|
On March 01 2011 20:23 LittLeD wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2011 20:14 Beyonder wrote: Please live report more in the live report thread for those at work :\ Inca (11) vs SC (1) on Terminus. SC up on three rax vs Inca who has expo, robo and 3 gates. SC doing a little push with several SCVs. 8:10 9:00 SC took down the Expo with the push. He's ahead in workers.
|
On March 01 2011 20:23 LittLeD wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2011 20:14 Beyonder wrote: Please live report more in the live report thread for those at work :\ Inca (11) vs SC (1) on Terminus. SC up on three rax vs Inca who has expo, robo and 3 gates. SC doing a little push with several SCVs. 8:10
correction, the map is Tal'darim Altar
|
On March 01 2011 20:23 Buff345 wrote: A fairly early MM attack by sC really giving a FE'ing InCa some problems. He cleans it up but loses alot of probes
Let that be a lesson for everyone! You can't do whatever you want, even on Taldarim Altar
|
And that's why Blizz nerf early stim.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
InCa loses his natural while sC takes his natural now. InCa now resorting to 1 base collosus
|
Man that was so greedy by inca, 1gate robo and expand at same time haha.
|
On March 01 2011 20:24 emc wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2011 20:23 LittLeD wrote:On March 01 2011 20:14 Beyonder wrote: Please live report more in the live report thread for those at work :\ Inca (11) vs SC (1) on Terminus. SC up on three rax vs Inca who has expo, robo and 3 gates. SC doing a little push with several SCVs. 8:10 correction, the map is Tal'darim Altar Ah, thanks. Still have to get used to the new maps
|
On March 01 2011 20:21 sleepingdog wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2011 20:19 BuzZoo wrote: I'm actually happy with the Zerg holocaust that is March GSL. I figure it should mean that Blizzard withdraw the "1.3 April fools a month early" patch and actually fix this completely broken game. The sheer quantity of zerg-QQ even when the opponent was just way better makes all the justified complaints about the zerg-race seem annoying and ridiculous as well. Keep going.
No, you're right. All the zerg players in the world suck. Ignore us while we learn to play.
|
On March 01 2011 20:24 Belha wrote: And that's why Blizz nerf early stim.
No it's not. Inca tried to tech, expand, and get a gateway army up, he was punished for his greediness.
|
On March 01 2011 20:22 Tyree wrote: First infant child on TeamLiquid.net!
Now this I seriously doubt. Just read every comment made here and you will understand.
|
wtf was that opening by inca with these positions, punished.
|
On March 01 2011 20:24 Belha wrote: And that's why Blizz nerf early stim.
By 30 seconds. He didn't even use stim right when he got there. 30 seconds wouldn't have changed anything.
|
On March 01 2011 20:22 Tyree wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2011 20:21 bbQ4Aiur wrote:This is insane, i just register my account and i mis-chosen my year of birth ( choosed this year  ), then i couldnt register again for so long that i actually switched on another computer to register again .. First infant child on TeamLiquid.net! Welcome! (btw im sure a mod can help you with that year of birth problem  ) its fine now, thank you :D
|
4 Rax for sC, now getting a reactor and starport. Almost finished. Thermal Lance almost done for InCa off of one base. Looks like he attacking with 1 collosus perhaps
|
On March 01 2011 20:24 Turgid wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2011 20:23 Buff345 wrote: A fairly early MM attack by sC really giving a FE'ing InCa some problems. He cleans it up but loses alot of probes Let that be a lesson for everyone! You can't do whatever you want, even on Taldarim Altar 
people defend that fine on smaller maps. you just cant do it without any sentries,zealots and just 5 stalkers.
|
On March 01 2011 20:24 LittLeD wrote:Show nested quote +On March 01 2011 20:23 LittLeD wrote:On March 01 2011 20:14 Beyonder wrote: Please live report more in the live report thread for those at work :\ Inca (11) vs SC (1) on Terminus. SC up on three rax vs Inca who has expo, robo and 3 gates. SC doing a little push with several SCVs. 8:10 9:00SC took down the Expo with the push. He's ahead in workers. 12:00 Inca doing one-base colussus. Thermal about to finnish. SC on 4-rax, one factory, one starport. Hes going MM + vikings
|
On March 01 2011 20:24 Belha wrote: And that's why Blizz nerf early stim.
Delay that by 30 seconds and nothing would have changed. Shitty play by a greedy protoss player. Absolutely zero micro in the engagement either ie. keeping his probes far ahead of his army so T could snipe probes without taking stalker hits.
|
United Kingdom16710 Posts
Poll: Recommend Game 2?No (31) 78% Yes (6) 15% Check it out if you have time (3) 8% 40 total votes Your vote: Recommend Game 2? (Vote): Yes (Vote): No (Vote): Check it out if you have time
|
On March 01 2011 20:24 Belha wrote: And that's why Blizz nerf early stim.
uh.. Inca did an extremely risky build, he teched and expanded, SC punished him, so how the hell does nerfing stim have anything to do with that?
You can't go 1 gate robo, expand and cry imba are you serious?
|
|
|
|
|