• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:43
CEST 22:43
KST 05:43
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence4Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups3WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia7Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues
Tourneys
WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 General Discussion Playing StarCraft as 2 people on the same network
Tourneys
Is there English video for group selection for ASL [ASL20] Ro16 Group C [ASL20] Ro16 Group B [IPSL] ISPL Season 1 Winter Qualis and Info!
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Borderlands 3
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1420 users

[New] HotS Forum Rules

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
Post a Reply
Normal
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-12-05 21:15:14
December 05 2012 21:12 GMT
#1
The staff have noticed that the HotS forum has become increasingly cluttered and difficult to read. As of this post we will be enforcing the following rules and locking per-existing threads which violate these rules.


(1.) Suggestion threads and 'these are my thoughts on the game' threads will be closed unless:
  • They are created by a notable member of the community.
  • They are of exceptional quality.

Notable member of the community include progamers, casters, staff and well known forum posters. Exceptional quality is entirely up to the discretion of banlings to decide. Don't try to argue that a thread you spent 5 minutes creating is 'exceptional' - it isn't going to happen. If you wish to post suggestions please do so over on the Battle.net forum. For the time being, we will permit these suggestions in patch threads or in threads where the suggestions are relevant (e.g. David Kim wants to do X announcement threads.)

(2.) Threads about HotS strategy will be held to the same standards as those in the Strategy forum. That means:
  • Help threads need to be tagged with [H] and contain replays and some analysis from you.
  • Discussion threads need to be tagged with [D] and should have a clear discussion point.

Consult the Strategy forum rules for further elaboration on what we expect from strategy threads.

(3.) Normal forum posting standards are expected.

That means follow the Ten Commandments and we'll all get along fine.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
TelecoM
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States10675 Posts
December 05 2012 21:16 GMT
#2
Thank god, thanks so much for this mod's, I am becoming so tired of reading how everyone thinks THEY would like the game to change. This was much needed and totally understandable, thanks for all of your hard work TL mods and banlings.
AKA: TelecoM[WHITE] Protoss fighting
Lesrah
Profile Joined November 2010
Portugal110 Posts
December 05 2012 21:31 GMT
#3
Ditadura ftw
aka_star
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United Kingdom1546 Posts
December 05 2012 21:36 GMT
#4
I always thought TL requires some elitism to get order flowing back into the forums, or go the way of reddit and allow the community to 'upvote a thread'
FlashDave.999 aka Star
Jehct
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
New Zealand9115 Posts
December 05 2012 21:36 GMT
#5
Thank you; this forum had really gone to hell. Hopefully this forum can have some genuine discussion again ^_^
"You seem to think about this game a lot"
MilesTeg
Profile Joined September 2010
France1271 Posts
December 05 2012 22:01 GMT
#6
Oh thank God for that.

And by God I mean the TL moderators.
Torte de Lini
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Germany38463 Posts
December 05 2012 22:59 GMT
#7
Praise the lord for this, thank you God!
https://twitter.com/#!/TorteDeLini (@TorteDeLini)
Xanbatou
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States805 Posts
December 05 2012 23:19 GMT
#8
thank god. so many random people were coming out of the wood works to post their awful ideas in the hots forum and it was getting ridiculous.
Blisse
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada3710 Posts
December 05 2012 23:42 GMT
#9
I wanted another purge like back in the days 2 years ago, but this is excellent as well. There were getting to be way too many "this is my thoughts on HOTS" posts.
There is no one like you in the universe.
packrat386
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States5077 Posts
December 06 2012 05:39 GMT
#10
Closed threads was starting to get a bit clogged up . Seriously though this is an awesome change and will definitely make the forum much more usable.
dreaming of a sunny day
Yoshi Kirishima
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States10347 Posts
December 06 2012 18:07 GMT
#11
thank the lord! i mean thank teamliquid! err

kk i guess they're the same thing
Mid-master streaming MECH ONLY + commentary www.twitch.tv/yoshikirishima +++ "If all-in fails, all-in again."
spbelky
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States623 Posts
December 06 2012 18:10 GMT
#12
On December 06 2012 06:12 Plexa wrote:
(1.) Suggestion threads and 'these are my thoughts on the game' threads will be closed unless:
  • They are created by a notable member of the community.
  • They are of exceptional quality.

