• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:19
CEST 06:19
KST 13:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation5$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced4Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles5[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
i aint gon lie to u bruh... ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 626 users

The inefficiency of DT tech in PvP - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 Next All
Bob300
Profile Joined April 2010
United States505 Posts
June 13 2010 03:11 GMT
#41
As for the OP - yes DTs are usually a crap choice and will fail against anything but a 4gate allin (which is rare on single entrance bases), and yes this is a problem as PVP is probably the most predictable/boring mu.


I'm pretty sure ZvZ is most predictable and boring MU.
PvP Dts cant be used observers go out so fast, and every toss player makes them.
NYC Suburbs --- College Freshman --- Season 1 - Drone Whiskey
0mar
Profile Joined February 2010
United States567 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-13 03:16:13
June 13 2010 03:15 GMT
#42
The Dark Shrine is the biggest joke in this game. It really should be removed because it's such a dead-end tech. You build it, you get one unit unlocked and that's it. It's also extremely vulnerable to being countered and leaves you with no options. At least if DTs came at the temp archives, you could transition into temps/archons (lol).

PvP is boring because it's balanced on a razor's edge, just like all the other matchups. Why isn't MMM viable in TvT or hydra/ling in ZvZ? It's for the same reason, the most optimal build will beat everything except that same optimal build done better.
Percutio
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1672 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-13 03:20:49
June 13 2010 03:17 GMT
#43
That is a pretty bad statement.

Stargate tech in PvP is very powerful in its own right and those players usually don't have detection.

Even then, robo players sometimes skip obs or only have 1 even late in the game. This makes DTs a really good midlate-late game harass or containment tool, especially considering their strength and speed.

The Dark Shrine by itself isn't very expensive, it is really the time that is substantial. Late game you should also have a twilight council anyways, so it really shouldn't be unnatural to get DTs later on in the game.

If you have been getting rolled by a robo timing attack, or simply killed by a Colossi army with 1 observer, then you are probably playing some kind of 1 base DT all-in.

The time and resource commitment to DTs is substantial in the early game and leaves you with no flexibility. Use them as if they aren't an all-in strategy and they really aren't bad units. By the late game their tech and time cost is insignificant compared to the map control they can give.
What does it matter how I loose it?
Alou
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States3748 Posts
June 13 2010 03:20 GMT
#44
On June 13 2010 11:58 Swede wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2010 11:49 Alou wrote:
On June 13 2010 11:29 Swede wrote:
Another thing I have a problem with: "(assuming that your dt rush was blocked)". Well, obviously Dark Templars will be inefficient if they are blocked. This is terrible reasoning. You may as well have said "Assuming that Dark Templars are inefficient, Dark Templars are inefficient".


He's saying if the DT's are blocked you have no transition to save the game. Not that if the DT's are blocked they are an inefficient unit.


But that's no different than rushing ANY other higher tier unit in the early game. If it doesn't pay for itself then you are massively behind because of the investment you made in that higher tier unit.

Like Nony said, the later in the game you go for Dark Templars (or x unit) the less risk there is if they are blocked because your economy has more wiggle room.


Of course you are behind if the rush fails, that's not the point. He is saying that when it fails, he has no transition, which is unlike other rush to fast tech builds, in which you have transitions to other units available.
Life is Good.
Percutio
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1672 Posts
June 13 2010 03:24 GMT
#45
That doesn't seem entirely true.

Void Rays, Dark Templar, Thors, and Mutas can all be rushed and used in order to win the game fast or at least get you a big advantage. If that fails then you will be behind.

However, these units can also be used without being all-in strategies. The problem is that most players go all in with DTs.
What does it matter how I loose it?
dignity
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada908 Posts
June 13 2010 03:26 GMT
#46
What I do not understand is why you are trying to force DTs to be used as a rushed unit. There are plenty of other ways to be using DTs and just because they were used in BW that way does not mean they should be used for the same identical purpose.

