• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:02
CEST 22:02
KST 05:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting10[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced!3[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5
Community News
Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou18Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four3BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET7Weekly Cups (Oct 6-12): Four star herO85.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)81
StarCraft 2
General
RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" Weekly Cups (Oct 13-19): Clem Goes for Four Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou The New Patch Killed Mech! 5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)
Tourneys
Tenacious Turtle Tussle RSL Season 3 Qualifier Links and Dates $1,200 WardiTV October (Oct 21st-31st) SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 INu's Battles #13 - ByuN vs Zoun
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers
Brood War
General
Is there anyway to get a private coach? SnOw's Awful Building Placements vs barracks BW General Discussion BSL Team A vs Koreans - Sat-Sun 16:00 CET BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL20] Semifinal B [Megathread] Daily Proleagues 300$ 3D!Community Brood War Super Cup #4 Azhi's Colosseum - Anonymous Tournament
Strategy
[I] TvP Marine Usage Roaring Currents ASL final Current Meta BW - ajfirecracker Strategy & Training
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Chess Thread Men's Fashion Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Benefits Of Limited Comm…
TrAiDoS
Sabrina was soooo lame on S…
Peanutsc
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Certified Crazy
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1799 users

[Q] Is Mech weaker then bio in TvP?

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 Next All
MockHamill
Profile Joined March 2010
Sweden1798 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-23 21:49:53
May 23 2013 16:35 GMT
#1
We all know the downsides of mech:
1. Harder to respond to harass.
2. Much harder to remax army.
3. Less benefit from strong micro skills compared to bio.
4. Requiring much better positioning skill compared to bio.
5. Harder to punish a greedy opponent.

The upsides are:
1. Less fragile.
2. Less reliant on micro skills.
3. Stronger in a straight up engagement in TvT and TvZ.

But the problem I see is this, in TvP mech have all the classic downsides of mech, but is not actually stronger than bio. A maxed out sieged up Terran army with lots and tanks and buffer units can still be a-moved over by the Protoss army, something that could never happen in TvT and very seldom happen in TvZ.

Protoss is actually stronger in a straight mid/late game engagement both compared to bio, and compared to mech. Only by hurting the Protoss players economy by splitting the army in many small groups and do simultaneous attacks can Terran gradually build up enough advantage to actually win the game. Bio is better against Protoss when split up, but mech is not.

Am I wrong in this assumption? Is it actually pointless to use mech in TvP since mech is just as weak as bio in the actual engagement but lack all the advantages of bio? Is there actually any point in using mech in TvP apart from mech being easier to micro?
gingerfluffmuff
Profile Joined January 2011
Austria4570 Posts
May 23 2013 16:46 GMT
#2
Assumption: T players in the GSL are the best of their kind.
Reality: No one plays mech vs P in GSL
Conclussion: Its not viable / bio is better in TvP.

I guess it comes down to your seriousness with your play.
Killing Ps in high GM - Bio. Killing Ps in master - doesnt matter.
・゚✧:・゚+..。✧・゚:・..。 ✧・゚ :・゚ ゜・:・ ✧・゚:・゚:.。 ✧・゚ SPARKULING *・゜・:・゚✧:・゚✧。゚+..。 ✧・゚: ✧・゚:・゜・:・゚✧::・・:・゚・゚
Markwerf
Profile Joined March 2010
Netherlands3728 Posts
May 23 2013 16:48 GMT
#3
There is a reason noone uses mech in TvP.
HotS was a catastrophic failure on many parts, most of all trying to get mech to work in TvP. It was basically the focus of the entire terran revamp but didn;t do anything.

Early tank play can be fine and mixing in hellbats later is alright but pure mech just stinks. No mobility, no proper counter for air and just not even that great against ground.

For this reason alone David Kim needs to be fired really, so much effort in the beta trying to fix this somehow but no success at all. Especially since they've shown to give up in using elegant fixes only I don't see any reason why they haven't made a fix for mech in TvP.
After all if you make some incredibly ugly fixes like these:
- hellbat being biological
- spores do bonus against bio
- hellbats taking more cargo space than the hellion
- widow mines doing bonus damage against shields
then why don't they fix mech by actually making some fixes specifically targeted at mech v P, for example just some upgrade for tanks giving them bonus damage against shields.

