[GSTL] Finals - Page 34
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Seditary
Australia7033 Posts
| ||
Butterz
688 Posts
Mark the Line !! | ||
Blasterion
China10272 Posts
On May 19 2011 19:08 Goibon wrote: Woah Best Performance EXTREME GAME? I gotta get on that shit NOW. Gskill is it? lol how long have you watched the GSL? btw Artosis uses GSkill | ||
Goibon
New Zealand8185 Posts
On May 19 2011 19:09 Blasterion wrote: lol how long have you watched the GSL? btw Artosis uses GSkill I never saw it explained as Best Performance Extreme Game before. I'm sold now. | ||
![]()
dabom88
United States3483 Posts
On May 19 2011 19:08 Dommk wrote: Double standard in the LR threads, Toss 6/9 Gate and they get flamed, Zerg roach all-in/Roach+ling and they get praised ![]() Once again, 3 base 70 drone attack is not an all-in. Fuck the complainers, but they would have absolutely no reason to complain if they were on 3 bases. | ||
covetousrat
2109 Posts
| ||
MESeidel
Germany326 Posts
On May 19 2011 19:07 ScaringKids wrote: These LR threads are getting ridiculous, so the guy has 3 bases with +60 drones but everyone still says he all in? Get ur shit together. Tournament threads are always like this. And they grow so fast that it makes no sense to try deeper discussion. I mean people call everything OP at the end of games. And if a player does not leave while the commentators say "it's pretty much over" than people call it BM or "bad GG timing". | ||
AndAgain
United States2621 Posts
On May 19 2011 19:07 ScaringKids wrote: These LR threads are getting ridiculous, so the guy has 3 bases with +60 drones but everyone still says he all in? Get ur shit together. Moletrap is the only one who called it an all-in. | ||
skullhoof
Korea (North)835 Posts
On May 19 2011 19:09 Elvedeta wrote: How can people say it was an all-in? he was on 3 bases, had great economy even if he lost his army... What he had done was not an all in because he was too far ahead. This move is "just kill him". But if they are even and he keep sending roaches, even through he has 3 base it can still be all in. | ||
Ezekyle
Australia607 Posts
On May 19 2011 19:08 Zealot Lord wrote: I think at this point its probably safest (ie highest chance of winning) for toss players to go with 1 base all in plays - this fast expand stuff just isn't working at all anymore. even if Genius got a robo it would have done nothing to stop that, observer with an immortal or two is not going to stop a never ending line of roaches imo. Eh. It took Zerg players a LONG time to stop dying to stupid all-ins in ZvP (it still happens, in fact). Give it time, you'll figure it out. | ||
meep
United States1699 Posts
On May 19 2011 19:09 Blasterion wrote: lol how long have you watched the GSL? btw Artosis uses GSkill is it because he gets it for free? | ||
SupremeMe
Sweden227 Posts
On May 19 2011 19:03 ihavetofartosis wrote: Roaches are 2 supply, not too shocking Oh, when will people stop this fucking BS?!?!? Zealots are 2 supply, stalkers and sentries are 2 supply | ||
mikep
Sweden133 Posts
| ||
Blasterion
China10272 Posts
On May 19 2011 19:10 Goibon wrote: I never saw it explained as Best Performance Extreme Game before. I'm sold now. well it's true GSL all use Gskill ram, and it is very good | ||
Frugalicious
United States121 Posts
On May 19 2011 19:09 Elvedeta wrote: How can people say it was an all-in? he was on 3 bases, had great economy even if he lost his army... The term "all-in" in SC2 is poorly defined and there is no clear, objective definition for it. According to Artosis' various descriptions of "all-ins", this would constitute as one. However, the term seems so subjective and open to interpretation, at least the definitions we have seen so far in the community and TLPD. | ||
Eurekastreet
1308 Posts
On May 19 2011 19:07 Sixes wrote: No lol, he had the better econ before attacking by a long shot. The supply is a bad indicator for roaches, we all know how 200/200 of roaches does against even 160 supply protoss. Genius applied no pressure and had only gateway units ... kind of deserves to get slapped around at that point. At what point of that short game was he supposed to pressure ? I might be wrong but a fast expanding protoss will seldom (never?) be able to pressure a fast expanding zerg. Isn't what he has to do is defend his expansion and hope he can survive the first big push and if he does, build/tech from there (to victory ?) | ||
Blasterion
China10272 Posts
Yes | ||
Zefa
United States297 Posts
| ||
RPR_Tempest
Australia7798 Posts
| ||
epik640x
United States1134 Posts
| ||
| ||