If you think about the tech needed to get to the dark shrine, you need the twilight council. Why not get the blink first and get stalkers, or get chargelots, and hide your dark shrine when you do get it? DTs can still give you an advantage, as you can just invest in one or two DTs and switch back to standard play. This would keep your opponents on their toes, and possibly get them to overcommit with cannons.
Swede
Profile Joined June 2010
New Zealand853 Posts
June 13 2010 03:35 GMT
#47

Of course you are behind if the rush fails, that's not the point. He is saying that when it fails, he has no transition, which is unlike other rush to fast tech builds, in which you have transitions to other units available.


That's not what he's saying. He's saying there is no WORKING transition, which is the same as any other early tech rush (when vsing a capable player).

The way to allow for a working transition is either by ensuring that your fast tech will do enough damage to buy you the time to switch (ie, don't try it unless you are 90% sure it will work), or by teching at a later stage when your economy has some wiggle room.

The OP has only outlined one aspect of the fundamental design of SC2. It's not something specific to Dark Templars.
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
June 13 2010 03:55 GMT
#48
One way I can think of to make DTs viable into the midgame if you opened with them is to somehow get a robo and observers of your own, plus 1 or 3 phoenix to kill enemy observers. At 3 shots to kill, and neither stalkers nor sentries take down phoenixes quickly, so I'd probably stick with one until I had my natural up and running, them add up to 3 phoenixes. That being said, it seems like that's too much tech at once, and the DT opening will die without fail to any 3 gate robo build, while every time I opened DTs it was an instant win against 4 gate and stargate builds.

Even somehow combining the Dark Shrine with the Templar Archives doesn't seem like it will make DTs any more viable. In Brood War, Goon/Reaver was good because it gave you observers if needed, the potential harassment with Shuttle/Reaver, and a stable army that could deal with any enemy unit composition well before a player teching straight to Templar could have more than a few Storms available. However, in the late game, Templar tech was superior to Reavers because storm outranged Reavers, Reavers were fairly immobile, and died in two storms.
Colossi, by contrast, take a whopping 5 storms to kill, outrange storm by 50%, don't run out of energy, can just amble out of storms, they're so big that one basically soaks a whole storm by itself if there's no units under it, the tech gives you options of immortals to help deal with mass stalker and observers to deal with DT. Like in BW, it's also faster to tech to. Furthermore, Colossi massacre Zealots, which a player teching to templar will have due to the mineral:gas cost ratio of Templar, and cost more minerals than gas themselves, giving the Colossi player a slightly healthier resource mix to spend on the rest of his/her army.
In conclusion, I'm not going to say that Templar tech of both sorts is useless in a PvP, but I don't think it will ever create an army that can stand toe to toe with a Colossus army on equal resources until there are a large number of templar on the field (enough to blanket the entire enemy army with storms, probably twice), so the only way to win is to keep the opponent in his/her base and take an economic lead with excellent harass, because until you get that many templar, they can just push out and kill you.
LaLuSh
Profile Blog Joined April 2003
Sweden2358 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-13 04:06:27
June 13 2010 04:03 GMT
#49
Robo units are just so strong that it'd be hard to make DTs viable without breaking the game or moving the matchup more towards a coin flip situation.

I don't think it's enough to just shorten the build time or make high templars build from the same building (what are you going to do, storm the colossi to death without actually having any units that can shoot at them?).

I don't think storm+canons can hold a 1base robo tech timing in a game like SC2 tbh. You'd need some sort of added functionality to the templar tech tree. Some mind control-ish spell, or some spell to stun and/or incapacitate the immortals/colossi. Even then it'd be really hard to balance.

I think tweaking the macro mechanics (weakening them), in conjunction with shortening or cheapening the building process for DTs might make it more viable. Micro battles early game would involve less units and turn out to be more interesting, and playing "safe" would actually mean you'd have to forgo some gateways to afford to build the robo in time.

