EPTGood to see a Zerg who really makes an effort to think ahead and be able to engage perfectly (the timing on the flank was abit off but but it worked out very very well.)
[IEM] World - Day 2 @ CeBIT - Page 147
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
EmilA
Denmark4618 Posts
Good to see a Zerg who really makes an effort to think ahead and be able to engage perfectly (the timing on the flank was abit off but but it worked out very very well.) | ||
|
Tsubbi
Germany7996 Posts
man i really want to see coca again :/ | ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
| ||
|
TheSubtleArt
Canada2527 Posts
| ||
|
Bagi
Germany6799 Posts
On March 08 2012 00:38 -_- wrote: what is this map called?(dima v killer map w/ island expos) GSL Metropolis. | ||
|
ChaosTerran
Austria844 Posts
On March 08 2012 00:26 zocktol wrote: Let's assume you have 2 Ravens with your main army. You throw down 2 PDDs and 2 Turrets. The Turrets will draw the aggresion from the chargelots and thus give you 1 or 2 more salvae for free whlie kiting, not sure about that though. The main reasons for me would be detection(save scans for more minerals to get a more even bank) and the ability to fly around to an expansion and just put 3 or 4 turrets behind the mineral line. Would be not a big supply investment and is normally able to do a lot of damage. This is just theorycrafting though, because i have NO way to play SC2 right now :D Well the thing about lategame tvp is that you need scans anyway, because you need to know where the protoss army is, and scan is the only way to see where the high templars are so you can emp them. So you always have to save scans anyway. And if your opponent makes 1 cannon in every mineral line you can't harrass with turrets either. I mean your idea might be good, I don't know, I just don't see it work. Because ravens are really only good vs. stalkers and stalkers are not the problem in TvP lategame, you want to counter HTs and collossi mainly, and chargelots to some extent, ravens really dont help with that at all. And if you want to harrass your opponent lategame, then banshees would clearly be a better option than ravens anyway. For me personally, the biggest problem about ravens however is the fact that they are so slow and so easy to feedback, because for a raven to get in range for HSM you have to fly really close to your opponent's army. They are like a suicide squad that can be countered quite easily. I don't know, I don't feel like ravens will ever be popular in TvP, but hey, maybe at some point a korean terran will prove me wrong and show that ravens are actually the sickest unit in TvP, I doubt it, but I can't know for sure. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
|
Andytaker
88 Posts
| ||
|
HowardRoark
1146 Posts
| ||
|
Tsubbi
Germany7996 Posts
On March 08 2012 00:39 TheSubtleArt wrote: Anybody else find it painful how bad killer is playing this game? :S killer is one of the really mediocre code s koreans, nothing unexpected in his play imo | ||
|
Shewklad
Sweden482 Posts
On March 08 2012 00:37 Koshi wrote: Is there a tournament game were those island expansions were taken? Would be so cool. MorroW vs Leenock! | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Tsubbi
Germany7996 Posts
| ||
|
Elem
Sweden4717 Posts
On March 08 2012 00:41 Tsubbi wrote: Hahaha <3 the name. Gonna start using it in the future to describe DIMAGA's ridiculously passive lategame.dimaga has the anti-july switch, at some point in the game he decides to never leave his half of the map again | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
Cereb
Denmark3388 Posts
| ||
|
Slomo
Germany7198 Posts
This is sad to watch, Dimaga is usually so active on the minimap and spotts everything. But losing drones like that is not typical. | ||
|
EmilA
Denmark4618 Posts
On March 08 2012 00:41 Tsubbi wrote: dimaga has the anti-july switch, at some point in the game he decides to never leave his half of the map again lol good one  | ||
|
ETisME
12710 Posts
3 stacking storms, ling hydra corruptor, speed warp prism HT drop, this is so weird | ||
| ||
