[GCPL] Dignitas vs EG - Page 7
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments | 
| 
							shaunnn
							
							
						 
						Ireland1230 Posts
						 | ||
| 
							Gunman_csz
							
							
						 
						United Arab Emirates492 Posts
						 He is probably on a plane atm and thinking of what he is going to do with his 1st finish at IEM  | ||
| 
							Influ
							
							
						 
						Germany780 Posts
						 it's not only technically all-in, it is an all in every way which doesn't mean it's something bad. it's what you get when you nexus first on BS (or try to expend any time in the game) | ||
| 
							Sorkoas
							
							
						 
						549 Posts
						 | ||
| 
							iNcontroL
							   
						USA29055 Posts
						 All in implies it could not work. It's like eating an apple and then someone asking "what if you didn't eat that apple?" But.. he did... Nexus first on BS beats a REALLY bad Z maybe... strife didn't even execute this strat that well and he still easily rocked it. Anyways I don't think we need to have 2 pages of discussion on a nexus first on BS. I am very excited for these next 2 games  | ||
| 
							Swixi
							
							
						 
						United States73 Posts
						 So what if it is? What's the point of bringing it up as if it's a bad thing if it's the proper response to a build? That's like posting "this guy went viking against collosus!" Yeah.. and? | ||
| 
							bobhund
							
							
						 
						Sweden364 Posts
						 On February 28 2011 04:44 Gunman_csz wrote: except idrA :/ He is probably on a plane atm and thinking of what he is going to do with his 1st finish at IEM  Second place you mean right? MorroW will beat him in the finals for sure ;> Ontopic: Colossus/voidray-deathball incomming! | ||
| 
							DeMusliM
							
							
						 
						United Kingdom401 Posts
						 it was a read-reaction type situation, i like to think of an "all-in" as a mindset from the start of the game, this on the other hand was the appropriate reaction to Bischu's risky as hell build. An all-in suggests you either win or lose from it, on this map and in this game in particular, there wasn't any lose situation so no, it wasn't really an all-in  . | ||
| 
							oYsteR
							
							
						 
						United Kingdom142 Posts
						 Edit: Ok yeah been answered like 5 times already xD | ||
| 
							Sorkoas
							
							
						 
						549 Posts
						 On February 28 2011 04:44 Influ wrote: it's not only technically all-in, it is an all in every way which doesn't mean it's something bad. it's what you get when you nexus first on BS (or try to expend any time in the game) I don't think anyone denied that it counters an eco build. However I thought a definition of an all in was that if you fail with your attack you have pretty much lost. Seems like that is usually the case if you cut worker production to rush the guy who is fast expanding. Am I wrong? | ||
| 
							Sorkoas
							
							
						 
						549 Posts
						 On February 28 2011 04:44 iNcontroL wrote: All in implies it could not work. It's like eating an apple and then someone asking "what if you didn't eat that apple?" But.. he did... Nexus first on BS beats a REALLY bad Z maybe... strife didn't even execute this strat that well and he still easily rocked it. Anyways I don't think we need to have 2 pages of discussion on a nexus first on BS. I am very excited for these next 2 games  Implying that Bischu has never practiced this build and basically is a bad player. Cool story, bro. User was warned for this post | ||
| 
							dff
							
							
						 
						2 Posts
						 On February 28 2011 04:48 Sorkoas wrote: I don't think anyone denied that it counters an eco build. However I thought a definition of an all in was that if you fail with your attack you have pretty much lost. Seems like that is usually the case if you cut worker production to rush the guy who is fast expanding. Am I wrong? No, that's how i define it too | ||
| 
							timmyfred
							
							
						 
						United States302 Posts
						 On February 28 2011 04:48 Sorkoas wrote: I don't think anyone denied that it counters an eco build. However I thought a definition of an all in was that if you fail with your attack you have pretty much lost. Seems like that is usually the case if you cut worker production to rush the guy who is fast expanding. Am I wrong? That's the way I see it. I equate this more to a guy basically drawing dead and you just raising a ton to force him out of the hand. There's no possible way you're gonna lose, and it's just the smart move to go ahead and take it down. | ||
| 
							nihlon
							
							
						 
						Sweden5581 Posts
						 On February 28 2011 04:49 Sorkoas wrote: Implying that Bischu has never practiced this build and basically is a bad player. Cool story, bro. He's implying that bischu chose the wrong strat for that map. Most people would agree. | ||
| 
							Velocity`
							
							
						 
						United Kingdom343 Posts
						 On February 28 2011 04:49 Sorkoas wrote: Implying that Bischu has never practiced this build and basically is a bad player. Cool story, bro. This isn't 4chan, stop that. Machine is way ahead in drone count, hopefully he can get enough units to pull through. | ||
| 
							hifriend
							
							
						 
						China7935 Posts
						 | ||
| 
							emperorchampion
							
							
						 
						Canada9496 Posts
						 | ||
| 
							Jotoco
							
							
						 
						Brazil1342 Posts
						 | ||
| 
							Asha
							
							
						 
						United Kingdom38256 Posts
						 On the other hand, really good decisions from Machine | ||
| 
							arioch
							
							
						 
						England403 Posts
						 Cant wait for Axslav vs Select... Axslav has done a fantastic job as EG's Ace recently. | ||
| 
 | ||
 EPT
EPT 
	









