EPTjk
Blizzard: "No plans for chatrooms, crossrealm play" - Page…
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Camila_br
Brazil529 Posts
jk | ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
On May 29 2010 10:36 TroopeR.ita wrote: we gave 1 star on amazon ok... but if we buy the game who cares about amazon ratings!? Blizzard. Sure there will be a lot of players buying it initially, but if the game get really bad ratings that limits the influx of new players that don't have much attachment to SC1 and therefore are much more influential to reviews and ratings. | ||
|
InFi.asc
Germany518 Posts
On May 29 2010 10:29 Islandsnake wrote: YES I WANT CHAT ROOMS LOL Holy crap I can't believe this But ... ![[image loading]](http://i45.tinypic.com/6z9729.jpg ) | ||
|
HazMat
United States17077 Posts
On May 29 2010 10:43 Archerofaiur wrote: The ratings matter a huge amount to the large number of on the fence buyers. So we have to buy the game to rate it? I'd rather just not buy the game. | ||
|
e4e5nf3
Canada599 Posts
| ||
|
meegrean
Thailand7699 Posts
| ||
|
Alphaes
United States651 Posts
On May 29 2010 10:26 Archerofaiur wrote: Ladies and Gentlement. I know have 1000 people willing to give SC2 a 1 star rating on Amazon.com in protest of BNET 0.2. Are you listening yet Frank Pearce? While this is a commendable effort, it's kind of indirect passive aggression. Isn't there some more active way to show our dislike of the direction Blizzard is taking the game? | ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
On May 29 2010 10:49 Alphaes wrote: While this is a commendable effort, it's kind of indirect passive aggression. Isn't there some more active way to show our dislike of the direction Blizzard is taking the game? This is a proven method. As stated before this approach got EA to change Spore's DRM with only 700 bad reviews. Imagine what we could do with 1000. Lowering the rating hurts the bottom line. And trust me companies care about that bottom line. So register in that poll people. Would you be willing to push a button to show blizzard your dissatisfaction? | ||
|
ocho
United States172 Posts
On May 29 2010 10:49 Alphaes wrote: While this is a commendable effort, it's kind of indirect passive aggression. Isn't there some more active way to show our dislike of the direction Blizzard is taking the game? what you're suggesting sounds highly illegal | ||
|
despite
Bulgaria105 Posts
| ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
We dont need to do anything illegal. Rating a game is not (to my knowledge) illegal. But it would be something Blizzard would care about especially once it started generating bad press. Hit them where it hurts ![[image loading]](http://weblogs.cltv.com/news/local/chicago/Money%20stacks.jpg) | ||
|
ocho
United States172 Posts
On May 29 2010 10:52 Archerofaiur wrote: We dont need to do anything illegal. Rating a game is not (to my knowledge) illegal. But it would be something Blizzard would care about especially once it started generating bad press. i completely agree, i was talking about alphaes saying "Isn't there some more active way to show our dislike of the direction Blizzard is taking the game?" sounded like a suggestion to me but maybe it was just an innocent question and i took it the wrong way | ||
|
Archerofaiur
United States4101 Posts
On May 29 2010 10:54 ocho wrote: i completely agree, i was talking about alphaes saying "Isn't there some more active way to show our dislike of the direction Blizzard is taking the game?" sounded like a suggestion to me but maybe it was just an innocent question and i took it the wrong way No i got that. I was replying to his post to but quoting you. | ||
|
Synwave
United States2803 Posts
Bnet2.0 is the largest step backwards that I have seen any company of this size make. Im sure they will fix it rapidly when they realize what a failed cluster fuck it is upon release but I for one vote with my dollar. I emailed them explaining the missing features, the invasive policies (I have to opt out to NOT have my shit shared?!) and the complete lack of e-sports support by forcing people to buy multiple copies just to play their friends in different areas. When they correct that stuff I will immediately go grab a copy, until they do they wont get my money. | ||
|
Diaspora
United States140 Posts
| ||
|
numberThirtyOne
United States294 Posts
On May 29 2010 10:47 HazMat wrote: So we have to buy the game to rate it? I'd rather just not buy the game. No, you don't. I've reviewed products on Amazon that I bought elsewhere before. | ||
|
Razii
United States88 Posts
On May 29 2010 10:48 meegrean wrote: Seriously, why no chatrooms? I don't see a logical reason. Because, you don't really want it...do you? | ||
|
LooseMoose
United States184 Posts
Lol. Just hasn't gotten old yet. Seriously though.. their argument against chat rooms is that they're used for spamming and such, right? But if you can only have one account per CD-key wouldn't reporting such spammers minimize spamming? =/ I don't see any logical reason to leave chat rooms out at release. | ||
|
mkfk1
United Kingdom153 Posts
Why should I buy SC2? Being an international student, most of my friends, and ALL of my sc clan are in another continent... I am pirating SC2 blizzard. I am not paying for a game with this type BS feature... God | ||
|
despite
Bulgaria105 Posts
| ||
| ||
