• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:27
CEST 04:27
KST 11:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202552RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams7Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 700 users

Official State of the Game Podcast Thread - Page 1871

Forum Index > SC2 General
54608 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 2731 Next
Kharnage
Profile Joined September 2011
Australia920 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-08 23:03:21
December 08 2011 22:52 GMT
#37401
On December 09 2011 07:06 KnightwhoSaysNI wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2011 06:52 Quotidian wrote:
On December 09 2011 05:10 wei2coolman wrote:
On December 09 2011 04:23 drax2000 wrote:
On December 09 2011 01:13 VanGarde wrote:
I am going to have to applaud the few people who replied to my post and thus proved my argument. So I made a long post pointing out that Day9 and Artosis never said mech was actually good but just wanted to discuss if it could be. I also made the point that people get so caught up in arguing a stupid point that did not even exist in the first place that they don't listen to what people say or read what people write.

So four/five people go out to prove the point by instantly replying to me continuing arguing the point I already said I did not care about, and clearly replies without having read my post since you once again state "Well we just don't like it when Artosis sais mech is the best thing in TvP" or more iterations of "this is why mech does not work, here is a pro player who supports my position".

Are people really this fucking stupid in 2011? READ THE GOD DAMN POST BEFORE YOU REPLY TO IT IN A WAY THAT COMPLETELY PROVES MY ARGUMENT.


Oh, please..

Artosis said: "Terrans should try Mech, I have no idea what a protoss should do to beat that lategame army". Then people explained why Mech doesn't work and in most cases, if the protoss is even half-competent, doesn't even get to the point of having a maxed mech army.

People brought up enough points as to why Mech wouldn't ever work, now you can go on and tell everybody that their combined "theoretical brilliance" (wtf does that even mean, is it just another way of saying that they never tried it so they simply don't know???) is going to make for an interesting discussion. But the discussion is only going to be interesting for people who have never meched in TvP before, because anyone who has ever meched in TvP at least once in their life and at a reasonable level (master+) could tell you that the whole discussion is a waste of time because it simply DOESNT WORK.

How can you be so dense to not understand that?

The problem that incontrol and other have said, isn't that mech is necessarily BAD against protoss. It's just it looks nearly impossible to get up to 200/200 with a Terran Mech army against a Protoss, while trying to keep protoss from having 8 bases while you're off of 3-4 bases as terran.



yes mech is BAD vs protoss. A 200 vs 200 mech vs pretty much anything protoss army is heavily protoss favored. On paper, mass tank should kill everything on the ground, but it just isn't the case. Chargelots, archons, immortals, colossi.. all these things will obliterate a mech army in a straight up fight. Terran has to spam PFs all over the place for their army to not straight up die, but even then protoss can abuse their mobility and resupply rate (gates make chargelots and archons, after all)

I wish people would stop with the "there's no data on mech because no one is doing it" bullshit. There has been attempts to make mech work since the beta - and it actually worked for a while back then, thanks to tanks not being worse than colossi and ghosts doing full damage to shields and energy. Now mech is beyond the point of saving with all the nerfs to terran. There really should be no suggestions of "going mech" from protoss players, and unfortunately there isn't really any point in discussing tvp mech any longer either. Mech just isn't viable because of how the protoss army is designed - get over it.


Wow just as I was getting ready to hit post I saw this ^^ props on beating me to the punch.

Those who assume that mech is viable vs protoss need to go play it, play against or go look at all the games that players like jinro grinded out. Aside from all the logistical problems it has, its simply not cost effective ENOUGH to be considered.

If you compare a engagement in TVT with mech in a position vs a well spread bio force, you will lose maybe HALF your hellions before the entire bioball is vaporized. TVZ, to fight mech you force Terran to trade Tanks for thors or get broodlord infestor to siege mech positions because your low hp units die as you run in, and your high hp armored units melt to tank fire.

The reason this is, Zerg and Terran Don’t have any NON ARMORED high hp unit that can tank massive amounts of damage as the army closes on the meching player. Zealots tank a massive amount of siege tank splash, as do archons. Marauders and roaches get splattered, Zealots and archons shrug it off. This means the meching force basically splashes itself into oblivion as the higher hp ball of protoss crushes in. Zealots simply take too long to die to hellions, which are trying to buffer the tanks.

The same mech force that loses half of its hellions against bio, barely remains standing after the engagement. Now, protoss with its ability to reinforce the fastest after an engagement mops up whatever remains with ease. Envision an engagement where your pushing across the map, if you have 25-50% of your army remaining against a competent protoss that tailors their ground force to combat mech and spreads thier units; that’s a good thing as a mech player...

You watch goody play mech TVP, and he basically MASSES PFS as he splits the map, something you don’t necessarily have to do as a meching player in TVT or TVZ. This is because mech by itself as a stand alone army isn’t efficient enough, the fact that a 1500hp building is required to buffer the army in this match up to be cost efficient enough to use logistically says something.

There are a number of pros who have made their thoughts on mech vs protoss clear, Jinro Goody and Avilo are such examples. Basically figuring out how to mech isn’t rewarding enough in engagements as compared to well microed Bio+Support. There IS a lot of data on it if you know where to look and its easy to see how there are major differences between Mech vs Protoss and the other match ups.

It will take major changes to the units that make mechs composition before we start seeing it again or used successfully vs protoss on long macro games on large maps like Tal Darim.

…And that’s before we consider the implications of giving up map control and mobility.

Bottom line, Bio in theory is much less limited because you can kite, spread and target your units to maximum effectiveness. The automaton for mech is quite a bit more limited since you cant kite back with sieged tanks...
Its very disingenous to those pros to say high level terrans never played around with it or attempted to grind these things out in practice.


Just to address the bolded section, isn't the PF sprawl as much to deal witht he immobility of mech as it is to tank damage? (get it, tank damage *crickets chirp*)

Like, if you're worried about stalkers moving around your army, blinking into your main and doing a lot of damage to your production, isn't some well placed PF's the easy, supply free method of stopping that from happening? Infact, think of a PF as more expensive supply depot that can shoot stuff and is a hell of a lot tougher.

I haven't watched a lot of TvP where T is using mech, but is mass ghost part of their play? Looking at a lot of the objects it seems like EMP actually answers at least some of those issues (archons, HT, immortal shields) Please don't tell me "but you can't get ghosts, blah blah blah". you don't need infantry upgrades for them to work. you don't even need to research anything for them to work, emp is available off the shelf (though you will want mobius).

Zealots are definately a problem to tank splash and I don't know if the answer is mass hellions like artosis suggests, emergency bunker buffers like forGG used vs july zerg on taldarim, a good number of banshees that cleanup the zealots, focus fire the tanks on the stalkers.

I dunno, there is no reason that i would know, i'm just a diamond level scrub

I just like thinking / discussing about the problem cause it's one of the fun parts of SC2.

For the pro level I maintain that they will train the most time efficient way to win. While MMMGV works really well mech is a timesink which may or maynot pay off. Pro's need to spend their training time more efficiently than that.
You won't see mech TvP until protoss are far and away better than MMMGV OR someone is going up against a protoss player and feels that the protoss players micro is Sooooo much better that MMMGV is suicide.
The arguement that "pro's don't use it" doesn't mean that it's not possible, it means their time is better spent improving their bio play.
mazwoo
Profile Joined November 2011
Germany12 Posts
December 08 2011 23:02 GMT
#37402
Mech isnt viable in the current state, but maybe people figure out new ways of playing it. Maybe they cant and it will take till HotS, but whos to say? I just dont understand how everyone saying it will never be viable seems to have figured out the game already. Maybe you can micro your hellions, split them, kite zealots away from tanks. Maybe you need flash-like tank positioning. There are alot of possibilities, and everybody stating its all been done/tried is ignorant to the fact that the game evolves and hopefully will continue to do so.

Alexstrasas
Profile Joined August 2010
302 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-09 00:26:33
December 08 2011 23:45 GMT
#37403
Oh my... Protoss and zergs talking about mech like its some sort of unexplored secret "iwin" weapon that terrans forgot to use.

On December 09 2011 06:20 Flonomenalz wrote:
I don't know why more people don't play Ghost Mech vs Zerg. I really, really don't. Because if they did I'd lose every ZvT.

edit: this was a response to MCDay, not a balance whine =p


"Ghost Mech" sounds awesome. Now could you tell us please what exactly is the difference between "Ghost Mech" and the standard late game TvZ army ? Helions instead of marines? Because tanks and thors are already extensively used.

Now i dont want to bash or diss but im seriously astonished by the things some people are saying here.

I cant really understand at all this people that are swearing on their knees that mech is going to be the next big thing in TvP.

Look:

SC2 Tank:

Minerals: 150
Vespene: 125
Supply: 3
Damage when sieged: 35 (bonus 15 vs Armored)

SCBW Tank:

Minerals: 150
Vespene: 100
Supply: 2
Damage when sieged: 70

Less damage and more supply.

If Protoss was already able to break siege lines in BW, how do you want people to hold them now? And this not factoring no spider mines, charge, blink, colossus etc.

It just doesnt make sense at all.

And i mean you arent even talking about just using tanks like in marine/tank or something but "mech", what helion/tank? You do realize that a helion has 90 hp and has to kite to win a 1on1 with a simple zealot right?

Most terrans including various pro players clearly stated that they tried and it simply doesnt work, the stats on the units clearly point to the same conclusion, why keep pushing the same button over and over again ?
Elefanto
Profile Joined May 2010
Switzerland3584 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-08 23:53:15
December 08 2011 23:49 GMT
#37404
On December 09 2011 08:45 Alexstrasas wrote:
Oh my... Protoss and zergs talking about mech like its some sort of unexplored secret "iwin" weapon that terrans forgot to use.

Show nested quote +
On December 09 2011 06:20 Flonomenalz wrote:
I don't know why more people don't play Ghost Mech vs Zerg. I really, really don't. Because if they did I'd lose every ZvT.

edit: this was a response to MCDay, not a balance whine =p


"Ghost Mech" sounds awesome. Now could you tell us please what exactly is the difference between "Ghost Mech" and the standard late game TvZ army ? Helions instead of marines? Because tanks and thors are already extensively used.

Now i dont want to bash or diss but im seriously astonished by the things some people are saying here.

I cant really understand at all this people that are swearing on their knees that mech is going to be the next big thing in TvP.

Look:

SC2 Tank:

Minerals: 150
Vespene: 125
Supply: 3
Damage when sieged: 35 (bonus 15 vs Armored)

SCBW Tank:

Minerals: 150
Vespene: 100
Supply: 2
Damage when sieged: 70

People either just dont know about the difference or they dont understand the implication of tanks doing HALF the damage that they used to while costing MORE supply.

Just so you understand the numbers, it takes 5 shots for 1 tank to kill a puny zealot.

If Protoss was already able to break siege lines in BW, how in the F, do you want people to hold them now? And this not factoring no spider mines, charge, blink, colossus etc.

It just doesnt make sense at all.

And i mean you arent even talking about just using tanks like in marine/tank or something but "mech", what helion/tank? You do realize that a helion has 90 hp and has to kite to win a 1on1 with a simple zealot right?

