• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:58
CET 13:58
KST 21:58
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down20ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier6Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League93
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? SC2 Power Rank: epic29 Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.17 How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Evil Geniuses - shutting down
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers [G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 548 Shining Bright Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion SCHNAIL now supports Remastered Ziemie's Starcraft 1 Prequel Campaign Bot on ladder Rollback Netcode in Brood War
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [Women's StarCraft] MonstarZ vs BA 2026-10-30 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Star Con San Diego 2026
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread US Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9340 users

[D] How not to die in a mine field (ZvT) - Page 2

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
yeastiality
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada374 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-20 16:04:17
April 20 2013 16:03 GMT
#21
Fungal will reveal and damage mines. Infested terrans will set off mines. Infestors can harass bases that don't have tanks guarding them, whereas mutas can still just die to random mines and stimmed marines.

Even if fungal is a projectile now, the bio units have to stay in a certain area relative to where the mines are placed. It's not *that* hard to hit a big chunk of them unless you're playing EU-KR with huge lag or something like that.

I don't think he's saying "never use mutas" or "make purely infestors with your gas" - just that infestors can answer a lot of the fundamental strengths of bio/mine armies. When terrans start mixing in tanks, we're screwed, though!
Big J
Profile Joined March 2011
Austria16289 Posts
April 20 2013 16:03 GMT
#22
On April 21 2013 00:34 TheDwf wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2013 00:14 Big J wrote:
Imo, you don't want to make banelings ever unless you want to bust.

It's not about what Zerg wants to do, it's about what Zerg is forced to do. Zergs do not morph Banelings out of pleasure, but because otherwise they will simply lose to critical mass of Marines in a tight formation. Your plan to jump straight to Infestors from Mutalisks without conceding any Baneling has major flaws; you will have severe issues defending the first Medivac push (particularly if Terran manages to land his troops behind mineral lines), and you will be in a world of pain if Terran hits you with 40+ Marines in a ball before you have Infestors out.


yes. But all Terrans I meet go for mines blindly these days.
Basically what I believe is: If Terran goes for a macro game (3CC with double upgrades), any form of marine/mine/medivac push/drop before 12mins can be held without banelings. If he goes for a two base play... just do whatever works to hold it with 3bases.

And for drops I go mutas. And then I try to not fuck up and let him drop me too heavily. Else I wouldn't go mutas and just open infestors to begin with. I don't believe in investing heavily into drop denial and then assuming that I need a lot of ground dropdefense as well.
ManiacTheZealot
Profile Joined December 2009
United States490 Posts
April 20 2013 16:08 GMT
#23
On April 21 2013 00:56 Decendos wrote:

thats the point. he HAS to make lings or will die. those 4 spines were great yeah....but you cant make 50 spines...you need lings or will just die to everything. if he does 1-2 drops while attacking...hf defending that without lings^^


You don't need 50 spines. Like you said those 4 spines were great. And you don't need to completely stop making zerglings either. So you won't be "defending without lings". Don't take it to extremes look at how it can be cost effective if you place them in the right spots at the right times.
Decendos
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany1341 Posts
April 20 2013 16:29 GMT
#24
On April 21 2013 01:08 ManiacTheZealot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2013 00:56 Decendos wrote:

thats the point. he HAS to make lings or will die. those 4 spines were great yeah....but you cant make 50 spines...you need lings or will just die to everything. if he does 1-2 drops while attacking...hf defending that without lings^^


You don't need 50 spines. Like you said those 4 spines were great. And you don't need to completely stop making zerglings either. So you won't be "defending without lings". Don't take it to extremes look at how it can be cost effective if you place them in the right spots at the right times.


4 spines to block the small attack path to the 4th...another 6 where flash attacked then and 3 or so do fight off drops. thats already 13 for 1 base...
ManiacTheZealot
Profile Joined December 2009
United States490 Posts
April 20 2013 16:54 GMT
#25
On April 21 2013 01:29 Decendos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2013 01:08 ManiacTheZealot wrote:
On April 21 2013 00:56 Decendos wrote:

thats the point. he HAS to make lings or will die. those 4 spines were great yeah....but you cant make 50 spines...you need lings or will just die to everything. if he does 1-2 drops while attacking...hf defending that without lings^^


You don't need 50 spines. Like you said those 4 spines were great. And you don't need to completely stop making zerglings either. So you won't be "defending without lings". Don't take it to extremes look at how it can be cost effective if you place them in the right spots at the right times.