Notable member of the community include progamers, casters, staff and well known forum posters. Exceptional quality is entirely up to the discretion of banlings to decide. Don't try to argue that a thread you spent 5 minutes creating is 'exceptional' - it isn't going to happen. If you wish to post suggestions please do so over on the Battle.net forum. For the time being, we will permit these suggestions in patch threads or in threads where the suggestions are relevant (e.g. David Kim wants to do X announcement threads.)



Thank god, write a shitty blog post if you wanna write a shitty post.
J.E.G.
Profile Joined May 2010
United States389 Posts
December 06 2012 18:13 GMT
#13
Thank all that is holy/TL staff for this.
Do or do not; there is no try.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
December 06 2012 18:14 GMT
#14
Majestic. TL, saving the community from the community.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Unshapely
Profile Joined November 2012
140 Posts
December 08 2012 16:11 GMT
#15
Thank goodness for this. I was getting weary of reading even my own pathetic ideas. It was about time. This is perhaps the only website where I can commend the regulators.
That is not dead which can eternal lie; and with strange aeons even death may die.
TheLunatic
Profile Joined February 2011
309 Posts
December 08 2012 16:39 GMT
#16
I say we change to an up/down vote system that way the community picks the value of a topic not tl staff or some race blind qqing poor performing '' well respected'' pro
Geneq
Profile Joined August 2010
Poland165 Posts
December 09 2012 13:04 GMT
#17
On December 09 2012 01:39 TheLunatic wrote:
I say we change to an up/down vote system that way the community picks the value of a topic not tl staff or some race blind qqing poor performing '' well respected'' pro

Go to reddit, and dont come back.
scFoX
Profile Joined September 2011
France454 Posts
December 09 2012 14:53 GMT
#18
I support this change; the HotS section is in bad need of cleaning up.
xsnac
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Barbados1365 Posts
December 09 2012 15:03 GMT
#19
all i have to say : FINALY ! damn i got sick seeing so many game designers making posts about how the game should be fix !
1/4 \pi \epsilon_0
Barbiero
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Brazil5259 Posts
December 09 2012 15:07 GMT
#20
On December 09 2012 01:39 TheLunatic wrote:
I say we change to an up/down vote system that way the community picks the value of a topic not tl staff or some race blind qqing poor performing '' well respected'' pro


You'd be surprised. Most of the time, if the post isn't well structured, even a "pro" thread will be closed, and some times a ban is warranted to them as well. The forum rules apply to them as much as you, except they have much more credibility when they say they experienced something.

Also this is TL. Your achievements and your actions are what determine your freedom here. Unlike other websites, being a part of TL is a privilege, NOT a right. Everyone has access to that privilege by default, but only if you prove worthy may you keep it.

In other words, accept this or GTFO. It's rules like these that kept TL as the top-quality in terms of forums.
♥ The world needs more hearts! ♥
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
December 09 2012 21:07 GMT
#21
On December 09 2012 01:39 TheLunatic wrote:
I say we change to an up/down vote system that way the community picks the value of a topic not tl staff or some race blind qqing poor performing '' well respected'' pro

If you want that kind of functionality then you're welcome to post on reddit.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Marou
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Germany1371 Posts
December 10 2012 18:15 GMT
#22
Is it okay to post a thread for a Group you created ingame ?
twitter@RickyMarou
NKexquisite
Profile Joined January 2009
United States911 Posts
December 27 2012 20:11 GMT
#23
On December 09 2012 01:39 TheLunatic wrote:
I say we change to an up/down vote system that way the community picks the value of a topic not tl staff or some race blind qqing poor performing '' well respected'' pro


Uhm.. No... That's why Reddits "forum" is totally unusable....
Whattttt Upppppppp Im Nesteaaaaaa!!
800800
Profile Joined October 2011
Afghanistan64 Posts
January 20 2013 09:02 GMT
#24
opps sorry didn't read this first.
Niska
Profile Joined March 2011
31 Posts
January 29 2013 17:35 GMT
#25
Thanks TL. I couldn't bare to read anymore amateur posts on why blizzard is dumb or what unit sucks. Blizzard made this amazing game that is near perfection, and they are looking to us to help them get to that perfection. We need well structured posts about real problems real pros have. Thank you TL for caring about the game.
Fencar
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States2694 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-02-14 08:13:42
February 12 2013 19:48 GMT
#26
Edit: I got a response, disregard this post.

If I want to post a thread on balance (suggestion) despite not being a well known poster, will I just have to undergo the trial by fire and post it and hope it doesn't get closed, should I ask a mod if I can post it with a copy to review, or whichever one that I prefer?

