• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:56
CEST 03:56
KST 10:56
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed13Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll4Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed Who will win EWC 2025? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL ASL20 Preliminary Maps BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Starcraft in widescreen
Tourneys
Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Segway man no more. Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 712 users

Don't Focus on Metagame

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All
NonY
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
8748 Posts
April 15 2010 19:00 GMT
#1
Let's get a proper explanation of what metagame is on the table, courtesy of Liquipedia:

The term metagame literally means 'beyond the game' and refers to any planning, preparation, or maneuvering that a player does outside of actual gameplay to gain an advantage. The metagame has three major branches, which contain some overlap:
Preparation done before a match to exploit current trends in Starcraft.
Preparation done specifically to exploit an opponent's or map's style of play.
Strategic decisions designed specifically to exploit a player's reaction or weakened mental state in the future. These are also known as 'mind games' or 'psychological warfare'.


An example of preparation done before a match to exploit current trends in StarCraft:
You are playing ladder. Nearly every Terran is doing an SCV/Marine rush. Rushing to defensive Cannons counters it. Blindly making Cannons against any other Terran build is horrible. Metagame justifies making Cannons without having scouted the SCV/Marine rush.

An example of preparation done specifically to exploit an opponent's or map's style of play:
You have a scheduled match against a specific person. You gather replays of that person. There is a point in your standard strategy where you lack scouting, so you have a choice of doing A, B, or C, where A counters one possibility, B counters another, and C does decently against either. The replays show you that your opponent almost always does the thing that A counters. Metagame justifies choosing A.

An example of strategic decisions designed specifically to exploit a player's reaction or weakened mental state in the future:
You have a scheduled best of 5 match against a specific person. Your worst map is scheduled to be used in game 5, which happens to be your opponent's best map. You cannot come up with a plan for winning game 5. In order to give yourself a chance, you decide to manipulate the metagame. You do the same build in games 1-4, hoping that by game 5 your opponent is justifying his decisions based on metagame and not based on what he's actually scouting in the game, which would give you the opportunity to counter his blind decision with your own blind decision. This might be accomplished by playing very passively in games 1-4 so that your opponent becomes comfortable investing more in econ/tech than in defense. In game 5, you appear to be playing the same way, but you are actually going to be extremely aggressive, which would only work if you've successfully manipulated your opponent's metagame. If your opponent is solid as a rock, not budging his prepared build an inch, then he is immune to these metagame mind games.

---

I hope that, by reading the definition and examples, you guys get an idea of why metagame is a relatively unimportant, and even harmful, aspect of SC2 right now. It inhibits the development of strategy. The development of metagame doesn't exist. Yeah, its variables might change. But the way you use it is pretty damn straightforward and hasn't gotten any more advanced than it was on day one. It is nothing more than statistically-glorified blind countering. It leads to rock-paper-scissors dynamics because it involves purposely doing something that is extra strong against one strategy and extra weak against another.

So I'm asking people to forget about metagame. Every game you play, base every decision and action you make on things you see in that particular game. Create logical and solid strategies that work against anything. If you are having trouble against a particular strategy, do not purposely weaken your build against other strategies in an attempt to counter that particular troubling strategy. Figure out a way to keep yourself in good shape against everything. That is how you will become good. Yes, your precious win rate will drop in the short term. But are you playing SC2 to be a name on a ladder with pretty numbers next to it or are you playing to be the best damn SC2 player you can be?

If everyone would forget about metagame for a while, better strategies would develop. Are you tired of all-in builds working too well? Tired of people refusing to expand? Tired of rock-paper-scissors dynamics? Do your part by making an effort at creating a decent strategy. Forget about metagame.
"Fucking up is part of it. If you can't fail, you have to always win. And I don't think you can always win." Elliott Smith ---------- Yet no sudden rage darkened his face, and his eyes were calm as they studied her. Then he smiled. 'Witness.'
yarkO
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
Canada810 Posts
April 15 2010 19:09 GMT
#2
I have a feeling someone took Chill's sig out for dinner last night...

