• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 13:55
CET 19:55
KST 03:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3
Community News
[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage0Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly2Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win62025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales!10BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION3
StarCraft 2
General
RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" [TLCH] Mission 7: Last Stand Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Monday Nights Weeklies SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia $3,500 WardiTV Korean Royale S4 Crank Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
SnOw on 'Experimental' Nonstandard Maps in ASL Finding world war 2 allied hope / final players? BW General Discussion [BSL21] RO32 Group Stage [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions
Tourneys
BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION [ASL20] Grand Finals Small VOD Thread 2.0 The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Current Meta How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread ZeroSpace Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Dating: How's your luck? Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
AI is so fuckin funny
Peanutsc
Challenge: Maths isn't all…
Hildegard
Career Paths and Skills for …
TrAiDoS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1694 users

Patch 7 Notes - Page 25

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 23 24 25 26 27 32 Next All
hellitsaboutme
Profile Joined March 2010
Singapore118 Posts
March 31 2010 03:58 GMT
#481
It's kinda ridiculous -_- I guess we are going to see 150 limit of maradeurs in TvP. Recent games from Morrow and Demu were so boring, just spamming maraduers whole game. Like some noobs, no offense.

But I think thats because maradeurs are way more cost effective compared to other terran units. Blizzard should've think of that. I've tried new psi storm, it literally sucks. Terran just stims and ran away barely damaged. That skill supposed to counter multiple cheap small units so that opponet didn't mass them. It would force terran to use high level units
Two_DoWn
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States13684 Posts
March 31 2010 03:59 GMT
#482
On March 31 2010 12:40 StorrZerg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 12:28 -orb- wrote:
i give up

I don't understand what Blizzard could have possibly been thinking.


same :/

new patch hurry up

With all of their switching of bonus damage to base damage I think they are trying to soften some of the hard counters. Not sure about storm thou.
"What is the air speed velocity of an unladen courier?" "Dire or Radiant?"
Captain Peabody
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3126 Posts
March 31 2010 04:06 GMT
#483
It's a Beta. Blizzard is going to make changes that are questionable, changes that are highly experimental, and changes that end up being dead wrong. Then, they look at the information and feedback from us, the players, and they will tweak the changes, alter them, or take them back completely, based on how things work out in practice. This is the reason they have a Beta in the first place; to test the game, the balance, and see what works and doesn't.

Blizzard has so far shown a remarkable ability to respond to feedback and trends fairly quickly. Rest assured, if Protoss is losing too much after this patch, then they will buff Protoss; if HTs aren't used enough, then they will buff HTs; if Roaches aren't used enough, then they will buff Roaches.

If anyone can't handle this, then they really shouldn't be in the Beta in the first place.
Dies Irae venit. youtube.com/SnobbinsFilms
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
March 31 2010 04:07 GMT
#484
On March 31 2010 12:54 danl9rm wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 12:20 FabledIntegral wrote:
I miss speedlots being so good, I do agree with the general feeling that SC2 has become more of a ranged vs ranged game.


dude, speedlots are good!
they absolutely force terran to get either hellions(and ruin their perfect little mmm force) or more marines(and the more marines terran has, the more vulnerable to coloxen©/storm)


There are no speedlots....
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
March 31 2010 04:07 GMT
#485
On March 31 2010 13:07 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 12:54 danl9rm wrote:
On March 31 2010 12:20 FabledIntegral wrote:
I miss speedlots being so good, I do agree with the general feeling that SC2 has become more of a ranged vs ranged game.


dude, speedlots are good!
they absolutely force terran to get either hellions(and ruin their perfect little mmm force) or more marines(and the more marines terran has, the more vulnerable to coloxen©/storm)


There are no speedlots....