Instead the retards at blizzard are applauding themselves practically saying the balance is just right now and they want to wait a bit longer to make changes, ie. mech won't be fixed before LotV. It's not so hard either to make balanced matchups if you change them very little from WoL..

User was temp banned for this post.
Juice!
Profile Joined January 2011
Belgium295 Posts
May 23 2013 17:10 GMT
#4
But what about the (few?) terrans in GM that only do mech?

yes most of them arn't bringing any results on high tournaments, but still they are in GM as mech (so they kinda played a lot of P's aswell?)

Many of us arn't progamers (or close to it) but try to get masters (mb GM) and it still seems to be possible? Harder probebly, yes, but possible?
Second place is just a fancy term for loser
Qikz
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United Kingdom12022 Posts
May 23 2013 17:13 GMT
#5
It's viable, it's possible and it against a ground protoss force is stronger in every single way than Bio is.

The only difference is, is at the highest level there's very few terrans playing mech as they know they can go bio and have been practicing and using that for 3 years now. Mech is outside of a few players unexplored in TvP at the highest level, but it's certainly strong.

As soon as people explore it more, it'll be used. Much like Mech vs Zerg.
FanTaSy's #1 Fan | STPL Caster/Organiser | SKT BEST KT | https://twitch.tv/stpl
ComBro1
Profile Joined March 2011
80 Posts
May 23 2013 17:15 GMT
#6
I go mech in TvP a lot on Zerus Prime (on ladder), but I think the way you pull it off is very situational. The general idea is that you have to put on a lot of pressure early (I use hellbat drops) while taking a silly fast third, then outmacroing the toss with 5 factories and a starport with reactor. I have been reasonably successful against my teammates doing this, but if they have any idea that its coming, they counter it really nicely with storm/immortals/voidrays. In short, I think it is a really good gimmick in a best of something series if you have shown a lot of bio styles in previous games, but bio is just so much more robust and consistant.
Juice!
Profile Joined January 2011
Belgium295 Posts
May 23 2013 17:15 GMT
#7
On May 24 2013 02:13 Qikz wrote:
It's viable, it's possible and it against a ground protoss force is stronger in every single way than Bio is.

The only difference is, is at the highest level there's very few terrans playing mech as they know they can go bio and have been practicing and using that for 3 years now. Mech is outside of a few players unexplored in TvP at the highest level, but it's certainly strong.

As soon as people explore it more, it'll be used. Much like Mech vs Zerg.


I agree with this aswell!

It's like Flash and all the others are soo used to BIO play. Why change what you know =) (this is I think the reason they don't try mech .. because they know they can win/play good with BIO)
Second place is just a fancy term for loser
Pachacutec
Profile Joined March 2012
Peru53 Posts
May 23 2013 17:19 GMT
#8
On May 24 2013 01:35 MockHamill wrote:

The upsides are:
1. Less fragile.
2. Less reliant on micro skills.
3. Stronger in a straight up engagement in TvT and TvZ.

Terran army with lots and tanks and buffer units can still be a-moved over my the Protoss army

Bio is better against Protoss when split up, but mech is not.

Am I wrong in this assumption? Is it actually pointless to use mech in TvP since mech is just as weak as bio in the actual engagement but lack all the advantages of bio? Is there actually any point in using mech in TvP apart from mech being easier to micro?


1.- in high levels your micro is godly so if better micro = metter use of the unit, bio is waaaaaaaaaaay better
2.- why on earth would you want to 1a2a3a on high level?
3.- mech is way to inmobile, P would just take 2 WP and star harrasing all your base, and you would be pin to 2 or 3 bases while he can get a 4th/5th and star getting voids/tempes/carrier and then he could 1a.

TL;DR: is "interesting" at most, but on lower leagues it coud be usefull because a player may not know how to react to ir, you cant just 1a 7 immortals an a bunch of zealots to a line of tanks (i did it... its horrible, tanks dps is just too much when they get to some point)
you look better in the shadows
Markwerf
Profile Joined March 2010
Netherlands3728 Posts
May 23 2013 17:26 GMT
#9
On May 24 2013 02:13 Qikz wrote:
It's viable, it's possible and it against a ground protoss force is stronger in every single way than Bio is.

The only difference is, is at the highest level there's very few terrans playing mech as they know they can go bio and have been practicing and using that for 3 years now. Mech is outside of a few players unexplored in TvP at the highest level, but it's certainly strong.

As soon as people explore it more, it'll be used. Much like Mech vs Zerg.