Most terrans including various pro players clearly stated that they tried and it simply doesnt work, the stats on the units clearly point to the same conclusion, why keep pushing the same button over and over again ?



You have no idea what you're talking about in your damage conclusion.
Research the broodwar damage system.
wat
Quotidian
Profile Joined August 2010
Norway1937 Posts
December 09 2011 00:20 GMT
#37405
On December 09 2011 08:49 Elefanto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2011 08:45 Alexstrasas wrote:
Oh my... Protoss and zergs talking about mech like its some sort of unexplored secret "iwin" weapon that terrans forgot to use.

On December 09 2011 06:20 Flonomenalz wrote:
I don't know why more people don't play Ghost Mech vs Zerg. I really, really don't. Because if they did I'd lose every ZvT.

edit: this was a response to MCDay, not a balance whine =p


"Ghost Mech" sounds awesome. Now could you tell us please what exactly is the difference between "Ghost Mech" and the standard late game TvZ army ? Helions instead of marines? Because tanks and thors are already extensively used.

Now i dont want to bash or diss but im seriously astonished by the things some people are saying here.

I cant really understand at all this people that are swearing on their knees that mech is going to be the next big thing in TvP.

Look:

SC2 Tank:

Minerals: 150
Vespene: 125
Supply: 3
Damage when sieged: 35 (bonus 15 vs Armored)

SCBW Tank:

Minerals: 150
Vespene: 100
Supply: 2
Damage when sieged: 70

People either just dont know about the difference or they dont understand the implication of tanks doing HALF the damage that they used to while costing MORE supply.

Just so you understand the numbers, it takes 5 shots for 1 tank to kill a puny zealot.

If Protoss was already able to break siege lines in BW, how in the F, do you want people to hold them now? And this not factoring no spider mines, charge, blink, colossus etc.

It just doesnt make sense at all.

And i mean you arent even talking about just using tanks like in marine/tank or something but "mech", what helion/tank? You do realize that a helion has 90 hp and has to kite to win a 1on1 with a simple zealot right?

Most terrans including various pro players clearly stated that they tried and it simply doesnt work, the stats on the units clearly point to the same conclusion, why keep pushing the same button over and over again ?



You have no idea what you're talking about in your damage conclusion.
Research the broodwar damage system.



BW tanks were still way more powerful
KnightwhoSaysNI
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada60 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-09 00:27:41
December 09 2011 00:24 GMT
#37406
On December 09 2011 07:52 Kharnage wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2011 07:06 KnightwhoSaysNI wrote:
On December 09 2011 06:52 Quotidian wrote:
On December 09 2011 05:10 wei2coolman wrote:
On December 09 2011 04:23 drax2000 wrote:
On December 09 2011 01:13 VanGarde wrote:
I am going to have to applaud the few people who replied to my post and thus proved my argument. So I made a long post pointing out that Day9 and Artosis never said mech was actually good but just wanted to discuss if it could be. I also made the point that people get so caught up in arguing a stupid point that did not even exist in the first place that they don't listen to what people say or read what people write.

So four/five people go out to prove the point by instantly replying to me continuing arguing the point I already said I did not care about, and clearly replies without having read my post since you once again state "Well we just don't like it when Artosis sais mech is the best thing in TvP" or more iterations of "this is why mech does not work, here is a pro player who supports my position".

Are people really this fucking stupid in 2011? READ THE GOD DAMN POST BEFORE YOU REPLY TO IT IN A WAY THAT COMPLETELY PROVES MY ARGUMENT.


Oh, please..

Artosis said: "Terrans should try Mech, I have no idea what a protoss should do to beat that lategame army". Then people explained why Mech doesn't work and in most cases, if the protoss is even half-competent, doesn't even get to the point of having a maxed mech army.

People brought up enough points as to why Mech wouldn't ever work, now you can go on and tell everybody that their combined "theoretical brilliance" (wtf does that even mean, is it just another way of saying that they never tried it so they simply don't know???) is going to make for an interesting discussion. But the discussion is only going to be interesting for people who have never meched in TvP before, because anyone who has ever meched in TvP at least once in their life and at a reasonable level (master+) could tell you that the whole discussion is a waste of time because it simply DOESNT WORK.

How can you be so dense to not understand that?

The problem that incontrol and other have said, isn't that mech is necessarily BAD against protoss. It's just it looks nearly impossible to get up to 200/200 with a Terran Mech army against a Protoss, while trying to keep protoss from having 8 bases while you're off of 3-4 bases as terran.



yes mech is BAD vs protoss. A 200 vs 200 mech vs pretty much anything protoss army is heavily protoss favored. On paper, mass tank should kill everything on the ground, but it just isn't the case. Chargelots, archons, immortals, colossi.. all these things will obliterate a mech army in a straight up fight. Terran has to spam PFs all over the place for their army to not straight up die, but even then protoss can abuse their mobility and resupply rate (gates make chargelots and archons, after all)

I wish people would stop with the "there's no data on mech because no one is doing it" bullshit. There has been attempts to make mech work since the beta - and it actually worked for a while back then, thanks to tanks not being worse than colossi and ghosts doing full damage to shields and energy. Now mech is beyond the point of saving with all the nerfs to terran. There really should be no suggestions of "going mech" from protoss players, and unfortunately there isn't really any point in discussing tvp mech any longer either. Mech just isn't viable because of how the protoss army is designed - get over it.


Wow just as I was getting ready to hit post I saw this ^^ props on beating me to the punch.

Those who assume that mech is viable vs protoss need to go play it, play against or go look at all the games that players like jinro grinded out. Aside from all the logistical problems it has, its simply not cost effective ENOUGH to be considered.

If you compare a engagement in TVT with mech in a position vs a well spread bio force, you will lose maybe HALF your hellions before the entire bioball is vaporized. TVZ, to fight mech you force Terran to trade Tanks for thors or get broodlord infestor to siege mech positions because your low hp units die as you run in, and your high hp armored units melt to tank fire.

The reason this is, Zerg and Terran Don’t have any NON ARMORED high hp unit that can tank massive amounts of damage as the army closes on the meching player. Zealots tank a massive amount of siege tank splash, as do archons. Marauders and roaches get splattered, Zealots and archons shrug it off. This means the meching force basically splashes itself into oblivion as the higher hp ball of protoss crushes in. Zealots simply take too long to die to hellions, which are trying to buffer the tanks.

The same mech force that loses half of its hellions against bio, barely remains standing after the engagement. Now, protoss with its ability to reinforce the fastest after an engagement mops up whatever remains with ease. Envision an engagement where your pushing across the map, if you have 25-50% of your army remaining against a competent protoss that tailors their ground force to combat mech and spreads thier units; that’s a good thing as a mech player...

You watch goody play mech TVP, and he basically MASSES PFS as he splits the map, something you don’t necessarily have to do as a meching player in TVT or TVZ. This is because mech by itself as a stand alone army isn’t efficient enough, the fact that a 1500hp building is required to buffer the army in this match up to be cost efficient enough to use logistically says something.

There are a number of pros who have made their thoughts on mech vs protoss clear, Jinro Goody and Avilo are such examples. Basically figuring out how to mech isn’t rewarding enough in engagements as compared to well microed Bio+Support. There IS a lot of data on it if you know where to look and its easy to see how there are major differences between Mech vs Protoss and the other match ups.

It will take major changes to the units that make mechs composition before we start seeing it again or used successfully vs protoss on long macro games on large maps like Tal Darim.

…And that’s before we consider the implications of giving up map control and mobility.

Bottom line, Bio in theory is much less limited because you can kite, spread and target your units to maximum effectiveness. The automaton for mech is quite a bit more limited since you cant kite back with sieged tanks...
Its very disingenous to those pros to say high level terrans never played around with it or attempted to grind these things out in practice.


Just to address the bolded section, isn't the PF sprawl as much to deal witht he immobility of mech as it is to tank damage? (get it, tank damage *crickets chirp*)

Like, if you're worried about stalkers moving around your army, blinking into your main and doing a lot of damage to your production, isn't some well placed PF's the easy, supply free method of stopping that from happening? Infact, think of a PF as more expensive supply depot that can shoot stuff and is a hell of a lot tougher.

I haven't watched a lot of TvP where T is using mech, but is mass ghost part of their play? Looking at a lot of the objects it seems like EMP actually answers at least some of those issues (archons, HT, immortal shields) Please don't tell me "but you can't get ghosts, blah blah blah". you don't need infantry upgrades for them to work. you don't even need to research anything for them to work, emp is available off the shelf (though you will want mobius).

Zealots are definately a problem to tank splash and I don't know if the answer is mass hellions like artosis suggests, emergency bunker buffers like forGG used vs july zerg on taldarim, a good number of banshees that cleanup the zealots, focus fire the tanks on the stalkers.

I dunno, there is no reason that i would know, i'm just a diamond level scrub

I just like thinking / discussing about the problem cause it's one of the fun parts of SC2.

For the pro level I maintain that they will train the most time efficient way to win. While MMMGV works really well mech is a timesink which may or maynot pay off. Pro's need to spend their training time more efficiently than that.
You won't see mech TvP until protoss are far and away better than MMMGV OR someone is going up against a protoss player and feels that the protoss players micro is Sooooo much better that MMMGV is suicide.
The arguement that "pro's don't use it" doesn't mean that it's not possible, it means their time is better spent improving their bio play.


PFS are required against protoss because of things like blink stalkers and collosus yes, your spread too thin. Terran has drops and zerg drops/nydus are alot easier to deal with because there is no bypass or cliffwalk. Your sinking more resources away from your army to stay alive instead of putting pressure back onto your opponent.


Nobody is saying ghosts aren't AMAZING at the matchup, but your trying to do too many things here, ghost mech is viable against zerg because
1) Its alot easier to get the nessecary infrastructure
2) Your units are alot more cost effective - so you get the required bases faster and more safely.

Please don't tell me "but you can't get ghosts, blah blah blah"

lol, but thats exactly the issue, where do you get the gas to make 20+ tanks + PFS + whatever else you need to deal with things like air and sensor towers and then afford mass ghosts? They arent cheap on gas, and you have to allocate such resources away from things like tanks. The emp nerf also hurt mech players especially because you dont get as much oompf as you did before and are very likely to have less of them then a bio player.
IF you can split the map and get the 10+ gases to support it, sure it could be good.

Its like saying 150 SUPPLY BCS WITH GHOSTS11!!!!1 sure, it could be unbeatable, but how on earth do I manage to get to that point?

The whole issue is that when you give up map control, turtle on three bases so you cannot be broken, and finally push out... to take a fourth or a fifth. Good luck envisioning an army that actually wins against an opponent with 8 + bases, 50 warpgates that reinforce anywhere on the map... and the massive resource bank to do it with.

Pretty much if your opponent is given THAT much room to play with, if they dont win they did a really poor job of exploiting all the issues mech has. If a meching player manages to split the map, thier opponent made a ton of mistakes.

Mech vs protoss is limited to a gimmick on certain maps where your able to turtle across the map for the course of an hour and exploit the fact that your opponent isnt playing against it properly.

