|
On September 27 2010 23:05 st3roids wrote:
Both of those units getting owned from a battlecruiser
Who needs a BC. The Terran has the tech for vikings (needs 5 to counter any number of BLs) and marauders (which are also great at most other things, so why not have a bunch, worst case use them to drop and take out any tech in 5 seconds flat).
What are the odds of Cool getting through Inca?
Quite honestly Cool beat top by totally outplaying him (watching those 10+ thors die in seconds was one of the most beautiful things ever). Let's see if he can outplay the rest that badly.
|
On September 27 2010 21:21 Fa1nT wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2010 21:18 CharlieMurphy wrote:
I missed the Check games today. He got roflstomped 2-0, what maps and what strats did they do? Game 1 - Check lost to drops. A large army of marines ran into his main and killed his hive and spire as he was dealing with another drop at his second base. He got ultras out, but not enough, not fast enough. Game 2 - Check lost to drops. Ran 30 zerglings into a corner where marines were walling off hellions, his army got decimated. Lost his natural to the marines All he had left was a few zerglings, 10 banelings, a queen or 2. Marines owned everything else. Show nested quote +On September 27 2010 21:21 bRuTaL!! wrote:On September 27 2010 21:18 ondik wrote:
no, it's just stupid without any strategical sense whatsoever. I remember raging after losing one game because my colossi would first attack the statue instead of hydra/ling army. You can also accidently blow up your banelings on it. Theyre great. So you lost because you were worse. No excuses not destroying it first. And since banelings can hit it a good player run around it to make them hit it. Anything that makes sc2 harder and more complicated is good. How about they remove large control groups? Use skill to move units. Remove attack move? pay attention to your army. Remove que-ing? Only nubs do that, right?
Are you seriously comparing THAT to map obstacles?
I also agree that removing large control groups would make the game more interesting. Keeping them to 24 would be enough.
Queue and attack move are as they were in sc1, slightly improved (building queue) so it's really not that big of a deal. The real help is MBS, and that's been discussed several times.
And to JinDesu, NO, banelings do NOT auto-target them, not even with attack structure autocast. You need to right-click it in order for them to attack it. Just like any other unit.
Also, it only takes 2 banes to drop it, so even if you do right-click it, you still only lose 2 banes for your noobish mistake.
Please get your facts right and/or stop trolling.
|
Hey guys, I used the change password tool a week ago and it made my gom account inaccessible. I never got a confirmation email for the new password and the website says my account no longer exists. I made a topic on the forums and I've sent 3 emails over the the last two weeks to their support address but Gom hasn't responded.
You guys know a way I can get in touch with someone at Gom to fix this?
|
Going to be really close after this. I think we'll see Maka and Ensnare in the semifinals.
|
On September 27 2010 23:28 damon2400 wrote:
Hey guys, I used the change password tool a week ago and it made my gom account inaccessible. I never got a confirmation email for the new password and the website says my account no longer exists. I made a topic on the forums and I've sent 3 emails over the the last two weeks to their support address but Gom hasn't responded.
You guys know a way I can get in touch with someone at Gom to fix this?
just create a new account dude...
|
CHECK NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO GOD DAMMIT!....It's all up to  Cool
|
On September 28 2010 00:09 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2010 23:28 damon2400 wrote:
Hey guys, I used the change password tool a week ago and it made my gom account inaccessible. I never got a confirmation email for the new password and the website says my account no longer exists. I made a topic on the forums and I've sent 3 emails over the the last two weeks to their support address but Gom hasn't responded.
You guys know a way I can get in touch with someone at Gom to fix this? just create a new account dude...
I payed 20 bucks.... Dude.
|
On September 28 2010 00:17 damon2400 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2010 00:09 supersoft wrote:On September 27 2010 23:28 damon2400 wrote:
Hey guys, I used the change password tool a week ago and it made my gom account inaccessible. I never got a confirmation email for the new password and the website says my account no longer exists. I made a topic on the forums and I've sent 3 emails over the the last two weeks to their support address but Gom hasn't responded.
You guys know a way I can get in touch with someone at Gom to fix this? just create a new account dude... I payed 20 bucks.... Dude.
Check your spam-folder(If you haven't already)
|
And to JinDesu, NO, banelings do NOT auto-target them, not even with attack structure autocast. You need to right-click it in order for them to attack it. Just like any other unit.