This is such a nonsense argument. They've tried mech plenty in their practice and they know how to play mech from other matchups. Even so them being uncomfortable with mech would easily balance out with opponents being uncomfortable to play against it.
Mech in TvP is not something that needs to be explored more and actually has a lot of hidden strength, if anything P players are unfamiliar with playing against it because P is never the aggressive harassing player in any matchup.

Mech just stinks, it has trouble fending off harass (blink stalkers or air), it is poor to open with because of the many different aggressive things P can do and it isn't even that strong when you assemble the ball because of immortals or carrier/tempest.
Basically you play a rigid difficult composition that only has a small window to excel before an air transition from protoss even nullifies it. Without serious buff it will never be viable.

TvZ it's already underpowered a little but there I can see value in it for switching it up occassionally and being fine at smaller cramped maps. TvP it's never any good.
MaTaAeRuKaNa
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States95 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-23 17:31:14
May 23 2013 17:29 GMT
#10
I disagree. I don't think a protoss can just a-move into a mech army if the terran knows what he's doing. If the terran uses EMP, the toss is just throwing his army away if he simply a-moves into it. Hellions/banshees are great harass early on and force the protoss to make cannons. The only exception I can think of is a toss maxed on carriers, in which case pretty much no terran army aside from mass BCs can really beat head to head. Here is an example of probably the best Mech I've seen dealing with the alleged counter to mech voidray/immortal. A lot of the successful mech users like HTO.Mario think that mech isn't inferior to bio, it's just unexplored.
Luddite wrote: Tentacle monster: Basically a sunken colony with legs, and multiple tentacles to attack with. It gets bonus damage vs. large units and Japanese school girls.
Sapphire.lux
Profile Joined July 2010
Romania2620 Posts
May 23 2013 17:36 GMT
#11
On May 24 2013 02:13 Qikz wrote:
It's viable, it's possible and it against a ground protoss force is stronger in every single way than Bio is.

The only difference is, is at the highest level there's very few terrans playing mech as they know they can go bio and have been practicing and using that for 3 years now. Mech is outside of a few players unexplored in TvP at the highest level, but it's certainly strong.

As soon as people explore it more, it'll be used. Much like Mech vs Zerg.

That bold part really annoys me. It asumes that players just use new strats at official games, therefore...no mech from the koreans on TV => they are not exploring. Complete BS.

Players, especially Koreans, train a fuck ton and play test strategies on ladder and especially custom games. We have not seen mech in WOL or HOTS because the pros have tried it and came to the conclusion it's crap. They will only play at official games what has worked in practice.

Any top player would want to use a strat that his opponent has very little if any experience playing against, but that start has to first be proven in practice that it has legs.

Let's not go back to the Artosis WOL argument of mech is great, but the Korean pros are lazy to explore. It was pathetic then and is so now.
Head Coach Park: "They should buff tanks!"
uh-oh
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Hong Kong135 Posts
May 23 2013 17:47 GMT
#12
I'll never understand why mechers cant just mix in a couple of ghosts. When you are on 3 bases I think its easy enough to get like 5-7 ghosts for blanket EMPs, and then push in with thor helbat while focusing down EMP'd immortals with tanks. Anything that stays far away gets shot by tanks, anything that tries to get into 7 range is blasted by thors and EMPs, anything that tries to come even closer is killed by helbats and mines. A properly controlled mech army WITH EMPs is probably much stronger than bio in a straight up battle.

Although the anti air part is a problem. When I see mech I usually just go straight for carriers and harass a lot and add tempests vs thors. The slow mech army will never get in range of the tempests/carrier fleet before dying, and surprisingly, if the vikings are behind on upgrades(which is probably because being gas starved by going mech) then carriers and tempests actually beat vikings supply for supply.
When I get to grandmasters, you have my permission to die!
sabas123
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Netherlands3122 Posts
May 23 2013 17:51 GMT
#13
On May 24 2013 02:29 MaTaAeRuKaNa wrote:
I disagree. I don't think a protoss can just a-move into a mech army if the terran knows what he's doing. If the terran uses EMP, the toss is just throwing his army away if he simply a-moves into it. Hellions/banshees are great harass early on and force the protoss to make cannons. The only exception I can think of is a toss maxed on carriers, in which case pretty much no terran army aside from mass BCs can really beat head to head. Here is an example of probably the best Mech I've seen dealing with the alleged counter to mech voidray/immortal. A lot of the successful mech users like HTO.Mario think that mech isn't inferior to bio, it's just unexplored.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2WqPcvXe_o

agreed, also i am getting sick of everybody going "gsl terrans don't do it so i don't do it" arguments. its invalid and just plain out stupid. you always should trust your own logic over any other trend.

