|
On March 01 2011 20:26 LittLeD wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2011 20:24 LittLeD wrote:On March 01 2011 20:23 LittLeD wrote:On March 01 2011 20:14 Beyonder wrote: Please live report more in the live report thread for those at work :\ Inca (11) vs SC (1) on Terminus. SC up on three rax vs Inca who has expo, robo and 3 gates. SC doing a little push with several SCVs. 8:10 9:00SC took down the Expo with the push. He's ahead in workers. 12:00Inca doing one-base colussus. Thermal about to finnish. SC on 4-rax, one factory, one starport. Hes going MM + vikings 14:00 Inca pushing with 2 colussus. SC held it off. GG SC takes it
|
United Kingdom38149 Posts
^__^
SC absolutely demolished Inca.
Nice Viking control in that last engagement, got a good angle on the colossus and comfortably out of the way of the stalkers
|
InCa tries to attack with some gateways units plus 2 collosus vs sCs massive barracks army. sC pulls out a fairly easy win
|
seems like a silly map to FE against terran on. huge ramp making any sentry play kinda useless against early T aggression.
|
On March 01 2011 20:25 ItsMeDomLee wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2011 20:21 sleepingdog wrote:On March 01 2011 20:19 BuzZoo wrote: I'm actually happy with the Zerg holocaust that is March GSL. I figure it should mean that Blizzard withdraw the "1.3 April fools a month early" patch and actually fix this completely broken game. The sheer quantity of zerg-QQ even when the opponent was just way better makes all the justified complaints about the zerg-race seem annoying and ridiculous as well. Keep going. No, you're right. All the zerg players in the world suck. Ignore us while we learn to play.
That's not even vaguely what he said, wtf are you talking about. He said that the justified complaints about zerg are undermined by the fact that every time a zerg loses anything some ass has to come out and go 'omg blizzard, nice balancing' or some bollocks. Apart from anything else, it's very boring.
|
inca got punished for being too greedy
|
Tal'darim Altar seems to be a better map compare to the current Shattered temple we have ...
|
That was some Kyrix-style marine/marauder micro.
|
On March 01 2011 20:24 Belha wrote: And that's why Blizz nerf early stim.
The problem with stim certainly isn't the timing, it's far more than that.
|
What's everyone talking about that being too risky?
That was the standard KCDC FE as far as I can tell
|
|
On March 01 2011 20:26 sleepingdog wrote:Now this I seriously doubt. Just read every comment made here and you will understand.
no shit, I mean seriously.
I feel like people aren't even watching/listening to whats going on, just listen to the commentary and you'll understand why things are the way they are. All this QQ imba is just dumb. The people winning are just out playing and out thinking their opponents it has nothing to do with balance.
|
On March 01 2011 20:29 bbQ4Aiur wrote: Tal'darim Altar seems to be a better map compare to the current Shattered temple we have ...
What's actually wrong with Shattered Temple? I like it.
|
after GSL1 Inca has never impressed me that much...
|
On March 01 2011 20:28 The KY wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2011 20:25 ItsMeDomLee wrote:On March 01 2011 20:21 sleepingdog wrote:On March 01 2011 20:19 BuzZoo wrote: I'm actually happy with the Zerg holocaust that is March GSL. I figure it should mean that Blizzard withdraw the "1.3 April fools a month early" patch and actually fix this completely broken game. The sheer quantity of zerg-QQ even when the opponent was just way better makes all the justified complaints about the zerg-race seem annoying and ridiculous as well. Keep going. No, you're right. All the zerg players in the world suck. Ignore us while we learn to play. That's not even vaguely what he said, wtf are you talking about. He said that the justified complaints about zerg are undermined by the fact that every time a zerg loses anything some ass has to come out and go 'omg blizzard, nice balancing' or some bollocks. Apart from anything else, it's very boring.
It may be boring, but zerg losing so easily over and over is also somewhat boring.
|
On March 01 2011 20:28 kvn4444 wrote: seems like a silly map to FE against terran on. huge ramp making any sentry play kinda useless against early T aggression.
It's a silly map to FE then go straight for Collosus while still on 1 Gateway, which is probably a good thing.
|
On March 01 2011 20:29 Psychopomp wrote: What's everyone talking about that being too risky?
That was the standard KCDC FE as far as I can tell
Nope it was not, far from that. It was the deviation I'd call "kcdc FE without actually getting units".
The kcdc-FE depends crucially on cutting probes to get up additional warpgates against the threat of early pushs. Inca added a robo, which was just stupidly greedy.
|
On March 01 2011 20:30 The KY wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2011 20:29 bbQ4Aiur wrote: Tal'darim Altar seems to be a better map compare to the current Shattered temple we have ... What's actually wrong with Shattered Temple? I like it. its kinda small and thats why i never played long/macro games on that map
|
On March 01 2011 20:29 Cabinet Sanchez wrote:The problem with stim certainly isn't the timing, it's far more than that.
*beats head against wall*
Aren't there rules against this kind of stuff in LR threads? You might as well have just said 'stim OP' and left it at that.
|
lol what is inka doing...
|
|
|
|