|
On November 29 2010 20:37 Scruff wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2010 20:31 klauz619 wrote:On November 29 2010 20:30 eNbee wrote:On November 29 2010 20:27 klauz619 wrote:On November 29 2010 20:26 eNbee wrote: Fruitdealer would've gotten crushed if SC actually had bio micro of a GSL-worthy level -_-
I mean all he did was stop his marauders and studderstep his marines, no splitting in the slightest... Yes having 200apm splits with battlenet's forced 150ms latency vs right-click moving banelings should be the standard. Who's saying it should be the standard, but if you're gonna be playing at arguably the highest level of SC2, with a "bland" unit setup, you better be able to micro them like Foxer, else don't bother... Besides, it was slow banelings off creep (again). It isn't _that_ hard to micro vs that. And yet for the zerg all you have to do is right click a marine to get an easy win while he has to have retarded micro to fight, and he'll still lose usually. Wow i didn't know right clicking on a marine will get Zerg an easy win. Do you even play the game?
Yeah, everyone knows it's a-move. + Show Spoiler +
|
Lol.. Tastosis talking about how far Moon might get and how much they like him.. Isn't he playing Jinro this round?
|
On November 29 2010 20:38 Scorch wrote:Go Ret, kick some terran ass! ![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/JKl2a.png) lol that just scares me
|
|
Ret automatically gets +1 speed for his roaches
|
The word of the day: Baller!
|
The word you are supposed to learn today is baller.
|
Go Ret !
And please TL stop saying steppes is a bad map for zerg. It's a bad map for hatch first, yes. A bad map for zerg, no. A bad map for greedy play, yes. A small change like pool first, then gaz then hatch suddenly makes the map neutral. But zergs won't do it, because greedy zerg is greedy :D
|
Hahaha, tasteless' baller comment :D
|
"A cool and successful person: baller."
YOU HEARIN THIS, BALLER?
|
BAller is word to learn today lol
|
Baller joke was baller :D
|
|
The word of the day, baller. A cool and succesful person, baller. Tasteless is a baller. LOLOL gotta love Tastosis
|
ROFL "The word you're supposed to learn today is Baller."
Tasteless should teach preschool:D
|
|
|
Lol, Tastosis English class!
|
On November 29 2010 20:35 Shikyo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2010 20:32 Angelbelow wrote: Have to admit, i really dont know much about Ret.. didn't follow BW too closely... but def. looking forward to watching him play. He was like... *quit for 4 years, starts playing again, top 3 foreigner in 2 months* Yep, he's that good.
Yep guy plays very calm but goes into bulldog mode and bites you in the ass and wont let go. Loved watching him practice on his stream.
|
On November 29 2010 20:37 Dakkas wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2010 20:31 klauz619 wrote:On November 29 2010 20:30 eNbee wrote:On November 29 2010 20:27 klauz619 wrote:On November 29 2010 20:26 eNbee wrote: Fruitdealer would've gotten crushed if SC actually had bio micro of a GSL-worthy level -_-
I mean all he did was stop his marauders and studderstep his marines, no splitting in the slightest... Yes having 200apm splits with battlenet's forced 150ms latency vs right-click moving banelings should be the standard. Who's saying it should be the standard, but if you're gonna be playing at arguably the highest level of SC2, with a "bland" unit setup, you better be able to micro them like Foxer, else don't bother... Besides, it was slow banelings off creep (again). It isn't _that_ hard to micro vs that. And yet for the zerg all you have to do is right click a marine to get an easy win while he has to have retarded micro to fight, and he'll still lose usually. Stop being a fanboy. Banelings were made to directly counter units like marines. I bet your complain when protoss get storm or colossus against your marines as well
Storms getting nerfed, and colossus are expensive, take a long time to get and have plenty weaknesses. Banelings have neither disadvantage.
|
|
|
|