4 spines to block the small attack path to the 4th...another 6 where flash attacked then and 3 or so do fight off drops. thats already 13 for 1 base...


So let me get this straight you're advocating for no spines at all unless you can build 50 of them and defend everything at once?
Aveng3r
Profile Joined February 2012
United States2411 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-20 17:05:04
April 20 2013 17:04 GMT
#26
allright dude what EXACTLY are you arguing for? 10 spines to stop the 13-15 minute aggression period for terran? 4 to stop the initial medivac moveout? you keep making these arbitrary statements that really dont mean anything at all unless you clearly explain what you are advocating and what problems it will solve. saying "spines are good against terran because they kill mines" doesnt help at all, we need details. What are the right places and times?
I carve marble busts of assassinated world leaders - PM for a quote
Decendos
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany1341 Posts
April 20 2013 17:09 GMT
#27
On April 21 2013 01:54 ManiacTheZealot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2013 01:29 Decendos wrote:
On April 21 2013 01:08 ManiacTheZealot wrote:
On April 21 2013 00:56 Decendos wrote:

thats the point. he HAS to make lings or will die. those 4 spines were great yeah....but you cant make 50 spines...you need lings or will just die to everything. if he does 1-2 drops while attacking...hf defending that without lings^^


You don't need 50 spines. Like you said those 4 spines were great. And you don't need to completely stop making zerglings either. So you won't be "defending without lings". Don't take it to extremes look at how it can be cost effective if you place them in the right spots at the right times.


4 spines to block the small attack path to the 4th...another 6 where flash attacked then and 3 or so do fight off drops. thats already 13 for 1 base...


So let me get this straight you're advocating for no spines at all unless you can build 50 of them and defend everything at once?


i am saying 1-2 spines/spores per base vs drops is fine. just like every Z does as standard play.

i dont really get what YOU mean. first you say " build spines vs mines instead of lings"...which you would need 30-60 depending on map. then you say, build 4....at 1 base...and basically play like bbong vs flash and build mass lings?! now how many spines would you say do you need in ZvT to stop the 11+ min attack that never stops. how would you balance the spine/ling ratio? how many spines/spores as drop defense? give us some numbers because right now it seems you had an idea "spines are good vs mines" but no practical clue on how to do it. if it is that good please give us a replay of you doing this mass spine style vs MMMM so we get a feeling for the number and positioning of spines you mean.
ManiacTheZealot
Profile Joined December 2009
United States490 Posts
April 20 2013 17:26 GMT
#28
On April 21 2013 02:09 Decendos wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 21 2013 01:54 ManiacTheZealot wrote:
On April 21 2013 01:29 Decendos wrote:
On April 21 2013 01:08 ManiacTheZealot wrote:
On April 21 2013 00:56 Decendos wrote:

thats the point. he HAS to make lings or will die. those 4 spines were great yeah....but you cant make 50 spines...you need lings or will just die to everything. if he does 1-2 drops while attacking...hf defending that without lings^^


You don't need 50 spines. Like you said those 4 spines were great. And you don't need to completely stop making zerglings either. So you won't be "defending without lings". Don't take it to extremes look at how it can be cost effective if you place them in the right spots at the right times.


4 spines to block the small attack path to the 4th...another 6 where flash attacked then and 3 or so do fight off drops. thats already 13 for 1 base...


So let me get this straight you're advocating for no spines at all unless you can build 50 of them and defend everything at once?


i am saying 1-2 spines/spores per base vs drops is fine. just like every Z does as standard play.

i dont really get what YOU mean. first you say " build spines vs mines instead of lings"...which you would need 30-60 depending on map. then you say, build 4....at 1 base...and basically play like bbong vs flash and build mass lings?! now how many spines would you say do you need in ZvT to stop the 11+ min attack that never stops. how would you balance the spine/ling ratio? how many spines/spores as drop defense? give us some numbers because right now it seems you had an idea "spines are good vs mines" but no practical clue on how to do it. if it is that good please give us a replay of you doing this mass spine style vs MMMM so we get a feeling for the number and positioning of spines you mean.


