EPT[IEM] Katowice - Groups C & D - Page 24
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Fango
United Kingdom8987 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55571 Posts
| ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On March 03 2017 22:47 Elentos wrote: And I guess that's the end of "Serral is the best player in the group" Zest is best | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
| ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On March 03 2017 22:47 Elentos wrote: And I guess that's the end of "Serral is the best player in the group" The group still has 3 Protoss and only 1 Zerg other than these 2 and Serral's better at ZvP. I just don't think there have been many players that could ever match Nerchio in a long ZvZ. | ||
|
coL.hendralisk
Zimbabwe1756 Posts
| ||
|
Fango
United Kingdom8987 Posts
On March 03 2017 22:47 Elentos wrote: And I guess that's the end of "Serral is the best player in the group" He seems to be a good player just doesn't have the experience of knowing when to attack, and how to engage | ||
|
fezvez
France3021 Posts
| ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16062 Posts
| ||
|
D-light
Finland7364 Posts
| ||
|
pvsnp
7676 Posts
| ||
|
palexhur
Colombia730 Posts
| ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On March 03 2017 22:48 Musicus wrote: GG, damn that was a great zvz series. I agree with that. But do people actually like ravager spam as a concept? I mean it spices up roach vs roach i guess, but i would rather see interesting movement micro, flanks, etc instead of bile² | ||
|
Malgo
Germany76 Posts
nerchio > patience called it now | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16062 Posts
On March 03 2017 22:49 Fango wrote: He seems to be a good player just doesn't have the experience of knowing when to attack, and how to engage at least in comparison to Nerchio he's bad at engagements. But that might be because Nerchio is just so good at it. | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
On March 03 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote: I agree with that. But do people actually like ravager spam as a concept? I mean it spices up roach vs roach i guess, but i would rather see interesting movement micro, flanks, etc instead of bile² Well I think we still get to see good movement and flanks, just that the biles are great to avoid huge roach clumps crashing into each other all game. | ||
|
teamplasma
Afghanistan12 Posts
| ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On March 03 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote: I agree with that. But do people actually like ravager spam as a concept? I mean it spices up roach vs roach i guess, but i would rather see interesting movement micro, flanks, etc instead of bile² there's a ton of army control and tactical movement in roach ravager infestor, Stop focusing on the yellow dots and start thinking why Nerchio's ravagers are always out of enemy bile range and yet hitting all biles. | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16062 Posts
On March 03 2017 22:49 The_Red_Viper wrote: I agree with that. But do people actually like ravager spam as a concept? I mean it spices up roach vs roach i guess, but i would rather see interesting movement micro, flanks, etc instead of bile² I like ravagers when there are only a few of them like in zvp but when it's MASS ravagers I think it's just stupid. | ||
|
Charoisaur
Germany16062 Posts
On March 03 2017 22:51 Musicus wrote: Well I think we still get to see good movement and flanks, just that the biles are great to avoid huge roach clumps crashing into each other all game. I preferred roach clumps crashing into each other tbh. | ||
| ||