Now mass hellions have issues against zealots,
Zealots dont always lead, they tank too much damage, and you cant kite them back past tanks, so things like collosus get to shred your hellions apart when you try to dart in, and you cant retreat or you expose your more important tanks. In a vacuum if you say sure mass hellion deals with zealots effectively... and then dont look at the larger picture in terms of army engagements you can make that error.
...And while your focusing what few stalkers the protoss has, the rest of the army that doesnt actually get hurt because hellions do shit damage that actually didnt kill all the zealots comes in and starts wrecking face.

As far as banshees are concerned, the longer the game goes, the less effective they are.

As far as training efficiently I'd disagree on the examples qouted, Jinro and Avilo and Goody did it for so long because it was a stylistic, and experimental way to play. Sure bio is easier - to win with, but they stubbornly tried for months on end to force it to work and figure it out.. They gave up after they concluded that it just wasnt a worthwhile way to play anymore. Pros dont just stick with what is known and the best way to win, they look for new ways to play, new styles and builds to use because those new novel ways are hard to prepare against and can give them a huge advantage.
Ni!
bLah.
Profile Joined July 2009
Croatia497 Posts
December 09 2011 00:26 GMT
#37407
On December 09 2011 08:02 mazwoo wrote:
Mech isnt viable in the current state, but maybe people figure out new ways of playing it. Maybe they cant and it will take till HotS, but whos to say? I just dont understand how everyone saying it will never be viable seems to have figured out the game already. Maybe you can micro your hellions, split them, kite zealots away from tanks. Maybe you need flash-like tank positioning. There are alot of possibilities, and everybody stating its all been done/tried is ignorant to the fact that the game evolves and hopefully will continue to do so.



Game surely evolves but it isn't all that hard to see in which way game will evolve. I mean that's like saying: who's to say that there won't be bio only play in brood war tvt? well, there just won't. Same thing with mech tvp. It just so isn't viable.
Why do some people refuse to understand that some strategies just won't work?

I mean if you take a look at starcraft 2 and strategy development we all knew how it's gonna look like a year ago. Patches are what changed stuff. All big strategy changes came after patches, not because metagame shifted so hard.
Just take a look at TvT for example
-once upon a time that matchup was played in a way that you would take quick expo and then make rax and just attack with bio + tons of scvs with every attack because scvs had 60hp so they were nice canon fodder. patch changed that
-after that it was all tank+viking combo but patch came which changed tank damage to light units from 50 to 35
-then we had bio mech and mech, marines or hellions
-after hellion nerf we have bio mech and only mvp and cople of people mech

TvZ same story, roach supply, tank damage to light, infestor change, supply before barracks, longer marine build time etc.etc.etc.

There will for sure be new ways and strategies but we aren't really at point where radical things will happen.
Alexstrasas
Profile Joined August 2010
302 Posts
December 09 2011 00:27 GMT
#37408
On December 09 2011 08:49 Elefanto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2011 08:45 Alexstrasas wrote:
Oh my... Protoss and zergs talking about mech like its some sort of unexplored secret "iwin" weapon that terrans forgot to use.

On December 09 2011 06:20 Flonomenalz wrote:
I don't know why more people don't play Ghost Mech vs Zerg. I really, really don't. Because if they did I'd lose every ZvT.

edit: this was a response to MCDay, not a balance whine =p


"Ghost Mech" sounds awesome. Now could you tell us please what exactly is the difference between "Ghost Mech" and the standard late game TvZ army ? Helions instead of marines? Because tanks and thors are already extensively used.

Now i dont want to bash or diss but im seriously astonished by the things some people are saying here.

I cant really understand at all this people that are swearing on their knees that mech is going to be the next big thing in TvP.

Look:

SC2 Tank:

Minerals: 150
Vespene: 125
Supply: 3
Damage when sieged: 35 (bonus 15 vs Armored)

SCBW Tank:

Minerals: 150
Vespene: 100
Supply: 2
Damage when sieged: 70

People either just dont know about the difference or they dont understand the implication of tanks doing HALF the damage that they used to while costing MORE supply.

Just so you understand the numbers, it takes 5 shots for 1 tank to kill a puny zealot.

If Protoss was already able to break siege lines in BW, how in the F, do you want people to hold them now? And this not factoring no spider mines, charge, blink, colossus etc.

It just doesnt make sense at all.

And i mean you arent even talking about just using tanks like in marine/tank or something but "mech", what helion/tank? You do realize that a helion has 90 hp and has to kite to win a 1on1 with a simple zealot right?

Most terrans including various pro players clearly stated that they tried and it simply doesnt work, the stats on the units clearly point to the same conclusion, why keep pushing the same button over and over again ?



You have no idea what you're talking about in your damage conclusion.
Research the broodwar damage system.


*fixed
Kharnage
Profile Joined September 2011
Australia920 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-09 01:01:03
December 09 2011 00:57 GMT
#37409
On December 09 2011 09:24 KnightwhoSaysNI wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2011 07:52 Kharnage wrote:
On December 09 2011 07:06 KnightwhoSaysNI wrote:
On December 09 2011 06:52 Quotidian wrote:
On December 09 2011 05:10 wei2coolman wrote:
On December 09 2011 04:23 drax2000 wrote:
On December 09 2011 01:13 VanGarde wrote:
I am going to have to applaud the few people who replied to my post and thus proved my argument. So I made a long post pointing out that Day9 and Artosis never said mech was actually good but just wanted to discuss if it could be. I also made the point that people get so caught up in arguing a stupid point that did not even exist in the first place that they don't listen to what people say or read what people write.

So four/five people go out to prove the point by instantly replying to me continuing arguing the point I already said I did not care about, and clearly replies without having read my post since you once again state "Well we just don't like it when Artosis sais mech is the best thing in TvP" or more iterations of "this is why mech does not work, here is a pro player who supports my position".

Are people really this fucking stupid in 2011? READ THE GOD DAMN POST BEFORE YOU REPLY TO IT IN A WAY THAT COMPLETELY PROVES MY ARGUMENT.


Oh, please..

Artosis said: "Terrans should try Mech, I have no idea what a protoss should do to beat that lategame army". Then people explained why Mech doesn't work and in most cases, if the protoss is even half-competent, doesn't even get to the point of having a maxed mech army.

People brought up enough points as to why Mech wouldn't ever work, now you can go on and tell everybody that their combined "theoretical brilliance" (wtf does that even mean, is it just another way of saying that they never tried it so they simply don't know???) is going to make for an interesting discussion. But the discussion is only going to be interesting for people who have never meched in TvP before, because anyone who has ever meched in TvP at least once in their life and at a reasonable level (master+) could tell you that the whole discussion is a waste of time because it simply DOESNT WORK.

How can you be so dense to not understand that?

The problem that incontrol and other have said, isn't that mech is necessarily BAD against protoss. It's just it looks nearly impossible to get up to 200/200 with a Terran Mech army against a Protoss, while trying to keep protoss from having 8 bases while you're off of 3-4 bases as terran.



yes mech is BAD vs protoss. A 200 vs 200 mech vs pretty much anything protoss army is heavily protoss favored. On paper, mass tank should kill everything on the ground, but it just isn't the case. Chargelots, archons, immortals, colossi.. all these things will obliterate a mech army in a straight up fight. Terran has to spam PFs all over the place for their army to not straight up die, but even then protoss can abuse their mobility and resupply rate (gates make chargelots and archons, after all)

I wish people would stop with the "there's no data on mech because no one is doing it" bullshit. There has been attempts to make mech work since the beta - and it actually worked for a while back then, thanks to tanks not being worse than colossi and ghosts doing full damage to shields and energy. Now mech is beyond the point of saving with all the nerfs to terran. There really should be no suggestions of "going mech" from protoss players, and unfortunately there isn't really any point in discussing tvp mech any longer either. Mech just isn't viable because of how the protoss army is designed - get over it.


Wow just as I was getting ready to hit post I saw this ^^ props on beating me to the punch.

Those who assume that mech is viable vs protoss need to go play it, play against or go look at all the games that players like jinro grinded out. Aside from all the logistical problems it has, its simply not cost effective ENOUGH to be considered.

If you compare a engagement in TVT with mech in a position vs a well spread bio force, you will lose maybe HALF your hellions before the entire bioball is vaporized. TVZ, to fight mech you force Terran to trade Tanks for thors or get broodlord infestor to siege mech positions because your low hp units die as you run in, and your high hp armored units melt to tank fire.

The reason this is, Zerg and Terran Don’t have any NON ARMORED high hp unit that can tank massive amounts of damage as the army closes on the meching player. Zealots tank a massive amount of siege tank splash, as do archons. Marauders and roaches get splattered, Zealots and archons shrug it off. This means the meching force basically splashes itself into oblivion as the higher hp ball of protoss crushes in. Zealots simply take too long to die to hellions, which are trying to buffer the tanks.

The same mech force that loses half of its hellions against bio, barely remains standing after the engagement. Now, protoss with its ability to reinforce the fastest after an engagement mops up whatever remains with ease. Envision an engagement where your pushing across the map, if you have 25-50% of your army remaining against a competent protoss that tailors their ground force to combat mech and spreads thier units; that’s a good thing as a mech player...

You watch goody play mech TVP, and he basically MASSES PFS as he splits the map, something you don’t necessarily have to do as a meching player in TVT or TVZ. This is because mech by itself as a stand alone army isn’t efficient enough, the fact that a 1500hp building is required to buffer the army in this match up to be cost efficient enough to use logistically says something.

There are a number of pros who have made their thoughts on mech vs protoss clear, Jinro Goody and Avilo are such examples. Basically figuring out how to mech isn’t rewarding enough in engagements as compared to well microed Bio+Support. There IS a lot of data on it if you know where to look and its easy to see how there are major differences between Mech vs Protoss and the other match ups.

It will take major changes to the units that make mechs composition before we start seeing it again or used successfully vs protoss on long macro games on large maps like Tal Darim.

…And that’s before we consider the implications of giving up map control and mobility.

Bottom line, Bio in theory is much less limited because you can kite, spread and target your units to maximum effectiveness. The automaton for mech is quite a bit more limited since you cant kite back with sieged tanks...
Its very disingenous to those pros to say high level terrans never played around with it or attempted to grind these things out in practice.


Just to address the bolded section, isn't the PF sprawl as much to deal witht he immobility of mech as it is to tank damage? (get it, tank damage *crickets chirp*)

Like, if you're worried about stalkers moving around your army, blinking into your main and doing a lot of damage to your production, isn't some well placed PF's the easy, supply free method of stopping that from happening? Infact, think of a PF as more expensive supply depot that can shoot stuff and is a hell of a lot tougher.

I haven't watched a lot of TvP where T is using mech, but is mass ghost part of their play? Looking at a lot of the objects it seems like EMP actually answers at least some of those issues (archons, HT, immortal shields) Please don't tell me "but you can't get ghosts, blah blah blah". you don't need infantry upgrades for them to work. you don't even need to research anything for them to work, emp is available off the shelf (though you will want mobius).

