[March GSL] Code A Ro32 Day 3 - Page 91
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
rysecake
United States2632 Posts
| ||
DaRKMaTT3r
Brazil553 Posts
On February 25 2011 23:24 Telcontar wrote: Just got back from uni. It's sad to see moonglade knocked out. I hope he tries again! Oh and Squirtle lost? WHAT HAPPENED? Game 1: He went 3 gate + 1 robo for colossi and 2 stargates for mass phoenix. Terran went MM+Mass vikings + Raven, they both took 3 ewxpansion and were clashing at bottom of Scrap Station, terran slowly adavnced to his side with turrets and poking everytime he could. Terran was sniping stuff with the viking range and would go back to mass turret range, Squirtle became impatient and instead of switching tech just went for the enagement over the turrets Oo. Colossi died so did phoenix so it was MM vs Stalker+Sentry. Game 2: FE from both on Taldarim Altair, terran helion dropped and destroyed lots of probes and Squirtle decided to move out, terran dropped 2 bunkers and vikings killed Colossi. Both of games i believe he was impatient! =( Edit: Wrote problem instead of Probes. And np Telcontar =D | ||
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
On February 25 2011 23:29 DaRKMaTT3r wrote: Game 1: He went 3 gate + 1 robo for colossi and 2 gates for mass phoenix. Terran went MM+Mass vikings + Raven, they both took 3 ewxpansion and were clashing at bottom of Scrap Station, terran slowly adavnced to his side with turrets and poking everytime he could. Terran was sniping stuff with the viking range and would go back to mass turret range, Squirtle became impatient and instead of switching tech just went for the enagement over the turrets Oo. Colossi died so did phoenix so it was MM vs Stalker+Sentry. Game 2: FE from both on Taldarim Altair, terran helion dropped and destroyed lots of problems and Squirtle decided to move out, terran dropped 2 bunkers and vikings killed Colossi. Both of games i believe he was impatient! =( ![]() Thanks for the recap! | ||
HeroHenry
United States1723 Posts
On February 25 2011 23:26 ImmortalTofu wrote: Interesting... Ace and Squirtle both roflstomped... By Terrans no less. This is why I think the GTSL is kinda overrated. Except for the finals, I don't think teams were sending out their best players in order to save strategies for this Code S tournament... Stinks for MoOnGlade... But Jjun looked quite strong! Also, did rain cheese out his opponent, because I quite like rain in some ways! Ace lost to a zerg not terran. | ||
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
On February 25 2011 23:26 ImmortalTofu wrote: Interesting... Ace and Squirtle both roflstomped... By Terrans no less. This is why I think the GTSL is kinda overrated. Except for the finals, I don't think teams were sending out their best players in order to save strategies for this Code S tournament... Stinks for MoOnGlade... But Jjun looked quite strong! Also, did rain cheese out his opponent, because I quite like rain in some ways! GSTL wasn't overrated. In Squirtle's case, it might have hurt him, as there was a lot of data to study about him. There's a research/prep component to individual leagues that you don't get in the team leagues. Makes team leagues a lot more exciting and does show off the true skill some of them have. | ||
PartyBiscuit
Canada4525 Posts
On February 25 2011 22:30 skrzmark wrote: at least i got Alicia right! Junwi never lets me down! Ret better win against jobbsu after all his good performances lately Lol, my liquibet also took a beating today but always bet against Junwi ![]() | ||
dLKnighT
Canada735 Posts
| ||
corpsepose
1678 Posts
| ||
AxionSteel
United States7754 Posts
| ||
Aquafresh
United States824 Posts
![]() | ||
rO_Or
United States306 Posts
On February 25 2011 21:32 Gingerninja wrote: 1. Tasteless makes just as many mistakes, Artosis often makes wrong predictions. 2. It's not a pain to listen to, guessing you don't deal with non native speakers very often. I have no problems with it, it doesn't grate, it's not annoying. 3. Once again in compaison to what? Tastosis often will both say something only for it go completely opposite. 4. Subjective, has nothing to do with casting ability. 5. Tastosis didn't have synergy at the start.. you build that by working together. her cheerfulness and enthusiasm is good, would you rather have a caster be dry and miserable? So much blind hate, the IRC is unreadable throughout code A games due to all the people makes "Jokes" about her accent, as if its 1, big, 2, clever, 3 1975... not everyone speaks the same, get over it. Look, its not "blind" hate if its substantiated... I don't HATE Kelly as a caster but it should be evident to anyone who has somewhat followed Starcraft 2 that she has ALOT of room for improvement in multiple areas. She mispronounces words like its her job and I can see why alot of people have difficulty understanding her. Personally, I don't have much of a problem because I have many relatives in the SEA region but its perfectly understandable for people to be annoyed with her manner of speech. Furthermore, she just seems to lack alot of understanding of the game and rarely adds meaningful analysis, often times making down right wrong statements. "2 gas so we will probably see a fast expo..." Really? I don't want to hate on her and she definitely brings enthusiasm to the cast but it takes more than that to make a good caster. First and foremost is the ability to articulate and translate your thoughts and analysis to the viewers, somet | ||
