NASL Open Tournament - Page 38
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
InvalidID
United States1050 Posts
| ||
StyLeD
United States2965 Posts
On June 23 2011 08:15 InvalidID wrote: TSL_JYP is playing under the account name "FecalFeast". I wonder if he has any idea what it means.. lol Zenex_Byun's US account? | ||
Leeto
United States1320 Posts
| ||
Sharkey
668 Posts
If you want to lend a helping hand to N.A. players so that one day they can be on par with their Korean counterparts, then you would give them every chance to succeed. Does that mean that you eliminate their competition, so they can win tournaments? Or do you put them toe-to-toe with the best players in the world to see how they stack up? I prefer a balance. You have to give them a chance to win you can't put them in the GSL and say go and do your best. Nor would they play just against players below their level (Masters League, etc). I remember seeing an interview with Giyom (fyi: Canadian BW player from the early 2000s) a long time ago and he said that the best situation for growth is when you win 55% of your games. That way you do not grow frustrated with your results, but at the same time you learn from your mistakes. I would implement a rule that is similar to what the CFL (Canadian Football League) does. Each team has a 42 man active rostering consisting of 16 non-Canadians with 3 non-Canadians you can use as back ups for those 16. The underlying purpose is that the CFL remains a Canadian league with lots of representation from Canada. You might say this is unfair but the CFL makes their own rules and it tries to speak to its audience (ie Canadians). I think the NASL should do something similar. Logistically I don't know how this should work. Maybe they cap the Koreans at 15. So when some Koreans don't qualify for the next season spots get open for new Koreans to qualify. Koreans then have their own separate qualifiers to see who qualifies for the general qualifiers. Sounds like a lot of work? Yes, but I think it would keep the NASL main audience engaged the most and that would help its sponsors as well. It would also help to grow esports more in N.A. I would also suggest that you start sooner then later, so their isn't as big of a backlash. CFL corresponding link Thoughts? | ||
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On June 23 2011 08:32 Sharkey wrote: If this is the NASL (where NA stands for North America) I think it would be prudent to have a large sample size of its players from North America. Am I asking that they league be overtly biased towards N.A. players? Yes! Does that mean that N.A. players will have an easier time qualifying and staying in the league? Yes! If you want to lend a helping hand to N.A. players so that one day they can be on par with their Korean counterparts, then you would give them every chance to succeed. Does that mean that you eliminate their competition, so they can win tournaments? Or do you put them toe-to-toe with the best players in the world to see how they stack up? I prefer a balance. You have to give them a chance to win you can't put them in the GSL and say go and do your best. Nor would they play just against players below their level (Masters League, etc). I remember seeing an interview with Giyom (fyi: Canadian BW player from the early 2000s) a long time ago and he said that the best situation for growth is when you win 55% of your games. That way you do not grow frustrated with your results, but at the same time you learn from your mistakes. I would implement a rule that is similar to what the CFL (Canadian Football League) does. Each team has a 42 man active rostering consisting of 16 non-Canadians with 3 non-Canadians you can use as back ups for those 16. The underlying purpose is that the CFL remains a Canadian league with lots of representation from Canada. You might say this is unfair but the CFL makes their own rules and it tries to speak to its audience (ie Canadians). I think the NASL should do something similar. Logistically I don't know how this should work. Maybe they cap the Koreans at 15. So when some Koreans don't qualify for the next season spots get open for new Koreans to qualify. Koreans then have their own separate qualifiers to see who qualifies for the general qualifiers. Sounds like a lot of work? Yes, but I think it would keep the NASL main audience engaged the most and that would help its sponsors as well. It would also help to grow esports more in N.A. I would also suggest that you start sooner then later, so their isn't as big of a backlash. CFL corresponding link Thoughts? And the CFL is a joke compared to the NFL. NASL wants to be the best league. That means they need the best players. NA players already have home server advantage. I love my NA players, but the fact is that they just need to step it up. | ||