Zealots are definately a problem to tank splash and I don't know if the answer is mass hellions like artosis suggests, emergency bunker buffers like forGG used vs july zerg on taldarim, a good number of banshees that cleanup the zealots, focus fire the tanks on the stalkers.

I dunno, there is no reason that i would know, i'm just a diamond level scrub

I just like thinking / discussing about the problem cause it's one of the fun parts of SC2.

For the pro level I maintain that they will train the most time efficient way to win. While MMMGV works really well mech is a timesink which may or maynot pay off. Pro's need to spend their training time more efficiently than that.
You won't see mech TvP until protoss are far and away better than MMMGV OR someone is going up against a protoss player and feels that the protoss players micro is Sooooo much better that MMMGV is suicide.
The arguement that "pro's don't use it" doesn't mean that it's not possible, it means their time is better spent improving their bio play.


PFS are required against protoss because of things like blink stalkers and collosus yes, your spread too thin. Terran has drops and zerg drops/nydus are alot easier to deal with because there is no bypass or cliffwalk. Your sinking more resources away from your army to stay alive instead of putting pressure back onto your opponent.


Nobody is saying ghosts aren't AMAZING at the matchup, but your trying to do too many things here, ghost mech is viable against zerg because
1) Its alot easier to get the nessecary infrastructure
2) Your units are alot more cost effective - so you get the required bases faster and more safely.

Please don't tell me "but you can't get ghosts, blah blah blah"

lol, but thats exactly the issue, where do you get the gas to make 20+ tanks + PFS + whatever else you need to deal with things like air and sensor towers and then afford mass ghosts? They arent cheap on gas, and you have to allocate such resources away from things like tanks. The emp nerf also hurt mech players especially because you dont get as much oompf as you did before and are very likely to have less of them then a bio player.
IF you can split the map and get the 10+ gases to support it, sure it could be good.

Its like saying 150 SUPPLY BCS WITH GHOSTS11!!!!1 sure, it could be unbeatable, but how on earth do I manage to get to that point?

The whole issue is that when you give up map control, turtle on three bases so you cannot be broken, and finally push out... to take a fourth or a fifth. Good luck envisioning an army that actually wins against an opponent with 8 + bases, 50 warpgates that reinforce anywhere on the map... and the massive resource bank to do it with.

Pretty much if your opponent is given THAT much room to play with, if they dont win they did a really poor job of exploiting all the issues mech has. If a meching player manages to split the map, thier opponent made a ton of mistakes.

Mech vs protoss is limited to a gimmick on certain maps where your able to turtle across the map for the course of an hour and exploit the fact that your opponent isnt playing against it properly.

Now mass hellions have issues against zealots,
Zealots dont always lead, they tank too much damage, and you cant kite them back past tanks, so things like collosus get to shred your hellions apart when you try to dart in, and you cant retreat or you expose your more important tanks. In a vacuum if you say sure mass hellion deals with zealots effectively... and then dont look at the larger picture in terms of army engagements you can make that error.
...And while your focusing what few stalkers the protoss has, the rest of the army that doesnt actually get hurt because hellions do shit damage that actually didnt kill all the zealots comes in and starts wrecking face.

As far as banshees are concerned, the longer the game goes, the less effective they are.

As far as training efficiently I'd disagree on the examples qouted, Jinro and Avilo and Goody did it for so long because it was a stylistic, and experimental way to play. Sure bio is easier - to win with, but they stubbornly tried for months on end to force it to work and figure it out.. They gave up after they concluded that it just wasnt a worthwhile way to play anymore. Pros dont just stick with what is known and the best way to win, they look for new ways to play, new styles and builds to use because those new novel ways are hard to prepare against and can give them a huge advantage.


It seems to me that there are 2 arguements being had right now.

arguement 1 is 200/200 mech army is just crap in TvP

arguement 2 is you can't survive long enough to get a 200/200 mech army

The ghost point is part of arguement 1. I'm actually ignoring arguement 2 initially because if arguement 1 is true then arguement 2 is a moot point. So, shelve the "but how do i get ghosts" for the moment and look at the more pressing issue of how good is the terran mech army when maxed. The first step would be, what does that 'look' like.

Assume Protoss will build the same army it does now as a starting point, that way you don't get bogged down into "but protoss will make this so i'll make this and then protoss will respond with this so i need this" never ending cycle.
Current protoss army is zealot, sentry, small stalker count, some colossus (6), HT with storm, few archons, maybe a few immortals. Stargates are pretty much not included.

So, what mech army would you 'want' to deal with that force? What are the problems? What units exploit the crap out of the current protoss composition?
you need some ghosts for the archons and HT's protoss is light on anti-air so banshees are intuitively good. ST out range colossus, HT, but are vulnerable to chargelots if chargelots can get close. Immortals will ruin your day unless you can EMP them first. some marines would also be good to help drain immortal shields quickly. You want vikings to deal with colossus, keep air control and a raven to shut down obs, which are CRITICAL for protoss to spot a weak spot in your positioning. for now lets assume missile turrets, sensor towers and vikings and keep warp prisms at bay, a few strategically placed PF's stop blink stalker harassment from being a "big" problem. How many tanks do you need for "critical" mass of damage? How much food does that leave for ghosts, vikings, banshees and ravens.

Just assuming you can get into this position, I don't care how or why right now, would you feel good about this game? Do you think from this position you could win? Do you feel that protoss has to change what they are doing to win?

If you throw this example over to protoss as an air army, no "air" army protoss can field vs a "standard" terran army would make me feel good about it. say, 8 carriers, a bunch of voidrays, mothership still leaves me 'feeling' like emp will do a lot of damage. the marines will kill the interceptors / VR, vikings will wipe out the mothership and then the carriers in no time. VS the standard MMMGV I feel that protoss AIR would be bad. Terran would ahve to change almost nothing about their current play to win this game. they might want to sack their maruaders and replace them with marines or vikings. not a big change.
kofman
Profile Joined August 2011
Andorra698 Posts
December 09 2011 01:29 GMT
#37410
mech is bad tvp, artosis and the other people who have been saying its viable just have never tried doing it before. state of the game is such a protoss dominated show.
KnightwhoSaysNI
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada60 Posts
December 09 2011 01:39 GMT
#37411
On December 09 2011 09:57 Kharnage wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2011 09:24 KnightwhoSaysNI wrote:
On December 09 2011 07:52 Kharnage wrote:
On December 09 2011 07:06 KnightwhoSaysNI wrote:
On December 09 2011 06:52 Quotidian wrote:
On December 09 2011 05:10 wei2coolman wrote:
On December 09 2011 04:23 drax2000 wrote:
On December 09 2011 01:13 VanGarde wrote:
I am going to have to applaud the few people who replied to my post and thus proved my argument. So I made a long post pointing out that Day9 and Artosis never said mech was actually good but just wanted to discuss if it could be. I also made the point that people get so caught up in arguing a stupid point that did not even exist in the first place that they don't listen to what people say or read what people write.

So four/five people go out to prove the point by instantly replying to me continuing arguing the point I already said I did not care about, and clearly replies without having read my post since you once again state "Well we just don't like it when Artosis sais mech is the best thing in TvP" or more iterations of "this is why mech does not work, here is a pro player who supports my position".

Are people really this fucking stupid in 2011? READ THE GOD DAMN POST BEFORE YOU REPLY TO IT IN A WAY THAT COMPLETELY PROVES MY ARGUMENT.


Oh, please..

Artosis said: "Terrans should try Mech, I have no idea what a protoss should do to beat that lategame army". Then people explained why Mech doesn't work and in most cases, if the protoss is even half-competent, doesn't even get to the point of having a maxed mech army.

People brought up enough points as to why Mech wouldn't ever work, now you can go on and tell everybody that their combined "theoretical brilliance" (wtf does that even mean, is it just another way of saying that they never tried it so they simply don't know???) is going to make for an interesting discussion. But the discussion is only going to be interesting for people who have never meched in TvP before, because anyone who has ever meched in TvP at least once in their life and at a reasonable level (master+) could tell you that the whole discussion is a waste of time because it simply DOESNT WORK.

How can you be so dense to not understand that?

The problem that incontrol and other have said, isn't that mech is necessarily BAD against protoss. It's just it looks nearly impossible to get up to 200/200 with a Terran Mech army against a Protoss, while trying to keep protoss from having 8 bases while you're off of 3-4 bases as terran.



yes mech is BAD vs protoss. A 200 vs 200 mech vs pretty much anything protoss army is heavily protoss favored. On paper, mass tank should kill everything on the ground, but it just isn't the case. Chargelots, archons, immortals, colossi.. all these things will obliterate a mech army in a straight up fight. Terran has to spam PFs all over the place for their army to not straight up die, but even then protoss can abuse their mobility and resupply rate (gates make chargelots and archons, after all)

I wish people would stop with the "there's no data on mech because no one is doing it" bullshit. There has been attempts to make mech work since the beta - and it actually worked for a while back then, thanks to tanks not being worse than colossi and ghosts doing full damage to shields and energy. Now mech is beyond the point of saving with all the nerfs to terran. There really should be no suggestions of "going mech" from protoss players, and unfortunately there isn't really any point in discussing tvp mech any longer either. Mech just isn't viable because of how the protoss army is designed - get over it.


Wow just as I was getting ready to hit post I saw this ^^ props on beating me to the punch.

Those who assume that mech is viable vs protoss need to go play it, play against or go look at all the games that players like jinro grinded out. Aside from all the logistical problems it has, its simply not cost effective ENOUGH to be considered.

If you compare a engagement in TVT with mech in a position vs a well spread bio force, you will lose maybe HALF your hellions before the entire bioball is vaporized. TVZ, to fight mech you force Terran to trade Tanks for thors or get broodlord infestor to siege mech positions because your low hp units die as you run in, and your high hp armored units melt to tank fire.

The reason this is, Zerg and Terran Don’t have any NON ARMORED high hp unit that can tank massive amounts of damage as the army closes on the meching player. Zealots tank a massive amount of siege tank splash, as do archons. Marauders and roaches get splattered, Zealots and archons shrug it off. This means the meching force basically splashes itself into oblivion as the higher hp ball of protoss crushes in. Zealots simply take too long to die to hellions, which are trying to buffer the tanks.

The same mech force that loses half of its hellions against bio, barely remains standing after the engagement. Now, protoss with its ability to reinforce the fastest after an engagement mops up whatever remains with ease. Envision an engagement where your pushing across the map, if you have 25-50% of your army remaining against a competent protoss that tailors their ground force to combat mech and spreads thier units; that’s a good thing as a mech player...

You watch goody play mech TVP, and he basically MASSES PFS as he splits the map, something you don’t necessarily have to do as a meching player in TVT or TVZ. This is because mech by itself as a stand alone army isn’t efficient enough, the fact that a 1500hp building is required to buffer the army in this match up to be cost efficient enough to use logistically says something.

There are a number of pros who have made their thoughts on mech vs protoss clear, Jinro Goody and Avilo are such examples. Basically figuring out how to mech isn’t rewarding enough in engagements as compared to well microed Bio+Support. There IS a lot of data on it if you know where to look and its easy to see how there are major differences between Mech vs Protoss and the other match ups.

