one of very few issues I have with Artosis, or rather points where he could improve upon. He is in Korea, the Starcraft mecca and he is certainly very aware of his status in the community and pays close attention that he's portrayed as the most knowledgeable (foreign) person in terms of Starcraft players, teams and generally everything esports-related in and about Korea. That is not a bad thing, we really need someone who fulfills that role, someone who knows everything about players and their styles, who knows who's up-and-coming, who has potential and who is falling into a slump and has background info on a lot of things. Only, I'm kinda getting the feeling that Artosis, is not really in a position to do that to such an extent anymore. Again, I don't want to sound like a dick, because that's totally not my intention, I'm really happy that we have a caster like Artosis in Korea to bring us the amazing games and incredible entertainment which GSL provides and it would not nearly be the same if he ever chose not to do it anymore. Plus, he had a kid and it's completely understandable that it takes a large amount of time away from your normal life as you knew it before. It's just, probably ever since additional casters were hired by GOM and Tastosis didn't have to cast everything anymore, it seems like Artosis is getting more and more focused on Code S (still, understandable, since it's the only thing he casts except for the occasional GSTL) and to a lesser extent foreign tournaments and less and less focused on everything below Code S (preliminaries, Code A, Up & Down matches), which causes that he only really seems to know a lot about players who've been Code S stalwarts while still oozing the vibe of 'I know everything about everyone'. And that's something I am a bit sad about, because this is the one thing I would like from someone like Artosis in addition to his great casting: bringing us great knowledge about many different players from Korea. I remember when Sage, his proclaimed favourite protoss player at that point qualified for the GSL for the first time since one of the open seasons through the preliminaries and a few days or weeks later when they talked about the brackets on SOTG, he was like 'Wow, Sage is in Code A? I didn't know that, GOM must have given him a free spot!'. You can clearly notice that he doesn't watch Code A and even Up & Down games quite a lot of the time, too, if you listen to the casts or SOTG shows when players are being discussed who haven't been in Code S for ages, but have shown a significant rise in skill lately or just won a lot more games recently, Artosis often is oblivious to it. Yesterday would have been a good time to talk about ST_Parting in the Code S RO16 groups, about his success and chances as the only player coming from Code A still alive in the tournament, but all we got was just something along the lines of "I don't really think anyone thinks Parting can advance here" from JP. Stuff like that is just something I would like to see from someone who's in a position like Artosis is, and it does hurt a bit when he knows so much more about the game itself than a random person on a forum and then sometimes a random person on the forums who watches GSL and a bit of other Korean tournaments like ESV Weekly and the KSL seems to know much more about a large amount of players and seems to have watched a lot more games from all these players. It shouldn't be that way. It really shouldn't. That said, I hope it's not perceived as a whine post or as a stupid "he lost his passion" argument, because that's not what it's supposed to be, it's just something that's bugged me for a bit and I really think we need someone who fulfills the role I described to also bring Korean players who really deserve it to the attention of the mainstream SC2 audience. At the moment, I think the caster who is most knowledgeable about the Korean players as a whole is Orb, and the ESV Weekly still doesn't get nearly as many viewers as it should, because as a tournament it's one of the biggest sources of great play and entertainment out there for me as a viewer. I just think that people like Artosis could do much much more for educating the viewers about the Korean players, because he lives in Korea and has a more direct connection to the scene, and that is what I hope for. Thoroughly agree. This is something that I've had an issue with for a while. Either Artosis needs to pay more attention to the scene (difficult cuz child and other priorities) or someone like Khaldor/Hwanni/whoever needs to become the authority on the Korean scene below Code S. | ||
JackDT
724 Posts
January 27 2012 19:44 GMT
#40620
On January 28 2012 01:42 Talin wrote: This has been the most beautiful SoTG since the very earliest ones post-beta. No dramatainment, no esports business talk, no cheap humour, not a lot of predictions (except for the GSL ones which were like 5 minutes long), not a lot of filler topics either etc. It seemed genuine and honest and generally relaxed, with the hosts being more themselves than I've seen them on sotg in a long time, it had that old vibe of "guys hanging out" the early shows had. Also bonus points for that awesome person who asked awesome questions near the end and for keeping the Indy gradient overlay. <3 Agree. At first I thought everyone was a bit subdued but the show ended up being more authentic and relaxed. Loved the thoughtful questions from the british guy too. | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games Dendi2927 singsing2149 ceh91357 hiko1214 Beastyqt1206 hungrybox320 Hui .209 ArmadaUGS159 Liquid`VortiX145 KnowMe141 B2W.Neo112 Trikslyr91 JuggernautJason11 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • StrangeGG StarCraft: Brood War![]() • MindelVK ![]() • Reevou ![]() ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • AfreecaTV YouTube • sooper7s • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • Migwel ![]() Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
PiGosaur Monday
OSC
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
Code For Giants Cup
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
The PondCast
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
Replay Cast
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
SC Evo Complete
Classic vs uThermal
[ Show More ] SOOP StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
SOOP
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
[BSL 2025] Weekly
SOOP StarCraft League
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Map Contest Tou…
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
|
|