Primadog
United States4411 Posts
1st Season 2 spot ![]() Roker ![]() prodigy exdeelol ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 2nd Season 2 spot lalush bbaboomPrime (checkpooh) ![]() jam ![]() stevo ![]() ![]() ![]() Constantine 3rd Season 2 spot ![]() Carthac ![]() ![]() Tool ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 4th Season 2 spot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Caliber ![]() ![]() 5th Season 2 spot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 6th Season 2 spot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() empolenz ![]() ![]() ![]() 7th Season 2 spot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() silentassassin ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() mrglouk ![]() taedge 8th Season 2 spot Lowel ![]() ![]() Reflex ![]() ![]() byakuranhao ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||
lunchforthesky
United Kingdom967 Posts
On June 23 2011 08:32 Sharkey wrote: If this is the NASL (where NA stands for North America) I think it would be prudent to have a large sample size of its players from North America. Am I asking that they league be overtly biased towards N.A. players? Yes! Does that mean that N.A. players will have an easier time qualifying and staying in the league? Yes! In that case you can say goodbye to an awful lot of subscribers. I personally bought the HD pass, it was probably worth it and assuming more Koreans qualify I think I'll pay again, but there's no chance on this earth I pay $25 to see Strife Cro vs Minigun, it's just not going to happen and I'm sure a lot of people agree. The money I pay is not to see the NASL it's to see it's players and it's not unconditional. | ||
Defacer
Canada5052 Posts
On June 23 2011 07:52 Xeris wrote: It's kinda funny how much shit we got from everyone that we didn't at first announce that we were adding Koreans, or we didn't do enough to add Koreans... and now people are worried that there will be too many Koreans. Can't please anyone, apparently ![]() Honestly, the die has been cast and will fall as it does. We can't really stop Koreans without seemingly incredibly biased. If we maintain an open qualification process, which really is the fairest way, we can't really limit Koreans. If we made it favorable to Americans somehow, then it would be unfair, by definition, to everyone else. I mean, the fact that Koreans and Europeans have to play with NA lag is an inherent advantage to NA players, if you really think about it. If American players aren't good enough, however, to qualify... there isn't much more we can do without totally biasing the competition. That being said, I think Minigun (if he can get past Major) has a very good shot ^_^! I agree with almost everything you said. It's a weird problem you have on your hands. I certainly believe the qualification process should be open to everyone. What makes NASL truly unique (and why I subscribe) is that it's the only online, truly international tournament (while MLG and GSL try to be global tournaments, you have to actually be able to afford to attend the events to participate). I'm just wondering if there is a way to meet the NA 'semi-pro' scene halfway. Because I'm pretty sure you could count the number of NA players that truly play SC2 full-time and can make a living on ten fingers and maybe ten toes. And the development and promotion of good NA pro's is going to be critical to the NASL long term success and viability. For example, if the NASL ends up being mostly Korean players, you'll be then offering a product that is in direct competition with GSL -- and I'm sorry, but GSL would blow you guys out of the water right now. If you end up with a tournament where only the most available NA players participate, as opposed to the best, than obviously you're in a bad situation. The truth is, the best and most diverse player pools are still assembled by shorter tournaments like MLG and Dreamhack. Right now, you have a tournament schedule that prevents an up-and-comer like Spanishiwa from participating, which runs counter of NASL's earlier aspirations of feature unknown or underdog players. So no, I'm not suggesting you put a cap on foreigners or any such nonsense, but maybe there's little things NASL can do while it waits for NA players to catch up to Korea and Europe. Like more streaming/casting partners willing to host the qualifiers at night for NA, or multiple small qualifiers before the playoffs so people can work around your schedule, etc. TLDR: Basically what I'm saying is that the NASL is (almost literally) banking on the NA pro scene on improving, and it's in it's own best interest to foster it. I understand not wanting to be biased to NA ... but christ, it's your business! You should be biased towards whatever lets you keep your job! | ||