As it is now, DTs are too expensive to tech to. It takes too long a time. You have to sacrifice too many gateways and units. And even if it partially works, trying to transition into a fast expansion is borderline suicidal because the strength of the macro mechanics enable people to sustain a ridiculous amount of gateways in conjunction with a robo really early in the game.

I doubt Blizzard is ready to make a fundamental change such as weakening the macro mechanics across all the races, but I think that at some point it will be evident that they need to in order to diversify strategies. Right now the macro mechanics have too great an impact on the metagame. Everyone expects at least 3 gates, if not 4 or 5 before an expansion. I can't really argue with that either, it's evidently the best and most optimal strategy.

What bothers me about the macro mechanics are that they literally bottleneck the midgame in almost every matchup. They create this bottleneck in the early midgame where you have to keep massing units at every cost. Where there is no other option than massing units like crazy. Where diverting from the norm more often than not punishes you.

I actually think that if they slowed down the early game and early mid game somewhat, SC2 would be a much more fun and fast paced (and more balanced) game in the mid and lategames. I'd especially think a lot more odd and technical strategies such as Warp Prism Colossus drops (and who knows what other strategies) would become viable.

As it is now, if you go for a cute tactic like warp prism colossus, more often than not you just get attack moved to death by a huge fucking mass of units.

dignity
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada908 Posts
June 13 2010 04:03 GMT
#50
I believe I should clarify my earlier post.

Just because a DT opening does not work does not warrant a change in the unit.
Percutio
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1672 Posts
June 13 2010 04:30 GMT
#51
LaLush you can still get DTs later on. They are expensive and time consuming, going for them quickly and sacrificing units and money to get them makes them really weak when getting robo is extremely popular.

Even if more people opened stargates it would still be a bad choice because it is so all in.

Maybe you should instead question whether high templar should be useful in PvP.

I personally don't think high templar need to be viable in PvP because in Broodwar PvP stargates went largely unused, but now they are pretty damn viable. That makes the number of options in PvP pretty similar to Broodwar.
What does it matter how I loose it?
Hikari
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
1914 Posts
June 13 2010 04:50 GMT
#52
Blink stalker + obs of your own do a good job sniping enemy observers, afterwards your enemy would be forced to retreat.

I wonder how viable it is to throw in some phoenixs afterwards to lift enemy immortals...
Mack
Profile Joined May 2010
United States25 Posts
June 13 2010 04:52 GMT
#53
On June 13 2010 13:03 dignity wrote:
Just because a DT opening does not work does not warrant a change in the unit.

I agree with this. The tech to DT is still a little shaky, but the unit still has its place. We're unfortunately not in BW anymore.

Infiltrator
Profile Joined February 2010
Montenegro80 Posts
June 13 2010 10:35 GMT
#54
On June 13 2010 12:24 Percutio wrote:
That doesn't seem entirely true.

Void Rays, Dark Templar, Thors, and Mutas can all be rushed and used in order to win the game fast or at least get you a big advantage. If that fails then you will be behind.

However, these units can also be used without being all-in strategies. The problem is that most players go all in with DTs.


This is the gist of it. Going DTs is a bigger resource and time investment than any of the other alternatives, and if they don't pay themselves out you are pretty much guaranteed to lose. The other options, even if not successful, do not put you in such a bad position, imo.
Infiltrator out.
Cheerio
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
Ukraine3178 Posts
June 13 2010 10:56 GMT
#55
Darks are invisible. 1 single dark can win you a game. The payoff of the all-in in case of success is huge. So are the costs in case of a failure. They are fine the way they are imo.
darmousseh
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States3437 Posts
June 13 2010 11:03 GMT
#56
In the beta I had some luck with mid-late game proxy dark templar. Basically hide the dt tech and when they attack warp in some dt at their main and wipe out probes while you force field main. Works well on maps with a small choke at your natural. You dont have to use pylons as warp prisms work just as well. Remember to keep them out of site as long as possible.
Developer for http://mtgfiddle.com
jtgizmo
Profile Joined April 2010
Congo161 Posts
June 13 2010 11:05 GMT
#57
TL DR - you need to watch more Tozars stream to see the power and enjoyment of DT's
http://www.livestream.com/tozar
nEAnS
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada161 Posts
June 13 2010 11:09 GMT
#58
I don't understand what your issue is with DTs are. You're basically saying that DTs should be more viable in pvp with 1base vs 1base and you're complaining about it? DTs are a harassing unit and are not necessarily a game ender just because you want it to be. That's like saying nukes should be more viable in TvT "JUST BECAUSE."

