|
|
On November 08 2016 14:05 WillyWanker wrote: I wonder why no one is trying to do a Netflix of sports... On-demand subscriptions to your favorite teams/competitions would sell so easily. Every country has their own TV rights but it's such a bad user experience. TV is outdated, streaming your computer to your TV or using a smart TV is super easy now. On-demand games with the choice of the commentary language... Maybe one day it'll happen. Only a huge, rich group could buy enough TV rights to make that a reality.. Football / sports rights are too expensive. One of the few things which still attracts massive viewership on tv consistently.
|
On November 09 2016 00:11 stilt wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2016 22:14 sharkie wrote: I always know the result of a barca match when their fanboys praise how good the match was (funnily enough a match was never good when they lost :p) hehe.
I also know that its not a win when they don't post. :D You always seem pretty bitter and salty when you talk about football, maybe you should calm down a bit.
This thread has already moved way passed explaining that to him for a few years now. One can appreciate the effort though :p.
|
On November 08 2016 13:44 Rebs wrote:Show nested quote +On November 08 2016 13:30 Dante08 wrote:On November 07 2016 08:35 haitike wrote: Messi was spectacular today.
PD: Sevilla Sampaoli is playing so well. Well fuck my country's service provider, I won't be able to watch Messi live. We pay USD50+ per month for cable and you would expect to be able to watch every league with that but nope only EPL, CL and Bundesliga. You dont get star channels in Singapore ?
No we don't, not my service provider anyway
|
Television viewership of Sky Plc’s flagship Sunday late-afternoon soccer game has fallen by 19 percent this season, the biggest drop yet in a five-year slide in the U.K. that raises the risk that a decline in subscribers may follow.
After eight games, the average audience for pay-TV provider’s “Super Sunday” English Premier League match is 1.03 million viewers, according to data from the Broadcasters’ Audience Research Board. That’s down 39 percent from a peak of 1.68 million viewers in 2011-2012. The 4 p.m. slot, a fixture for Sky since 1992, is part of an overall drop in its Premier League viewership this year, a concern for investors after the company paid 4.17 billion pounds ($5.17 billion) in its latest three-season contract with the league.
The audience drop, familiar to U.S. broadcasters contending with shrinking ratings for some sports, highlights the global squeeze on media companies as viewers move online and onto mobile devices. Sky, whose largest shareholder is Rupert Murdoch’s 21st Century Fox Inc., is paying record sums to air the world’s richest soccer league and keep ahead of BT Group Plc, which broadcasts some Premier League games. While Sky held on to most matches, it’s still losing viewers, and there’s no guarantee the outlay will prevent subscriber losses.
“Viewership stats such as that can often be seen as a precursor to churn increasing,” said Neil Campling, an analyst at Northern Trust Securities LLP in London, referring to the industry performance indicator for customer attrition. “These are big changes. These are not two, three percent declines. These are potentially quite significant.”
The BARB data show the full-season average audience has fallen each year since 2011-2012, including the first eight games of the current 2016-2017 season. The figures are similar when comparing the first eight games of each season with this year’s start, though not all five seasons show a drop.
Sky executives have blamed the tough start on competition from the Rio de Janeiro Summer Olympics and the 2016 European soccer championship.
In response to the Sunday decline, Sky said that overall, it’s shown 19 of the 20 most-watched Premier League matches in the season that started in August. The company also said BARB data doesn’t include audiences for its Now TV digital service or Sky Go mobile package -- figures Sky doesn’t release. The broadcaster said that it is actually drawing more viewers when lower-tier divisions such as the Championship are included.
“There are of course a number of factors which affect short-term year-on-year viewing trends, with the Olympics this season being a good example, but what is important is we have seen growth in viewing across domestic football and our whole sport portfolio year on year,” Barney Francis, managing director of Sky Sports, said in an e-mailed statement. “While the data doesn’t reflect the total picture, what we see at Sky is even greater audiences engaging in the way that suits them best.”
