EPT[IEM] Guangzhou - Day 3 - Page 98
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Angelbelow
United States3728 Posts
| ||
|
Malinor
Germany4721 Posts
 | ||
|
Scrandom
Canada2819 Posts
On October 03 2011 16:50 cyclone25 wrote: Not really. You wanted this to be the final? JYP is playing bad and doesn't deserve top 4. I feel like he would of beat most other players in the semis because he would play differently. Not trying to start a fight here, would of been bad luck no matter who matched up against Puma | ||
|
anrimayu
United States875 Posts
On October 03 2011 16:52 Aiglatson wrote: i dont get why JYP doesnt make more pylons, he keeps getting supply blocked He doesnt need pylons when he can lose all units w/ EMP to free up his supplies. | ||
|
dmnum
Brazil6910 Posts
| ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38199 Posts
Meh, this tournament is pretty much dead to me. GG's from Puma I guess, using the 1/1/1 and then abusing the fear of it for the next 2 games to get a massive lead... | ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
gg | ||
|
Sabu113
United States11047 Posts
Actually that exciting as well. | ||
|
seupac
Canada148 Posts
| ||
|
stangstang
Canada281 Posts
| ||
|
Soulforged
Latvia917 Posts
 | ||
|
TheAntZ
Israel6248 Posts
| ||
|
Cow
Canada1104 Posts
| ||
|
ottersareneat
United States55 Posts
tvp metagame imba! i don't know whether the argument is utter genius or complete insanity, but i'm pretty sure it has to be one or the other  . | ||
|
TooN
1046 Posts
| ||
|
HinagikUx
United States178 Posts
Not to mention 2/3 games were 1-1-1 | ||
|
Daralii
United States16991 Posts
On October 03 2011 16:54 seupac wrote: puma never got above 50 scvs those games, even on 3 base Since when does terran need SCVs? >.> | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On October 03 2011 16:54 seupac wrote: puma never got above 50 scvs those games, even on 3 base Terran doesn't need it honestly. Mules with 50 scv's is really good don't need 70-80 like protoss/zerg in harvesters. | ||
|
Takezou
United States320 Posts
On October 03 2011 16:51 Daralii wrote: The problem with that is that then we have something equivalent to a BFH, but it can be built anywhere we have a pylon. It would have to be either fragile as hell or incredibly immobile. Yeah i am not saying that it would be the best solution. But i do feel in my mind that that is a fundamental weakness of the toss army. It is why the marines of the 1/1/1 is so hard to deal with and also why toss have an incredibly hard time early game trying to get any sort of expansion. | ||
|
Polarexia
United States383 Posts
I was predicting finals. | ||
| ||
