• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:44
CEST 01:44
KST 08:44
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash8[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy16ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion Gypsy to Korea How Can I Add Timer & APM Count? A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group F [ASL21] Ro24 Group E Azhi's Colosseum - Foreign KCM Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7833 users

Patch 7 Notes - Page 25

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 23 24 25 26 27 32 Next All
hellitsaboutme
Profile Joined March 2010
Singapore118 Posts
March 31 2010 03:58 GMT
#481
It's kinda ridiculous -_- I guess we are going to see 150 limit of maradeurs in TvP. Recent games from Morrow and Demu were so boring, just spamming maraduers whole game. Like some noobs, no offense.

But I think thats because maradeurs are way more cost effective compared to other terran units. Blizzard should've think of that. I've tried new psi storm, it literally sucks. Terran just stims and ran away barely damaged. That skill supposed to counter multiple cheap small units so that opponet didn't mass them. It would force terran to use high level units
Two_DoWn
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States13684 Posts
March 31 2010 03:59 GMT
#482
On March 31 2010 12:40 StorrZerg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 12:28 -orb- wrote:
i give up

I don't understand what Blizzard could have possibly been thinking.


same :/

new patch hurry up

With all of their switching of bonus damage to base damage I think they are trying to soften some of the hard counters. Not sure about storm thou.
"What is the air speed velocity of an unladen courier?" "Dire or Radiant?"
Captain Peabody
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3128 Posts
March 31 2010 04:06 GMT
#483
It's a Beta. Blizzard is going to make changes that are questionable, changes that are highly experimental, and changes that end up being dead wrong. Then, they look at the information and feedback from us, the players, and they will tweak the changes, alter them, or take them back completely, based on how things work out in practice. This is the reason they have a Beta in the first place; to test the game, the balance, and see what works and doesn't.

Blizzard has so far shown a remarkable ability to respond to feedback and trends fairly quickly. Rest assured, if Protoss is losing too much after this patch, then they will buff Protoss; if HTs aren't used enough, then they will buff HTs; if Roaches aren't used enough, then they will buff Roaches.

If anyone can't handle this, then they really shouldn't be in the Beta in the first place.
Dies Irae venit. youtube.com/SnobbinsFilms
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
March 31 2010 04:07 GMT
#484
On March 31 2010 12:54 danl9rm wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 12:20 FabledIntegral wrote:
I miss speedlots being so good, I do agree with the general feeling that SC2 has become more of a ranged vs ranged game.


dude, speedlots are good!
they absolutely force terran to get either hellions(and ruin their perfect little mmm force) or more marines(and the more marines terran has, the more vulnerable to coloxen©/storm)


There are no speedlots....
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
March 31 2010 04:07 GMT
#485
On March 31 2010 13:07 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 12:54 danl9rm wrote:
On March 31 2010 12:20 FabledIntegral wrote:
I miss speedlots being so good, I do agree with the general feeling that SC2 has become more of a ranged vs ranged game.


dude, speedlots are good!
they absolutely force terran to get either hellions(and ruin their perfect little mmm force) or more marines(and the more marines terran has, the more vulnerable to coloxen©/storm)


There are no speedlots....

chargelots sound stupid
TFlame
Profile Joined March 2010
United States25 Posts
March 31 2010 04:10 GMT
#486
buff banshee's, the strongest thing against toss (which can CLOAK) who have shit AA, and nerf storm to shit, the only thing that keeps toss in the game. Ridiculous patch.
You yarg and you blarg and you end up with shyarg.
Ryuu314
Profile Joined October 2009
United States12679 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-31 04:11:30
March 31 2010 04:11 GMT
#487
I really dont' get the HT storm nerf. It's already been downsized since SCBW and now an AoE nerf? Storm wasn't imbalanced before anyways because moving out of it was already quite easy. The only people who would get completely roflstomped by it were noobs who just sat and took the entire duration of storm. -.-

