|
Ok, I hate disruptors, but TY should have really killed that base
|
On September 05 2018 19:59 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 19:58 Durnuu wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:55 dankobanana wrote:On September 05 2018 19:51 207aicila wrote:
While I fully agree that was a loss-worthy move, if it hadn't been for disruptors TY would've won that set 7 minutes earlier lol. but they exist and I'm pretty sure TY has heard of them before. he played worse in total and deserved a loss. by the chance of a stupid game mechanic, he got a draw. By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design.  i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings pretty sure BW's design is literally perfect Pathing included.
Yeah, should give Disruptor shots BW reaver pathing. :D
|
On September 05 2018 20:02 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:55 dankobanana wrote:On September 05 2018 19:51 207aicila wrote:
While I fully agree that was a loss-worthy move, if it hadn't been for disruptors TY would've won that set 7 minutes earlier lol. but they exist and I'm pretty sure TY has heard of them before. he played worse in total and deserved a loss. by the chance of a stupid game mechanic, he got a draw. By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design. i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs Hey that's no fair, I thought we were ignoring facts.
I purposefuly ignored reavers' presence in 2 other matchups.
But what do I know, I'm just a little kid, unlike certain old veterans here who solved both BW and SC2 metagame 15 years ago.
|
On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:55 dankobanana wrote:On September 05 2018 19:51 207aicila wrote:
While I fully agree that was a loss-worthy move, if it hadn't been for disruptors TY would've won that set 7 minutes earlier lol. but they exist and I'm pretty sure TY has heard of them before. he played worse in total and deserved a loss. by the chance of a stupid game mechanic, he got a draw. By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design. i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs
There's pro matches where even a Deep Six Terran can hold his own against reavers better than you often see in disruptor TvP in SC2. Just saying.
|
United States97274 Posts
|
That was a bit too premature.
|
|
|
GG. TY was in control of that game.
|
|
|
your Country52797 Posts
Those offensive blinks were not very effective...
|
On September 05 2018 20:03 Ej_ wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:02 The_Templar wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:55 dankobanana wrote:On September 05 2018 19:51 207aicila wrote:
While I fully agree that was a loss-worthy move, if it hadn't been for disruptors TY would've won that set 7 minutes earlier lol. but they exist and I'm pretty sure TY has heard of them before. he played worse in total and deserved a loss. by the chance of a stupid game mechanic, he got a draw. By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design. i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs Hey that's no fair, I thought we were ignoring facts. I purposefuly ignored reavers' presence in 2 other matchups. But what do I know, I'm just a little kid, unlike certain old veterans here who solved both BW and SC2 metagame 15 years ago.
Yes you should actually watch some pro matches before opening your mouth trying to trash talk with objectively incorrect views against people who actually know what they're talking about.
|
On September 05 2018 20:03 207aicila wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:55 dankobanana wrote:On September 05 2018 19:51 207aicila wrote:
While I fully agree that was a loss-worthy move, if it hadn't been for disruptors TY would've won that set 7 minutes earlier lol. but they exist and I'm pretty sure TY has heard of them before. he played worse in total and deserved a loss. by the chance of a stupid game mechanic, he got a draw. By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design. i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs There's pro matches where even a Deep Six Terran can hold his own against reavers better than you often see in disruptor TvP in SC2. Just saying.
So how on earth could Ty win against this op unit?!
|
On September 05 2018 20:03 Shellshock wrote:
Neeb dead
Excellent multitasking again from TY.
|
On September 05 2018 20:04 Weavel wrote:
GG. TY was in control of that game.
Very in control.
|
On September 05 2018 20:04 Heartland wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:03 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:55 dankobanana wrote:On September 05 2018 19:51 207aicila wrote:
While I fully agree that was a loss-worthy move, if it hadn't been for disruptors TY would've won that set 7 minutes earlier lol. but they exist and I'm pretty sure TY has heard of them before. he played worse in total and deserved a loss. by the chance of a stupid game mechanic, he got a draw. By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design. i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs There's pro matches where even a Deep Six Terran can hold his own against reavers better than you often see in disruptor TvP in SC2. Just saying. So how on earth could Ty win against this op unit?!
