EPT
[NationWars 4] Qualifier Thread - Page 10
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Ludwigvan
Germany2371 Posts
| ||
|
corydoras
161 Posts
| ||
|
GreenMash
Norway1746 Posts
| ||
|
Durnuu
13322 Posts
On December 21 2016 23:30 Elentos wrote: I think a 2nd revive would have been a much cooler option. Halfway through the match we disqualify a team? Really? At least give them the 1st normal revive :/ | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
 | ||
|
Elentos
55571 Posts
On December 21 2016 23:30 Durnuu wrote: At least give them the 1st normal revive :/ I wonder if they knew Oogway would have to leave but they let Croatia play anyway expecting a 20 minute 4-0 | ||
|
shid0x
Korea (South)5014 Posts
On December 21 2016 23:30 Durnuu wrote: At least give them the 1st normal revive :/ Rules are rules. At some point you have to follow them otherwise everyone could abuse them. Regardless of how cold hearted it may like in special occasions. | ||
|
D-light
Finland7364 Posts
| ||
|
imre
France9263 Posts
On December 21 2016 23:32 shid0x wrote: Rules are rules. At some point you have to follow them otherwise everyone could abuse them. Regardless of how cold hearted it may like in special occasions. That's annoying but you are on point. Making exceptions is the worst thing you can do. | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
On December 21 2016 23:32 Elentos wrote: I wonder if they knew Oogway would have to leave but they let Croatia play anyway expecting a 20 minute 4-0 I think Ptak knew Oogway couldn't play, but didn't mention it expecting to 4-0 Korea himself. | ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55571 Posts
On December 21 2016 23:34 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: So both Netherlands and Korea couldn't qualify on their own merit Rigged competition. Netherlands vs Korea finals confirmed. Also ZG doesn't know Couguar? He's one of the Russian 6 Dank Templars. | ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55571 Posts
On December 21 2016 23:16 CynicalDeath wrote: go go go Italy on stream B! I don't think Italy is making it today friend. | ||
|
Jacenoob
299 Posts
On December 21 2016 23:32 shid0x wrote: Rules are rules. At some point you have to follow them otherwise everyone could abuse them. Regardless of how cold hearted it may like in special occasions. Sure. Please tell me how you abuse "forfeiting a game". There is nothing. The rule is utter bullshit. If a player can't compete why not just give the team a loss. | ||
|
TBO
Germany1350 Posts
Don't see anything specific about the situation mentioned there. The closest one is about a player disconnecting and then not being able to reconnect, which just makes him lose the map not DQ the team. | ||
|
Rehio
United States1718 Posts
On December 21 2016 23:41 Jacenoob wrote: Sure. Please tell me how you abuse "forfeiting a game". There is nothing. The rule is utter bullshit. If a player can't compete why not just give the team a loss. How to abuse it? Alright. A country only has two good players. They sign up a third unknown who they never intend to play, just taking a loss in order to have enough players to compete in the tournament. Regardless, this was an established rule. The time for bitching about whether it's a good rule or not is before the tournament starts, not only once it becomes relevant. | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On December 21 2016 23:45 Rehio wrote: How to abuse it? Alright. A country only has two good players. They sign up a third unknown who they never intend to play, just taking a loss in order to have enough players to compete in the tournament. Regardless, this was an established rule. The time for bitching about whether it's a good rule or not is before the tournament starts, not only once it becomes relevant. how is that abuse lol, you could always submit a team with 2 progamers and a diamond and the result would be the same... | ||
|
TBO
Germany1350 Posts
On December 21 2016 23:45 Rehio wrote: How to abuse it? Alright. A country only has two good players. They sign up a third unknown who they never intend to play, just taking a loss in order to have enough players to compete in the tournament. Regardless, this was an established rule. The time for bitching about whether it's a good rule or not is before the tournament starts, not only once it becomes relevant. "established rule" , maybe I am blind but I don't see it in the rulebook. | ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
| ||
| ||
