• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:04
CEST 07:04
KST 14:04
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20254Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202576RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced20BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 What tournaments are world championships? I offer completely free coaching services
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Dewalt's Show Matches in China
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 573 users

SC2 Ladder Analysis: Part 2 - Page 16

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 14 15 16 17 18 21 Next All
Matrim
Profile Joined October 2010
United Kingdom16 Posts
October 15 2010 15:33 GMT
#301
Seems correct though Excaliber is the authority in this thread. It used to be a lot easier with the bonus pool on your league window showing utilised whereas now it shows remaining..
But one also finds in the human heart a depraved taste for equality, which impels the weak to want to bring the strong down to their level, and which reduces men to preferring equality in servitude to inequality in freedom
BenKen
Profile Joined August 2009
United States860 Posts
October 15 2010 15:50 GMT
#302
On October 15 2010 23:34 ashaman771 wrote:
Great OP. But at some point, which you learn after university, you have to be able to digest the information to present it to people in a clear way. Essentially, can you take the information you have and explain it to someone in high school.

Again, great OP, but I suspect it's from someone green in university.


You mean like this?

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=150367

Also, no offense, but there are better ways to make suggestions than back-handed "oh you must be young, you'll learn" insults.
I deadlift for Aiur
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
October 15 2010 17:03 GMT
#303
On October 15 2010 23:34 ashaman771 wrote:
Great OP. But at some point, which you learn after university, you have to be able to digest the information to present it to people in a clear way. Essentially, can you take the information you have and explain it to someone in high school.

Again, great OP, but I suspect it's from someone green in university.


It isn't. Vanick is a college graduate with a CS degree, and we've gone through several phases of proofreading and editing before posting this. I don't have a formal college education on statistics since I went to a trade school, so over those passes we made it more accessible and easier to understand (it used to be a lot more verbose than this). Not to sound condescending, but we've had a lot of comments praising this post because of how thorough and straightforward the explanations are. To quote a poster from SomethingAwful where this thread was linked, "That poster has a fucking spectacular ability to communicate, holy shit."
Moderator
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
October 15 2010 17:08 GMT
#304
On October 16 2010 00:13 Mendelfist wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 15 2010 18:25 Matrim wrote:
Difficult to tell now that the utilised bonus pool has been 'corrected' to show bonus pool remaining and not bonus pool utilised.


When I post this total available bonus points are exactly 1120 (for EU, I don't know if other regions are in sync with this). Those interested can keep track of it either by looking at how your own bonus pool increases and add it to this number, or by just counting hours from this moment (1 point per 2 hours).

Utilised bonus pool is then of course total available bonus pool minus remaining bonus pool.

As far as I know this works even after promotions/demotions. Correct me if I'm wrong.


Yeah, that's what I've noticed too. However, there was one notable exception (so it's probably a bug). When I got promoted from Platinum to Diamond, my last game earned me +20 bonus points, but -40 was deducted from my bonus pool. I saw this in someone else's match history when being promoted to Diamond too, and it was the same phenomenon: earning 20 but deducting 40. Every other match history parse I've seen has kept the bonus pool total consistent. My guess is it's just a Diamond-promotion double-deduction bug.
Moderator
iDreamStar
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2 Posts
October 16 2010 02:47 GMT
#305
Hello,
I am a first time poster however I have been reading carefully all the threads relating to Analysis of the SC2 Ladder. I am a bronze player and though this might been insignificant to most of you I am still confused as to why I still remain in Bronze league. I started off 1-4 due to some disconnections and continued to a dismal record of 6-19 until I started to step my game up watch some Day9 and read some TL. Now in my past 13 or so games I have been playing Top Bronze with Top Silver have won all but 2 games and a couple hours ago I defeated a rank 44 platinum that was "even" with me. Now I know that being "even" is just the displayed ratings being compared however if anyone could answer my question as to why I remain in bronze league it would be appreciative.

