EPTAssembly Winter 2011 - Day 1 - Page 26
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
iaretehnoob
Sweden741 Posts
| ||
|
CooDu
Australia899 Posts
| ||
|
Finrod1
Germany3997 Posts
| ||
bkrow
Australia8532 Posts
On February 11 2011 21:37 Asha` wrote: Nope, suffering from Gastric Ulcers -_______- That sounds ridiculously painful.. JB is such a joke map - Kas did an awesome job of constantly denying darkforce his 3rd and eventually was able to take the game  good on Kas though - i like his play | ||
|
Sfydjklm
United States9218 Posts
On February 11 2011 21:36 Nimic wrote: And yet Styggen won his game on it to go 2-1 in the group. Go figure, right? omg styggen won a zvz on JB? amazing. | ||
|
mike1
Germany155 Posts
| ||
|
ondik
Czech Republic2908 Posts
On February 11 2011 21:37 Asha` wrote: Nope, suffering from Gastric Ulcers -_______- uh... he's so unlucky, missed like three major events T_T | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
1. Battlecruiser transition 2. Dropping Bio on tanks 3. Dropping Vikings on tanks 4. Some combination What he did was just destined to lose. | ||
|
Bloodash
Netherlands1384 Posts
| ||
|
shaunnn
Ireland1230 Posts
On February 11 2011 21:39 Shikyo wrote: Why didn't Naama ever take air control vs the mass tanks strategy? There would have been numerous options afterwards: 1. Battlecruiser transition 2. Dropping Bio on tankgs 3. Dropping Vikings on tanks 4. Some combination What he did was just destined to lose. Have to agree, even mass maruaders cant go headfirst into seige lines | ||
|
kvarko
Sweden26 Posts
On February 11 2011 21:32 Lann555 wrote: I really wonder why noone ever just gets a few banshees out when their opponent goes only tank with a few hellion. Jimpo had no anti-air in both games whatsoever, yet Naama never even tried to capitalize on that. It's a good tech switch but not without risk. They take a really long time to build and you can loose them fast and if you didn't kill alot of tanks your opponent has alot more tanks than you because you spent alot of gas on banshees. Thats my two cents! | ||
|
Nimic
Norway1360 Posts
ZvT. | ||
|
Sfydjklm
United States9218 Posts
U tripping he lost 0-2 to Kas | ||
|
bkrow
Australia8532 Posts
On February 11 2011 21:40 Bloodash wrote: 2.5 hours break? bluhh, guess i'll get some work done There is a 2.5 hour break now????? | ||
|
Frankon
3054 Posts
On February 11 2011 20:38 kckkryptonite wrote: This tourney is a joke right now, hopefully gets better. GSL ro 64 wasnt any better ^^ | ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
Against someone who is far beneath his own level. That doesnt make the map balanced. | ||
|
bennyaus
Australia1833 Posts
On February 11 2011 21:39 Shikyo wrote: Why didn't Naama ever take air control vs the mass tanks strategy? There would have been numerous options afterwards: 1. Battlecruiser transition 2. Dropping Bio on tanks 3. Dropping Vikings on tanks 4. Some combination What he did was just destined to lose. ^ Indeed. I was actually very unimpressed with what was a very one dimensional strategy in both games. Perhaps today just isn't his day, given that if the hype is to be believed, he is a top level EU terran. | ||
|
Armsved
Denmark642 Posts
On February 11 2011 21:39 Shikyo wrote: Why didn't Naama ever take air control vs the mass tanks strategy? There would have been numerous options afterwards: 1. Battlecruiser transition 2. Dropping Bio on tanks 3. Dropping Vikings on tanks 4. Some combination What he did was just destined to lose. They both ended up having 35 workers off 2 bases so their relative gas income could be very high. Jimpo used this to get an insanely tank heavy composition while naama didnt and made marauders. | ||
|
kyla
198 Posts
? he played 2 games in total a zvz against darkforce and against kas..lost both games i dont get what you mean he won versus T on jb | ||
|
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
Plus i'm excited to see how Jimpo will do. | ||
| ||