Great post though.
When you are prepared, there's no such thing as pressure.
Leoj
Profile Joined January 2010
United States396 Posts
April 15 2010 19:09 GMT
#3
Strongly agree, would love to see more creativity in general.
Terrakin
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States1440 Posts
April 15 2010 19:10 GMT
#4
so thats what metagame ment..

already forgot it...
Fame was like a drug. But what was even more like a drug were the drugs.
Zoltan
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States656 Posts
April 15 2010 19:12 GMT
#5
THANKS! Lets get creative up in 'ere!

This is really, really good advice and should be heeded by teh masses.
'HOW LONG HAVE THOSE REAPERS BEEN KILLING MY PROBES?!?!
Tropics
Profile Joined August 2007
United Kingdom1132 Posts
April 15 2010 19:13 GMT
#6
This is a good post but I think the main problem about this is the fact that people run off all sorts of different definitions for the word metagame. There's what your posting about here and a lot of people use metagame as the current optimal style of play - i.e it is the development of strategy. It is the current trends, not just a way to counter them TL is really the only place I've seen metagame used this way, hopefully this clears up a lot of confusion anyway. I think a lot of people do think like this already, they're just using different terminology.

Everything you posted is true though, disregarding what I said. (those things are just labels anyway, doesnt make the point any less clear)

metagame is a stupid buzzword these days anyway, people use it to death and think they're cool for talking about the "metagame", makes them sound like they know what they're talking about.
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25980 Posts
April 15 2010 19:15 GMT
#7
People are stupid.
Moderator
Azarkon
Profile Joined January 2010
United States21060 Posts
April 15 2010 19:17 GMT
#8
Nony is just saying this cause he keeps losing to all-ins

J/k. It's more like the opposite from what I've seen. A lot of ladder players are playing with the intention of exploiting a particular trend and this results in so many holes that it raises a dilemma: do you specifically play the counter-exploit to win, or do you try to get better by playing straight up? If you do the former, you'll win more, but if you do the latter, the overall game will improve. I think that might be the issue that prompted Nony to do this post.
NonY
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
8748 Posts
April 15 2010 19:19 GMT
#9
On April 16 2010 04:13 Tropics wrote:
This is a good post but I think the main problem about this is the fact that people run off all sorts of different definitions for the word metagame. There's what your posting about here and a lot of people use metagame as the current optimal style of play - i.e it is the development of strategy. It is the current trends, not just a way to counter them TL is really the only place I've seen metagame used this way, hopefully this clears up a lot of confusion anyway. I think a lot of people do think like this already, they're just using different terminology.

Everything you posted is true though, disregarding what I said. (those things are just labels anyway, doesnt make the point any less clear)

metagame is a stupid buzzword these days anyway, people use it to death and think they're cool for talking about the "metagame", makes them sound like they know what they're talking about.

Yeah, this is a built-in purpose of my post. The way I use metagame is the way people ought to use it.
"Fucking up is part of it. If you can't fail, you have to always win. And I don't think you can always win." Elliott Smith ---------- Yet no sudden rage darkened his face, and his eyes were calm as they studied her. Then he smiled. 'Witness.'
ZenDeX
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
Philippines2916 Posts
April 15 2010 19:20 GMT
#10
On April 16 2010 04:13 Tropics wrote:
This is a good post but I think the main problem about this is the fact that people run off all sorts of different definitions for the word metagame. There's what your posting about here and a lot of people use metagame as the current optimal style of play - i.e it is the development of strategy. It is the current trends, not just a way to counter them TL is really the only place I've seen metagame used this way, hopefully this clears up a lot of confusion anyway. I think a lot of people do think like this already, they're just using different terminology.

Everything you posted is true though, disregarding what I said. (those things are just labels anyway, doesnt make the point any less clear)

metagame is a stupid buzzword these days anyway, people use it to death and think they're cool for talking about the "metagame", makes them sound like they know what they're talking about.

