|
Austria24422 Posts
On May 06 2013 16:56 Ghanburighan wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 16:40 Nebuchad wrote:On May 06 2013 16:32 Ghanburighan wrote:On May 06 2013 16:28 Nebuchad wrote:On May 06 2013 16:25 Ghanburighan wrote:
The amount of balance whine when Flash beats Roro in a Bo1 One post. Sick amount. I remember you, you make balance whiney posts about ZvT quite often. On May 06 2013 02:23 Nebuchad wrote:On May 06 2013 02:20 YoungTyTy wrote:On May 06 2013 02:16 Nebuchad wrote:
Terran got destroyed this round, wow. Had 9 in Ro32 and only 1 so far in Ro16 (with Pro7ect still in play for potential n"2) Is that because terran is so imba like yesterday :p Depends how many hellbats they made :p Nah yesterday I didn't mean anything about balance, it was just frustrating to see no zergs advance once again, when they had so many contenders and terrans had so few. But then uzer pulled something unexpected and things got okay. Balance whine in this thread so far: ktgster pylonsalad YourHarry Tsubbi ktgster wrote like 150 times that he was after solutions, not balance, and the other two posted after you complained. Anyway 4 people is very low in TL standards, your outrage is invalid. Btw you went into my history and that's all the whine you could find? lol. I've complained way harder than that. Wow, the way some people think... The correct amount of balance whine in an LR is none.And complaining more about balance is not something to be proud of. Instead of discussing the awesome games happening on stream, we get spammed by whiners, detracting from the enjoyment.
Unless it's WoL PvZ. Then it's completely fine.
|
Bisutopia19384 Posts
On May 06 2013 16:54 Thrillz wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 16:52 BisuDagger wrote:On May 06 2013 16:48 teddyoojo wrote:On May 06 2013 16:47 BisuDagger wrote:
With all the drops in TvT do you think that planetary fortress is going to become more standard at the natural and third? lol no pf on natural is straight up stupid and well, pf on third is aswell as you just lose if u do it Losing 9 scvs at a single base is stupid. The cost of losing those units. Plus not having to pull units to deal with pressure allows you to move out with your army. No one is going to get a pf at there natural, and very few would ever consider pf at the third.
This is the kind of strategical thinking that will limit you as a player. Never say never. There is a scenario for everything.
|
On May 06 2013 16:52 BisuDagger wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 16:48 teddyoojo wrote:On May 06 2013 16:47 BisuDagger wrote:
With all the drops in TvT do you think that planetary fortress is going to become more standard at the natural and third? lol no pf on natural is straight up stupid and well, pf on third is aswell as you just lose if u do it Losing 9 scvs at a single base is stupid. The cost of losing those units. Plus not having to pull units to deal with pressure allows you to move out with your army.
a PF is not going to stop a drop. Most players would just drop anyways and target fire scvs. Giving up scans and mules just to half-assedly defend against drops also doesn't make much sense either
|
|
|
Austria24422 Posts
I feel bad since Innovation got me 10 fpl points by all killing EGTL and beating HerO. I did need the points though since Bong decided to win for no reason at all.
I'd like a HerO all kill next time so I can actually feel good about getting points.
|
On May 06 2013 16:57 EpiK wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 16:52 BisuDagger wrote:On May 06 2013 16:48 teddyoojo wrote:On May 06 2013 16:47 BisuDagger wrote:
With all the drops in TvT do you think that planetary fortress is going to become more standard at the natural and third? lol no pf on natural is straight up stupid and well, pf on third is aswell as you just lose if u do it Losing 9 scvs at a single base is stupid. The cost of losing those units. Plus not having to pull units to deal with pressure allows you to move out with your army. a PF is not going to stop a drop. Most players would just drop anyways and target fire scvs. Giving up scans and mules just to half-assedly defend against drops also doesn't make much sense either
I think a better solution is more sensor towers and turrets, taking advantage of your mineral wealth.