Here's a copy if a mod wants to review it: + Show Spoiler +
Title: Viking Assault mode buff suggestion to 8x2 damage




Posted on the battle.net HotS beta forum: http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/post/79081891824
I figured that I'd post this here as well to see what the TL community thinks.

Currently, Vikings are awful units on the ground. Their DPS is mediocre, and their HP is just awful. Assault mode Vikings are just a formality that keeps Terran players from losing while way ahead if most of their army is Vikings.

In TvP, after killing the enemy Colossus, if you somehow lose barely any Vikings, you have nothing to do with them. All you can do is fly them to a corner and hope that the Protoss gets some Colossus sooner or later so that your Vikings can be useful. Otherwise they die in seconds to Zealots and Stalkers, barely doing any damage.

Against Zerg, the story is very much the same. You finally beat their Broodlord/Infestor army with Vikings, then suddenly they have a huge army of Ultralisk/Infestor + X, and your Vikings become paperweights since their damage, HP, and move speed are all so awful on the ground. Once again you must fly them to a corner and hope your ground army is strong enough to deal with the Ultralisks and Infestors while you wait for the Zerg to go back to Broodlords.

Buff the damage to 8x2 instead of 12.

TL;DR of what this change is: This change is a buff to ground mode DPS making the Viking a usable backup unit for extra DPS against Chargelots, Zerglings, and the like after taking out the enemy air units- though it is still vulnerable if you mis-micro or otherwise screw up.

TL;DR of what this change is not: This does not make the Viking an effective ground meat-shield for Siege Tanks, a good 'core' unit, and it doesn't let it land right on top of enemy armies after killing the enemy air units without taking major losses.

This will greatly increase the Viking's effectiveness while at the same time rewarding the use of Air attack upgrades. You will have to be two attack upgrades below the opponent's armor upgrade level in order to even go back to the old damage value of 12- though against Zealots or other units with a base armor of 1, it does do two less damage.

The potential drawback is that the Viking ground mode will become too strong. I do not believe that this will be the case because of the Viking's low speed and HP, along with the fact that a single Marine rivals the Viking's DPS vs ground units considering how Terran players always get upgrades for their MMM before the Vikings, and in many cases not at all.




This change helps most against Marines, Zerglings, Zealots, Roaches, Immortals, and Archons; all of the typical front-line units.

Against Marines, it will always four-shot them instead of taking five shots to kill one if you are behind by even one upgrade.
Against Zerglings, it will always three-shot them instead of taking four shots to kill one if you are behind by even one upgrade.
Against Zealots, it does more damage; at even upgrades, it takes 10 shots to kill it instead of 13.
Against Roaches, it again does more damage; at even upgrades, it takes 11 shots to kill it instead of 14.
Against Immortals, the attack is almost a direct counter to the hardened shield. Of course, landed Vikings still die in three hits to the Immortal, so it's not a huge buff.
Against Archons, the Protoss always gets shield upgrades last; Mech will have a slightly more reasonable damage-dealer against Archons than Widow Mines + Hellbats.

It does not help nearly as much against Ultralisks, Swarm Hosts Stalkers, Marauders, Thors, and Siege Tanks.

Ultralisks have six armor when fully upgraded; even after the Terran fully upgrades his Vikings, he will still be doing less damage than if he had the Viking which does 12 damage by default.
Swarm Hosts simply kill the landed Vikings with a Locust wave. Vikings still have awful HP.
Stalkers, Marauders, and Thors are tanky units which also do a lot of damage against armored units with about as much HP as a Viking while having a mid-range attack. They countered ground mode Vikings before, hard, and it's not changing any time soon.
Siege Tanks simply blow the landed Vikings to bits if the Vikings attack directly. Not much changes if the Vikings land on top of the Siege Tanks, though.

I also think that it's silly that a huge Gatling gun (yes the cap is grammatically correct) does as much/little damage as a tiny C-14 Gauss rifle, even accounting for recoil and accuracy.




Frequently Asked Questions & Answers

Q: Wouldn't this make Vikings too versatile?

A: No. They still have very little HP, low move speed, and either lower damage values or a lack of splash damage compared to other Terran units. They would become more versatile, but certainly not overpowered. Their main use is still AtA, the GtG is a bonus.

Q: Vikings can kill Stalkers in 1v1 really easily now! Isn't this overpowered?

