EPT[WCS EU] Ro16 Group B Season 3 2014 - Page 20
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
mikumegurine
Canada3145 Posts
| ||
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
Poll: Recommend Winners Match Game 1? ★- Do not see this game no matter what (0) ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3) ★★★- Good game (0) ★★★★- Highly recommended game (1) ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (6) 10 total votes Your vote: Recommend Winners Match Game 1? (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what | ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/VuKCgYfjur0/hqdefault.jpg) | ||
|
dark1882
Ireland529 Posts
| ||
|
Ketch
Netherlands7285 Posts
| ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/thH24md.png) GumBa getting eFamous. | ||
|
Fanatic-Templar
Canada5819 Posts
| ||
|
FuRRie
Belgium815 Posts
| ||
|
ZAiNs
United Kingdom6525 Posts
On September 18 2014 03:43 Nirel wrote: 2010 called it wants its strategy back. Nah this is a 2014 strategy. Most Protoss scout their mains every PvT on 2-player map because of this, it's pretty much autowin if unscouted. | ||
|
Squat
Sweden7978 Posts
On September 18 2014 03:43 Darkhorse wrote: I wouldn't be that opposed to it these days. There isn't much that a Zerg would neural in a typical TvZ army these days besides thors (and this would be better than in WoL considering most Terrans wouldn't have tanks to insta-kill the infestor that neuraled a thor) but I guess that could be cool. It would be more useful in ZvP and it wouldn't be as dumb now that the mothership with vortex isn't such an integral part of the lategame PvZ army. Yeah the thing that broke it was NPing the MS and then using vortex on the protoss army, but that was broken becuase of the MS, not the NP. What could zerg do with it that would be broken these days, considering the cost and risks associated with the spell? | ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
On September 18 2014 03:44 stuchiu wrote: Morrow the real MVP of this game. The Bunker Centipede ? | ||
|
royalroadweed
United States8301 Posts
On September 18 2014 03:44 ThomasjServo wrote: GumBa getting eFamous. I'm not surprised. Redeye is almost as big of an innovation fan as gumba. Probably 3rd behind naruto. | ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
| ||
|
AWalker9
United Kingdom7229 Posts
| ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On September 18 2014 03:46 TheDwf wrote: What happened in the first game? 12/14? 8rax in main | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On September 18 2014 03:45 Squat wrote: Yeah the thing that broke it was NPing the MS and then using vortex on the protoss army, but that was broken becuase of the MS, not the NP. What could zerg do with it that would be broken these days, considering the cost and risks associated with the spell? 2 way Archon Toilet, They should look at NP infestors are kind of wandering in the meta, they have uses, but they are still very fringish units in the current meta. | ||
|
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
Yoda was just trying to use the bunker teleportation mining trick. It's San's fault for spawning in the way of the minerals! | ||
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
On September 18 2014 03:45 Squat wrote: Yeah the thing that broke it was NPing the MS and then using vortex on the protoss army, but that was broken becuase of the MS, not the NP. What could zerg do with it that would be broken these days, considering the cost and risks associated with the spell? Right exactly the removal of vortex really removed the problem with it. (Leenock vs HerO on antiga never forget fuck that game) so honestly I wouldn't mind a buff to it. It's a cool spell and an interesting concept. Taking control of a few colossus in the middle of a fight is huge and a sick play. Wish we could see more | ||
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
On September 18 2014 03:44 ThomasjServo wrote: GumBa getting eFamous. I wish famous people wished me happy birthday :\ | ||
|
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
On September 18 2014 03:44 ThomasjServo wrote: GumBa getting eFamous. Wow where is my redeye shoutout? | ||
| ||