Link to Profile:

http://sc2ranks.com/us/889656/iDreamStar

Thanks
pGa.Ghu)Z(dan
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany2 Posts
October 19 2010 09:10 GMT
#306
Why is it possible that a friend of mine is diamond with 30 games (375 rating) and I have about 100 games 60% (1000 rating) and I'm still platin -.-. Don't get it and that math here is way to complicated imho!
mDuo13
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States307 Posts
October 19 2010 18:27 GMT
#307
On October 16 2010 11:47 iDreamStar wrote:
Hello,
I am a first time poster however I have been reading carefully all the threads relating to Analysis of the SC2 Ladder. I am a bronze player and though this might been insignificant to most of you I am still confused as to why I still remain in Bronze league. I started off 1-4 due to some disconnections and continued to a dismal record of 6-19 until I started to step my game up watch some Day9 and read some TL. Now in my past 13 or so games I have been playing Top Bronze with Top Silver have won all but 2 games and a couple hours ago I defeated a rank 44 platinum that was "even" with me. Now I know that being "even" is just the displayed ratings being compared however if anyone could answer my question as to why I remain in bronze league it would be appreciative.

Link to Profile:

http://sc2ranks.com/us/889656/iDreamStar

Thanks

Simple: You have now confused the system significantly, and you'll get promoted when it confidently establishes which league you belong in.

In more technical terms, your sigma is very high from causing so many upsets and your MMR is likely fluctuating significantly as you play players with such varied MMRs. You will get promoted when your MMR +/- sigma falls cleanly in a particular league range.
Impaler
Profile Joined September 2010
United States11 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-19 22:28:40
October 19 2010 22:27 GMT
#308
While reading the article on Microsoft True Skill a thought occurs to me.

Sigma should be split into two separate Sigmas a high and a low. Currently the system MUST create a symmetrical bell curve around ones MMR which represents a total probability of expected performance. If you win against a higher ranked player the MMR goes up but so dose the single Sigma which causes the lower end 'tail' of your performance expectation to stagnate. Thus a players Performance curve just keeps getting 'smeared' upward and the system won't promote because of the high confidence threshold needed.

So for example Bob a Platinum with 2000 MMR plays against Jon a Diamond player with 2300 MMR. Jon is favored but Bob wins an upset victory. The systems single sigma means the system is forced to basically say "Oh I seem to have Bobs skill level wrong, he might actually be Diamond material or he could equally likely be Gold caliber." Now obviously any inference that Bob win means he is more likely to Gold caliber should not be drawn from a win against a higher ranked opponent.

While the upper end of the performance curve should indeed go up because your win means you might really be that good, it should indicate to the system that your not going to perform poorly. An upset win would incresse only the Upper-Sigma, while an upset loss would increase only the Lower-Sigma, on the flip-side an expected win decreases Lower-Sigma and and an Expected loss decreases Upper-Sigma, all of course scaled by the degree to which one is favored. In each case the system ONLY takes the logical inference of the result of a game and not an illogical 'mirror' inference on the other side of the curve.

I find it rather silly that such an obvious and easily fixed flaw in the system exists.
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
October 20 2010 00:21 GMT
#309
On October 20 2010 07:27 Impaler wrote:
While reading the article on Microsoft True Skill a thought occurs to me.

Sigma should be split into two separate Sigmas a high and a low. Currently the system MUST create a symmetrical bell curve around ones MMR which represents a total probability of expected performance. If you win against a higher ranked player the MMR goes up but so dose the single Sigma which causes the lower end 'tail' of your performance expectation to stagnate. Thus a players Performance curve just keeps getting 'smeared' upward and the system won't promote because of the high confidence threshold needed.

So for example Bob a Platinum with 2000 MMR plays against Jon a Diamond player with 2300 MMR. Jon is favored but Bob wins an upset victory. The systems single sigma means the system is forced to basically say "Oh I seem to have Bobs skill level wrong, he might actually be Diamond material or he could equally likely be Gold caliber." Now obviously any inference that Bob win means he is more likely to Gold caliber should not be drawn from a win against a higher ranked opponent.

While the upper end of the performance curve should indeed go up because your win means you might really be that good, it should indicate to the system that your not going to perform poorly. An upset win would incresse only the Upper-Sigma, while an upset loss would increase only the Lower-Sigma, on the flip-side an expected win decreases Lower-Sigma and and an Expected loss decreases Upper-Sigma, all of course scaled by the degree to which one is favored. In each case the system ONLY takes the logical inference of the result of a game and not an illogical 'mirror' inference on the other side of the curve.

