data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
[WCS EU] Challenger League Bracket Stages Season 3 - Page 24
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
![]() | ||
![]()
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
| ||
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
![]() edit: gg Starbuck! Welcome to Code S! :D Starbuck 2-0 San | ||
![]()
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
| ||
scsnow
Slovenia515 Posts
| ||
Aeromi
France14456 Posts
| ||
![]()
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
On October 03 2013 01:35 Aeromi wrote: Starbuck is not in Premier League but he won against San. For now we'll leave it as he advances as we do not know 100% how WCS will run in 2014 | ||
Aeromi
France14456 Posts
On October 03 2013 01:36 NovemberstOrm wrote: For now we'll leave it as he advances as we do not know 100% how WCS will run in 2014 Ok ! ^_^ | ||
![]()
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
but yeah i really hope that doesn't happen it's gonna make it so hard to qualify for premier :/ for anyone who has no idea what're talking about: On October 02 2013 20:57 Starbuck- wrote: This season you can't qualify from Season 3 challenger to Premier league season 1 - 2014. If you finish top at challenger, you get better seed for the qualifiers for Premier, so it's like that Qualify for challenger (or drop from premier ) --- > Play and try to finish first (top 8) --------> another qualifiers only for top players from challenger. So it's gonna be really hard to come back in Premier once your out... I hate Blizzard, this makes rly no sense to do something like that ... On October 02 2013 23:09 SC2ShoWTimE wrote: they sent an email to every player in which they explain it and also said that they will announce more changes for wcs 2014 in the near future. | ||
Aeromi
France14456 Posts
On October 02 2013 23:09 SC2ShoWTimE wrote: they sent an email to every player in which they explain it and also said that they will announce more changes for wcs 2014 in the near future. | ||
Heartland
Sweden24578 Posts
| ||
![]()
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
| ||
![]()
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
| ||
![]()
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
| ||
Boucot
France15997 Posts
On October 03 2013 01:41 Heartland wrote: I don't think it's necessarily bad with the WCS format. I think the player pool has been a bit too conservative in who goes in and out. There needs to be some more radical cut-off between the seasons to mix up the player pool. I agree that a 16 players rotation over the actual 8 would be better but why penalize the players who are doing well ? | ||
XtreMe_au
Australia412 Posts
| ||
Heartland
Sweden24578 Posts
On October 03 2013 01:48 Boucot wrote: I agree that a 16 players rotation over the actual 8 would be better but why penalize the players who are doing well ? Sure. But any system will create some injustices. You could make the argument that you're penalising people who are constantly almost getting in through the qualifiers, but just missing out because most players stay in the WCS rotation. | ||
Aeromi
France14456 Posts
![]() ![]() | ||
![]()
NovemberstOrm
Canada16217 Posts
| ||
Heartland
Sweden24578 Posts
| ||
| ||