Please don't quote things that I didn't say. Also note that this is a discussion topic not a strategy guide. It would be pointless to tell you how many to make as that would change from game to game depending on the situation. Telling you where to put them would be map specific. The topic for discussion is how to defend against this slow push use of the mines. And yes you can boil it down to spines can kill mines but that's vastly over-simplified.
Aveng3r
Profile Joined February 2012
United States2411 Posts
April 20 2013 18:50 GMT
#29
then elaborate please.. you seem to be doing everything except explaining what you mean with these statements
I carve marble busts of assassinated world leaders - PM for a quote
PanzerElite
Profile Joined May 2012
540 Posts
April 20 2013 18:55 GMT
#30
Seriously the OP is just telling to fortify your base in the lategame instead of wasting your minerals on lings that you just run into a minefield and get slaughtered without doing any damage. Instead of chasing down bio, just regroup add static defense and take the next fight on your terms, instead of running your units into a minefield.
Spyridon
Profile Joined April 2010
United States997 Posts
April 20 2013 19:02 GMT
#31
Why has noone mentioned Swarm Hosts?

Lately when I see enemies going for heavy mine/bio I have been getting SH/Roaches with spellcaster support and it has worked great so far.

Locusts basically make the mines irrelevant, and then you can send Roaches in to take initial aggression and clean up the mines. Locusts are great vs Marines as well, and infestors (or vipers if it goes that late) can nullify the infantry.

I honestly don't see what Mutas provide vs this match up that SH compositions don't do better, aside from discouraging drops a bit? (which can be handled with static defenses and roaches)
EsportsJohn
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4883 Posts
April 20 2013 19:11 GMT
#32
In my personal experience, the best way to stop mines from creeping up to your front door is just constant counterattacks with muta/ling. Life has a lot of success with this, and I've been trying to copy a lot from him. Basically, you can defend the first parts of terran aggression with your muta/ling and start putting up static defenses at your base and then just go balls to the wall counterattack aggression which will stop the inevitable widow mine fields in the middle of the map from being dangerous.

In addition, if you can keep terran pinned back away from the mines, it's no problem to run a handful of lings over the mines, set them off, and then clean them up with mutas. Essentially, it works the same way as a terran clearing creep after distracting zerg with a drop or 2.
StrategyAllyssa Grey <3<3
Decendos
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany1341 Posts
April 20 2013 19:15 GMT
#33
On April 21 2013 04:02 Spyridon wrote:
Why has noone mentioned Swarm Hosts?

Lately when I see enemies going for heavy mine/bio I have been getting SH/Roaches with spellcaster support and it has worked great so far.

Locusts basically make the mines irrelevant, and then you can send Roaches in to take initial aggression and clean up the mines. Locusts are great vs Marines as well, and infestors (or vipers if it goes that late) can nullify the infantry.

I honestly don't see what Mutas provide vs this match up that SH compositions don't do better, aside from discouraging drops a bit? (which can be handled with static defenses and roaches)


so where exactly do you get your gas? do you go roach ling bling into SH and then add infestors and static? or infestor first and then add SH and static?

basically you go muta because otherwise T will drop you a lot and worst of all: his medivac count will get out of hand very fast. like in 5 min he will have 10-12 medivacs which means he can outheal fungal at which point you have a problem. especially doomdrops with 4-5 medivacs are insanely hard to deal with if you go SH without muta.

you guys need to post replays and not just theorycraft about this.
ManiacTheZealot
Profile Joined December 2009
United States490 Posts
April 21 2013 01:41 GMT
#34
On April 21 2013 04:11 SC2John wrote:
In my personal experience, the best way to stop mines from creeping up to your front door is just constant counterattacks with muta/ling. Life has a lot of success with this, and I've been trying to copy a lot from him. Basically, you can defend the first parts of terran aggression with your muta/ling and start putting up static defenses at your base and then just go balls to the wall counterattack aggression which will stop the inevitable widow mine fields in the middle of the map from being dangerous.

In addition, if you can keep terran pinned back away from the mines, it's no problem to run a handful of lings over the mines, set them off, and then clean them up with mutas. Essentially, it works the same way as a terran clearing creep after distracting zerg with a drop or 2.


I've been experimenting with this as well. However I've been using drops and nydus to do it to avoid the widow mines and wall off. Once my lings get adrenal glands I load up a bunch and drop them in his base while pushing with the rest of my army. The drop itself is very cheap and cost very little supply but can do significant damage with the adrenal glands upgrade. Killing scv's and production facilities will slow him down a lot. Nydus can do this without risk of being out of position and you can take a larger part of your army but it's harder to get down. I think this is definitely the way we need to play to beat MMMM. Putting pressure on the terran without having to attack into his mine field is definitely the way to go.
ManiacTheZealot
Profile Joined December 2009
United States490 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-21 02:45:40
April 21 2013 01:50 GMT
#35
On April 21 2013 04:02 Spyridon wrote:
Why has noone mentioned Swarm Hosts?