the buff to static defense was much needed tho.
Captain Peabody
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3128 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-31 04:11:58
March 31 2010 04:11 GMT
#488
Also, I wouldn't be surprised if, now that Storm and Roaches have both been nerfed, we see a Marauder nerf in the near future. With storm and Roaches in their pre-patch state, nerfing Marauders significantly would probably involve almost completely crippling Terran bio. Now, however, after the requisite information is in, Blizzard will feel much more "free" to deliver whatever nerfs are needed for Terran, without having to worry about catastrophic balance losses.
Dies Irae venit. youtube.com/SnobbinsFilms
LunarC
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States1186 Posts
March 31 2010 04:12 GMT
#489
Psionic storm hasn't even been all that overpowered in games that I've observed and now it receives a nerf :[

At least increase the total damage to compensate for area reduction.

Also if structures were not classified as "armored" they would be more durable. Seems like buildings are way too fragile from the way armies can simply run into expansions and snipe the cc/hatchery/nexus before running back out.
REEBUH!!!
Chairman Ray
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States11903 Posts
March 31 2010 04:14 GMT
#490
Ok, nerfing storms is the worst thing that they can do. Saying psi storms are overpowered when people deliberately ball up their units is like saying mutas are overpowered when you build nothing but zealots. During a battle when all the units are in a big firing line, storms hits like 4 guys. Now that there are high HP units such as roaches and marauders, I don't see what's the problem in 20 dps for 4 seconds on 4 measly units at the cost of a whopping 150 gas. Let's look at sc1. Storms do 114 damage at a larger radius, and the average unit has less HP. Storms are fair because in competitive play, people don't clump up all their units, or at least try not to. The same thing applies in sc2.

My suggestion is to keep storm the same, but make the animation smaller. Right now, the storming animation covers a much larger area than it damages and I think that's why people think it's so good. With a smaller area, people don't need to pull back their entire army, they just pull back 4 units. Problem solved.
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
March 31 2010 04:17 GMT
#491
So this stops the fast expand 6-7 rax marauder build TvP how.....?
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Chairman Ray
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States11903 Posts
March 31 2010 04:20 GMT
#492
On March 31 2010 13:17 Plexa wrote:
So this stops the fast expand 6-7 rax marauder build TvP how.....?


Now marauders need one extra hit to take down photon cannons!

YAAAAARRRRRRR
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
March 31 2010 04:22 GMT
#493
On March 31 2010 13:14 Chairman Ray wrote:
Ok, nerfing storms is the worst thing that they can do. Saying psi storms are overpowered when people deliberately ball up their units is like saying mutas are overpowered when you build nothing but zealots. During a battle when all the units are in a big firing line, storms hits like 4 guys. Now that there are high HP units such as roaches and marauders, I don't see what's the problem in 20 dps for 4 seconds on 4 measly units at the cost of a whopping 150 gas. Let's look at sc1. Storms do 114 damage at a larger radius, and the average unit has less HP. Storms are fair because in competitive play, people don't clump up all their units, or at least try not to. The same thing applies in sc2.

My suggestion is to keep storm the same, but make the animation smaller. Right now, the storming animation covers a much larger area than it damages and I think that's why people think it's so good. With a smaller area, people don't need to pull back their entire army, they just pull back 4 units. Problem solved.


Please enlighten me on how to not clump all the units? The collision size is so much smaller amongst units accompanied by the fact that most units used are ranged in SC2. Hydras could dodge storm much easier in SC1 and were much cheaper.

It's nigh impossible not to attack in a ball, they almost automatically do it, even if you just tell them to run to the enemy.
LunarC
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States1186 Posts
March 31 2010 04:31 GMT
#494
On March 31 2010 13:22 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 13:14 Chairman Ray wrote:
Ok, nerfing storms is the worst thing that they can do. Saying psi storms are overpowered when people deliberately ball up their units is like saying mutas are overpowered when you build nothing but zealots. During a battle when all the units are in a big firing line, storms hits like 4 guys. Now that there are high HP units such as roaches and marauders, I don't see what's the problem in 20 dps for 4 seconds on 4 measly units at the cost of a whopping 150 gas. Let's look at sc1. Storms do 114 damage at a larger radius, and the average unit has less HP. Storms are fair because in competitive play, people don't clump up all their units, or at least try not to. The same thing applies in sc2.

