EPT[HSC VII] Day 3 - Page 95
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7032 Posts
| ||
|
Henk
Netherlands578 Posts
| ||
|
_SpiRaL_
Afghanistan1636 Posts
| ||
Beyonder
Netherlands15103 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:49 Grumbels wrote: mana with bad decision making... how can you still lose after killing that many roaches? That was such a confusing game.. wtf. | ||
|
SyDe
France355 Posts
| ||
|
wildstyle1337
Poland514 Posts
| ||
|
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
| ||
|
Abominous
Croatia1625 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:50 wildstyle1337 wrote: losing 30 roaches for free no big deal... Yeah, he lost them for free. | ||
|
Qwerty85
Croatia5536 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:49 Grumbels wrote: mana with bad decision making... how can you still lose after killing that many roaches? because they are very cheap and dont mean anything to a 3+ base zerg.... | ||
|
LuckyMacro
United States1482 Posts
| ||
|
Makro
France16890 Posts
| ||
|
_SpiRaL_
Afghanistan1636 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:50 wildstyle1337 wrote: losing 30 roaches for free no big deal... Was not completely for free and it was not 30 roaches. He did a lot of damage at the second base meanwhile and they were able to fight a little bit as well killing some units in MaNas army although not cost effectively. | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:50 Qwerty85 wrote: because they are very cheap and dont mean anything to a 3+ base zerg.... Not precisely true, but the division of roaches by stephano made it so Mana couldn't ignore the pressure at the natural which in turn delayed his opportunity to return aggression | ||
|
revel8
United Kingdom3022 Posts
| ||
|
Boucot
France15997 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:51 LuckyMacro wrote: Pretty sure Stephano spawns 2 roaches/hydras for each larvae. Seriously his macro was impressive this game. He lost a ton of roaches and 1 minute later he was 157/200 against 97/200. | ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:51 revel8 wrote: Missed the Stephano - Mana games. Was it just another case of Stephanoach too stronk? No first game was ultra passive swarmhost | ||
|
mongoose22
174 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:43 Faruko wrote: Sure, they will make another passive unit for P and T that could counter static SH, thats how they balance this game... That wouldn't make any sense. Making new units is way more expensive than balancing the current units; there's virtually no chance Blizzard would introduce new units until the next expansion. Besides, the problem at that point is more that the swarm host doesn't fit David's vision of a more raider-type unit that can be repositioned constantly. I would expect that Blizzard reduces their burrow time and makes up for that by also reducing the lifespan of the locusts. This would allow the swarm hosts to move around faster but would reduce the range of the locusts and allow for closer enemy engagements. This would be particularly effective if they kept the cooldown higher, so that even with the upgrade there's a hole between the locusts' spawn times. So many things Blizzard could do without resorting to making a new unit. | ||
|
_SpiRaL_
Afghanistan1636 Posts
On June 23 2013 04:51 revel8 wrote: Missed the Stephano - Mana games. Was it just another case of Stephanoach too stronk? First game-MaNa went passive 3 base to start, Stephano went SH and did the same. MaNa denied the 4th of Stephano and at one stage took 5 bases vs 3. However Stephano cost efficiency was sick and he was eventually able to take the 4th and keep MaNa to 4. MaNa went sky toss. SH, Hydra, corruptor, viper control too good. Game 2, Stephano denies 3rd of Mana twice, delays it so long Mana has to go all in with immortal, sentry stalker, MSC. Hydra roach defends the all in. | ||
|
Faruko
Chile34173 Posts
| ||
|
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
break music it is | ||
| ||
