EPTif you want it harder just do it without research/pgrades
Beyond brutal . a harder than brutal difficulty ? - Page 2
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 HotS |
|
summerloud
Austria1201 Posts
if you want it harder just do it without research/pgrades | ||
|
GreatFall
United States1061 Posts
| ||
|
Tonyoh
France218 Posts
Hopefully I've got this achievement before ^^ | ||
|
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
Even All-in isnt that difficult if you know how to properly play it. I would like to see a harder difficulty for the expansions. Some of the levels should be kept the same, but many of the levels should be made more difficult. As someone else mentioned, I wouldnt want engine of destruction to be any more difficult. | ||
|
Yurie
12079 Posts
So I voted it needs to be harder. 3 tries is what I would expect on the second hardest difficulty. | ||
|
xinxy
Canada116 Posts
| ||
|
Shiladie
Canada1631 Posts
On September 30 2010 03:47 xinxy wrote: Try doing In Utter Darkness with zealots only. I will be as part of my marine only NUR, I figure I'll do the protoss missions as zealot only, utter darkness is the only one I'm then worried about, but my memory of difficulty may be due to needing to keep the archives alive, and get the 3250 kills. 2500 kills shouldn't be too hard... For those who want a harder difficulty, try no upgrades, only building marines. It's not actually as hard as I thought it would be so far, but I expect the last few missions will be hell. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=155237 | ||
|
Fa1nT
United States3423 Posts
one is fun, the other is a chore :p | ||
|
Shiladie
Canada1631 Posts
also it's fun to never need more then the little bit of gas to make reactors, get upgrades, and repair. also the strategic use of bunkers/turrets has been interesting. | ||
| ||