It will take major changes to the units that make mechs composition before we start seeing it again or used successfully vs protoss on long macro games on large maps like Tal Darim.

…And that’s before we consider the implications of giving up map control and mobility.

Bottom line, Bio in theory is much less limited because you can kite, spread and target your units to maximum effectiveness. The automaton for mech is quite a bit more limited since you cant kite back with sieged tanks...
Its very disingenous to those pros to say high level terrans never played around with it or attempted to grind these things out in practice.


Just to address the bolded section, isn't the PF sprawl as much to deal witht he immobility of mech as it is to tank damage? (get it, tank damage *crickets chirp*)

Like, if you're worried about stalkers moving around your army, blinking into your main and doing a lot of damage to your production, isn't some well placed PF's the easy, supply free method of stopping that from happening? Infact, think of a PF as more expensive supply depot that can shoot stuff and is a hell of a lot tougher.

I haven't watched a lot of TvP where T is using mech, but is mass ghost part of their play? Looking at a lot of the objects it seems like EMP actually answers at least some of those issues (archons, HT, immortal shields) Please don't tell me "but you can't get ghosts, blah blah blah". you don't need infantry upgrades for them to work. you don't even need to research anything for them to work, emp is available off the shelf (though you will want mobius).

Zealots are definately a problem to tank splash and I don't know if the answer is mass hellions like artosis suggests, emergency bunker buffers like forGG used vs july zerg on taldarim, a good number of banshees that cleanup the zealots, focus fire the tanks on the stalkers.

I dunno, there is no reason that i would know, i'm just a diamond level scrub

I just like thinking / discussing about the problem cause it's one of the fun parts of SC2.

For the pro level I maintain that they will train the most time efficient way to win. While MMMGV works really well mech is a timesink which may or maynot pay off. Pro's need to spend their training time more efficiently than that.
You won't see mech TvP until protoss are far and away better than MMMGV OR someone is going up against a protoss player and feels that the protoss players micro is Sooooo much better that MMMGV is suicide.
The arguement that "pro's don't use it" doesn't mean that it's not possible, it means their time is better spent improving their bio play.


PFS are required against protoss because of things like blink stalkers and collosus yes, your spread too thin. Terran has drops and zerg drops/nydus are alot easier to deal with because there is no bypass or cliffwalk. Your sinking more resources away from your army to stay alive instead of putting pressure back onto your opponent.


Nobody is saying ghosts aren't AMAZING at the matchup, but your trying to do too many things here, ghost mech is viable against zerg because
1) Its alot easier to get the nessecary infrastructure
2) Your units are alot more cost effective - so you get the required bases faster and more safely.

Please don't tell me "but you can't get ghosts, blah blah blah"

lol, but thats exactly the issue, where do you get the gas to make 20+ tanks + PFS + whatever else you need to deal with things like air and sensor towers and then afford mass ghosts? They arent cheap on gas, and you have to allocate such resources away from things like tanks. The emp nerf also hurt mech players especially because you dont get as much oompf as you did before and are very likely to have less of them then a bio player.
IF you can split the map and get the 10+ gases to support it, sure it could be good.

Its like saying 150 SUPPLY BCS WITH GHOSTS11!!!!1 sure, it could be unbeatable, but how on earth do I manage to get to that point?

The whole issue is that when you give up map control, turtle on three bases so you cannot be broken, and finally push out... to take a fourth or a fifth. Good luck envisioning an army that actually wins against an opponent with 8 + bases, 50 warpgates that reinforce anywhere on the map... and the massive resource bank to do it with.

Pretty much if your opponent is given THAT much room to play with, if they dont win they did a really poor job of exploiting all the issues mech has. If a meching player manages to split the map, thier opponent made a ton of mistakes.

Mech vs protoss is limited to a gimmick on certain maps where your able to turtle across the map for the course of an hour and exploit the fact that your opponent isnt playing against it properly.

Now mass hellions have issues against zealots,
Zealots dont always lead, they tank too much damage, and you cant kite them back past tanks, so things like collosus get to shred your hellions apart when you try to dart in, and you cant retreat or you expose your more important tanks. In a vacuum if you say sure mass hellion deals with zealots effectively... and then dont look at the larger picture in terms of army engagements you can make that error.
...And while your focusing what few stalkers the protoss has, the rest of the army that doesnt actually get hurt because hellions do shit damage that actually didnt kill all the zealots comes in and starts wrecking face.

As far as banshees are concerned, the longer the game goes, the less effective they are.

As far as training efficiently I'd disagree on the examples qouted, Jinro and Avilo and Goody did it for so long because it was a stylistic, and experimental way to play. Sure bio is easier - to win with, but they stubbornly tried for months on end to force it to work and figure it out.. They gave up after they concluded that it just wasnt a worthwhile way to play anymore. Pros dont just stick with what is known and the best way to win, they look for new ways to play, new styles and builds to use because those new novel ways are hard to prepare against and can give them a huge advantage.


It seems to me that there are 2 arguements being had right now.

arguement 1 is 200/200 mech army is just crap in TvP

arguement 2 is you can't survive long enough to get a 200/200 mech army

The ghost point is part of arguement 1. I'm actually ignoring arguement 2 initially because if arguement 1 is true then arguement 2 is a moot point. So, shelve the "but how do i get ghosts" for the moment and look at the more pressing issue of how good is the terran mech army when maxed. The first step would be, what does that 'look' like.

Assume Protoss will build the same army it does now as a starting point, that way you don't get bogged down into "but protoss will make this so i'll make this and then protoss will respond with this so i need this" never ending cycle.
Current protoss army is zealot, sentry, small stalker count, some colossus (6), HT with storm, few archons, maybe a few immortals. Stargates are pretty much not included.

So, what mech army would you 'want' to deal with that force? What are the problems? What units exploit the crap out of the current protoss composition?
you need some ghosts for the archons and HT's protoss is light on anti-air so banshees are intuitively good. ST out range colossus, HT, but are vulnerable to chargelots if chargelots can get close. Immortals will ruin your day unless you can EMP them first. some marines would also be good to help drain immortal shields quickly. You want vikings to deal with colossus, keep air control and a raven to shut down obs, which are CRITICAL for protoss to spot a weak spot in your positioning. for now lets assume missile turrets, sensor towers and vikings and keep warp prisms at bay, a few strategically placed PF's stop blink stalker harassment from being a "big" problem. How many tanks do you need for "critical" mass of damage? How much food does that leave for ghosts, vikings, banshees and ravens.

Just assuming you can get into this position, I don't care how or why right now, would you feel good about this game? Do you think from this position you could win? Do you feel that protoss has to change what they are doing to win?

If you throw this example over to protoss as an air army, no "air" army protoss can field vs a "standard" terran army would make me feel good about it. say, 8 carriers, a bunch of voidrays, mothership still leaves me 'feeling' like emp will do a lot of damage. the marines will kill the interceptors / VR, vikings will wipe out the mothership and then the carriers in no time. VS the standard MMMGV I feel that protoss AIR would be bad. Terran would ahve to change almost nothing about their current play to win this game. they might want to sack their maruaders and replace them with marines or vikings. not a big change.


Your missing something, you CAN Max out with mech on... on 3 bases, but your unit compsition is limited, sucks and you cant actually remake it.

IT LIMITS YOUR COMPOSITION.
You dont get the freedom to make whatever you want, you dont have 12 geysers to work with like protoss will, your options are limited to what your playstyle is inside the game. You give up map control and you give up aggression in any form aside from econ harrass.

You cant theory craft this imaginary dream army where you have tanks + marines + Raven + Vikings + Banshees +Ghosts. Bio you can transition into other shit... where you can possibly get the mass of bcs. With mech you dont get too. Your stuck with X number of hellions X number of Tanks X number of thors X number of Vikings. If you want anything extra, pick and chose which your going to have less of. You dont get to remax, you get ONE ARMY. Against an opponent that has the ability to INSTANTLY REMAX and change whatever unit composition he wants.

You dont get to pick and choose, "well, I have 3/3 tanks, 3/3 marines, 3/3 air upgrades with raven, viking, banshee + Ghosts." Thats not mech. Mech is whatever your sorry ass can make out of 3-5 factories before protoss kills you, or starves you out.

By the time you have 1/1 with mech, your facing 3/3 ground from protoss. The unit comp you pick will always be suboptimal against an opponent that has a 100% macro advantage over you.
As far as marine tank is concerned which is what you brought up, its still an allin because its even more fragile then what mech is, just with more dps and mobility. there is a reason 1/1/1 is a 1 or 2 base play v p and you transition out of it..

Mech is not viable because you give up control of the game, and restrict yourself into a bottleneck against an opponent who effectively has 2-3 more bases then you from a very early point with a suboptimal unit comp that is limited to what you can afford on 6 gases and is a nightmare to defend with. If mech was to be viable, it would have to be losing 30 supply against protoss in max'd engagements not 70. It would have to behave against protoss like it does against bio or zerg without certain techs.

If you want your ideal theory craft army, its alot easier to get it with bio and you dont give up control of the game while you do so, because its impracticle and pointless to do it with mech. The arguement is that MECH as a unit comp is just not effective enough, without adding all these wonderful things that you cant actually get with it.
Ni!
Kharnage
Profile Joined September 2011
Australia920 Posts
December 09 2011 01:47 GMT
#37412
On December 09 2011 10:39 KnightwhoSaysNI wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2011 09:57 Kharnage wrote:
On December 09 2011 09:24 KnightwhoSaysNI wrote:
On December 09 2011 07:52 Kharnage wrote:
On December 09 2011 07:06 KnightwhoSaysNI wrote:
On December 09 2011 06:52 Quotidian wrote:
On December 09 2011 05:10 wei2coolman wrote:
On December 09 2011 04:23 drax2000 wrote:
On December 09 2011 01:13 VanGarde wrote:
I am going to have to applaud the few people who replied to my post and thus proved my argument. So I made a long post pointing out that Day9 and Artosis never said mech was actually good but just wanted to discuss if it could be. I also made the point that people get so caught up in arguing a stupid point that did not even exist in the first place that they don't listen to what people say or read what people write.

So four/five people go out to prove the point by instantly replying to me continuing arguing the point I already said I did not care about, and clearly replies without having read my post since you once again state "Well we just don't like it when Artosis sais mech is the best thing in TvP" or more iterations of "this is why mech does not work, here is a pro player who supports my position".

Are people really this fucking stupid in 2011? READ THE GOD DAMN POST BEFORE YOU REPLY TO IT IN A WAY THAT COMPLETELY PROVES MY ARGUMENT.


Oh, please..

Artosis said: "Terrans should try Mech, I have no idea what a protoss should do to beat that lategame army". Then people explained why Mech doesn't work and in most cases, if the protoss is even half-competent, doesn't even get to the point of having a maxed mech army.

People brought up enough points as to why Mech wouldn't ever work, now you can go on and tell everybody that their combined "theoretical brilliance" (wtf does that even mean, is it just another way of saying that they never tried it so they simply don't know???) is going to make for an interesting discussion. But the discussion is only going to be interesting for people who have never meched in TvP before, because anyone who has ever meched in TvP at least once in their life and at a reasonable level (master+) could tell you that the whole discussion is a waste of time because it simply DOESNT WORK.