My suggestion is to keep storm the same, but make the animation smaller. Right now, the storming animation covers a much larger area than it damages and I think that's why people think it's so good. With a smaller area, people don't need to pull back their entire army, they just pull back 4 units. Problem solved.


Please enlighten me on how to not clump all the units? The collision size is so much smaller amongst units accompanied by the fact that most units used are ranged in SC2. Hydras could dodge storm much easier in SC1 and were much cheaper.

It's nigh impossible not to attack in a ball, they almost automatically do it, even if you just tell them to run to the enemy.

It's not collision size it's better pathing. SC1 units could potentially clump like SC2 units do, they just don't because the pathing AI makes them scatter or pause a bit. Also the magic box probably had something to do with it.

Blizzard really needs to implement some sort of hold-formation+move command and, on a completely unrelated note, bring back F2-F4 screen position hotkeys.
REEBUH!!!
agorist
Profile Joined July 2009
United States115 Posts
March 31 2010 04:32 GMT
#495
They're obviously balancing the game for copper players.
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
March 31 2010 04:38 GMT
#496
On March 31 2010 13:31 LunarC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 13:22 FabledIntegral wrote:
On March 31 2010 13:14 Chairman Ray wrote:
Ok, nerfing storms is the worst thing that they can do. Saying psi storms are overpowered when people deliberately ball up their units is like saying mutas are overpowered when you build nothing but zealots. During a battle when all the units are in a big firing line, storms hits like 4 guys. Now that there are high HP units such as roaches and marauders, I don't see what's the problem in 20 dps for 4 seconds on 4 measly units at the cost of a whopping 150 gas. Let's look at sc1. Storms do 114 damage at a larger radius, and the average unit has less HP. Storms are fair because in competitive play, people don't clump up all their units, or at least try not to. The same thing applies in sc2.

My suggestion is to keep storm the same, but make the animation smaller. Right now, the storming animation covers a much larger area than it damages and I think that's why people think it's so good. With a smaller area, people don't need to pull back their entire army, they just pull back 4 units. Problem solved.


Please enlighten me on how to not clump all the units? The collision size is so much smaller amongst units accompanied by the fact that most units used are ranged in SC2. Hydras could dodge storm much easier in SC1 and were much cheaper.

It's nigh impossible not to attack in a ball, they almost automatically do it, even if you just tell them to run to the enemy.

It's not collision size it's better pathing. SC1 units could potentially clump like SC2 units do, they just don't because the pathing AI makes them scatter or pause a bit. Also the magic box probably had something to do with it.

Blizzard really needs to implement some sort of hold-formation+move command and, on a completely unrelated note, bring back F2-F4 screen position hotkeys.


Units definitely couldn't clump as close in SC1.
Spawkuring
Profile Joined July 2008
United States755 Posts
March 31 2010 04:40 GMT
#497
On March 31 2010 13:38 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 13:31 LunarC wrote:
On March 31 2010 13:22 FabledIntegral wrote:
On March 31 2010 13:14 Chairman Ray wrote:
Ok, nerfing storms is the worst thing that they can do. Saying psi storms are overpowered when people deliberately ball up their units is like saying mutas are overpowered when you build nothing but zealots. During a battle when all the units are in a big firing line, storms hits like 4 guys. Now that there are high HP units such as roaches and marauders, I don't see what's the problem in 20 dps for 4 seconds on 4 measly units at the cost of a whopping 150 gas. Let's look at sc1. Storms do 114 damage at a larger radius, and the average unit has less HP. Storms are fair because in competitive play, people don't clump up all their units, or at least try not to. The same thing applies in sc2.

My suggestion is to keep storm the same, but make the animation smaller. Right now, the storming animation covers a much larger area than it damages and I think that's why people think it's so good. With a smaller area, people don't need to pull back their entire army, they just pull back 4 units. Problem solved.