if you want to hear it from a pro level player, go to the day9 podcasts......
The harder it becomes, the more you should focus on the basics.
Whatson
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United States5357 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-23 18:02:57
May 23 2013 17:59 GMT
#14
On May 24 2013 02:51 sabas123 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 24 2013 02:29 MaTaAeRuKaNa wrote:
I disagree. I don't think a protoss can just a-move into a mech army if the terran knows what he's doing. If the terran uses EMP, the toss is just throwing his army away if he simply a-moves into it. Hellions/banshees are great harass early on and force the protoss to make cannons. The only exception I can think of is a toss maxed on carriers, in which case pretty much no terran army aside from mass BCs can really beat head to head. Here is an example of probably the best Mech I've seen dealing with the alleged counter to mech voidray/immortal. A lot of the successful mech users like HTO.Mario think that mech isn't inferior to bio, it's just unexplored.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2WqPcvXe_o

agreed, also i am getting sick of everybody going "gsl terrans don't do it so i don't do it" arguments. its invalid and just plain out stupid. you always should trust your own logic over any other trend.

if you want to hear it from a pro level player, go to the day9 podcasts......

How is it invalid?
I trust the logic of guys who are paid to do it and play (and win) at the highest level over any master or even relatively no-name GM player any day, and so should you.
¯\_(シ)_/¯
Elldar
Profile Joined July 2010
Sweden287 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-25 09:43:38
May 23 2013 18:10 GMT
#15
On May 24 2013 02:26 Markwerf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 24 2013 02:13 Qikz wrote:
It's viable, it's possible and it against a ground protoss force is stronger in every single way than Bio is.

The only difference is, is at the highest level there's very few terrans playing mech as they know they can go bio and have been practicing and using that for 3 years now. Mech is outside of a few players unexplored in TvP at the highest level, but it's certainly strong.

As soon as people explore it more, it'll be used. Much like Mech vs Zerg.


This is such a nonsense argument. They've tried mech plenty in their practice and they know how to play mech from other matchups. Even so them being uncomfortable with mech would easily balance out with opponents being uncomfortable to play against it.
Mech in TvP is not something that needs to be explored more and actually has a lot of hidden strength, if anything P players are unfamiliar with playing against it because P is never the aggressive harassing player in any matchup.

Mech just stinks, it has trouble fending off harass (blink stalkers or air), it is poor to open with because of the many different aggressive things P can do and it isn't even that strong when you assemble the ball because of immortals or carrier/tempest.
Basically you play a rigid difficult composition that only has a small window to excel before an air transition from protoss even nullifies it. Without serious buff it will never be viable.

TvZ it's already underpowered a little but there I can see value in it for switching it up occassionally and being fine at smaller cramped maps. TvP it's never any good.


If you can not hold off blink stalkers then you are just bad.
If you can not hold of warp prism then you are not watching the mini-map(i.e playing badly).
Terran midgame army don't lose to immortal but late game do if you don't have a ghost.
Playing something in practice and in a tournament is two different things and they are probably more uncomfortable to pull mech off when the pressure is on. You want something you know is good and not something you think is good.
Juice!
Profile Joined January 2011
Belgium295 Posts
May 23 2013 18:10 GMT
#16
On May 24 2013 02:59 Whatson wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 24 2013 02:51 sabas123 wrote:
On May 24 2013 02:29 MaTaAeRuKaNa wrote:
I disagree. I don't think a protoss can just a-move into a mech army if the terran knows what he's doing. If the terran uses EMP, the toss is just throwing his army away if he simply a-moves into it. Hellions/banshees are great harass early on and force the protoss to make cannons. The only exception I can think of is a toss maxed on carriers, in which case pretty much no terran army aside from mass BCs can really beat head to head. Here is an example of probably the best Mech I've seen dealing with the alleged counter to mech voidray/immortal. A lot of the successful mech users like HTO.Mario think that mech isn't inferior to bio, it's just unexplored.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2WqPcvXe_o

agreed, also i am getting sick of everybody going "gsl terrans don't do it so i don't do it" arguments. its invalid and just plain out stupid. you always should trust your own logic over any other trend.

if you want to hear it from a pro level player, go to the day9 podcasts......

