|
|
On September 14 2013 17:47 LittleRedBoy wrote:
I'm not sure why you guys think that carriers aren't any good. They destroy almost every unit once you get enough of them.
In WoL I would actually agree that Carrier could possibly be the ultimate late game PvP unit but in HotS Tempests exist. Getting enough of them is next to impossible anyway and a hugely unnecessary risk in the position that Monchi was in. You always have better options.
|
For some reason I can't seem to get myself hyped for these matches, it's like I'm watching chess and not sc2 lol
|
On September 14 2013 17:47 LittleRedBoy wrote:
I'm not sure why you guys think that carriers aren't any good. They destroy almost every unit once you get enough of them.
That's probably the biggest problem, they take FOREVER to build, aren't cheap and pretty terrible in low numbers.
|
On September 14 2013 17:46 Exarl25 wrote:
Why do pro players STILL NOT FUCKING SCOUT? The number of games I've seen lost due to this shit. As if the handful of lost minerals are ever actually a big deal. So pathetic.
It's part of the meta. People like to play economically greedy so the smarter players are punishing them. Give it a few weeks and everyone will go back to scouting and the cycle will continue forevers.
|
On September 14 2013 17:48 Zheryn wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2013 17:46 Exarl25 wrote:
Why do pro players STILL NOT FUCKING SCOUT? The number of games I've seen lost due to this shit. As if the handful of lost minerals are ever actually a big deal. So pathetic. They are taking risks to gain advantages. However, I really do believe as well that it's quite unnecessary sometimes to just straight up gamble and have no chance to win vs certain builds.
The risk vs reward is completely off balance though. The tiny loss of income from scouting is near meaningless, anyone who says different is bullshitting you. Insta win vs insta loss if you just send a single Probe out. If players were actually confident they could hold anything without scouting then not scouting makes sense but otherwise it's just stupid and arrogant.
|
typical DH 
|
that music clip again :DDDD
|
Finally some real swedish rock 'n' roll
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This song isn't very entertaining (or even tolerable) when you don't speak Swedish.
|
On September 14 2013 17:54 {ToT}ColmA wrote:
whats that song lol
Bräkne-Hoby with the smash hit "Du Tände Mig"
|
|
|
Youtube link to the song please?^^
On September 14 2013 17:56 AlternativeEgo wrote:Bräkne-Hoby with the smash hit "Du Tände Mig"
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Gotta love the Swedes. They randomly drop F-bombs in places you don't expect.
|
On September 14 2013 17:52 Exarl25 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 14 2013 17:48 Zheryn wrote:On September 14 2013 17:46 Exarl25 wrote:
Why do pro players STILL NOT FUCKING SCOUT? The number of games I've seen lost due to this shit. As if the handful of lost minerals are ever actually a big deal. So pathetic. They are taking risks to gain advantages. However, I really do believe as well that it's quite unnecessary sometimes to just straight up gamble and have no chance to win vs certain builds. The risk vs reward is completely off balance though. The tiny loss of income from scouting is near meaningless, anyone who says different is bullshitting you. Insta win vs insta loss if you just send a single Probe out. If players were actually confident they could hold anything without scouting then not scouting makes sense but otherwise it's just stupid and arrogant.
I feel like that as well most of the times. Personally I wouldn't like to do a build where I straight up lose like 5% of the games without any chance at winning them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
