On July 29 2012 07:24 L3g3nd_ wrote: why do people have the mentality of "this build lost = its bad" just because squirtle lost DOES NOT MEAN CARRIERS ARE BAD. he just didnt play it well enough.
no, that's just extreme arrogance on his part
squirtle apparently doesn't know that ret isnt just some random foreigner chobo
im not talking about whether or not he was arrogant? im just saying if carriers dont win it doesnt mean they arent good.
However, if carriers never win (except for maybe when you already have a substantial lead), it does mean that they aren't good.
and yet every protoss who knows 5x more about the game than any of us still go for it every late game.
I doubt the people/person responsible for the player artwork will see this, but if the they do it's a job well done. As long as it's not a picture why not add character to it.
On July 29 2012 07:34 fezvez wrote: Wow, bad game again =/
Interesting PvZ games are really rare nowadays...
hmmm yeah we normally see either 2 base all in from protoss, or a fast third which the zerg tries to all in, or we see neither of them attack each other and it becomes a "greed war"
On July 29 2012 07:24 L3g3nd_ wrote: why do people have the mentality of "this build lost = its bad" just because squirtle lost DOES NOT MEAN CARRIERS ARE BAD. he just didnt play it well enough.
no, that's just extreme arrogance on his part
squirtle apparently doesn't know that ret isnt just some random foreigner chobo
im not talking about whether or not he was arrogant? im just saying if carriers dont win it doesnt mean they arent good.
However, if carriers never win (except for maybe when you already have a substantial lead), it does mean that they aren't good.
and yet every protoss who knows 5x more about the game than any of us still go for it every late game.
Uh, what are you talking about? Hardly anyone goes carriers.
On July 29 2012 07:24 L3g3nd_ wrote: why do people have the mentality of "this build lost = its bad" just because squirtle lost DOES NOT MEAN CARRIERS ARE BAD. he just didnt play it well enough.
no, that's just extreme arrogance on his part
squirtle apparently doesn't know that ret isnt just some random foreigner chobo
im not talking about whether or not he was arrogant? im just saying if carriers dont win it doesnt mean they arent good.
However, if carriers never win (except for maybe when you already have a substantial lead), it does mean that they aren't good.
and yet every protoss who knows 5x more about the game than any of us still go for it every late game.
Uh, what are you talking about? Hardly anyone goes carriers.
yeah because they are such a super super late game unit, but when it gets to that point (which is very rare) carrier is the only unit they go for.
On July 29 2012 07:24 L3g3nd_ wrote: why do people have the mentality of "this build lost = its bad" just because squirtle lost DOES NOT MEAN CARRIERS ARE BAD. he just didnt play it well enough.
no, that's just extreme arrogance on his part
squirtle apparently doesn't know that ret isnt just some random foreigner chobo
im not talking about whether or not he was arrogant? im just saying if carriers dont win it doesnt mean they arent good.
However, if carriers never win (except for maybe when you already have a substantial lead), it does mean that they aren't good.
and yet every protoss who knows 5x more about the game than any of us still go for it every late game.
Uh, what are you talking about? Hardly anyone goes carriers.
Now, remember when was the last time you actually saw anyone play lategame PvZ and actually win.