How is it invalid?
I trust the logic of guys who are paid to do it and play (and win) at the highest level over any master or even relatively no-name GM player any day, and so should you.


as long as 'we' arn't trying to go pro .. Why should 'we'?
Second place is just a fancy term for loser
architecture
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States643 Posts
May 23 2013 18:19 GMT
#17
On May 24 2013 02:13 Qikz wrote:
It's viable, it's possible and it against a ground protoss force is stronger in every single way than Bio is.

The only difference is, is at the highest level there's very few terrans playing mech as they know they can go bio and have been practicing and using that for 3 years now. Mech is outside of a few players unexplored in TvP at the highest level, but it's certainly strong.

As soon as people explore it more, it'll be used. Much like Mech vs Zerg.


This is the same argument people used in WoL in support of mech. That it just needs practice.

Why do people think that mech has to be necessarily viable? In 12 years of BW bio TvP was not viable past allin.

If it doesn't work, it doesn't work.
tpfkan
Sapphire.lux
Profile Joined July 2010
Romania2620 Posts
May 23 2013 18:23 GMT
#18
On May 24 2013 03:10 Juice! wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 24 2013 02:59 Whatson wrote:
On May 24 2013 02:51 sabas123 wrote:
On May 24 2013 02:29 MaTaAeRuKaNa wrote:
I disagree. I don't think a protoss can just a-move into a mech army if the terran knows what he's doing. If the terran uses EMP, the toss is just throwing his army away if he simply a-moves into it. Hellions/banshees are great harass early on and force the protoss to make cannons. The only exception I can think of is a toss maxed on carriers, in which case pretty much no terran army aside from mass BCs can really beat head to head. Here is an example of probably the best Mech I've seen dealing with the alleged counter to mech voidray/immortal. A lot of the successful mech users like HTO.Mario think that mech isn't inferior to bio, it's just unexplored.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2WqPcvXe_o

agreed, also i am getting sick of everybody going "gsl terrans don't do it so i don't do it" arguments. its invalid and just plain out stupid. you always should trust your own logic over any other trend.

if you want to hear it from a pro level player, go to the day9 podcasts......

How is it invalid?
I trust the logic of guys who are paid to do it and play (and win) at the highest level over any master or even relatively no-name GM player any day, and so should you.


as long as 'we' arn't trying to go pro .. Why should 'we'?

Because a strategies viability "factor" is determined by the highest levels of play. At lower level (wood..masters/low GM AM) you can win consistently with less then optimal strategies, making a discussion on whether a strat is good or not almost moot.
Head Coach Park: "They should buff tanks!"
haaz
Profile Joined May 2010
157 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-23 18:31:40
May 23 2013 18:26 GMT
#19
The sad thing about mech is that it is weak with ghosts, and even weaker without them.

The real problem is tank itself.
20 tanks should be able to RAPE everything on the ground with good positioning.
But it is not true anymore.

Protoss got uber shielded immortals, tanks are not artillery anymore with reduced dmg, and there is no proper antiair unit from factory to fight against toss air.

The problem exsist even in TvT, where proper positioned siege tanks got raped by stimmed marines because some people dont like / dont know how to play strategy games, and feel its boring, so they decided to cry for blizzard to nerf tanks and we got some crappy shit right now ;/

Even HotS buff to tanks doesnt help. Who cares about instant siege mode, when unsieged tanks got higher dps?

Something went wrong ;/

Shame on blizzard. They destroyed the role of this unit completely.



Edit:

Even in TvZ there is no need to build them anymore. Mines + bio is much more effective than old Tanks + bio.
It is easier, more rewarding to place mines and rape mutalisk banelings lings, instead of making tanks and kill some banes.
Playing full mech vs zerg is a joke compared to bio + mines. If you dont kill the zerg early or dont harras them, you just die in late game, while bio + mine can just afk macro and still be able to destroy zergs so easy.

Blizzard Logic, Fuck this Logic

User was warned for this post
temp banned: 2 warnings: 8, my little achievments 8), last update: 23-05-2013
TheDwf
Profile Joined November 2011
France19747 Posts
May 23 2013 18:31 GMT
#20
On May 24 2013 02:26 Markwerf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 24 2013 02:13 Qikz wrote:
It's viable, it's possible and it against a ground protoss force is stronger in every single way than Bio is.