I have a roommate that knows the true meaning of metagame. I was surprised when he said "Got you with my metagame didn't I?" My scanner sweep drove me nuts each time I scan his base. He did a fake Muta to fake Lurker to fake Hydra to Guardian-Scourge.
StayFrosty
Profile Joined February 2010
Canada743 Posts
April 15 2010 19:25 GMT
#11
Great post, thanks nony
Clearout
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Norway1060 Posts
April 15 2010 19:27 GMT
#12
Well written post Nony
really?
junemermaid
Profile Joined September 2006
United States981 Posts
April 15 2010 19:29 GMT
#13
On April 16 2010 04:20 lolaloc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 16 2010 04:13 Tropics wrote:
This is a good post but I think the main problem about this is the fact that people run off all sorts of different definitions for the word metagame. There's what your posting about here and a lot of people use metagame as the current optimal style of play - i.e it is the development of strategy. It is the current trends, not just a way to counter them TL is really the only place I've seen metagame used this way, hopefully this clears up a lot of confusion anyway. I think a lot of people do think like this already, they're just using different terminology.

Everything you posted is true though, disregarding what I said. (those things are just labels anyway, doesnt make the point any less clear)

metagame is a stupid buzzword these days anyway, people use it to death and think they're cool for talking about the "metagame", makes them sound like they know what they're talking about.

I have a roommate that knows the true meaning of metagame. I was surprised when he said "Got you with my metagame didn't I?" My scanner sweep drove me nuts each time I scan his base. He did a fake Muta to fake Lurker to fake Hydra to Guardian-Scourge.


In the interim between your first scan and his first guardian did he get any REAL units?

On topic: great post, I actually wanted to start doing this, but needed motivation.
the UMP says YER OUT
avilo
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States4100 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-15 19:36:28
April 15 2010 19:32 GMT
#14
good post, but metagame is actually just the theoretically best possible way to play the game at a specific point in time.

most of the stuff you mention is exactly what you mention. Preparation is...preparation, studying the game is...studying the game, reading the opponent, is reading the opponent.

when most people say metagame they are describing the best possible way to play the game with current trends at the time. It's just one instance of the game state that is the "best way to play."

although, most of what you describe is how the metagame develops - by doing exactly what you said, preparing for games, preparing for specific opponents, and using all of that knowledge to your advantage.

edit: i agree though, you make a very good point that people focus on it too much to the point of their own detriment. people "assume" something is the strongest thing to do, when they themselves have not tried anything or researched on their own.

so some idiots will 100% always try to go marauder FE tvp if they think it's the "metagame" or best thing to do. so basically...listen to nony lmao and don't fucking do things cause people on the forums and elsewhere perceive it to be the best thing to do.

edit:
On April 16 2010 04:13 Tropics wrote:
This is a good post but I think the main problem about this is the fact that people run off all sorts of different definitions for the word metagame. There's what your posting about here and a lot of people use metagame as the current optimal style of play - i.e it is the development of strategy. It is the current trends, not just a way to counter them TL is really the only place I've seen metagame used this way, hopefully this clears up a lot of confusion anyway. I think a lot of people do think like this already, they're just using different terminology.

Everything you posted is true though, disregarding what I said. (those things are just labels anyway, doesnt make the point any less clear)

metagame is a stupid buzzword these days anyway, people use it to death and think they're cool for talking about the "metagame", makes them sound like they know what they're talking about.


yes, most people usually use that definition of metagame, or a variation of it. pretty much disagree with liquipedia's.
Sup
NarutO
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
Germany18839 Posts
April 15 2010 19:40 GMT
#15
Using metagame strategies and trying mindgames doesn't really work out in ladder situations. Also the game is pretty new and undeveloped so its even worse to base decisions on metagame and mindgames.