chargelots sound stupid
TFlame
Profile Joined March 2010
United States25 Posts
March 31 2010 04:10 GMT
#486
buff banshee's, the strongest thing against toss (which can CLOAK) who have shit AA, and nerf storm to shit, the only thing that keeps toss in the game. Ridiculous patch.
You yarg and you blarg and you end up with shyarg.
Ryuu314
Profile Joined October 2009
United States12679 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-31 04:11:30
March 31 2010 04:11 GMT
#487
I really dont' get the HT storm nerf. It's already been downsized since SCBW and now an AoE nerf? Storm wasn't imbalanced before anyways because moving out of it was already quite easy. The only people who would get completely roflstomped by it were noobs who just sat and took the entire duration of storm. -.-

the buff to static defense was much needed tho.
Captain Peabody
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3126 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-31 04:11:58
March 31 2010 04:11 GMT
#488
Also, I wouldn't be surprised if, now that Storm and Roaches have both been nerfed, we see a Marauder nerf in the near future. With storm and Roaches in their pre-patch state, nerfing Marauders significantly would probably involve almost completely crippling Terran bio. Now, however, after the requisite information is in, Blizzard will feel much more "free" to deliver whatever nerfs are needed for Terran, without having to worry about catastrophic balance losses.
Dies Irae venit. youtube.com/SnobbinsFilms
LunarC
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States1186 Posts
March 31 2010 04:12 GMT
#489
Psionic storm hasn't even been all that overpowered in games that I've observed and now it receives a nerf :[

At least increase the total damage to compensate for area reduction.

Also if structures were not classified as "armored" they would be more durable. Seems like buildings are way too fragile from the way armies can simply run into expansions and snipe the cc/hatchery/nexus before running back out.
REEBUH!!!
Chairman Ray
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States11903 Posts
March 31 2010 04:14 GMT
#490
Ok, nerfing storms is the worst thing that they can do. Saying psi storms are overpowered when people deliberately ball up their units is like saying mutas are overpowered when you build nothing but zealots. During a battle when all the units are in a big firing line, storms hits like 4 guys. Now that there are high HP units such as roaches and marauders, I don't see what's the problem in 20 dps for 4 seconds on 4 measly units at the cost of a whopping 150 gas. Let's look at sc1. Storms do 114 damage at a larger radius, and the average unit has less HP. Storms are fair because in competitive play, people don't clump up all their units, or at least try not to. The same thing applies in sc2.

My suggestion is to keep storm the same, but make the animation smaller. Right now, the storming animation covers a much larger area than it damages and I think that's why people think it's so good. With a smaller area, people don't need to pull back their entire army, they just pull back 4 units. Problem solved.
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
March 31 2010 04:17 GMT
#491
So this stops the fast expand 6-7 rax marauder build TvP how.....?
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Chairman Ray
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States11903 Posts
March 31 2010 04:20 GMT
#492
On March 31 2010 13:17 Plexa wrote:
So this stops the fast expand 6-7 rax marauder build TvP how.....?


Now marauders need one extra hit to take down photon cannons!

YAAAAARRRRRRR
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
March 31 2010 04:22 GMT
#493
On March 31 2010 13:14 Chairman Ray wrote:
Ok, nerfing storms is the worst thing that they can do. Saying psi storms are overpowered when people deliberately ball up their units is like saying mutas are overpowered when you build nothing but zealots. During a battle when all the units are in a big firing line, storms hits like 4 guys. Now that there are high HP units such as roaches and marauders, I don't see what's the problem in 20 dps for 4 seconds on 4 measly units at the cost of a whopping 150 gas. Let's look at sc1. Storms do 114 damage at a larger radius, and the average unit has less HP. Storms are fair because in competitive play, people don't clump up all their units, or at least try not to. The same thing applies in sc2.

My suggestion is to keep storm the same, but make the animation smaller. Right now, the storming animation covers a much larger area than it damages and I think that's why people think it's so good. With a smaller area, people don't need to pull back their entire army, they just pull back 4 units. Problem solved.


Please enlighten me on how to not clump all the units? The collision size is so much smaller amongst units accompanied by the fact that most units used are ranged in SC2. Hydras could dodge storm much easier in SC1 and were much cheaper.

It's nigh impossible not to attack in a ball, they almost automatically do it, even if you just tell them to run to the enemy.
LunarC
Profile Blog Joined October 2009
United States1186 Posts
March 31 2010 04:31 GMT
#494
On March 31 2010 13:22 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 13:14 Chairman Ray wrote:
Ok, nerfing storms is the worst thing that they can do. Saying psi storms are overpowered when people deliberately ball up their units is like saying mutas are overpowered when you build nothing but zealots. During a battle when all the units are in a big firing line, storms hits like 4 guys. Now that there are high HP units such as roaches and marauders, I don't see what's the problem in 20 dps for 4 seconds on 4 measly units at the cost of a whopping 150 gas. Let's look at sc1. Storms do 114 damage at a larger radius, and the average unit has less HP. Storms are fair because in competitive play, people don't clump up all their units, or at least try not to. The same thing applies in sc2.