A: No. This is because different races are different. Terran and Protoss production mechanics and economy really aren't comparable without looking at real-game situations and observing unit interactions based on what actually happens in the game. This is a mistake that many people make when comparing for example, the Marine and either Zergling or Zealot.

People said that Marines were overpowered because they costed only minerals, but in truth the reason that they're so strong is because Terran gas heavy units like the Siege Tank, Banshee, etc are very weak in comparison to the Marine, and the Marine needs much of that gas for upgrades: +3/+3, Stim/Shields, and any number of reactors, as well as the very important Medivacs.

The situation with the Viking is much the same; it's actually still far worse than the Banshee against ground because of it's transformation time, lower damage value for higher speed, (Terran air upgrades are rarely if ever seen before the late-game, so higher damage value over rate of fire is preferred) armor class, (Vikings are armored which is weaker against Protoss ground, as there are no Protoss ground units which do bonus damage against light while Stalkers do bonus damage vs armored) move speed, (2.25 vs 2.75) and the fact that Banshees fly while doing AtG and Vikings must go GtG, making them vulnerable to any number of things while being unable to focus fire some of the farther back targets very easily such as the Immortal.

Not to say that this isn't a substantial buff, but it in no way makes the Viking nearly as good as any ground unit.

Q: Corruptors are worse vs ground! They don't have any ground mode, we have to make an entirely separate unit against ground! How is it okay that Terran gets a buffed ground mode for free while Zerg must build another unit to deal with ground?

A: Oddly enough this is one of the most frequently asked questions.

First, I do not see how this relates to the ground mode Viking in any way other than a similarity which doesn't have a lot if anything to do with unit interactions between races, and it was not complained about before. If it is a problem in any way, I think that it deserves a separate thread. However I do not believe it is a problem after watching a large number of professional games.

The Corruptor and Broodlord are not exactly the same unit, but the Broodlord morphs from the Corruptor and the Corruptor is the Zerg's primary AtA unit that has a moderately long range, making it the only unit which can really help deal with Vikings trying to kill the Broodlords.

I've debated this with one poster quite a bit. You can see the start of the debate here if you want more details: http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/forum/topic/7864606703?page=10#185
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
BlessedHammers
Profile Joined December 2012
Canada19 Posts
February 14 2013 07:01 GMT
#27
then you got to buff hydras then
Fencar
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States2694 Posts
February 14 2013 07:42 GMT
#28
On February 14 2013 16:01 BlessedHammers wrote:
then you got to buff hydras then

This is in response to my post?

If it is, I think Hydralisks are a separate issue.
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
bobsire
Profile Joined December 2011
Canada296 Posts
February 14 2013 07:55 GMT
#29
Thank you for this, there are way too many "i think blizz should do this" blah blabh blah blah bullshit crying babies. Lets have meaningful discussions leave anything else to the blizzard forums.
Lobotomist
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1541 Posts
March 01 2013 17:23 GMT
#30
hell...it's about time.

But seriously, glad for more enforcement.
Teching to hive too quickly isn't just a risk: it's an ultrarisk
ZenithM
Profile Joined February 2011
France15952 Posts
March 01 2013 17:29 GMT
#31
On December 09 2012 01:11 Unshapely wrote:
Thank goodness for this. I was getting weary of reading even my own pathetic ideas. It was about time. This is perhaps the only website where I can commend the regulators.

TL isn't a democracy, they make it quite clear.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 18m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ZombieGrub208
SteadfastSC 174
NeuroSwarm 140
UpATreeSC 98
JuggernautJason60
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 821
Mind 55
sSak 21
ajuk12(nOOB) 13
Dota 2
Fuzer 214
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
ScreaM1392
pashabiceps429
Stewie2K329
Foxcn170
Super Smash Bros
PPMD66
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu496
Other Games
Grubby3707
FrodaN1436
mouzStarbuck339
PiGStarcraft173
C9.Mang0115
Trikslyr70
ToD67
rGuardiaN44
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• kabyraGe 174
• davetesta23
• Psz 11
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 18
• FirePhoenix16
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3346
• masondota22437
• Ler101
League of Legends
• TFBlade343
Other Games
• Scarra1121
• imaqtpie1012
• Shiphtur225
Upcoming Events
OSC
3h 18m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
13h 18m
Afreeca Starleague
13h 18m
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
2v2
14h 18m
PiGosaur Monday
1d 3h
LiuLi Cup
1d 14h
RSL Revival
2 days
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
4 days
BSL Team Wars
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Online Event
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Team Wars
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.