How can you be so dense to not understand that?

The problem that incontrol and other have said, isn't that mech is necessarily BAD against protoss. It's just it looks nearly impossible to get up to 200/200 with a Terran Mech army against a Protoss, while trying to keep protoss from having 8 bases while you're off of 3-4 bases as terran.



yes mech is BAD vs protoss. A 200 vs 200 mech vs pretty much anything protoss army is heavily protoss favored. On paper, mass tank should kill everything on the ground, but it just isn't the case. Chargelots, archons, immortals, colossi.. all these things will obliterate a mech army in a straight up fight. Terran has to spam PFs all over the place for their army to not straight up die, but even then protoss can abuse their mobility and resupply rate (gates make chargelots and archons, after all)

I wish people would stop with the "there's no data on mech because no one is doing it" bullshit. There has been attempts to make mech work since the beta - and it actually worked for a while back then, thanks to tanks not being worse than colossi and ghosts doing full damage to shields and energy. Now mech is beyond the point of saving with all the nerfs to terran. There really should be no suggestions of "going mech" from protoss players, and unfortunately there isn't really any point in discussing tvp mech any longer either. Mech just isn't viable because of how the protoss army is designed - get over it.


Wow just as I was getting ready to hit post I saw this ^^ props on beating me to the punch.

Those who assume that mech is viable vs protoss need to go play it, play against or go look at all the games that players like jinro grinded out. Aside from all the logistical problems it has, its simply not cost effective ENOUGH to be considered.

If you compare a engagement in TVT with mech in a position vs a well spread bio force, you will lose maybe HALF your hellions before the entire bioball is vaporized. TVZ, to fight mech you force Terran to trade Tanks for thors or get broodlord infestor to siege mech positions because your low hp units die as you run in, and your high hp armored units melt to tank fire.

The reason this is, Zerg and Terran Don’t have any NON ARMORED high hp unit that can tank massive amounts of damage as the army closes on the meching player. Zealots tank a massive amount of siege tank splash, as do archons. Marauders and roaches get splattered, Zealots and archons shrug it off. This means the meching force basically splashes itself into oblivion as the higher hp ball of protoss crushes in. Zealots simply take too long to die to hellions, which are trying to buffer the tanks.

The same mech force that loses half of its hellions against bio, barely remains standing after the engagement. Now, protoss with its ability to reinforce the fastest after an engagement mops up whatever remains with ease. Envision an engagement where your pushing across the map, if you have 25-50% of your army remaining against a competent protoss that tailors their ground force to combat mech and spreads thier units; that’s a good thing as a mech player...

You watch goody play mech TVP, and he basically MASSES PFS as he splits the map, something you don’t necessarily have to do as a meching player in TVT or TVZ. This is because mech by itself as a stand alone army isn’t efficient enough, the fact that a 1500hp building is required to buffer the army in this match up to be cost efficient enough to use logistically says something.

There are a number of pros who have made their thoughts on mech vs protoss clear, Jinro Goody and Avilo are such examples. Basically figuring out how to mech isn’t rewarding enough in engagements as compared to well microed Bio+Support. There IS a lot of data on it if you know where to look and its easy to see how there are major differences between Mech vs Protoss and the other match ups.

It will take major changes to the units that make mechs composition before we start seeing it again or used successfully vs protoss on long macro games on large maps like Tal Darim.

…And that’s before we consider the implications of giving up map control and mobility.

Bottom line, Bio in theory is much less limited because you can kite, spread and target your units to maximum effectiveness. The automaton for mech is quite a bit more limited since you cant kite back with sieged tanks...
Its very disingenous to those pros to say high level terrans never played around with it or attempted to grind these things out in practice.


Just to address the bolded section, isn't the PF sprawl as much to deal witht he immobility of mech as it is to tank damage? (get it, tank damage *crickets chirp*)

Like, if you're worried about stalkers moving around your army, blinking into your main and doing a lot of damage to your production, isn't some well placed PF's the easy, supply free method of stopping that from happening? Infact, think of a PF as more expensive supply depot that can shoot stuff and is a hell of a lot tougher.

I haven't watched a lot of TvP where T is using mech, but is mass ghost part of their play? Looking at a lot of the objects it seems like EMP actually answers at least some of those issues (archons, HT, immortal shields) Please don't tell me "but you can't get ghosts, blah blah blah". you don't need infantry upgrades for them to work. you don't even need to research anything for them to work, emp is available off the shelf (though you will want mobius).

Zealots are definately a problem to tank splash and I don't know if the answer is mass hellions like artosis suggests, emergency bunker buffers like forGG used vs july zerg on taldarim, a good number of banshees that cleanup the zealots, focus fire the tanks on the stalkers.

I dunno, there is no reason that i would know, i'm just a diamond level scrub

I just like thinking / discussing about the problem cause it's one of the fun parts of SC2.

For the pro level I maintain that they will train the most time efficient way to win. While MMMGV works really well mech is a timesink which may or maynot pay off. Pro's need to spend their training time more efficiently than that.
You won't see mech TvP until protoss are far and away better than MMMGV OR someone is going up against a protoss player and feels that the protoss players micro is Sooooo much better that MMMGV is suicide.
The arguement that "pro's don't use it" doesn't mean that it's not possible, it means their time is better spent improving their bio play.


PFS are required against protoss because of things like blink stalkers and collosus yes, your spread too thin. Terran has drops and zerg drops/nydus are alot easier to deal with because there is no bypass or cliffwalk. Your sinking more resources away from your army to stay alive instead of putting pressure back onto your opponent.


Nobody is saying ghosts aren't AMAZING at the matchup, but your trying to do too many things here, ghost mech is viable against zerg because
1) Its alot easier to get the nessecary infrastructure
2) Your units are alot more cost effective - so you get the required bases faster and more safely.

Please don't tell me "but you can't get ghosts, blah blah blah"

lol, but thats exactly the issue, where do you get the gas to make 20+ tanks + PFS + whatever else you need to deal with things like air and sensor towers and then afford mass ghosts? They arent cheap on gas, and you have to allocate such resources away from things like tanks. The emp nerf also hurt mech players especially because you dont get as much oompf as you did before and are very likely to have less of them then a bio player.
IF you can split the map and get the 10+ gases to support it, sure it could be good.

Its like saying 150 SUPPLY BCS WITH GHOSTS11!!!!1 sure, it could be unbeatable, but how on earth do I manage to get to that point?

The whole issue is that when you give up map control, turtle on three bases so you cannot be broken, and finally push out... to take a fourth or a fifth. Good luck envisioning an army that actually wins against an opponent with 8 + bases, 50 warpgates that reinforce anywhere on the map... and the massive resource bank to do it with.

Pretty much if your opponent is given THAT much room to play with, if they dont win they did a really poor job of exploiting all the issues mech has. If a meching player manages to split the map, thier opponent made a ton of mistakes.

Mech vs protoss is limited to a gimmick on certain maps where your able to turtle across the map for the course of an hour and exploit the fact that your opponent isnt playing against it properly.

Now mass hellions have issues against zealots,
Zealots dont always lead, they tank too much damage, and you cant kite them back past tanks, so things like collosus get to shred your hellions apart when you try to dart in, and you cant retreat or you expose your more important tanks. In a vacuum if you say sure mass hellion deals with zealots effectively... and then dont look at the larger picture in terms of army engagements you can make that error.
...And while your focusing what few stalkers the protoss has, the rest of the army that doesnt actually get hurt because hellions do shit damage that actually didnt kill all the zealots comes in and starts wrecking face.

As far as banshees are concerned, the longer the game goes, the less effective they are.

As far as training efficiently I'd disagree on the examples qouted, Jinro and Avilo and Goody did it for so long because it was a stylistic, and experimental way to play. Sure bio is easier - to win with, but they stubbornly tried for months on end to force it to work and figure it out.. They gave up after they concluded that it just wasnt a worthwhile way to play anymore. Pros dont just stick with what is known and the best way to win, they look for new ways to play, new styles and builds to use because those new novel ways are hard to prepare against and can give them a huge advantage.


It seems to me that there are 2 arguements being had right now.

arguement 1 is 200/200 mech army is just crap in TvP

arguement 2 is you can't survive long enough to get a 200/200 mech army

The ghost point is part of arguement 1. I'm actually ignoring arguement 2 initially because if arguement 1 is true then arguement 2 is a moot point. So, shelve the "but how do i get ghosts" for the moment and look at the more pressing issue of how good is the terran mech army when maxed. The first step would be, what does that 'look' like.

Assume Protoss will build the same army it does now as a starting point, that way you don't get bogged down into "but protoss will make this so i'll make this and then protoss will respond with this so i need this" never ending cycle.
Current protoss army is zealot, sentry, small stalker count, some colossus (6), HT with storm, few archons, maybe a few immortals. Stargates are pretty much not included.

So, what mech army would you 'want' to deal with that force? What are the problems? What units exploit the crap out of the current protoss composition?
you need some ghosts for the archons and HT's protoss is light on anti-air so banshees are intuitively good. ST out range colossus, HT, but are vulnerable to chargelots if chargelots can get close. Immortals will ruin your day unless you can EMP them first. some marines would also be good to help drain immortal shields quickly. You want vikings to deal with colossus, keep air control and a raven to shut down obs, which are CRITICAL for protoss to spot a weak spot in your positioning. for now lets assume missile turrets, sensor towers and vikings and keep warp prisms at bay, a few strategically placed PF's stop blink stalker harassment from being a "big" problem. How many tanks do you need for "critical" mass of damage? How much food does that leave for ghosts, vikings, banshees and ravens.

Just assuming you can get into this position, I don't care how or why right now, would you feel good about this game? Do you think from this position you could win? Do you feel that protoss has to change what they are doing to win?

If you throw this example over to protoss as an air army, no "air" army protoss can field vs a "standard" terran army would make me feel good about it. say, 8 carriers, a bunch of voidrays, mothership still leaves me 'feeling' like emp will do a lot of damage. the marines will kill the interceptors / VR, vikings will wipe out the mothership and then the carriers in no time. VS the standard MMMGV I feel that protoss AIR would be bad. Terran would ahve to change almost nothing about their current play to win this game. they might want to sack their maruaders and replace them with marines or vikings. not a big change.


Your missing something, you CAN Max out with mech on... on 3 bases, but your unit compsition is limited, sucks and you cant actually remake it.

IT LIMITS YOUR COMPOSITION.
You dont get the freedom to make whatever you want, you dont have 12 geysers to work with like protoss will, your options are limited to what your playstyle is inside the game. You give up map control and you give up aggression in any form aside from econ harrass.

You cant theory craft this imaginary dream army where you have tanks + marines + Raven + Vikings + Banshees +Ghosts. Bio you can transition into other shit... where you can possibly get the mass of bcs. With mech you dont get too. Your stuck with X number of hellions X number of Tanks X number of thors X number of Vikings. If you want anything extra, pick and chose which your going to have less of. You dont get to remax, you get ONE ARMY. Against an opponent that has the ability to INSTANTLY REMAX and change whatever unit composition he wants.

