|
On September 05 2018 20:04 D-light wrote:Very in control.
The one thing to note is that the natural is pretty hard for Toss to protect. Good game from TY though
|
On September 05 2018 20:05 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:04 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:03 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 The_Templar wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:55 dankobanana wrote:On September 05 2018 19:51 207aicila wrote:
While I fully agree that was a loss-worthy move, if it hadn't been for disruptors TY would've won that set 7 minutes earlier lol. but they exist and I'm pretty sure TY has heard of them before. he played worse in total and deserved a loss. by the chance of a stupid game mechanic, he got a draw. By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design.  i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs Hey that's no fair, I thought we were ignoring facts. I purposefuly ignored reavers' presence in 2 other matchups. But what do I know, I'm just a little kid, unlike certain old veterans here who solved both BW and SC2 metagame 15 years ago. Yes you should actually watch some pro matches before opening your mouth trying to trash talk with objectively incorrect views against people who actually know what they're talking about. I'm glad you've confirmed that everyone who doesn't agree with you is "objectively incorrect".
Literally just watch BW and see what the facts are. I didn't say reavers are bad, just that disruptors do similar or better damage much more easily and don't require the arcane bullshit prayers to the pathing gods to do *any damage whatsoever*.
|
So much terrran bias here lol. Arent protoss watching this match or?
|
Disruptor vs Bio is actually really cool to watch. Always messy since it's so hard to control and multitask for both players.
|
On September 05 2018 20:06 IshinShishi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:04 Heartland wrote:On September 05 2018 20:03 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:55 dankobanana wrote:On September 05 2018 19:51 207aicila wrote:
While I fully agree that was a loss-worthy move, if it hadn't been for disruptors TY would've won that set 7 minutes earlier lol. but they exist and I'm pretty sure TY has heard of them before. he played worse in total and deserved a loss. by the chance of a stupid game mechanic, he got a draw. By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design. i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs There's pro matches where even a Deep Six Terran can hold his own against reavers better than you often see in disruptor TvP in SC2. Just saying. So how on earth could Ty win against this op unit?! Honestly? By being that much better , I'd bet on around 100 eapm over Neeb.
Yes, guessing eapm is a good way to judge skill.
|
On September 05 2018 20:05 Heartland wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:05 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:04 Heartland wrote:On September 05 2018 20:03 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:55 dankobanana wrote:On September 05 2018 19:51 207aicila wrote:
While I fully agree that was a loss-worthy move, if it hadn't been for disruptors TY would've won that set 7 minutes earlier lol. but they exist and I'm pretty sure TY has heard of them before. he played worse in total and deserved a loss. by the chance of a stupid game mechanic, he got a draw. By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design. i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs There's pro matches where even a Deep Six Terran can hold his own against reavers better than you often see in disruptor TvP in SC2. Just saying. So how on earth could Ty win against this op unit?! Being substantially better than his opponent? Wow it's like you've never watched esports before. Ah yes, that must be it.
Lol you're Heartland the shitposter who blindly worships Protoss. I remember reading your posts back when I was on my old account. Guess I'm wasting my time lol.
User was warned for this post
|
On September 05 2018 20:06 DreamOen wrote:
So much terrran bias here lol. Arent protoss watching this match or?
Protoss know to stay silent and keep the party in Aiur!!!
|
On September 05 2018 20:06 DreamOen wrote:
So much terrran bias here lol. Arent protoss watching this match or?
Enjoying the match, rather than bothering with these pointless arguments  .
|
On September 05 2018 20:06 DreamOen wrote:
So much terrran bias here lol. Arent protoss watching this match or?
Korean bias. Not enough NA fanboys here.
|
On September 05 2018 20:07 207aicila wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:05 Heartland wrote:On September 05 2018 20:05 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:04 Heartland wrote:On September 05 2018 20:03 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:55 dankobanana wrote:
[quote]
but they exist and I'm pretty sure TY has heard of them before. he played worse in total and deserved a loss. by the chance of a stupid game mechanic, he got a draw. By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design. i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs There's pro matches where even a Deep Six Terran can hold his own against reavers better than you often see in disruptor TvP in SC2. Just saying. So how on earth could Ty win against this op unit?! Being substantially better than his opponent? Wow it's like you've never watched esports before. Ah yes, that must be it. Lol you're Heartland the shitposter who blindly worships Protoss. I remember reading your posts back when I was on my old account. Guess I'm wasting my time lol.
An account I am sure was not banned for being utterly obnoxious.
|
On September 05 2018 20:07 Fyzar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:06 DreamOen wrote:
So much terrran bias here lol. Arent protoss watching this match or? Enjoying the match, rather than bothering with these pointless arguments .
Yeah you may be right. The arguments are pointless when these 20 year olds who joined in 2013 think they know BW better than people who literally watched proleague and starleague all the time for most of the game's existence.
I think I'll take your advice.
|
On September 05 2018 20:08 D-light wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:06 DreamOen wrote:
So much terrran bias here lol. Arent protoss watching this match or? Korean bias. Not enough NA fanboys here.
Bruh it's 7 (or 4) in the morning.
|
I don't understand neeb's unwillingess to build cannons to that backbase of his
|
On September 05 2018 20:08 Heartland wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:07 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:05 Heartland wrote:On September 05 2018 20:05 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:04 Heartland wrote:On September 05 2018 20:03 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:[quote] By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design. i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs There's pro matches where even a Deep Six Terran can hold his own against reavers better than you often see in disruptor TvP in SC2. Just saying. So how on earth could Ty win against this op unit?! Being substantially better than his opponent? Wow it's like you've never watched esports before. Ah yes, that must be it. Lol you're Heartland the shitposter who blindly worships Protoss. I remember reading your posts back when I was on my old account. Guess I'm wasting my time lol. An account I am sure was not banned for being utterly obnoxious.
It wasn't banned no.
Also you're implying that saying objectively incorrect things in a snarky tone isn't obnoxious. That's the youngster's Le Leddit way of arguing though, I see.
|
So did TY just figure out Neeb's weak spot?
|
On September 05 2018 20:08 Heartland wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:07 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:05 Heartland wrote:On September 05 2018 20:05 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:04 Heartland wrote:On September 05 2018 20:03 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:[quote] By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design. i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs There's pro matches where even a Deep Six Terran can hold his own against reavers better than you often see in disruptor TvP in SC2. Just saying. So how on earth could Ty win against this op unit?! Being substantially better than his opponent? Wow it's like you've never watched esports before. Ah yes, that must be it. Lol you're Heartland the shitposter who blindly worships Protoss. I remember reading your posts back when I was on my old account. Guess I'm wasting my time lol. An account I am sure was not banned for being utterly obnoxious.
Nice
|
On September 05 2018 20:08 207aicila wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:07 Fyzar wrote:On September 05 2018 20:06 DreamOen wrote:
So much terrran bias here lol. Arent protoss watching this match or? Enjoying the match, rather than bothering with these pointless arguments . Yeah you may be right. The arguments are pointless when these 20 year olds who joined in 2013 think they know BW better than people who literally watched proleague and starleague all the time for most of the game's existence. I think I'll take your advice.
For someone probably older than 20 you're quite immature
|
|
|
On September 05 2018 20:09 TheDougler wrote:
Morning boys! GO NEEB!!!
How do you have this much energy in the morning?
Coffee?
|
This series is exactly what I wanted out of Neeb vs Rogue. Aggression, normal games, close series, and proxies. We even had a draw and we're only on game 5 (6)! This has been amazing
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