There's a right time to use every unit. DTs are fine even with the tech tree. Aside from having templar and dt's using two different buildings if you think about it, it takes the same amount of buildings to get DTs as it did in Starcraft 1.

People need to stop thinking about how they can win games using cheap gimmicky tricks because it won't work on a good player.
tarsier
Profile Joined May 2010
United Kingdom223 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-13 11:16:24
June 13 2010 11:14 GMT
#59
DT's are a reaaaaally fun unit.

there's nothing more satisfying than sneaking a few DT's in and then escaping before the observer arrives.

it definately rewards ingenius play and is one of the best harrass units in the game.
Arco
Profile Joined September 2009
United States2090 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-06-13 12:17:55
June 13 2010 12:10 GMT
#60
As an avid fan of the PvP MU in BW and all the great number of openings you could do, I was really disappointed with the PvP MU in SC2.

In BW, I enjoyed DT openings a lot. Not because the slim chance of "rock-paper-scissoring" your opponent, but because it allowed for a different tech path and playstyle. You could grab an expansion and get Storm/Zealot Legs, stop counter DTs with Cannons and get fast upgrades with the Forge you built for them.

What doesn't allow for this interesting play or build orders is the expenses of the Templar route in SC2. We all know this. This is why we see most everyone go for mass gates or robo builds. Stargate is even more appealing/useful than the Templar tech.

I'd like to propose an upgrade that allows the Templar Archives tech to also allow production of Dark Templar. It would be an upgrade called something like "Dark Commune" that costs 50minerals/50gas, and takes longer to upgrade than just going straight Dark Shrine (but roughly the same if chrono boosts are saced on the upgrade) Perhaps it could be a visual/name upgrade to the Templar Archives itself (with a cool name like Templar Tribunal),

The details of the upgrade/idea aren't really important. Hell, maybe just make it so you can convert one between the other. The point is finding a balanced way to allow you to get your DTs out around the same time as building a Dark Shrine, but you will afterwards be able to immediately research Storm and not have to commit a large amount of resources on a tech that should essentially be merged together on one building.

But why not merge it? Blizzard probably wants to keep around the cool building art and place to add Dark Archon or other unit upgrades in the next two expansions.

So why not find a fun, cool, balanced and lore following alternative that spices up Protoss a bit more, and allows for more interesting play, particularly in PvP mirror matchups?

Edit: Also, maybe make Psi Storm more useful in PvP. I haven't checked it out too much, but it seems probably terrible considering Immortals shield works against it? They should just change that, its not going to hurt Immortals in any other MU anyways.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Monday
00:00
#39
PiGStarcraft474
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft480
WinterStarcraft406
Nina 196
RuFF_SC2 118
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 186
Sharp 53
Icarus 12
Dota 2
monkeys_forever696
League of Legends
JimRising 854
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox490
Other Games
summit1g6606
shahzam907
ViBE247
Maynarde167
CosmosSc2 22
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick44336
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH308
• Hupsaiya 62
• practicex 21
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1930
• masondota2429
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
5h 41m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
11h 41m
WardiTV European League
11h 41m
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
19h 41m
RSL Revival
1d 5h
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 19h
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
2 days
OSC
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
FEL
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.