My suggestion is to keep storm the same, but make the animation smaller. Right now, the storming animation covers a much larger area than it damages and I think that's why people think it's so good. With a smaller area, people don't need to pull back their entire army, they just pull back 4 units. Problem solved.


Please enlighten me on how to not clump all the units? The collision size is so much smaller amongst units accompanied by the fact that most units used are ranged in SC2. Hydras could dodge storm much easier in SC1 and were much cheaper.

It's nigh impossible not to attack in a ball, they almost automatically do it, even if you just tell them to run to the enemy.

It's not collision size it's better pathing. SC1 units could potentially clump like SC2 units do, they just don't because the pathing AI makes them scatter or pause a bit. Also the magic box probably had something to do with it.

Blizzard really needs to implement some sort of hold-formation+move command and, on a completely unrelated note, bring back F2-F4 screen position hotkeys.
REEBUH!!!
agorist
Profile Joined July 2009
United States115 Posts
March 31 2010 04:32 GMT
#495
They're obviously balancing the game for copper players.
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
March 31 2010 04:38 GMT
#496
On March 31 2010 13:31 LunarC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 13:22 FabledIntegral wrote:
On March 31 2010 13:14 Chairman Ray wrote:
Ok, nerfing storms is the worst thing that they can do. Saying psi storms are overpowered when people deliberately ball up their units is like saying mutas are overpowered when you build nothing but zealots. During a battle when all the units are in a big firing line, storms hits like 4 guys. Now that there are high HP units such as roaches and marauders, I don't see what's the problem in 20 dps for 4 seconds on 4 measly units at the cost of a whopping 150 gas. Let's look at sc1. Storms do 114 damage at a larger radius, and the average unit has less HP. Storms are fair because in competitive play, people don't clump up all their units, or at least try not to. The same thing applies in sc2.

My suggestion is to keep storm the same, but make the animation smaller. Right now, the storming animation covers a much larger area than it damages and I think that's why people think it's so good. With a smaller area, people don't need to pull back their entire army, they just pull back 4 units. Problem solved.


Please enlighten me on how to not clump all the units? The collision size is so much smaller amongst units accompanied by the fact that most units used are ranged in SC2. Hydras could dodge storm much easier in SC1 and were much cheaper.

It's nigh impossible not to attack in a ball, they almost automatically do it, even if you just tell them to run to the enemy.

It's not collision size it's better pathing. SC1 units could potentially clump like SC2 units do, they just don't because the pathing AI makes them scatter or pause a bit. Also the magic box probably had something to do with it.

Blizzard really needs to implement some sort of hold-formation+move command and, on a completely unrelated note, bring back F2-F4 screen position hotkeys.


Units definitely couldn't clump as close in SC1.
Spawkuring
Profile Joined July 2008
United States755 Posts
March 31 2010 04:40 GMT
#497
On March 31 2010 13:38 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 13:31 LunarC wrote:
On March 31 2010 13:22 FabledIntegral wrote:
On March 31 2010 13:14 Chairman Ray wrote:
Ok, nerfing storms is the worst thing that they can do. Saying psi storms are overpowered when people deliberately ball up their units is like saying mutas are overpowered when you build nothing but zealots. During a battle when all the units are in a big firing line, storms hits like 4 guys. Now that there are high HP units such as roaches and marauders, I don't see what's the problem in 20 dps for 4 seconds on 4 measly units at the cost of a whopping 150 gas. Let's look at sc1. Storms do 114 damage at a larger radius, and the average unit has less HP. Storms are fair because in competitive play, people don't clump up all their units, or at least try not to. The same thing applies in sc2.

My suggestion is to keep storm the same, but make the animation smaller. Right now, the storming animation covers a much larger area than it damages and I think that's why people think it's so good. With a smaller area, people don't need to pull back their entire army, they just pull back 4 units. Problem solved.


Please enlighten me on how to not clump all the units? The collision size is so much smaller amongst units accompanied by the fact that most units used are ranged in SC2. Hydras could dodge storm much easier in SC1 and were much cheaper.