I find it rather silly that such an obvious and easily fixed flaw in the system exists.


I don't think you have it right. Say Bob's curve range is 1500-2500 and he beats Jon who's at 2300 and it's an upset and sigma increases. Bob's new range doesn't become 1450-2550. It would move more toward the right because his MMR increased, so the new range would be more like 1525-2625.
Moderator
Impaler
Profile Joined September 2010
United States11 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-20 05:32:38
October 20 2010 05:22 GMT
#310
Yes I realize that MMR is increasing, that why I described the bell curve as 'smearing upwards'. While I'm sure the lower end of the curve would not move down because the increased MMR outweighs the increased sigma. It seems I overstated my case with the 'He might be Gold" bit, perhaps 'He might just be on a lucky streak" would be more accurate. But my central point is the low end of the spectrum could certainly be moving up too slowly if your consistently winning upsets.

Lets take your your example and construct a scenario to demonstrate my point, Bob's initial MMR is 2000 with sigma spread of 500 on each side. After the upset victory the MMR is increased to 2075 with a sigma spread of 550 on each side for the new 1525-2625 spread. The low end tail increased only 25 points. This seems reasonable for a single upset game but if the player continues being placed against opponents 300 MMR above them (cause the system is trying to bring your win percentage down like it should). Each win will add 75 points to Bobs MMR but add 50 to the sigma spread on each side resulting in the tail end of their expected range increasing by only 25 points and the upper end by 125 points.

After three such matches Bobs MMR would be 2225 but the spread would be a whopping 1625-2875, Now Bob has just beaten a 2300, 2375 and 2450 player in that order so the upper bound is not unreasonable, Bob might really be that good and until he starts to lose matches against high ranked players that upper bound should be very fuzzy. But the low end estimate is really quite absurd after that strong a performance, Bob has demonstrated play consistently above that level, if Bob was to choke on a few games and lose to a 2000 or lower player then that low end estimate is reasonable but not after repeated strong performance.

Imagine instead two separate sigma spreads, which are initially each 500 around the 2000 mean. As Bob wins upset victories the MMR moves in the same manor but only the upper sigma increases by 50 rather then both, Now the lower bound is moving up in sync with the MMR and the upper is moving up just as it was before. Now after the same matches the MMR is 2225 the lower sigma spread is still unchanged at 500 but the upper is elongated to 650 for a total spread of 1725-2875 which is a more reasonable spread given the matches that have taken place.

Another interesting side effect of this dual-sigma approach is an ability to actually capture a players likely-hood of choking. Normal True-Skill makes the in my opinion false assumption that an individuals has an equal probability of deviating above and below their average performance. In reality is is FAR more likely for performance in any skill to fall dramatically aka 'choke' then it is to proportionally over-perform. Take a runner for example who normally runs a mile in 5 minutes, it's far more likely that one day he has a bruised hamstring and dose it in 6 then it is for them to out of the blue run a 4 minute mile. And the higher the level of ones average performance the more easy it is to choke (the smallest error will do it) and the harder it is to over-perform (so many factors would have to be elevated and you may be near the maximum humanly possible performance). With a dual-sigma approach you would expect to see a larger low end sigma on nearly all high end players because of occasional chokes, players who consistently never choke will have this reflected in a narrower low-end sigma and this could significantly improve the accuracy of predictions made under this system.
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
October 20 2010 05:36 GMT
#311
Sigma will decrease instead if it is large enough. It doesn't just keep growing with each upset.

I mean, it's entirely possible that a two sigma system exists, and you make good points for how it could address the shortcomings of the TrueSkill system. However, a bell curve is more computationally efficient and is also accurate enough for the purposes of estimating skill. It doesn't seem as likely that player curves would have two peaks.
Moderator
Impaler
Profile Joined September 2010
United States11 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-20 06:36:22
October 20 2010 06:35 GMT
#312
I wasn't aware it would decrease, is the sigma simply constrained when it grows beyond a certain point or is it a natural byproduct of the system, I'd assumed if one upset increases sigma then more just keep doing the same but perhaps this is ware I'm wrong? True-Skill seems to indicate that a constant inflation of sigma is applied to all players which each game whittles down as their needs to be something preventing it from collapsing to Zero.