FallDownMarigold
United States3710 Posts
Can anyone out there ring off the remaining Korean players as of now in the NASL Open? From what I gather: -Clide -aLive -Lee ho joon (assuming Korean, never heard of him.. real ID anyone?) -Rain -Minhyuk kim (again, assuming, and I have no idea what his real ID is) Any others left that still have a shot of getting in? I'm pumped to see extra Koreans added - great job Xeris & NASL. It would be such a pathetic joke if NASL disallowed Koreans from entering. | ||
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
On June 23 2011 09:36 FallDownMarigold wrote: So I'm stepping in here a bit late... Can anyone out there ring off the remaining Korean players as of now in the NASL Open? From what I gather: -Clide -aLive -Lee ho joon (assuming Korean, never heard of him.. real ID anyone?) -Rain -Minhyuk kim (again, assuming, and I have no idea what his real ID is) Any others left that still have a shot of getting in? I'm pumped to see extra Koreans added - great job Xeris & NASL. It would be such a pathetic joke if NASL disallowed Koreans from entering. Lee Ho Joon = TSL_Puma Minhyuk Kim = TSL_Heart. | ||
FallDownMarigold
United States3710 Posts
| ||
Defacer
Canada5052 Posts
On June 23 2011 09:20 Primadog wrote: If I understand the brackets correctly, round-of-6 is where the 8 players whom qualify for Season 2 will be decided. This means some good players are competing for a single spot! Yikes! These brackets are unforgiving. Reminds me of Code B or first 3 GSL qualifiers. You do need to be good to qualify, but luck helps ![]() | ||
lunchforthesky
United Kingdom967 Posts
On June 23 2011 09:41 FallDownMarigold wrote: Thanks so from that I'll also infer that indeed I named them all and that there aren't any others still in. Shocked to see that Virus was beaten early on... Someone mustve been either very good or lucky He messed up with his application so the guy got a walkover, he didn't actually lose. | ||
Duravi
United States1205 Posts
| ||
FairForever
Canada2392 Posts
On June 23 2011 09:51 Duravi wrote: Okay, say since there are two methods for qualifying for the next season, open tournament and qualifier tournament, one could be international and the other limited to NA to ensure that some NA players are in the mix if the lack of them becomes an issue. Even this solution still has a big flaw though; if the NA players need a segregated tournament to even qualify how are they going to compete in the regular season against the koreans (and euros to some extent)? It would make for some pretty bad and one-sided games which we already had a lot of this season. The responsibility is not on the NASL to make NA players stop being a laughingstock in tournaments aside from a couple exceptions (Huk, Idra). HuK chose not to participate in NASL due to latency. Not sure why anyone would give up the opportunity for $50k but I suppose he didn't want to jeopardize his playing schedule in Korea by getting up to play 4 AM games... | ||
Oboeman
Canada3980 Posts
| ||
Primadog
United States4411 Posts
On June 23 2011 09:55 Oboeman wrote: Are the open tourney games being officially cast/broadcasted? I think there's arrangements made with guest casters and youtube casters. | ||
Warpish
834 Posts
| ||
Jayjay54
Germany2296 Posts
| ||
Sharkey
668 Posts
On June 23 2011 08:53 jmbthirteen wrote: And the CFL is a joke compared to the NFL. NASL wants to be the best league. That means they need the best players. NA players already have home server advantage. I love my NA players, but the fact is that they just need to step it up. If the NASL goal is to have the best players in the world playing in it and to be more competitive than the GSL, than I am totally off base. I assumed that the NASL wanted to be highly competitive and to help grow esports in North America (and the West). On June 23 2011 09:26 lunchforthesky wrote: In that case you can say goodbye to an awful lot of subscribers. I personally bought the HD pass, it was probably worth it and assuming more Koreans qualify I think I'll pay again, but there's no chance on this earth I pay $25 to see Strife Cro vs Minigun, it's just not going to happen and I'm sure a lot of people agree. The money I pay is not to see the NASL it's to see it's players and it's not unconditional. Fair enough, I never thought of it like that. I have a few questions for you though: 1) Are you subscribed to GSL? If not why? Would you still pay for your pass if the players were 80% Korean? I did purpose to kick the Koreans out, I would merely cap the number of Koreans allowed in NASL. | ||
| ||