Being substantially better than his opponent? Wow it's like you've never watched esports before.
|
France12750 Posts
That works better when you have the economy to have the planetary so your army can fight back
Gg TY
|
On September 05 2018 20:04 207aicila wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:03 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 The_Templar wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:55 dankobanana wrote:On September 05 2018 19:51 207aicila wrote:
While I fully agree that was a loss-worthy move, if it hadn't been for disruptors TY would've won that set 7 minutes earlier lol. but they exist and I'm pretty sure TY has heard of them before. he played worse in total and deserved a loss. by the chance of a stupid game mechanic, he got a draw. By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design. i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs Hey that's no fair, I thought we were ignoring facts. I purposefuly ignored reavers' presence in 2 other matchups. But what do I know, I'm just a little kid, unlike certain old veterans here who solved both BW and SC2 metagame 15 years ago. Yes you should actually watch some pro matches before opening your mouth trying to trash talk with objectively incorrect views against people who actually know what they're talking about.
I'm glad you've confirmed that everyone who doesn't agree with you is "objectively incorrect".
|
On September 05 2018 20:05 207aicila wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:04 Heartland wrote:On September 05 2018 20:03 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:55 dankobanana wrote:On September 05 2018 19:51 207aicila wrote:
While I fully agree that was a loss-worthy move, if it hadn't been for disruptors TY would've won that set 7 minutes earlier lol. but they exist and I'm pretty sure TY has heard of them before. he played worse in total and deserved a loss. by the chance of a stupid game mechanic, he got a draw. By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design. i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs There's pro matches where even a Deep Six Terran can hold his own against reavers better than you often see in disruptor TvP in SC2. Just saying. So how on earth could Ty win against this op unit?! Being substantially better than his opponent? Wow it's like you've never watched esports before.
Ah yes, that must be it.
|
On September 05 2018 20:04 207aicila wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:03 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 The_Templar wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:55 dankobanana wrote:On September 05 2018 19:51 207aicila wrote:
While I fully agree that was a loss-worthy move, if it hadn't been for disruptors TY would've won that set 7 minutes earlier lol. but they exist and I'm pretty sure TY has heard of them before. he played worse in total and deserved a loss. by the chance of a stupid game mechanic, he got a draw. By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design. i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs Hey that's no fair, I thought we were ignoring facts. I purposefuly ignored reavers' presence in 2 other matchups. But what do I know, I'm just a little kid, unlike certain old veterans here who solved both BW and SC2 metagame 15 years ago. Yes you should actually watch some pro matches before opening your mouth trying to trash talk with objectively incorrect views against people who actually know what they're talking about.
You objectively don't know what you're talking about.
|
On September 05 2018 20:04 Heartland wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2018 20:03 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 20:02 Ej_ wrote:On September 05 2018 20:00 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:58 -NegativeZero- wrote:On September 05 2018 19:57 207aicila wrote:On September 05 2018 19:55 dankobanana wrote:On September 05 2018 19:51 207aicila wrote:
While I fully agree that was a loss-worthy move, if it hadn't been for disruptors TY would've won that set 7 minutes earlier lol. but they exist and I'm pretty sure TY has heard of them before. he played worse in total and deserved a loss. by the chance of a stupid game mechanic, he got a draw. By the chance of Neeb (who had double the army supply) not realizing he should've defended his nexus. For what it's worth Terran building float has been around in Starcraft much longer than stupid 1 unit kills 20 supply in 1 shot terrible terrible damage syndrome design. i'm pretty sure reavers have been around as long as flying buildings And I'm pretty sure from over a decade of playing and watching BW (sadly I don't play anymore) that reavers were never anywhere near as effective as disruptors, due to scarab pathing and also the fact that scarabs cost money which would make them tricky in the basetrade situations of SC2. But sure, let's ignore facts. disruptor, a niche unit that sees very little usage compared to storm and collossus in every matchup vs reaver, the unit that destroys Terran in half the televise PvTs There's pro matches where even a Deep Six Terran can hold his own against reavers better than you often see in disruptor TvP in SC2. Just saying. So how on earth could Ty win against this op unit?!
Honestly? By being that much better , I'd bet on around 100 eapm over Neeb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
