• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:49
CEST 09:49
KST 16:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202533RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams3Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 543 users

Carrier Micro - Page 10

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS
Post a Reply
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 33 Next All
bgx
Profile Joined August 2010
Poland6595 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-17 09:13:56
September 17 2012 09:12 GMT
#181
On September 17 2012 17:56 winthrop wrote:
so in starcraft 2 the carrier bug is fixed.
dont whine

You know that many things you are using nowadays were first unintended(daily life)? So in programming language they were bugs or unintended mechanics. But because they proved to be useful they remained untouched or even built upon, thus switching up their official unintended status for intended, because letting it stay was concious acceptance of its usefulness.
Stork[gm]
snailz
Profile Joined April 2011
Croatia900 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-17 09:15:33
September 17 2012 09:14 GMT
#182
i wish more pros would do this, and more often.

there are so many things in sc2 designed poorly, but anybody rarely speaks out about it... i remember lalush posting a huge thread about micro, that was very good.

this:



is better if presented like Nony did...
"I am saying that there are 300 current pros and semi-pros that have the potential to come in and dominate SC2 at any moment, with a latency of a few months from the day they switch." - intrigue
xSTaRFiSHx
Profile Joined February 2012
Germany176 Posts
September 17 2012 09:32 GMT
#183
Well explained.
Totally agree with you.
I wonder if there will be cake...
MavercK
Profile Joined March 2010
Australia2181 Posts
September 17 2012 09:35 GMT
#184
On September 17 2012 16:03 SigmaoctanusIV wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2012 15:24 Talin wrote:
The programming solution should be rather simple actually, and shouldn't involve tweaking the underlying engine or breaking the general unit behavior.

First they need to make Interceptors an actual unit - which should be simple enough, given that there's already a class for similar type of "swarm" units (Broodlings, Locusts). That way, Carriers would need range 8 to release Interceptors on a target inititally, but Interceptors themselves have a normal unit behavior and can be ordered to attack at maximum leash range once they're already out.

Also, didn't SC2BW already make Carriers (and most other units) control like in Brood War? That should be evidence enough that "it's complicated" is just a copout reason to not make the changes.


in the SC2BW mod Carriers don't work like they do in BW I just tested it so they might not even have known about it or a way to make it work.


your absolutely right.
but this just became my priority. it's hard to find extremely specific information about BW like this.
Brood War Remake - SC2BW - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=145316
Liquid`Nazgul
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
22427 Posts
September 17 2012 10:09 GMT
#185
Excellent video. I hope that if Blizzard decides not to go with this that we get to see a thought out response from their side that addresses the suggestions brought up here.
Administrator
dafnay
Profile Joined May 2010
Angola375 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-17 10:10:42
September 17 2012 10:09 GMT
#186
nony should post this in the "pro only" battle net forum section to get blizz attention like Grubby did.
crbox
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada1180 Posts
September 17 2012 10:19 GMT
#187
great video, I hope some blizzard people see it
800800
Profile Joined October 2011
Afghanistan64 Posts
September 17 2012 10:20 GMT
#188
On September 17 2012 05:28 AxiR wrote:
I think Blizzard is hesitating to implement the "old" carrier because it would overlap a little bit with role of the tempest.


In that case remove the tempest.
Nawyria
Profile Joined July 2010
Netherlands140 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-17 10:33:16
September 17 2012 10:32 GMT
#189
Leash range deployment look soo awesome with interceptors already out. I want this in my SC2.
FeyFey
Profile Joined September 2010
Germany10114 Posts
September 17 2012 10:33 GMT
#190
On September 17 2012 19:20 800800 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2012 05:28 AxiR wrote:
I think Blizzard is hesitating to implement the "old" carrier because it would overlap a little bit with role of the tempest.


In that case remove the tempest.


Oh yes that too, but i agree just remove the tempest then. It was already just a stripped down carrier to gain some range in exchange for everything the carrier was good at. And the carrier even now fills the role almost better imo. (going into fungal range is no issue anymore with the new oracle skill.)
mcmartini
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Australia1972 Posts
September 17 2012 10:33 GMT
#191
Excellent post, and I agree with Nazgul, if this isn't implemented I would really like to know why as I feel this would help carriers a lot and have wondered for over a year why it was not implemented to encourage carrier use since they felt it wasn't used.
I just want to say I have 370 APM - Liquid'Tyler SotG 14-12-2011 "I mean it's too bad you can't be paid to be, you know, a chicken shit fucking whiny bitch on the internet or we would have lots of rich community members" Nick "Tasteless" Plott
v3chr0
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States856 Posts
September 17 2012 10:35 GMT
#192
NonY, thanks for sharing this. There are what seemed to be so many problems with the Carrier in SC2, but what you've said nails the one and only real issue.

The most interesting part about it, is that it'd be a mechanical buff, instead of a stat buff. All in all, I really can't see them not doing these changes, because quite frankly it seems they didn't even know this stuff, or that it didn't survive from BW-SC2 mechanically.