Really good post by Nony. I completely agree.
CommentatorPolt | MMA | Jjakji | BoxeR | NaDa | MVP | MKP ... truly inspiring.
Talic_Zealot
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
688 Posts
April 15 2010 19:41 GMT
#16
Wonderful post.. The last point you made is exactly the reason why i dislike the 'omg totally imba' tendency since the start of the beta. One can say that something is slightly imbalanced in some way only if one has played and experienced a ton of games using the particular unit. People loose to something 2 times and go imba and the next day go imba to the thing that stopped the previous imba :D..
There are three types of people in the universe: those who can count, and those who cant.
AcrossFiveJulys
Profile Blog Joined September 2005
United States3612 Posts
April 15 2010 19:46 GMT
#17
Very good post. Just wondering, what inspired you to write this? Have you been coming up against a lot of players going for all-in/semi-blind strategies?
JohannesH
Profile Joined September 2009
Finland1364 Posts
April 15 2010 19:47 GMT
#18
On April 16 2010 04:32 avilo wrote:
good post, but metagame is actually just the theoretically best possible way to play the game at a specific point in time.

No actually it is not. Give me any credible source that says metagame means that.
Metagame = using out of game information to affect how you play.
If you have to ask, you don't know.
yomi
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
United States773 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-04-15 19:51:09
April 15 2010 19:48 GMT
#19
I don't agree, the game is best tested in as realistic an environment as possible. There can be very subtle imbalances and design flaws that only appear when the game is pushed to its limit.

If Race 1 has:
Build A with an expected utility value of 10
Build B " " 3
Build C " " 3

Is it not rational and part of the development of strategy to develop a build that has a 75% chance to win vs Build A but at the cost of only 20% chance to win vs build B and C? Numbers are not exact but you know what I mean. Part of a certain race's advantage (Zerg) is their ability to manipulate meta game. To have multiple strategies they can branch into very rapidly if left alone for only a couple of minutes. To build as though you have no idea about their actual probability of executing either strat (they are most likely to do build A, the overall strongest build) prevents us from seeing the real balance of the game. Can Zerg win consistently if players are blindly building against their strong build, and gambling against the weaker one? Is Zerg's power to branch to any one of 3-4 army compositions within a couple of minutes overpowered? If we play with a mental block in our heads we will not discover the answers to these questions.

As far as player-specific meta game considerations I suppose this argument is more reasonable than arguing against "current trends". What constitutes a current trend? How do we know if this build is trendy, standard, or overpowered? What if the SCV rush could only be stopped by one possible Protoss build that must be executed blindly, but if Protoss does not lose to this one build he will always win? This imbalance would not be discovered and instead we would believe Protoss to be underpowered as they are refusing to play with knowledge that they do actually have.

Even exploiting player specific tendencies I believe to be a very legitimate strategy that must be explored. Does a Protoss player that is known as a macro player have a stark disadvantage in a BO5 tournament setting? Does it not matter the style the Terran is known for, as there is little way to exploit this known information? This is part of the balance as well. Players cannot always choose their style and it can become an issue in tournament play if a certain style plays very well in ladder against an unknown opponent, but cannot win in a tournament against an expert player that has some vague idea of what is coming.

We find the most balance information about the game if everyone is most of the time trying to win every game they play by any means necessary.

The6357
Profile Blog Joined August 2005
United States1268 Posts
April 15 2010 19:50 GMT
#20
welll...i wouldn't mind name on the top of the plat league with big numbers...
good post regardless...this motivates me to use different units in the game and try different races...
2010 worldcup!! corea fighting!!!
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 4m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Livibee 245
RuFF_SC2 132
Nina 107
Ketroc 28
StarCraft: Brood War
Aegong 118
Icarus 5
ajuk12(nOOB) 3
LuMiX 3
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1062
NeuroSwarm128
Counter-Strike
taco 341
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King74
AZ_Axe54
Other Games
summit1g14846
shahzam1441
Day[9].tv829
hungrybox727
JimRising 463
C9.Mang0263
ViBE193
Maynarde147
Trikslyr81
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2099
BasetradeTV39
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 118
• davetesta51
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki44
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4154
• Rush782
Other Games
• Scarra1392
• Day9tv829
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
8h 4m
OSC
11h 4m
WardiTV European League
14h 4m
Fjant vs Babymarine
Mixu vs HiGhDrA
Gerald vs ArT
goblin vs MaNa
Jumy vs YoungYakov
Replay Cast
22h 4m
Epic.LAN
1d 10h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
Epic.LAN
2 days
CSO Contender
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Esports World Cup
5 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

JPL Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.