Overall, Sky is still adding subscribers, though growth has slowed. It gained 35,000 customers in the U.K. and Ireland in the fiscal first quarter, about half as many as the 77,000 additions a year earlier. But a rising churn rate, a rolling measure of customer attrition over the past year, suggests marketing costs are on the rise, Campling said. There’s also a risk that there’s simply too much saturation of sports content and viewers are getting turned off, he said. Walt Disney Co.’s ESPN lost 621,000 subscribers from October to November, according to Nielsen data. www.bloomberg.com
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Yeah plus The Times did a report now on other versions which is the fact streaming is so popular with people who are tech savvy and then the others who are not refuse to pay for Sky and BT so they just go to pub xD
|
Since chile won the copa america
Leicester won the league, di caprio won the oscar, bowie, lemmy weiland died, portugal won the euro, the brexit happened and now trump
we are truly sorry
|
And in colombia the No for agreement with farc won :p
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
Yeah that one was beyond my logic i mean breixt was silly but holy hell to vote to keep a civil war going was rather interesting.
|
On November 10 2016 04:40 Pandemona wrote: Yeah that one was beyond my logic i mean breixt was silly but holy hell to vote to keep a civil war going was rather interesting. You see, Civ 6 totally overestimates war weariness as a thing.
On topic: NL has a whole bunch of subs I have never heard of. I know friendlies are a good time to experiment, but this seems a bit desperate. Do we really not have any decent defenders?
|
On November 10 2016 05:16 Acrofales wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2016 04:40 Pandemona wrote: Yeah that one was beyond my logic i mean breixt was silly but holy hell to vote to keep a civil war going was rather interesting. You see, Civ 6 totally overestimates war weariness as a thing. On topic: NL has a whole bunch of subs I have never heard of. I know friendlies are a good time to experiment, but this seems a bit desperate. Do we really not have any decent defenders?
There is no shame in not knowing the subs of teams that can't even make it to the Euro.
|
On November 10 2016 05:36 mahrgell wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2016 05:16 Acrofales wrote:On November 10 2016 04:40 Pandemona wrote: Yeah that one was beyond my logic i mean breixt was silly but holy hell to vote to keep a civil war going was rather interesting. You see, Civ 6 totally overestimates war weariness as a thing. On topic: NL has a whole bunch of subs I have never heard of. I know friendlies are a good time to experiment, but this seems a bit desperate. Do we really not have any decent defenders? There is no shame in not knowing the subs of teams that can't even make it to the Euro. ouch
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51493 Posts
On November 10 2016 05:36 mahrgell wrote:Show nested quote +On November 10 2016 05:16 Acrofales wrote:On November 10 2016 04:40 Pandemona wrote: Yeah that one was beyond my logic i mean breixt was silly but holy hell to vote to keep a civil war going was rather interesting. You see, Civ 6 totally overestimates war weariness as a thing. On topic: NL has a whole bunch of subs I have never heard of. I know friendlies are a good time to experiment, but this seems a bit desperate. Do we really not have any decent defenders? There is no shame in not knowing the subs of teams that can't even make it to the Euro. Wow bro :3
|
On November 10 2016 04:40 Pandemona wrote: Yeah that one was beyond my logic i mean breixt was silly but holy hell to vote to keep a civil war going was rather interesting.
It is way more complex than that. The goverment tryed to pull it as .."you want peace yey or ney"
But the agreement was 200+ pages long and had many controvertory points to say the least.
So people didnt want to continue war, people wanted a better agreement.
I voted no btw.
|
What kind of bet did you lose pande? Pls tell me you dont do US politics...
|
|
|
|
On November 10 2016 20:47 Skynx wrote: Nice sig you got then Damn you, he wouldn't have noticed that until next summer when he finally updates his sig for this seasons threads! Oh well, was fun while it lasted
|
That sig had a point tho
|
So Löw decided to field Ter Stegen vs San Marino and Leno vs Italy.
I mean I'm not super confident after Ter Stegen's previous performances in our national team, but it's gotta suck to get San Marino while your competitor gets Italy.
|
|
|
|