Also, it only takes 2 banes to drop it, so even if you do right-click it, you still only lose 2 banes for your noobish mistake.
Please get your facts right and/or stop trolling.
I apologize on the "auto-target". I clicked on the statue, yes, still a noob mistake - something that the map should not faulted with.
I do remember losing more than 2 banes, and the replay of Machine v QXC where Machine did the same thing as me lost at least 4 banes.
|
On September 28 2010 00:23 Quakie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2010 00:17 damon2400 wrote:On September 28 2010 00:09 supersoft wrote:On September 27 2010 23:28 damon2400 wrote:
Hey guys, I used the change password tool a week ago and it made my gom account inaccessible. I never got a confirmation email for the new password and the website says my account no longer exists. I made a topic on the forums and I've sent 3 emails over the the last two weeks to their support address but Gom hasn't responded.
You guys know a way I can get in touch with someone at Gom to fix this? just create a new account dude... I payed 20 bucks.... Dude. Check your spam-folder(If you haven't already)
Yah I did 
When I log in it tells me my account does not exist. I didn't just lose my password, my account got deleted or something and gom hasn't been replying to my support emails.
Very sad cause I missed today's games this morning and I really don't have the cash to spend 20 bucks again.
|
On September 28 2010 00:25 JinDesu wrote:Show nested quote +
And to JinDesu, NO, banelings do NOT auto-target them, not even with attack structure autocast. You need to right-click it in order for them to attack it. Just like any other unit.
Also, it only takes 2 banes to drop it, so even if you do right-click it, you still only lose 2 banes for your noobish mistake.
Please get your facts right and/or stop trolling.
I apologize on the "auto-target". I clicked on the statue, yes, still a noob mistake - something that the map should not faulted with. I do remember losing more than 2 banes, and the replay of Machine v QXC where Machine did the same thing as me lost at least 4 banes.
That may be true with the "outside" statues (the pyramid-like ones), but not the ones between the mains (the Mengsk statues in the corners). Those only take two banes to kill, I tried it myself. And they don't overkill like scourges used to.
|
On September 27 2010 21:56 amorpheus wrote:
Tester is playing good but he's still the ugly nerd no one liked in broodwar.
ITR ftw!
Yeah he is playing well (not good). IMO he is the least nerd-looking of anyone in the tournament. If you're going to make slanderous remarks about someone at least make them somewhat believable.
|
On September 28 2010 00:36 CheeseGrater wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2010 21:56 amorpheus wrote:
Tester is playing good but he's still the ugly nerd no one liked in broodwar.
ITR ftw! Yeah he is playing well (not good). IMO he is the least nerd-looking of anyone in the tournament. If you're going to make slanderous remarks about someone at least make them somewhat believable.
Dude looks like a damn rock. I honestly think he looks pretty cool if he gets rid of the bags under his eyes.
On September 28 2010 00:35 CubEdIn wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2010 00:25 JinDesu wrote:
And to JinDesu, NO, banelings do NOT auto-target them, not even with attack structure autocast. You need to right-click it in order for them to attack it. Just like any other unit.
Also, it only takes 2 banes to drop it, so even if you do right-click it, you still only lose 2 banes for your noobish mistake.
Please get your facts right and/or stop trolling.
I apologize on the "auto-target". I clicked on the statue, yes, still a noob mistake - something that the map should not faulted with. I do remember losing more than 2 banes, and the replay of Machine v QXC where Machine did the same thing as me lost at least 4 banes. That may be true with the "outside" statues (the pyramid-like ones), but not the ones between the mains (the Mengsk statues in the corners). Those only take two banes to kill, I tried it myself. And they don't overkill like scourges used to.
I'll look at my replay. Maybe I am overreacting based on how it pissed me off that I lost that game.
|
Epic RainBOw vs. Tester. That series was just so good during the Day[9]'s KotH, so I'm eagerly waiting to see what each will bring. Cool did say Tester "fears" RainBOw a bit, but you know Tester is probably going to win.
It would have been better if it happened in the Ro4, though (and Maka wins). Maka vs. Cool and Tester vs. Rainbow would have made for an amazing Ro4.
|
Korea (South)855 Posts
On September 27 2010 22:02 Hancell wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2010 21:43 KristianJS wrote:On September 27 2010 21:40 Hancell wrote:
GOMTV should hire more skilled interview interpreter. Or at least he needs more practice and training on interpretation.
