| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
JMS31207
United States292 Posts
On July 01 2010 12:10 iCCup.Diamond wrote: Dude this is so gangster. I guess we picked a good tourney to cast a sick amount of games from  !i wanted to tell you so bad, we knew about the ifixit like a week ago  | ||
|
goswser
United States3548 Posts
| ||
|
JMS31207
United States292 Posts
On July 01 2010 12:21 Newguy wrote: JMS I pmed you the final bracket image if you want to put it up, and will have pmed you the other banners within 5 minutes! thanks!!! finals bracket posted | ||
|
goswser
United States3548 Posts
| ||
|
JMS31207
United States292 Posts
On July 01 2010 12:41 Newguy wrote: I also pmed you the other banners, I'm not sure if you need all of them though. i used them all!!! thanks | ||
|
Diamond
United States10796 Posts
On July 01 2010 12:19 JMS31207 wrote: i wanted to tell you so bad, we knew about the ifixit like a week ago It's cool man I understand how these things go ! I had a good feeling about this tournament anyways. We are really going to shoot for 100% of the games casted because doing stuff that's batshit insane is more or less the motto of iCCup TV ! Raelcun really set the standard with his 34 hour record breaking cast! He so deserves a star for that lol. | ||
|
MiniTsunami
United States274 Posts
To me it seems like either 8 or 16 seeded players would be a much more logical decisions. Also, I am interested as to why the 128 person portion is being treated as a part of the main tournament, rather than a satellite to win spots vs the seeded players. Anyway, I think it is cool that you got such a big prize pool, just interested about these things. | ||
|
Straife
United States36 Posts
You'll get more info back from me soon on various plugs to insert during the casts and links and stuff to put in the video info parts on youtube <3 iCCup TV + all other casters who love SC2 | ||
|
JMS31207
United States292 Posts
| ||
|
MiniTsunami
United States274 Posts
On July 01 2010 13:01 JMS31207 wrote: the 128 players are playing for the 4 extra spots for the actual tournament.... and the 12 seeded players were who we felt were our favorites and the best at the time, Yes that is quite apparent. My question was about the logic behind this choice though. | ||
|
JMS31207
United States292 Posts
| ||
|
MiniTsunami
United States274 Posts
On July 01 2010 13:05 JMS31207 wrote: it was the best at the time when we did not know if any of those players would even sign up, we could not imagine that it would get to the mass scale that it has, we weren't really prepared for it and we did th best we could. Ahh, yeah I can see how that would be a problem. Well, not to give you advice on how to run your own tournament, but just a suggestion for you to with as you will. If you change the number of seeded players to 8 or 16, and treat the 128 man portion as a satellite tournament (I.E. top 8 or 16 get a spot in the main 16 or 32 man tournament). Then you could seed the qualifiers against the seeded players, and the setup would allow for more qualifiers to get an actual shot at the prize pool, and it would allow for more diversity in your final 16 or 32 players. I don't mean to impose, I just thought that this approach might allow for a more competitive environment. Feel free to completely disregard me if you disagree :D | ||
|
JMS31207
United States292 Posts
| ||
|
Saechiis
Netherlands4989 Posts
As more and more players signed up the qualifiers went from 32, to 64, to 128 players. And the reason people are now treating these qualifiers as a part of the main event is because there are so many good players in it that it's arguably as competitive as the final RO16. So, there's your logic  | ||
|
MiniTsunami
United States274 Posts
On July 01 2010 13:21 Saechiis wrote: Don't be so defensive about it. The setup has always been a RO16 Tournament with 12 invites and 4 open spots that were decided by qualifiers. The reasons are quite obvious actually, we wanted to have some great known players in our tournament, but we didn't want to exclude potentially great players that never get invited because they're unknown. So we decided to invite 12 players we wanted to have and we opened a qualifier for the remaining 4 spots. As more and more players signed up the qualifiers went from 32, to 64, to 128 players. And the reason people are now treating these qualifiers as a part of the main event is because there are so many good players in it that it's arguably as competitive as the final RO16. So, there's your logic I see, my thought was that I should mention something to make sure that this tournament was being run as it is because it was planned out that way, because it is an illogical way of running a tournament. Either way if there is a prize pool, players will play, and if the tournament organizers want to organize it they will, and if not, apparently they won't. I will leave this thread alone now. | ||
|
holy_war
United States3590 Posts
| ||
|
Saechiis
Netherlands4989 Posts
On July 01 2010 13:33 holy_war wrote: Exciting qualifying tournament and awesome first round heavyweight matchups! What are you guys going to do if beta doesn't come back on time? Blame it on Dustin Browder ... and then push the dates back a bit | ||
|
Darkn3ss
United States717 Posts
GL to all!!! | ||
Lovedrop
2629 Posts
| ||
|
kar1181
United Kingdom515 Posts
Congratulations guys on securing such great support for your tournament. Me, I just CANNOT wait to see these games! | ||
| ||
|
|
The PondCast
OSC
Clem vs Cure
ByuN vs TBD
TBD vs Solar
MaxPax vs TBD
Krystianer vs TBD
ShoWTimE vs TBD
Big Brain Bouts
Serral vs TBD
BSL 21
BSL 21
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
WardiTV Invitational
|
|
|
EPT