You dont get to pick and choose, "well, I have 3/3 tanks, 3/3 marines, 3/3 air upgrades with raven, viking, banshee + Ghosts." Thats not mech. Mech is whatever your sorry ass can make out of 3-5 factories before protoss kills you, or starves you out.

By the time you have 1/1 with mech, your facing 3/3 ground from protoss. The unit comp you pick will always be suboptimal against an opponent that has a 100% macro advantage over you.
As far as marine tank is concerned which is what you brought up, its still an allin because its even more fragile then what mech is, just with more dps and mobility. there is a reason 1/1/1 is a 1 or 2 base play v p and you transition out of it..

Mech is not viable because you give up control of the game, and restrict yourself into a bottleneck against an opponent who effectively has 2-3 more bases then you from a very early point with a suboptimal unit comp that is limited to what you can afford on 6 gases and is a nightmare to defend with. If mech was to be viable, it would have to be losing 30 supply against protoss in max'd engagements not 70. It would have to behave against protoss like it does against bio or zerg without certain techs.

If you want your ideal theory craft army, its alot easier to get it with bio and you dont give up control of the game while you do so, because its impracticle and pointless to do it with mech. The arguement is that MECH as a unit comp is just not effective enough, without adding all these wonderful things that you cant actually get with it.


I'm not 'missing' it. All these points are valid and present a massive set of problems to deal with, I'm not disputing that at all.

I'm asking 'is the goal worthwhile'. If the goal of that army composition is not worthwhile then these are a bunch of problems which simply don't need solving. It may be that these problems are insurmountable and it's idiotic to try and achieve this mech end game goal for all the reasons you have listed above. But before beginning to even attempt to solve the problem I want to know if there is even a point in trying.

This i also the point artosis is making when he says "i'm not sure what protoss does against that". He's looking at the goal before the problem of attaining it.

If the goal is worthwhile then I'll start thinking about how to not die, how to put pressure on the protoss player and so on.
if not then screw it, i don't see the point. Mech in TvP is just bad.
KnightwhoSaysNI
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada60 Posts
December 09 2011 02:07 GMT
#37413
On December 09 2011 10:47 Kharnage wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2011 10:39 KnightwhoSaysNI wrote:
On December 09 2011 09:57 Kharnage wrote:
On December 09 2011 09:24 KnightwhoSaysNI wrote:
On December 09 2011 07:52 Kharnage wrote:
On December 09 2011 07:06 KnightwhoSaysNI wrote:
On December 09 2011 06:52 Quotidian wrote:
On December 09 2011 05:10 wei2coolman wrote:
On December 09 2011 04:23 drax2000 wrote:
On December 09 2011 01:13 VanGarde wrote:
I am going to have to applaud the few people who replied to my post and thus proved my argument. So I made a long post pointing out that Day9 and Artosis never said mech was actually good but just wanted to discuss if it could be. I also made the point that people get so caught up in arguing a stupid point that did not even exist in the first place that they don't listen to what people say or read what people write.

So four/five people go out to prove the point by instantly replying to me continuing arguing the point I already said I did not care about, and clearly replies without having read my post since you once again state "Well we just don't like it when Artosis sais mech is the best thing in TvP" or more iterations of "this is why mech does not work, here is a pro player who supports my position".

Are people really this fucking stupid in 2011? READ THE GOD DAMN POST BEFORE YOU REPLY TO IT IN A WAY THAT COMPLETELY PROVES MY ARGUMENT.


Oh, please..

Artosis said: "Terrans should try Mech, I have no idea what a protoss should do to beat that lategame army". Then people explained why Mech doesn't work and in most cases, if the protoss is even half-competent, doesn't even get to the point of having a maxed mech army.

People brought up enough points as to why Mech wouldn't ever work, now you can go on and tell everybody that their combined "theoretical brilliance" (wtf does that even mean, is it just another way of saying that they never tried it so they simply don't know???) is going to make for an interesting discussion. But the discussion is only going to be interesting for people who have never meched in TvP before, because anyone who has ever meched in TvP at least once in their life and at a reasonable level (master+) could tell you that the whole discussion is a waste of time because it simply DOESNT WORK.

How can you be so dense to not understand that?

The problem that incontrol and other have said, isn't that mech is necessarily BAD against protoss. It's just it looks nearly impossible to get up to 200/200 with a Terran Mech army against a Protoss, while trying to keep protoss from having 8 bases while you're off of 3-4 bases as terran.



yes mech is BAD vs protoss. A 200 vs 200 mech vs pretty much anything protoss army is heavily protoss favored. On paper, mass tank should kill everything on the ground, but it just isn't the case. Chargelots, archons, immortals, colossi.. all these things will obliterate a mech army in a straight up fight. Terran has to spam PFs all over the place for their army to not straight up die, but even then protoss can abuse their mobility and resupply rate (gates make chargelots and archons, after all)

I wish people would stop with the "there's no data on mech because no one is doing it" bullshit. There has been attempts to make mech work since the beta - and it actually worked for a while back then, thanks to tanks not being worse than colossi and ghosts doing full damage to shields and energy. Now mech is beyond the point of saving with all the nerfs to terran. There really should be no suggestions of "going mech" from protoss players, and unfortunately there isn't really any point in discussing tvp mech any longer either. Mech just isn't viable because of how the protoss army is designed - get over it.


Wow just as I was getting ready to hit post I saw this ^^ props on beating me to the punch.

Those who assume that mech is viable vs protoss need to go play it, play against or go look at all the games that players like jinro grinded out. Aside from all the logistical problems it has, its simply not cost effective ENOUGH to be considered.

If you compare a engagement in TVT with mech in a position vs a well spread bio force, you will lose maybe HALF your hellions before the entire bioball is vaporized. TVZ, to fight mech you force Terran to trade Tanks for thors or get broodlord infestor to siege mech positions because your low hp units die as you run in, and your high hp armored units melt to tank fire.

The reason this is, Zerg and Terran Don’t have any NON ARMORED high hp unit that can tank massive amounts of damage as the army closes on the meching player. Zealots tank a massive amount of siege tank splash, as do archons. Marauders and roaches get splattered, Zealots and archons shrug it off. This means the meching force basically splashes itself into oblivion as the higher hp ball of protoss crushes in. Zealots simply take too long to die to hellions, which are trying to buffer the tanks.

The same mech force that loses half of its hellions against bio, barely remains standing after the engagement. Now, protoss with its ability to reinforce the fastest after an engagement mops up whatever remains with ease. Envision an engagement where your pushing across the map, if you have 25-50% of your army remaining against a competent protoss that tailors their ground force to combat mech and spreads thier units; that’s a good thing as a mech player...

You watch goody play mech TVP, and he basically MASSES PFS as he splits the map, something you don’t necessarily have to do as a meching player in TVT or TVZ. This is because mech by itself as a stand alone army isn’t efficient enough, the fact that a 1500hp building is required to buffer the army in this match up to be cost efficient enough to use logistically says something.

There are a number of pros who have made their thoughts on mech vs protoss clear, Jinro Goody and Avilo are such examples. Basically figuring out how to mech isn’t rewarding enough in engagements as compared to well microed Bio+Support. There IS a lot of data on it if you know where to look and its easy to see how there are major differences between Mech vs Protoss and the other match ups.

It will take major changes to the units that make mechs composition before we start seeing it again or used successfully vs protoss on long macro games on large maps like Tal Darim.

…And that’s before we consider the implications of giving up map control and mobility.

Bottom line, Bio in theory is much less limited because you can kite, spread and target your units to maximum effectiveness. The automaton for mech is quite a bit more limited since you cant kite back with sieged tanks...
Its very disingenous to those pros to say high level terrans never played around with it or attempted to grind these things out in practice.


Just to address the bolded section, isn't the PF sprawl as much to deal witht he immobility of mech as it is to tank damage? (get it, tank damage *crickets chirp*)

Like, if you're worried about stalkers moving around your army, blinking into your main and doing a lot of damage to your production, isn't some well placed PF's the easy, supply free method of stopping that from happening? Infact, think of a PF as more expensive supply depot that can shoot stuff and is a hell of a lot tougher.

I haven't watched a lot of TvP where T is using mech, but is mass ghost part of their play? Looking at a lot of the objects it seems like EMP actually answers at least some of those issues (archons, HT, immortal shields) Please don't tell me "but you can't get ghosts, blah blah blah". you don't need infantry upgrades for them to work. you don't even need to research anything for them to work, emp is available off the shelf (though you will want mobius).

Zealots are definately a problem to tank splash and I don't know if the answer is mass hellions like artosis suggests, emergency bunker buffers like forGG used vs july zerg on taldarim, a good number of banshees that cleanup the zealots, focus fire the tanks on the stalkers.

I dunno, there is no reason that i would know, i'm just a diamond level scrub

I just like thinking / discussing about the problem cause it's one of the fun parts of SC2.

For the pro level I maintain that they will train the most time efficient way to win. While MMMGV works really well mech is a timesink which may or maynot pay off. Pro's need to spend their training time more efficiently than that.
You won't see mech TvP until protoss are far and away better than MMMGV OR someone is going up against a protoss player and feels that the protoss players micro is Sooooo much better that MMMGV is suicide.
The arguement that "pro's don't use it" doesn't mean that it's not possible, it means their time is better spent improving their bio play.


PFS are required against protoss because of things like blink stalkers and collosus yes, your spread too thin. Terran has drops and zerg drops/nydus are alot easier to deal with because there is no bypass or cliffwalk. Your sinking more resources away from your army to stay alive instead of putting pressure back onto your opponent.


Nobody is saying ghosts aren't AMAZING at the matchup, but your trying to do too many things here, ghost mech is viable against zerg because
1) Its alot easier to get the nessecary infrastructure
2) Your units are alot more cost effective - so you get the required bases faster and more safely.

Please don't tell me "but you can't get ghosts, blah blah blah"

lol, but thats exactly the issue, where do you get the gas to make 20+ tanks + PFS + whatever else you need to deal with things like air and sensor towers and then afford mass ghosts? They arent cheap on gas, and you have to allocate such resources away from things like tanks. The emp nerf also hurt mech players especially because you dont get as much oompf as you did before and are very likely to have less of them then a bio player.
IF you can split the map and get the 10+ gases to support it, sure it could be good.

Its like saying 150 SUPPLY BCS WITH GHOSTS11!!!!1 sure, it could be unbeatable, but how on earth do I manage to get to that point?

The whole issue is that when you give up map control, turtle on three bases so you cannot be broken, and finally push out... to take a fourth or a fifth. Good luck envisioning an army that actually wins against an opponent with 8 + bases, 50 warpgates that reinforce anywhere on the map... and the massive resource bank to do it with.

Pretty much if your opponent is given THAT much room to play with, if they dont win they did a really poor job of exploiting all the issues mech has. If a meching player manages to split the map, thier opponent made a ton of mistakes.

Mech vs protoss is limited to a gimmick on certain maps where your able to turtle across the map for the course of an hour and exploit the fact that your opponent isnt playing against it properly.