|
On May 06 2013 16:57 EpiK wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 16:52 BisuDagger wrote:On May 06 2013 16:48 teddyoojo wrote:On May 06 2013 16:47 BisuDagger wrote:
With all the drops in TvT do you think that planetary fortress is going to become more standard at the natural and third? lol no pf on natural is straight up stupid and well, pf on third is aswell as you just lose if u do it Losing 9 scvs at a single base is stupid. The cost of losing those units. Plus not having to pull units to deal with pressure allows you to move out with your army. a PF is not going to stop a drop. Most players would just drop anyways and target fire scvs. Giving up scans and mules just to half-assedly defend against drops also doesn't make much sense either
Whats the general opinion on using bunkers with M/M and turrets for drop protection? (iirc Innovation used this to minimize dmg from flash)
|
Bisutopia19384 Posts
On May 06 2013 16:58 armada[sb] wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 16:57 EpiK wrote:On May 06 2013 16:52 BisuDagger wrote:On May 06 2013 16:48 teddyoojo wrote:On May 06 2013 16:47 BisuDagger wrote:
With all the drops in TvT do you think that planetary fortress is going to become more standard at the natural and third? lol no pf on natural is straight up stupid and well, pf on third is aswell as you just lose if u do it Losing 9 scvs at a single base is stupid. The cost of losing those units. Plus not having to pull units to deal with pressure allows you to move out with your army. a PF is not going to stop a drop. Most players would just drop anyways and target fire scvs. Giving up scans and mules just to half-assedly defend against drops also doesn't make much sense either I think a better solution is more sensor towers and turrets, taking advantage of your mineral wealth.
I agree with this too. More turrets would have definitely helped out. Unfortunately Flash's strategy is so new the timing to drop turrets is up in the air at this time.
|
On May 06 2013 16:59 gingerfluffmuff wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 16:57 EpiK wrote:On May 06 2013 16:52 BisuDagger wrote:On May 06 2013 16:48 teddyoojo wrote:On May 06 2013 16:47 BisuDagger wrote:
With all the drops in TvT do you think that planetary fortress is going to become more standard at the natural and third? lol no pf on natural is straight up stupid and well, pf on third is aswell as you just lose if u do it Losing 9 scvs at a single base is stupid. The cost of losing those units. Plus not having to pull units to deal with pressure allows you to move out with your army. a PF is not going to stop a drop. Most players would just drop anyways and target fire scvs. Giving up scans and mules just to half-assedly defend against drops also doesn't make much sense either Whats the general opinion on using bunkers with M/M and turrets for drop protection? (iirc Innovation used this to minimize dmg from flash)
MMM wants to be active and pressure the mech player, imho.
|
Austria24422 Posts
On May 06 2013 16:59 gingerfluffmuff wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 16:57 EpiK wrote:On May 06 2013 16:52 BisuDagger wrote:On May 06 2013 16:48 teddyoojo wrote:On May 06 2013 16:47 BisuDagger wrote:
With all the drops in TvT do you think that planetary fortress is going to become more standard at the natural and third? lol no pf on natural is straight up stupid and well, pf on third is aswell as you just lose if u do it Losing 9 scvs at a single base is stupid. The cost of losing those units. Plus not having to pull units to deal with pressure allows you to move out with your army. a PF is not going to stop a drop. Most players would just drop anyways and target fire scvs. Giving up scans and mules just to half-assedly defend against drops also doesn't make much sense either Whats the general opinion on using bunkers with M/M and turrets for drop protection? (iirc Innovation used this to minimize dmg from flash)
People will start building bunkers and load their SCVs in them when hellbat drops occur. It'll be like real life.
|
Oh man I love Jangbi but you ain't on the fantasy team. ULTIMATE WEAPON
|
Austria24422 Posts
In terms of FPL points I don't care at all about this match but I do love Jangbi. I hope he bags some confidence so he can beat MKP in Code A.
|
On May 06 2013 16:56 BisuDagger wrote:Show nested quote +On May 06 2013 16:54 Thrillz wrote:On May 06 2013 16:52 BisuDagger wrote:On May 06 2013 16:48 teddyoojo wrote:On May 06 2013 16:47 BisuDagger wrote:
With all the drops in TvT do you think that planetary fortress is going to become more standard at the natural and third? lol no pf on natural is straight up stupid and well, pf on third is aswell as you just lose if u do it Losing 9 scvs at a single base is stupid. The cost of losing those units. Plus not having to pull units to deal with pressure allows you to move out with your army. No one is going to get a pf at there natural, and very few would ever consider pf at the third. This is the kind of strategical thinking that will limit you as a player. Never say never. There is a scenario for everything.
It's not theoretically impossible but the possibility of high level pros actually doing it is so incredibly minute. The tradeoff for mules/scans/supply drops is simply considered not worth it.
|
|
|
Flash is back with cheese! That should be fun! 
|
On May 06 2013 17:03 teddyoojo wrote:
cheese are u stupid?
No, cheese is very mature.
|
Austria24422 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES51293 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
