Well I can't argue that since I don't play protoss and he did after all lose. However the way he put it was really in the manner of saying that Bischu is bad because he used a build that wouldn't work on this level. Which is implying that he hasn't practiced it. And that's a pretty silly assumption when it's a player of Dignitas we are talking about.

On February 28 2011 04:54 Callous wrote:

Show nested quote +

This isn't 4chan, stop that.

Thanks for making me aware of that. I will try to express myself in a different way from now on.

Azarkon

United States21060 Posts

February 27 2011 20:01 GMT

#144

Machine subbed for Idra quite well there

DrainX

Sweden3187 Posts

February 27 2011 20:02 GMT

#145

Well played by Machine. Hope Select wins the next game so we get an ace match.

Jotoco

Brazil1342 Posts

February 27 2011 20:02 GMT

#146

Machine was near flawless there.

Really, I think EG is the only team who is not showing good Terran players, but Strife, Axlav and Machine keep surprising me. They are very good.

I wanted to see more of Demuslim (obviously need to wait) and LzGamer, but I will take whatever they give me.

bobhund

Sweden364 Posts

February 27 2011 20:02 GMT

#147

Congrats to Machine! Glad to see a Zerg win even if it was against a fellow swede

Velocity`

United Kingdom343 Posts

February 27 2011 20:04 GMT

#148

On February 28 2011 04:54 Callous wrote:

Show nested quote +

This isn't 4chan, stop that.

Thanks for making me aware of that. I will try to express myself in a different way from now on.[/QUOTE]
Good to know.
Also, rooting for Axslav in this one.

NonY

8751 Posts

February 27 2011 20:04 GMT

#149

On February 28 2011 04:48 Sorkoas wrote:

Show nested quote +

I don't think anyone denied that it counters an eco build. However I thought a definition of an all in was that if you fail with your attack you have pretty much lost. Seems like that is usually the case if you cut worker production to rush the guy who is fast expanding. Am I wrong?

The defending player can stop the attack but lose enough harvesters to be behind. As soon as the attacker sees that he's killing a lot of harvesters, he has the option to take the econ advantage and move on to the next stage of the game.

Synche

United States1345 Posts

February 27 2011 20:08 GMT

#150

Sheth's improving his casting quite a bit. Between him and Gretorp and Inc these GCPL are some of the best analytical casts around, I really don't miss any of them because I learn so much.

Sorkoas

549 Posts

February 27 2011 20:10 GMT

#151

On February 28 2011 05:04 Liquid`Tyler wrote:

Show nested quote +

Well, I get that. But if we are going to use the phrase all in, can't we say that he is betting all he has on doing enough damage that he can either win or at least punish the opponent but if he does fail he has lost the game? It sounds like we are trying to deny the existence of all in strategies completely because we can keep finding arguments like this since we can end up with all kind of crazy scenarios, while the fact is that the attacking player still has to do significant damage to not end up losing the game because of that specific attack he has invested so much in.

emperorchampion

Canada9496 Posts

February 27 2011 20:11 GMT

#152

Hmm, I'd be interested in seeing the APMs during these engagements. I wonder if Axslav's low APM can deal with SeleCT's multi-pronged attacks?