|
On August 03 2012 03:29 OrchidThief wrote: Archon toilets are complete bullcrap, I don't care if it somehow magically balances the matchup, nothing should be that cost efficient. I made almost the same comment 6 months ago and got a warning :D I shared your opinion. but zerg split makes it kinda bad.
|
|
|
NightEnd playing surprisingly well!
|
|
LOL @ the TLO comment on how you always want to do this one thing, like a drop just before you are about to die in a game because you were looking forward to that
I get that so much, and then I micro the little (and ultimately irrelevant) attack like HELL, haha
|
United States97274 Posts
Mana has carriers arriving
|
Puma is just proving that without ghosts, TvP late-game is a joke.
|
On August 03 2012 03:31 Sated wrote:Show nested quote +On August 03 2012 03:29 OrchidThief wrote: Archon toilets are complete bullcrap, I don't care if it somehow magically balances the matchup, nothing should be that cost efficient. >Complains about cost-efficiency. >Broodlord/Infestor for a race that aren't even supposed to be cost-efficient.
Indeed.
I don't like Archon toilet though, or PvZ in general
|
On August 03 2012 03:29 OrchidThief wrote: Archon toilets are complete bullcrap, I don't care if it somehow magically balances the matchup, nothing should be that cost efficient.
In what way is Mana, or any protoss player, supposed to beat 20 broodlords with infestor support (with corruptor support if there's carriers/voidrays) without vortex? Good thing we'll have the Tempest in HotS, that should make it so vortex can be removed and get rid of what you're saying about stupid cost-efficiency.
|
On August 03 2012 03:32 Whatson wrote: Puma is just proving that without ghosts, TvP late-game is a joke.
It's like a zerg would try to prove that without brood lords zvp is a joke. What do you exactly prove?
|
On August 03 2012 03:32 Whatson wrote: Puma is just proving that without ghosts, TvP late-game is a joke.
well i think that without templars it'd be a joke too ^^
|
Wow Suppy 3-0 Kas and 3-1 Ret I'm impressed
|
On August 03 2012 03:33 Master_Blaster wrote:Show nested quote +On August 03 2012 03:32 Whatson wrote: Puma is just proving that without ghosts, TvP late-game is a joke. It's like a zerg would try to prove that without brood lords zvp is a joke. What do you exactly prove? I don't follow
|
On August 03 2012 03:33 sAsImre wrote:Show nested quote +On August 03 2012 03:32 Whatson wrote: Puma is just proving that without ghosts, TvP late-game is a joke. well i think that without templars it'd be a joke too ^^ This is going nowhere
|
On August 03 2012 03:33 Master_Blaster wrote:Show nested quote +On August 03 2012 03:32 Whatson wrote: Puma is just proving that without ghosts, TvP late-game is a joke. It's like a zerg would try to prove that without brood lords zvp is a joke. What do you exactly prove?
cept stephano proves this every day...also..ghosts are only needed when HT are out..GO FIGURE
|
On August 03 2012 03:29 OrchidThief wrote: Archon toilets are complete bullcrap, I don't care if it somehow magically balances the matchup, nothing should be that cost efficient. Think about it like this...
You get caught clumped and then get fungaled -> you lose everything and can't do anything about it.
Same thing with mothership. Although it's more damaging you still want to spread everything out.l It just takes like 2-3 seconds to spread everything if you spend maybe 15min in training map practicing that
|
On August 03 2012 03:29 OrchidThief wrote: Archon toilets are complete bullcrap, I don't care if it somehow magically balances the matchup, nothing should be that cost efficient. Broodlord infestor is more cost efficient if you spread and have enough supporting units.
|
United States15275 Posts
On August 03 2012 03:32 Heavenlee wrote:Show nested quote +On August 03 2012 03:29 OrchidThief wrote: Archon toilets are complete bullcrap, I don't care if it somehow magically balances the matchup, nothing should be that cost efficient. In what way is Mana, or any protoss player, supposed to beat 20 broodlords with infestor support (with corruptor support if there's carriers/voidrays) without vortex? Good thing we'll have the Tempest in HotS, that should make it so vortex can be removed and get rid of what you're saying about stupid cost-efficiency.
Why would we want to counter broodlord/infestor with a possibly worse version?
|
|
|
|
|