I have watched the English stream this time and I found he didn't tell enough in English from player's answers. He only told the points in a few words. I think he couldn't express the details in English.
He essentially has to keep it brief because they have very little time for the interviews. It's all squeezed into the Korean commercial break. I don't think it was intentional. He was not that quick. I'm Korean native so I knew the original answers. If you understand the original answers most of you will be annoyed. His translation is in this style: Artosis: why did you do A? Player: I did it by mistake during preparing something against opponent's something. The translator: he did it by mistake. Artosis: What is your feeling about B? Player: I feel good because it's blahblah. The translator: Ah... he feels good.
This all might sound like excuses, but I myself did lot of complaining when watching others translate.
However, it's one thing listening to someone translate and another doing it yourself.
It's not really the translating part that's hard,but memorizing the contents of answers.
With voices on the headphone telling me stuff like "30seconds left!" "no time" it's very hard to
concentrate and I am very nervous when in front of the camera. Plus I actually am instructed to summarize them.
I am not saying you are wrong though. Like you said, these things require training, but I have never been a translator before and was not hired to do it either. I just happened to be the only available person when they decided on providing interview for global cast. All the training I ever had is in GSL. I do feel sorry for not being able to translate all the details, but I promise I'll only get better.
|
Yeah Junkka thanks for doing it. Good luck for tomorrow and hopefully you have fun 
|
On September 28 2010 01:04 JunkkaGom wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2010 22:02 Hancell wrote:On September 27 2010 21:43 KristianJS wrote:On September 27 2010 21:40 Hancell wrote:
GOMTV should hire more skilled interview interpreter. Or at least he needs more practice and training on interpretation.
I have watched the English stream this time and I found he didn't tell enough in English from player's answers. He only told the points in a few words. I think he couldn't express the details in English.
He essentially has to keep it brief because they have very little time for the interviews. It's all squeezed into the Korean commercial break. I don't think it was intentional. He was not that quick. I'm Korean native so I knew the original answers. If you understand the original answers most of you will be annoyed. His translation is in this style: Artosis: why did you do A? Player: I did it by mistake during preparing something against opponent's something. The translator: he did it by mistake. Artosis: What is your feeling about B? Player: I feel good because it's blahblah. The translator: Ah... he feels good. This all might sound like excuses, but I myself did lot of complaining when watching others translate. However, it's one thing listening to someone translate and another doing it yourself. It's not really the translating part that's hard,but memorizing the contents of answers. With voices on the headphone telling me stuff like "30seconds left!" "no time" it's very hard to concentrate and I am very nervous when in front of the camera. Plus I actually am instructed to summarize them. I am not saying you are wrong though. Like you said, these things require training and all the training I ever had is in GSL. I do feel sorry for not being able to translate all the details, but I promise I'll only get better.
must be hard to juggle the time limit and audience demands
thanks for translating and also being so well mannered
hope to see u keep doing well!
|
Clide always looks so tired all the time =[. I don't know if I'm being to presumptuous, but I honestly think he'd preform even better if he got himself some decent rest(possibly some solid GTL) before important matches.
Umm yeah... not to sure about some of those recommendations >.>.
|
On September 28 2010 00:36 CheeseGrater wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2010 21:56 amorpheus wrote:
Tester is playing good but he's still the ugly nerd no one liked in broodwar.
ITR ftw! Yeah he is playing well (not good). IMO he is the least nerd-looking of anyone in the tournament. If you're going to make slanderous remarks about someone at least make them somewhat believable.
he aint as pretty as rainbow though ^^
|
On September 28 2010 01:40 Pulimuli wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2010 00:36 CheeseGrater wrote:On September 27 2010 21:56 amorpheus wrote:
Tester is playing good but he's still the ugly nerd no one liked in broodwar.
ITR ftw! Yeah he is playing well (not good). IMO he is the least nerd-looking of anyone in the tournament. If you're going to make slanderous remarks about someone at least make them somewhat believable. he aint as pretty as rainbow though ^^
Haha sorry I wasn't comparing the two. I admit I am just automatically biased against Terran players. At this point, Cool is the sexiest of them all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