The only difference is, is at the highest level there's very few terrans playing mech as they know they can go bio and have been practicing and using that for 3 years now. Mech is outside of a few players unexplored in TvP at the highest level, but it's certainly strong.

As soon as people explore it more, it'll be used. Much like Mech vs Zerg.


This is such a nonsense argument. They've tried mech plenty in their practice and they know how to play mech from other matchups. Even so them being uncomfortable with mech would easily balance out with opponents being uncomfortable to play against it.
Mech in TvP is not something that needs to be explored more and actually has a lot of hidden strength, if anything P players are unfamiliar with playing against it because P is never the aggressive harassing player in any matchup.

Mech just stinks, it has trouble fending off harass (blink stalkers or air), it is poor to open with because of the many different aggressive things P can do and it isn't even that strong when you assemble the ball because of immortals or carrier/tempest.
Basically you play a rigid difficult composition that only has a small window to excel before an air transition from protoss even nullifies it. Without serious buff it will never be viable.

TvZ it's already underpowered a little but there I can see value in it for switching it up occassionally and being fine at smaller cramped maps. TvP it's never any good.


On May 24 2013 02:36 Sapphire.lux wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 24 2013 02:13 Qikz wrote:
It's viable, it's possible and it against a ground protoss force is stronger in every single way than Bio is.

The only difference is, is at the highest level there's very few terrans playing mech as they know they can go bio and have been practicing and using that for 3 years now. Mech is outside of a few players unexplored in TvP at the highest level, but it's certainly strong.

As soon as people explore it more, it'll be used. Much like Mech vs Zerg.

That bold part really annoys me. It asumes that players just use new strats at official games, therefore...no mech from the koreans on TV => they are not exploring. Complete BS.

Players, especially Koreans, train a fuck ton and play test strategies on ladder and especially custom games. We have not seen mech in WOL or HOTS because the pros have tried it and came to the conclusion it's crap. They will only play at official games what has worked in practice.

Any top player would want to use a strat that his opponent has very little if any experience playing against, but that start has to first be proven in practice that it has legs.

Let's not go back to the Artosis WOL argument of mech is great, but the Korean pros are lazy to explore. It was pathetic then and is so now.

Yeah, this. Enough with the mech conspiracy. According to this "mech is not figured out yet" thesis there is a secret, somewhere, about how to play mech in TvP. But funnily enough, the secret is so well hidden that no one has ever discovered it despite repetitive attempts. The reason is of course simple: the secret does not exist.

As people above me said, pros did try mech. It doesn't take long to see it's still awful. All you have to do is draw two imaginary columns, list the disadvantages of going mech vs bio in the first one and the advantages in the second one, just like the OP did. Needless to say, the "disadvantages" column is full while the "advantages" one is desperately empty. I don't know how one can says that mech ground armies are more powerful than bio. It's flat out wrong, even with the Hellbat wall Protoss can still 1a lines of Tanks (or Thors) with pathetic ease as long as they have an appropriate composition.

And I am saying this despite having some wins against some EU Protoss pros using mech. But those wins simply followed the pattern below:

On April 19 2013 21:27 TheDwf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 18 2013 07:23 avilo wrote:
On April 17 2013 22:04 PredY wrote:
think the most difficult thing in tvp mech now is to find an optimal opening and then figure out how much stuff to build etc, i see too many people lose because their mass tank army gets obliterated by immortals. strelok and bunny showed some interesting builds in wcs eu althought im not so sure how they deal with really strong early agression.


Yes, that is the most difficult part for sure. I've been exclusively mech TvP again, and i know others are still attempting it as well.

What i've found is a reaper into 111 with any type of medivac into cloak banshee is one of the best mech openers because you have a way to pressure Protoss's probe count and still defend all-ins with reaper/scv scouting.

Also, many, many hellbat drops are a key to getting mech TvP to work, but that is something most of us already knew - mech TvP relies on killing a lot of workers through hellion harrass/banshee harrass otherwise Protoss can do whatever they want.

I saw a bunch of the posted bunny/strelok/krass games...pretty good mech TvPs but in a bunch of those it looked like the Protosses were all 1 gate expanding for the most part, very few all-ins. In particular I saw strelok do a 15 CC into 1 rax and then 1 refinery...literally any all-in from Protoss kills this...but if the game goes on past this point then through harrass mech TvP is looking a bit better lately.