Also the distribution wouldn't be two peaked, it would be a skewed distribution.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skewness
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skew_normal_distribution

The math is way over my head so the best lay description I can give is that of two sigmas one above the average and one below. In reality it seems a skewed normal distribution uses a third factor to express the skew with 0 being the plain symmetrical Gaussian. In that case upset wins increases skew and upset losses decrease skew, while an expected win or loss dose not change skew (or at least changes it less). It would indeed make the math even more complex (perhaps unnecessarily) but I'm sure people though the same thing about expanding on ELO, I'll do some more searching to see if this idea has ever been explored (it would be hard to imagine that it hasn't been explored by Vegas bookies)
Mendelfist
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden356 Posts
October 23 2010 11:48 GMT
#313
On October 16 2010 02:08 Excalibur_Z wrote:
Yeah, that's what I've noticed too. However, there was one notable exception (so it's probably a bug). When I got promoted from Platinum to Diamond, my last game earned me +20 bonus points, but -40 was deducted from my bonus pool. I saw this in someone else's match history when being promoted to Diamond too, and it was the same phenomenon: earning 20 but deducting 40. Every other match history parse I've seen has kept the bonus pool total consistent. My guess is it's just a Diamond-promotion double-deduction bug.


Found another bug, and this time it was not after a promotion:

My points before match: 959. Spent bonus before match: 886
Points after match (loss): 978. Spent bonus after match: 902

The score screen and my match history says I lost 13 points, but my score increased 19 points. This makes no sense at first, but the difference is 32 points, and 16 points were deducted from the bonus pool. I suspect that the system thinks that I both won and lost the match at the same time. -13 for losing and 16 + 16 for winning. Curious. And annoying if you are trying to keep track of everything and make sense of it.

My match history is here:
http://www.lysator.liu.se/~john/history.html
Ownos
Profile Joined July 2010
United States2147 Posts
October 24 2010 05:40 GMT
#314
I saw you ask a question at the multiplayer panel, Excalbur!

Nice they confirm that this is all pretty close. Good job! They also mentioned something very important in that your ranking/points(?) is relative to the skill of your division. Not sure on the exact wording there.That point alone makes things 10000% more complicated? If it's comparing your performance vs the 99 others in your division.
...deeper and deeper into the bowels of El Diablo
Ryalnos
Profile Joined July 2010
United States1946 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-24 05:56:46
October 24 2010 05:56 GMT
#315
On October 15 2010 23:34 ashaman771 wrote:
Great OP. But at some point, which you learn after university, you have to be able to digest the information to present it to people in a clear way. Essentially, can you take the information you have and explain it to someone in high school.

Again, great OP, but I suspect it's from someone green in university.


I'm flabbergasted by this post. Has this guy 'been to university'? Clear presentation is not something you magically learn there. And what's the point of speculating on someone's level of higher education?

If I were to speculate myself, I might think that this is a high school kid who can't understand the really not too sophisticated math in the OP...



Anyway, well done OP, and congrats on that MVP status on the blizzard forums. It is a role for the brave and patient, I imagine.
conqueso
Profile Joined May 2010
United States22 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-24 06:05:15
October 24 2010 06:03 GMT
#316
Ive read most of this thread but didn't see my particular question: Is there a reason I win/lose in large streaks? Its incredibly odd, Ill lose 7-8 in a row then win the same amount, pretty consistently, its happened in about 4 cycles now.

My elo might be inflated because of a large bonus pool, I recently switched races. After the bonus pool i often come out ahead in visible rating, even though my record is quickly approaching 50/50.
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
October 24 2010 18:12 GMT
#317
So after the Multiplayer panel yesterday, we asked the Doc some more specific questions. There are some things that we're not sure about now. We now know that divisions are not equal which adds a great deal of confusion because sites like SC2Ranks are specifically designed to ignore division weighting. It seems like they've gone out of their way to put emphasis on your own division rather than your league ranking, which sort of has a side effect of screwing up global point rankings like SC2Ranks.

