EPT[IEM] Sao Paulo - Day 4 - Page 75
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Mouzone
3937 Posts
| ||
|
netsky4
Austria511 Posts
| ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
| ||
|
NexUmbra
Scotland3776 Posts
On February 12 2012 06:06 xrapture wrote: there's no reason to deprive the viewer of information, especially something as valuable as hit points. GSL has them always off and just highlight the units in the UI at the bottom, hence making the HP bars appearing over the units | ||
|
anonymitylol
Canada4477 Posts
| ||
Shellshock
United States97277 Posts
| ||
|
XiGua
Sweden3085 Posts
| ||
|
Stanlot
United States5742 Posts
On February 12 2012 06:07 Mouzone wrote: Is there any good reason as to why terran refuse to get a raven for detection? I mean, it surely must be more efficient than using multiple scans to detect burrowed units. TvP, they may have a reason if P went HT but there's almost no excuse otherwise >:| | ||
|
Sea_aeS
1025 Posts
| ||
|
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
| ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
On February 12 2012 06:07 Mouzone wrote: Is there any good reason as to why terran refuse to get a raven for detection? I mean, it surely must be more efficient than using multiple scans to detect burrowed units. With so many muta out it would probably get sniped without accomplishing much. Mules is minerals, raven is gas. | ||
|
Roe
Canada6002 Posts
On February 12 2012 06:07 Mouzone wrote: Is there any good reason as to why terran refuse to get a raven for detection? I mean, it surely must be more efficient than using multiple scans to detect burrowed units. i guess it takes time because terrans usually like getting a reactor on starport | ||
|
clusen
Germany8702 Posts
| ||
|
hagga
Sweden219 Posts
| ||
|
XiGua
Sweden3085 Posts
| ||
|
anonymitylol
Canada4477 Posts
| ||
|
playtetris
48 Posts
| ||
|
Ketch
Netherlands7285 Posts
| ||
|
DamnCats
United States1472 Posts
| ||
|
Enki
United States2548 Posts
| ||
| ||