Most elite Protoss vs mech players will abuse DTs, warp prisms, immortals and stargate tech + all-ins as openers that end up not being all-in because of doing massive damage. Didn't really see a lot of P abuse in those WCS EU games, a lot could have to do with mech being so rarely seen that the protosses didn't react as efficiently as they could.

The game that comes to mind that I saw was strelok vs finale on newkirk. Finale adjusted from the first game and began immortal production much sooner in this game instead of building so many collosus. And strelok actually had a huge lead and at one point i saw almost 170 supply mech Terran get crushed by like a 120 supply Protoss (lol).

I do think ghosts are necessary with mech, they were in wings of liberty, but the optimal timing of when to start such things is not so mapped out yet, even for really experienced mech tvp users.

This matches my experience as well. Mech in TvP "works" mainly because of two factors:

  1. massive economic advantage, obtainable through:

    • greed, for instance metagaming a passive MSC expand with CC rax gas, or teching Hellbats drops behind one Bunker and a couple of Mines, etc.;
    • killing mass Probes with harass, e. g. Hellbats drops, BFH raids, etc.;
    • or both.

  2. Protoss players failing to adapt and having really poor answers:

    • many of them are unwilling to unplug the anti bio play autopilot;
    • or they react too late to mech play;
    • or they resort to hackneyed tactics such as massing 10+ Immortals on dual robotics, etc.

Which, of course, means mech technically does not work, because defending Probes only comes down to having 2+ Cannons per mineral line to shut down all forms of mech mild harass, and thinking a bit to find various ways to exploit mech's numerous weaknesses is quite simple.

Another case of victory can be "Protoss playing too greedy and not scouting a 2-bases all-in/timing" (or, in the same way, suiciding a 2-bases timing/all-in against a fortified mech position in the Terran's base).



On May 24 2013 02:47 uh-oh wrote:
I'll never understand why mechers cant just mix in a couple of ghosts. When you are on 3 bases I think its easy enough to get like 5-7 ghosts for blanket EMPs, and then push in with thor helbat while focusing down EMP'd immortals with tanks. Anything that stays far away gets shot by tanks, anything that tries to get into 7 range is blasted by thors and EMPs, anything that tries to come even closer is killed by helbats and mines. A properly controlled mech army WITH EMPs is probably much stronger than bio in a straight up battle.

To quote myself:

On April 19 2013 21:27 TheDwf wrote:
Just like in WoL, the best way to play mech in TvP—outside of not playing it—is probably ghostmech, but then the amount of units (with many of them being gas-intensive, and naturally slow to produce) required to deal with Protoss armies quickly becomes ridiculous... If Protoss incorporates Stargate units you end up with Ghosts/Hellbats/Mines/Tanks/Thors/Vikings/Ravens, and the mere enunciation of such a unit composition says everything (and even with all of that you're not even guaranteed good trades...).

So people do play Ghosts along with mech, but on top of being horribly passive massing your expensive army you will still get rolled by air/Templars in the end.
1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 14h 58m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 610
UpATreeSC 96
Railgan 35
MindelVK 33
Codebar 28
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 1206
EffOrt 379
Backho 86
Yoon 28
Free 21
scan(afreeca) 19
NaDa 4
Dota 2
monkeys_forever257
capcasts54
Counter-Strike
ScreaM2000
Stewie2K301
kRYSTAL_25
Super Smash Bros
Chillindude33
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu392
Other Games
Grubby3588
FrodaN2086
fl0m1171
Beastyqt626
Skadoodle272
ToD117
Trikslyr49
Mew2King36
ViBE36
QueenE32
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL175
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 21
• davetesta3
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 23
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota259
Other Games
• imaqtpie1281
• Shiphtur190
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Invitational
14h 58m
Online Event
19h 58m
RSL Revival
1d 5h
RSL Revival
1d 13h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 14h
OSC
1d 18h
SKillous vs goblin
Spirit vs GgMaChine
ByuN vs MaxPax
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Snow vs Soma
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
CrankTV Team League
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
CrankTV Team League
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
CrankTV Team League
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
CrankTV Team League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS2
WardiTV TLMC #15
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
RSL Offline Finals
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
CranK Gathers Season 2: SC II Pro Teams
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.