The other concept that he introduced was a moving average which has a similar function as sigma. Basically, if you were to track player skill game by game, it would have a ton of sharp peaks and deep valleys. Blizzard chooses to use a moving average to slowly gauge where you belong. Once your moving average crosses a certain threshold (some kind of confidence buffer), that's when you get promoted. This means that if you bomb your initial placement matches and go down into Bronze, then rapidly improve to Diamond level, it will take a long time for your moving average to cross into Diamond level and cement that level of confidence for a promotion. We believe that the moving average only covers your last X games (maybe 100 for example) otherwise players with 4000+ games played would never get out of their league.

I'll be making more corrections to the original post later on today or tomorrow.
Moderator
lololol
Profile Joined February 2006
5198 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-10-24 18:49:06
October 24 2010 18:41 GMT
#318
That the divisons are not equal has been known since early beta.
Copied from another thread on TL:
by Benzenn
18 Mar 2010, 19:43
Sorry I misunderstood what the OP was referring to. I didn't mean to imply that one division is ranked better than the other, but simply explaining the basics of divisions. As far as comparison across divisions it's certainly something we've considered but there are issues, such that the rankings in one division don't directly translate to the other divisions. So you couldn't compare division 10 to division 48 and compare one player's points to another.
I'll call Nada.
Happy Frog
Profile Joined May 2010
Australia490 Posts
October 24 2010 23:30 GMT
#319
On October 25 2010 03:12 Excalibur_Z wrote:
So after the Multiplayer panel yesterday, we asked the Doc some more specific questions. There are some things that we're not sure about now. We now know that divisions are not equal which adds a great deal of confusion because sites like SC2Ranks are specifically designed to ignore division weighting. It seems like they've gone out of their way to put emphasis on your own division rather than your league ranking, which sort of has a side effect of screwing up global point rankings like SC2Ranks.

The other concept that he introduced was a moving average which has a similar function as sigma. Basically, if you were to track player skill game by game, it would have a ton of sharp peaks and deep valleys. Blizzard chooses to use a moving average to slowly gauge where you belong. Once your moving average crosses a certain threshold (some kind of confidence buffer), that's when you get promoted. This means that if you bomb your initial placement matches and go down into Bronze, then rapidly improve to Diamond level, it will take a long time for your moving average to cross into Diamond level and cement that level of confidence for a promotion. We believe that the moving average only covers your last X games (maybe 100 for example) otherwise players with 4000+ games played would never get out of their league.

I'll be making more corrections to the original post later on today or tomorrow.



Thanks for all your work, and nice sleuth work at Blizzcon.

I had a question for you; I'm not sure if you saw the Day 1 SC panel but Greg Canessa stated that Bronze / Silver / Gold / Plat / Diamond were designed to be evenly distributed at 20% of the servers player base each, obviously this doesn't match up with data from Sc2ranks which looks more like top 7% in Diamond and bottom 50% in Bronze.

Any theories on this? A symptom of inactive players perhaps?
Excalibur_Z
Profile Joined October 2002
United States12235 Posts
October 25 2010 01:33 GMT
#320
On October 25 2010 03:41 lololol wrote:
That the divisons are not equal has been known since early beta.
Copied from another thread on TL:
Show nested quote +
by Benzenn
18 Mar 2010, 19:43
Sorry I misunderstood what the OP was referring to. I didn't mean to imply that one division is ranked better than the other, but simply explaining the basics of divisions. As far as comparison across divisions it's certainly something we've considered but there are issues, such that the rankings in one division don't directly translate to the other divisions. So you couldn't compare division 10 to division 48 and compare one player's points to another.


We figured that something changed because it didn't make sense (and still doesn't make sense) to set it up that way. Now that we have official confirmation of that it throws a wrench in sites like SC2Ranks. We sort of had a sinking feeling that was how it behaved but ugh... silly that it does.

He did mention that when he pulls the Top 200 lists for the week that they're purely by points, only without the division weighting.
Moderator
Prev 1 14 15 16 17 18 21 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 56m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft634
Nina 244
RuFF_SC2 113
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4527
Larva 522
Backho 138
sSak 109
Sexy 50
zelot 24
scan(afreeca) 19
League of Legends
JimRising 818
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor147
Other Games
tarik_tv10578
summit1g10129
ViBE235
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1422
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH192
• practicex 42
• Hupsaiya 40
• Light_VIP 11
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1187
Upcoming Events
FEL
3h 56m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
8h 56m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
12h 56m
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Online Event
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL 20 Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.