It's nigh impossible not to attack in a ball, they almost automatically do it, even if you just tell them to run to the enemy.

It's not collision size it's better pathing. SC1 units could potentially clump like SC2 units do, they just don't because the pathing AI makes them scatter or pause a bit. Also the magic box probably had something to do with it.

Blizzard really needs to implement some sort of hold-formation+move command and, on a completely unrelated note, bring back F2-F4 screen position hotkeys.


Units definitely couldn't clump as close in SC1.


It's both really. Collision size and better pathing makes it much harder to split units. Units clump up more due to less collision size, and the removal of the magic box means that units will automatically try to clump up no matter how they are ordered to move.
TheDna
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany577 Posts
March 31 2010 04:59 GMT
#498
I would have prefered a spore crawler range buff to a spine crawler damage buff as a zerg. Tbh it feels like you are forced to fast tech or AI cheese vs terran at the moment.
Banshees pretty much destroy me if i dont fast tech. At the same time they made fast tech mutas vs terran worse, so i m wondering about a good strat atm.
Yamoth
Profile Joined February 2009
United States315 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-31 05:03:38
March 31 2010 05:03 GMT
#499
Hehe, I just spread the marauder out and hammer the protoss, I don't even bother to dodge the tiny storm.
Chen
Profile Joined June 2009
United States6344 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-03-31 05:06:22
March 31 2010 05:04 GMT
#500
On March 31 2010 13:22 FabledIntegral wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2010 13:14 Chairman Ray wrote:
Ok, nerfing storms is the worst thing that they can do. Saying psi storms are overpowered when people deliberately ball up their units is like saying mutas are overpowered when you build nothing but zealots. During a battle when all the units are in a big firing line, storms hits like 4 guys. Now that there are high HP units such as roaches and marauders, I don't see what's the problem in 20 dps for 4 seconds on 4 measly units at the cost of a whopping 150 gas. Let's look at sc1. Storms do 114 damage at a larger radius, and the average unit has less HP. Storms are fair because in competitive play, people don't clump up all their units, or at least try not to. The same thing applies in sc2.

My suggestion is to keep storm the same, but make the animation smaller. Right now, the storming animation covers a much larger area than it damages and I think that's why people think it's so good. With a smaller area, people don't need to pull back their entire army, they just pull back 4 units. Problem solved.


Please enlighten me on how to not clump all the units? The collision size is so much smaller amongst units accompanied by the fact that most units used are ranged in SC2. Hydras could dodge storm much easier in SC1 and were much cheaper.

It's nigh impossible not to attack in a ball, they almost automatically do it, even if you just tell them to run to the enemy.

use multiple control groups? just attack in a couple staggered clumps rather than one giant ball and see what happens, I see top players doing it all the time and it works wonders on both collosi and storm. when you do this your units will naturally make a very nice arc when attacking, which is much harder to storm than the giant ball that you get if you 1a your units in.
if you arc correctly, those 150 gas templar can hit... maybe 4 marauders with storm.
Prev 1 23 24 25 26 27 32 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
LAN Event
18:00
Merivale 8: Swiss Groups Day 1
SteadfastSC172
IndyStarCraft 131
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 380
White-Ra 179
SteadfastSC 172
IndyStarCraft 131
UpATreeSC 20
ForJumy 8
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 711
firebathero 216
NaDa 12
Dota 2
qojqva3444
Dendi1179
League of Legends
Trikslyr43
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps721
Other Games
FrodaN1752
Beastyqt1101
RotterdaM385
Mlord266
Fuzer 219
mouzStarbuck146
ArmadaUGS114
C9.Mang075
QueenE45
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL273
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 20
• Dystopia_ 2
• Reevou 1
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV622
• Ler84
• Noizen36
League of Legends
• TFBlade750
Other Games
• imaqtpie951
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
6h 5m
Replay Cast
14h 5m
WardiTV Korean Royale
17h 5m
LAN Event
20h 5m
OSC
1d 4h
The PondCast
1d 15h
LAN Event
1d 20h
Replay Cast
2 days
LAN Event
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
LAN Event
3 days
IPSL
3 days
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
Replay Cast
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
LAN Event
4 days
IPSL
4 days
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025

Upcoming

BSL Season 21
SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
META Madness #9
LHT Stage 1
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.