"He catches him with his pants down, backs him off into a corner, and then it's over." - Khaldor
eltese
Profile Joined November 2010
Sweden369 Posts
September 17 2012 10:35 GMT
#193
I'm all for this. More micro and more skill required actions makes for a way cooler game. And it just makes it that more awesome when you see someone pull it off in a game where a lot is at stake.

Go go Blizzard, implement this right now!
Clow
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
Brazil880 Posts
September 17 2012 10:41 GMT
#194
I don't think Blizzard knew about this and a lot of other things.
(–_–) CJ Entusman #33
sluggaslamoo
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Australia4494 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-09-17 11:02:44
September 17 2012 10:51 GMT
#195
We should realise that this won't be the magic bullet that a lot of people reckon it is, although it is definitely a very much needed change.

For carriers to be viable, we need disruption web (shuts down units, use it on clumps of AA units) or the other races to use AA units with slow rates of fire like the goliath, so that the interceptors wont get obliterated as soon as they launch out. Then the intercepters have time to be repaired.

Requirements for Carrier are:
Terran goes mech and sacrifices a bit of AA by going goliaths instead of marines, which can't shoot down interceptors easily.
or
Protoss can prevent AA with a spell like disruption web. Maybe give it to the Phoenix.

On September 17 2012 19:09 dafnay wrote:
nony should post this in the "pro only" battle net forum section to get blizz attention like Grubby did.


Didn't know there was one, but this sounds like a good idea. Or at least someone should refer it.
Come play Android Netrunner - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=409008
Mataza
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Germany5364 Posts
September 17 2012 11:45 GMT
#196
Naww, we don´t need to copy every last thing in bw.
Matchups work different, so mech versus Protoss isn´t a natural choice.
Carriers are probably going to be more relevant versus Zerg as that race lacks anti air by default.

Just hope this gets into the beta and see from there. Micro ability will go a long way to make a fringe unit a staple unit, I´m sure.
If nobody hates you, you´re doing something wrong. However someone hating you doesn´t make you right
revy
Profile Joined September 2009
United States1524 Posts
September 17 2012 11:46 GMT
#197
On September 17 2012 07:33 puppykiller wrote:
It's funny because it actually goes much deeper than this. Nony didn't even get to mentioning how goliath vs carrier works. If carriers are left in the open goliaths (which are a bit faster than carriers) can simply walk under them and kill them very quickly. For this reason carriers tend to be deployed in areas in which the terran can't maneuver there goliaths very well. Usually this means over mineral lines or from behind cliffs that are near key points of the map. In these locations the carriers can easily retreat if goliaths get to close and since often times few goliaths will be able to shoot at a time, the carriers will have significantly more dps. In order for the goliaths to combat this, they will often back off from the ridge a bit and shoot down the carriers interceptors rather than put themselves in an area in which they are at the carriers mercy near by the maps obstructions. This forces the carriers to move forward, which in turn leaves them vulnerable to the goliaths running under them and dispatching of them rapidly. However if the goliaths move too far back the carriers will just ignore them and continue kill whatever buildings/expansion they were attacking in the first place. This creates a really high level of skill micro dynamic between the players that is very interesting for an observer to watch.

Here's and example:
2007 Korean OSL Flash vs Stork

EDIT: lol looks like while I was writing this post someone already posted the vod above.


A further point about gol vs carrier is when it's best for the gols to shoot directly at carriers and when its best to pick off interceptors. If a terran can get a clean shot at the carriers its usually best to take the shot. But if the toss has very little eco left, staying further out of range and targeting interceptors becomes a viable option. Flash would often use this tactic: During scouted carrier switch break up army into small working groups. Send those small working groups to assault each of the remaining active toss bases with the goal of killing the nexus/workers. Make tons of gols, but never run them in so close to the carriers that they get picked off easily, make the toss micro the carriers well. Staying back, the only units you can really target are the ints, but you can essentially starve him by picking off interceptors and keeping his mining bases to a minimum. Once the interceptor count gets low the toss will attempt a retreat, if you have an opportunity, pick off a few carriers.

It was really exciting play.
Leetley
Profile Joined October 2010
1796 Posts
September 17 2012 11:55 GMT
#198
Very good job, Tyler. <3
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
September 17 2012 11:56 GMT
#199
Moved to HotS to get more attention
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Big-t
Profile Joined January 2011
Austria1350 Posts
September 17 2012 12:02 GMT
#200
Very informative video. I always wondered why the Carrier was so weak in WoL. Now I can totally understand and these ways of micro look funny and strong.
monchi | IdrA | Flash
Prev 1 8 9 10 11 12 33 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 11m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech71
StarCraft: Brood War
Nal_rA 5198
Hyuk 4059
Zeus 1368
BeSt 429
ToSsGirL 265
Leta 92
Backho 62
Sacsri 62
ajuk12(nOOB) 24
NaDa 18
[ Show more ]
Britney 0
Dota 2
XcaliburYe173
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K684
Other Games
summit1g5657
ceh9651
SortOf39
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1198
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH455
• Sammyuel 33
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota258
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
2h 11m
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs ShoWTimE
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
1d 2h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.