Now mass hellions have issues against zealots,
Zealots dont always lead, they tank too much damage, and you cant kite them back past tanks, so things like collosus get to shred your hellions apart when you try to dart in, and you cant retreat or you expose your more important tanks. In a vacuum if you say sure mass hellion deals with zealots effectively... and then dont look at the larger picture in terms of army engagements you can make that error.
...And while your focusing what few stalkers the protoss has, the rest of the army that doesnt actually get hurt because hellions do shit damage that actually didnt kill all the zealots comes in and starts wrecking face.

As far as banshees are concerned, the longer the game goes, the less effective they are.

As far as training efficiently I'd disagree on the examples qouted, Jinro and Avilo and Goody did it for so long because it was a stylistic, and experimental way to play. Sure bio is easier - to win with, but they stubbornly tried for months on end to force it to work and figure it out.. They gave up after they concluded that it just wasnt a worthwhile way to play anymore. Pros dont just stick with what is known and the best way to win, they look for new ways to play, new styles and builds to use because those new novel ways are hard to prepare against and can give them a huge advantage.


It seems to me that there are 2 arguements being had right now.

arguement 1 is 200/200 mech army is just crap in TvP

arguement 2 is you can't survive long enough to get a 200/200 mech army

The ghost point is part of arguement 1. I'm actually ignoring arguement 2 initially because if arguement 1 is true then arguement 2 is a moot point. So, shelve the "but how do i get ghosts" for the moment and look at the more pressing issue of how good is the terran mech army when maxed. The first step would be, what does that 'look' like.

Assume Protoss will build the same army it does now as a starting point, that way you don't get bogged down into "but protoss will make this so i'll make this and then protoss will respond with this so i need this" never ending cycle.
Current protoss army is zealot, sentry, small stalker count, some colossus (6), HT with storm, few archons, maybe a few immortals. Stargates are pretty much not included.

So, what mech army would you 'want' to deal with that force? What are the problems? What units exploit the crap out of the current protoss composition?
you need some ghosts for the archons and HT's protoss is light on anti-air so banshees are intuitively good. ST out range colossus, HT, but are vulnerable to chargelots if chargelots can get close. Immortals will ruin your day unless you can EMP them first. some marines would also be good to help drain immortal shields quickly. You want vikings to deal with colossus, keep air control and a raven to shut down obs, which are CRITICAL for protoss to spot a weak spot in your positioning. for now lets assume missile turrets, sensor towers and vikings and keep warp prisms at bay, a few strategically placed PF's stop blink stalker harassment from being a "big" problem. How many tanks do you need for "critical" mass of damage? How much food does that leave for ghosts, vikings, banshees and ravens.

Just assuming you can get into this position, I don't care how or why right now, would you feel good about this game? Do you think from this position you could win? Do you feel that protoss has to change what they are doing to win?

If you throw this example over to protoss as an air army, no "air" army protoss can field vs a "standard" terran army would make me feel good about it. say, 8 carriers, a bunch of voidrays, mothership still leaves me 'feeling' like emp will do a lot of damage. the marines will kill the interceptors / VR, vikings will wipe out the mothership and then the carriers in no time. VS the standard MMMGV I feel that protoss AIR would be bad. Terran would ahve to change almost nothing about their current play to win this game. they might want to sack their maruaders and replace them with marines or vikings. not a big change.


Your missing something, you CAN Max out with mech on... on 3 bases, but your unit compsition is limited, sucks and you cant actually remake it.

IT LIMITS YOUR COMPOSITION.
You dont get the freedom to make whatever you want, you dont have 12 geysers to work with like protoss will, your options are limited to what your playstyle is inside the game. You give up map control and you give up aggression in any form aside from econ harrass.

You cant theory craft this imaginary dream army where you have tanks + marines + Raven + Vikings + Banshees +Ghosts. Bio you can transition into other shit... where you can possibly get the mass of bcs. With mech you dont get too. Your stuck with X number of hellions X number of Tanks X number of thors X number of Vikings. If you want anything extra, pick and chose which your going to have less of. You dont get to remax, you get ONE ARMY. Against an opponent that has the ability to INSTANTLY REMAX and change whatever unit composition he wants.

You dont get to pick and choose, "well, I have 3/3 tanks, 3/3 marines, 3/3 air upgrades with raven, viking, banshee + Ghosts." Thats not mech. Mech is whatever your sorry ass can make out of 3-5 factories before protoss kills you, or starves you out.

By the time you have 1/1 with mech, your facing 3/3 ground from protoss. The unit comp you pick will always be suboptimal against an opponent that has a 100% macro advantage over you.
As far as marine tank is concerned which is what you brought up, its still an allin because its even more fragile then what mech is, just with more dps and mobility. there is a reason 1/1/1 is a 1 or 2 base play v p and you transition out of it..

Mech is not viable because you give up control of the game, and restrict yourself into a bottleneck against an opponent who effectively has 2-3 more bases then you from a very early point with a suboptimal unit comp that is limited to what you can afford on 6 gases and is a nightmare to defend with. If mech was to be viable, it would have to be losing 30 supply against protoss in max'd engagements not 70. It would have to behave against protoss like it does against bio or zerg without certain techs.

If you want your ideal theory craft army, its alot easier to get it with bio and you dont give up control of the game while you do so, because its impracticle and pointless to do it with mech. The arguement is that MECH as a unit comp is just not effective enough, without adding all these wonderful things that you cant actually get with it.


I'm not 'missing' it. All these points are valid and present a massive set of problems to deal with, I'm not disputing that at all.

I'm asking 'is the goal worthwhile'. If the goal of that army composition is not worthwhile then these are a bunch of problems which simply don't need solving. It may be that these problems are insurmountable and it's idiotic to try and achieve this mech end game goal for all the reasons you have listed above. But before beginning to even attempt to solve the problem I want to know if there is even a point in trying.

This i also the point artosis is making when he says "i'm not sure what protoss does against that". He's looking at the goal before the problem of attaining it.

If the goal is worthwhile then I'll start thinking about how to not die, how to put pressure on the protoss player and so on.
if not then screw it, i don't see the point. Mech in TvP is just bad.


The answer if its worth it is different for every Terran player, Its worth trying because its new, its different, its novel, its how it was done in broodwar etc not because its nessecarily effective, its something that players worked on for a long time before they found out the answer to the question if it was worthwhile.. it wasnt. Then they stopped doing it.

Right now, no, the unit composition of factory units against protoss is just not effective enough in a vacuum situation to be worthwhile to acheive and there are much more powerful unit combinations against protoss in the same vein which have thier own logistical issues.
Ni!
mattjkim
Profile Joined May 2011
United States34 Posts
December 09 2011 02:37 GMT
#37414
i just wish incontrol could of had calm conversation with dan and sean. maybe its geoff debate days but he doesnt have to "win" and resort to abnoxious behavior.
Duka08
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
3391 Posts
December 09 2011 02:51 GMT
#37415
On December 09 2011 08:49 Elefanto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2011 08:45 Alexstrasas wrote:
Oh my... Protoss and zergs talking about mech like its some sort of unexplored secret "iwin" weapon that terrans forgot to use.

On December 09 2011 06:20 Flonomenalz wrote:
I don't know why more people don't play Ghost Mech vs Zerg. I really, really don't. Because if they did I'd lose every ZvT.

edit: this was a response to MCDay, not a balance whine =p


"Ghost Mech" sounds awesome. Now could you tell us please what exactly is the difference between "Ghost Mech" and the standard late game TvZ army ? Helions instead of marines? Because tanks and thors are already extensively used.

Now i dont want to bash or diss but im seriously astonished by the things some people are saying here.

I cant really understand at all this people that are swearing on their knees that mech is going to be the next big thing in TvP.

Look:

SC2 Tank:

Minerals: 150
Vespene: 125
Supply: 3
Damage when sieged: 35 (bonus 15 vs Armored)

SCBW Tank:

Minerals: 150
Vespene: 100
Supply: 2
Damage when sieged: 70

People either just dont know about the difference or they dont understand the implication of tanks doing HALF the damage that they used to while costing MORE supply.

Just so you understand the numbers, it takes 5 shots for 1 tank to kill a puny zealot.

If Protoss was already able to break siege lines in BW, how in the F, do you want people to hold them now? And this not factoring no spider mines, charge, blink, colossus etc.

It just doesnt make sense at all.

And i mean you arent even talking about just using tanks like in marine/tank or something but "mech", what helion/tank? You do realize that a helion has 90 hp and has to kite to win a 1on1 with a simple zealot right?

Most terrans including various pro players clearly stated that they tried and it simply doesnt work, the stats on the units clearly point to the same conclusion, why keep pushing the same button over and over again ?



You have no idea what you're talking about in your damage conclusion.
Research the broodwar damage system.

Against zealots - Sieged Tank - SCBW vs SC2 : 35 vs 35 (half damage to small units in BW)
Against dragoons/stalkers - Sieged Tank - SCBW vs SC2 : 70 vs 50

That's objectively better, even considering his mistake regarding damage vs. small units. Bit rash to say NO idea.
aviator116
Profile Joined November 2011
United States820 Posts
December 09 2011 02:54 GMT
#37416
yeah, theres gonna be a LOT of bans incoming soon on this thread. i really hope drax2000 gets slaughtered by the admins.
Bogus ST_Life IMMVP
windsupernova
Profile Joined October 2010
Mexico5280 Posts
December 09 2011 02:58 GMT
#37417
Did people forget that in BW Tanks wasted tons of damage due to the AI?

I am not going to touch the discussion, but when you compare the Siege tank stats in BW vs the stats in SC2 you have to take the smart targetting into account.

Although I wouldn´t mind a 35+ 35 to armoured :3, people will be begging for Ts to use Marines again XD

Also something that people forget is that damage vs shields always did full damage, that changed in SC2 too.
"Its easy, just trust your CPU".-Boxer on being good at games
hugman
Profile Joined June 2009
Sweden4644 Posts
December 09 2011 03:01 GMT
#37418
ThorZaIN said on his stream that he thought Mech could work
He did say though that any game you would win with Mech you would win with bio, but still =D
iSometric
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
2221 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-09 03:04:19
December 09 2011 03:03 GMT
#37419
SOTG TIME!
edit: nvm
strava.com/athletes/zhaodynasty
BEARDiaguz
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Australia2362 Posts
December 09 2011 03:07 GMT
#37420
Aye, but units in BW moved inefficiently too. Big bulky stupid fucking dragoons getting in each others way hampers the effectiveness of that army quite a bit. Not sure if the two cancel each other out necessarily though.

It's also worth noting that the 70 damage tank round did full damage to a zealots shields but only half afterwards. So they're still better then SC2 tanks dammit!
ProgamerAustralian alcohol user follow @iaguzSC2
Prev 1 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 2731 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 33m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 272
RuFF_SC2 164
StarCraft: Brood War
sSak 150
HiyA 88
Sexy 86
NaDa 63
Icarus 6
League of Legends
JimRising 678
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 373
Other Games
summit1g13251
shahzam969
ViBE258
C9.Mang0185
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 112
• davetesta42
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota2328
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
8h 33m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
11h 33m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 7h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 11h
CSO Cup
1d 13h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 15h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.