Please enlighten me on how to not clump all the units? The collision size is so much smaller amongst units accompanied by the fact that most units used are ranged in SC2. Hydras could dodge storm much easier in SC1 and were much cheaper.

It's nigh impossible not to attack in a ball, they almost automatically do it, even if you just tell them to run to the enemy.

It's not collision size it's better pathing. SC1 units could potentially clump like SC2 units do, they just don't because the pathing AI makes them scatter or pause a bit. Also the magic box probably had something to do with it.

Blizzard really needs to implement some sort of hold-formation+move command and, on a completely unrelated note, bring back F2-F4 screen position hotkeys.


Units definitely couldn't clump as close in SC1.


It's both really. Collision size and better pathing makes it much harder to split units. Units clump up more due to less collision size, and the removal of the magic box means that units will automatically try to clump up no matter how they are ordered to move.
TheDna
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany577 Posts
March 31 2010 04:59 GMT
#498
I would have prefered a spore crawler range buff to a spine crawler damage buff as a zerg. Tbh it feels like you are forced to fast tech or AI cheese vs terran at the moment.
Banshees pretty much destroy me if i dont fast tech. At the same time they made fast tech mutas vs terran worse, so i m wondering about a good strat atm.
Yamoth
Profile Joined February 2009
United States315 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-31 05:03:38
March 31 2010 05:03 GMT
#499
Hehe, I just spread the marauder out and hammer the protoss, I don't even bother to dodge the tiny storm.
Chen
Profile Joined June 2009
United States6344 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-31 05:06:22
March 31 2010 05:04 GMT
#500
On March 31 2010 13:22 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 13:14 Chairman Ray wrote:
Ok, nerfing storms is the worst thing that they can do. Saying psi storms are overpowered when people deliberately ball up their units is like saying mutas are overpowered when you build nothing but zealots. During a battle when all the units are in a big firing line, storms hits like 4 guys. Now that there are high HP units such as roaches and marauders, I don't see what's the problem in 20 dps for 4 seconds on 4 measly units at the cost of a whopping 150 gas. Let's look at sc1. Storms do 114 damage at a larger radius, and the average unit has less HP. Storms are fair because in competitive play, people don't clump up all their units, or at least try not to. The same thing applies in sc2.

My suggestion is to keep storm the same, but make the animation smaller. Right now, the storming animation covers a much larger area than it damages and I think that's why people think it's so good. With a smaller area, people don't need to pull back their entire army, they just pull back 4 units. Problem solved.


Please enlighten me on how to not clump all the units? The collision size is so much smaller amongst units accompanied by the fact that most units used are ranged in SC2. Hydras could dodge storm much easier in SC1 and were much cheaper.

It's nigh impossible not to attack in a ball, they almost automatically do it, even if you just tell them to run to the enemy.

use multiple control groups? just attack in a couple staggered clumps rather than one giant ball and see what happens, I see top players doing it all the time and it works wonders on both collosi and storm. when you do this your units will naturally make a very nice arc when attacking, which is much harder to storm than the giant ball that you get if you 1a your units in.
if you arc correctly, those 150 gas templar can hit... maybe 4 marauders with storm.
Prev 1 23 24 25 26 27 32 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PiG Daily
21:00
Best Games of SC
Reynor vs Zoun
SHIN vs ByuN
herO vs sOs
Maru vs SHIN
Clem vs Bunny
PiGStarcraft586
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft567
SpeCial 139
StarCraft: Brood War
firebathero 161
Backho 95
910 43
Dota 2
monkeys_forever477
Counter-Strike
taco 33
Other Games
summit1g8293
tarik_tv4452
shahzam529
C9.Mang0229
Fuzer 151
ProTech123
Mew2King63
PPMD15
Liquid`Ken7
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick677
BasetradeTV59
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 87
• Hupsaiya 75
• RyuSc2 40
• davetesta5
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 41
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• imaqtpie1133
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
10h 16m
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
19h 16m
RSL Revival
1d 7h
Cure vs Rogue
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 14h
BSL
1d 19h
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.