Shindou
United States120 Posts
On February 25 2011 23:27 rysecake wrote: Funny how every time a foreigner loses it's either because he was unlucky or he played pretty solid and barely lost. Moonglade was completely manhandled in game 2, dunno what games you guys are watching. 10000000000000000000000% agree. By far the most annoying comments in post game play by play threads. I guess they would be more lucky never playing appropriate competition or having a challenge and cakewalking it to the top against bronze players. | ||
ReachTheSky
United States3294 Posts
| ||
RiceMuncher
Australia138 Posts
STOP "commentating" on every single move and then trying to predict whos gona win which battle etc etc. And please stop using words like "always" and "will" etcet. Its not 100% that a player will do "X" or "Y". Makes you sound so stupid | ||
ezk
Canada239 Posts
Predictions are based from more than 1 factor. That was just terrible analysis/deduction based on an irrelevant factor. Just to point out one of the many examples of why people may dislike her casting | ||
Slardar
Canada7593 Posts
| ||
m3rciless
United States1476 Posts
On February 25 2011 23:29 DaRKMaTT3r wrote: Game 1: He went 3 gate + 1 robo for colossi and 2 stargates for mass phoenix. Terran went MM+Mass vikings + Raven, they both took 3 ewxpansion and were clashing at bottom of Scrap Station, terran slowly adavnced to his side with turrets and poking everytime he could. Terran was sniping stuff with the viking range and would go back to mass turret range, Squirtle became impatient and instead of switching tech just went for the enagement over the turrets Oo. Colossi died so did phoenix so it was MM vs Stalker+Sentry. Game 2: FE from both on Taldarim Altair, terran helion dropped and destroyed lots of probes and Squirtle decided to move out, terran dropped 2 bunkers and vikings killed Colossi. Both of games i believe he was impatient! =( Edit: Wrote problem instead of Probes. And np Telcontar =D This best part of this game was tasteless screaming about how crazy pheonix + colussus is. I wonder if he watches any games besides GSL. | ||
godemperor
Belgium2043 Posts
Edit: John is really good at interviews now, even making up question on the way. | ||
Ansinjunger
United States2451 Posts
One!...Two!.......a-Thr----Twenty. It's too bad Yeah did that and made his training partner Nestea look bad in the process, especially given the infamy of the Rain/Nestea thing in GSL3. That said, I am sick of people dogging Rain for all-ins, when he doesn't do it very often since that series, he's not bitbybit.prime. Sad to see Moonglade out, but his terran opponent seemed much better than Rain, just as was the case with Haypro vs Ganzi. What's interesting is that Ganzi is former IM but currently teamless. I don't know the reasons, but it seems IM lost a pretty good Terran. His Terminus game against Haypro, I'm sorry to say, looked about as decisive as IMSeed's games in the GSTL. He looked like an IM player for sure. I'm less surprised now about Junwi's loss to SlayerS_Alicia after J's teamleague performance. I didn't watch Squirtle closely until I saw that giant phoenix fleet in the Scrap Station game. I guess he didn't do the colossus/phoenix mix properly, although tbh the battle was fairly close. Go Supernova! | ||
darmousseh
United States3437 Posts
On February 26 2011 00:55 Shindou wrote: 10000000000000000000000% agree. By far the most annoying comments in post game play by play threads. I guess they would be more lucky never playing appropriate competition or having a challenge and cakewalking it to the top against bronze players. Everyone gives excuses for why their favorite players lost. Remember when cellawerra lost in season 1? Everyone thought it was a fluke because "He's an awesome streamer", but he simply wasn't at the level of all of these other players. Haypro vs Ganzi was a terrible series. If you look at it objectively without considering the name of the players playing, it was pretty bad. Neither player was comfortable playing in a macro game. Haypro's mutas were the most ineffective mutas I've ever seen in a pro game and he wasn't able to deal with multiple harassments at the same time. Ganzi on the other hand played as standard of a terran as possible making tanks marines marauders and medivacs. He lost SOOOOOOOOO many medivacs. Maybe he didn't care becuase he was sitting on 5 bases, but a better player would not have lost them. He apparently did this in bw too. Also, where was the tech for haypro? He's sitting on 5-6 bases (and losing like 5-6 hatches that he didn't need anyway). He could have gone broodlords or ultras or infestors or even, omg, roaches to tank the tank shots. Neither player convinced me they deserve a code S spot and the better (slightly) player won. This is a mentality that ESPN also has with east coast teams. When the Giants won the world series they called it a fluke stating that "they were lucky". They simply couldn't believe that their Philies lost. The Philies are a great team, but the giants had the pitching advantage and they had a group of hitters that could get things done at the right time. | ||
| ||