|
On April 15 2011 12:30 Aequos wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 12:30 MajorityofOne wrote:On April 15 2011 12:28 Aequos wrote:
Please read the top of the thread, that giant warning. Wow, good job breaking the rule you just referenced O.O I'm afraid I don't understand - I spoilered what he said so it wouldn't carry on.
Bahahaha fail on my part, I didn't notice it was spoilered.
CARRY ON THEN!
|
For the record, this game actually looks interesting
|
On April 15 2011 12:28 mordk wrote:Show nested quote +On April 15 2011 12:22 MechKing wrote:On April 15 2011 12:21 doffe wrote:On April 15 2011 12:19 MechKing wrote: Lol here comes the BW fanboys, although DDE outplayed him the entire game until he made the mistake of letting nada get the gold. What game where you watching? Nada failed with his army once, he was certinly not ouplayed and as someone stated before me, Nadas multitasking was extremly good when he turned the game around. Lol Dde's macro was so far ahead the whole game. The only mistake dde made was letting nada take the middle of the map. I think... DDE was more stable throughout the game. But NaDa played a smarter game, showing intelligence in his decisions, this made a HUGE difference. What the hell, there's like no player who'll make that crazy doom drop while in such a disadvantage. It was so so good. Also, while DDE had more supply, it doesn't mean he had the better macro mechanics. He won a few sieges, but in general, NaDa had a positional advantage most of the game. Plus he took a successful risk by taking the gold to help his comeback. Great stuff. Also, even when mining gold with tons of mules, NaDa was able to keep his minerals low, really low, and resupply really fast when losing units. His macro mechanics were top class on game 3. He didn't even seem to be playing at half his potential though, he'd be damn scary if he played SC2 full time. I do agree with NaDa making smart decisions but dde definitely lost that game more than NaDa won it. If he put turrets up in his main; no drop. If he just pushed when he had the advantege: gg. NaDa definitey played solid but I do think that if dde did 1-2 things different he would've won.
|
Incontrol, is there any chance you guys could cycle through the production, army, and economy tabs more often. I find you guys stick on the production tab for the vast majority of the game and while it is very useful, the economy and army tabs are as well.
I don't believe you can accurately spectate or commentate a game without knowing the army composition and the economy. I think it would help you and gretorp as commentators as well.
|
On April 15 2011 12:29 Ajax77 wrote:Fail.
wow you're a genius - talk about a "fail"
|
HOLY SHIT
PvP with over 200 supply in total
|
phoenixes + immortals + zealots, seems interesting
|
On April 15 2011 12:32 Kazzabiss wrote: HOLY SHIT
PvP with over 200 supply in total I laughed.
|
Wow, picking up sentries with phoenix. Nice play.
|
|
Axslav building a stargate Wow I just noticed that Axlsav's gameplan is really good here.
Huge battle at axslav ramp, squirtle's collossi destroying the gateway units but the IMMORTALS are defending quite well, and axslav's phoenixes picking up the remaining units
|
|
|
what an amazing battle o_O
|
WTF??? how did axslav hold that?!!!!!
|
|
Holy FUCK how did he win that
|
phoenix are pretty good
|
Wooooooooooow that was a good engagement for Axslav. Really didnt expect that lol.
|
WHAT THE FUCK DID I JUST WITNESS
|
|
|
|