Lately when I see enemies going for heavy mine/bio I have been getting SH/Roaches with spellcaster support and it has worked great so far.

Locusts basically make the mines irrelevant, and then you can send Roaches in to take initial aggression and clean up the mines. Locusts are great vs Marines as well, and infestors (or vipers if it goes that late) can nullify the infantry.

I honestly don't see what Mutas provide vs this match up that SH compositions don't do better, aside from discouraging drops a bit? (which can be handled with static defenses and roaches)


The reason I don't use swarmhosts mid game is because I get melee upgrades first against terran. I feel like the aoe from banelings and ultralisks is something you can't live without against bio. Late game if the terran tries a switch to something like say raven/bc I think swarmhosts can win the game for you with some multi pronged attacks taking advantage of his weaker ground army.

I haven't tried the hydra/roach timing attacks against bio yet. Those might synergize with a swarmhost switch more.

Someone asked for a replay. Here's the best I can do on short notice. The terran wasn't as aggressive as I would have liked him to be in the example so I didn't make a lot of spines. But the ones I did make paid for themselves.
http://drop.sc/325983

Here's another a bit more aggressive, more spines used. http://drop.sc/325988
Hattori_Hanzo
Profile Joined October 2010
Singapore1229 Posts
April 21 2013 02:49 GMT
#36
On April 21 2013 01:03 yeastiality wrote:
Fungal will reveal and damage mines. Infested terrans will set off mines. Infestors can harass bases that don't have tanks guarding them, whereas mutas can still just die to random mines and stimmed marines.

Even if fungal is a projectile now, the bio units have to stay in a certain area relative to where the mines are placed. It's not *that* hard to hit a big chunk of them unless you're playing EU-KR with huge lag or something like that.

I don't think he's saying "never use mutas" or "make purely infestors with your gas" - just that infestors can answer a lot of the fundamental strengths of bio/mine armies. When terrans start mixing in tanks, we're screwed, though!


3-5 infestors are good in mid-game onwards mine sweepers role.
That makes muta/ling/bling into muta/ling/bling/infestor.

Blizzard is really making it hard. Separates the pros from the amateurs. I like it.
Cauterize the area
ETisME
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
12904 Posts
April 21 2013 03:37 GMT
#37
I will expand on my points earlier on. The problem is not your plat/diamond league, I am not having a too big big trouble against terran at diamond league either with just ling micro and good defense against drop and I am playing a ling baneling hydra combo into ultra viper.

The main issue is the lower league who doesn't try to donate the mine before entering first AND the GM/Pro level where the balance issue really shines.

This is what I heard from Ret when I was watching from his stream, something along this line:
you can get dropped to death and zerg can't put on aggression back onto the terran because they have total map control with the new medivac. They also have a great defensive capability because of the mines. Korean Zerg basically beat mines by having really good ling control and drop defense.

Spines will do nothing against marauder drops/run by which can snipe a hatch within around 10 seconds. Every spine you lose is losing one more drone and one less larva that needed for something else.

What he means is that in order to shut down drops and have some form of map control, you can only rely on muta but even with muta, it is much harder to kill medivac, making the eventually bio mine push much more powerful because a high medivac, mine and upgraded bio can *only* be beaten but a strong hive tech army backed with infestors.

Not to mention nowadays terrans are relatively safe to do a quick in base 3rd CC. With no ability to put back pressure onto the terran due to reaper, hellions, big maps and eventually the mines and drops, zerg will be at a macro disadvantage.
其疾如风,其徐如林,侵掠如火,不动如山,难知如阴,动如雷震。
AlexanderDebois
Profile Joined October 2011
Kyrgyzstan38 Posts
April 21 2013 04:05 GMT
#38
As a terran player I would simply stim my 2-2, or worse 3-3, maruaders with a medivac or two up to the spines. They then die in about .5 seconds. I don't really know how you would stop this..if there are mines right behind the marauders good luck getting close to them and they would probably kill the spines before you could react anyway. Interesting theory crafting but I do no think it could work.
Qwyn
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2781 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-04-21 04:07:14
April 21 2013 04:05 GMT
#39
On April 21 2013 12:37 ETisME wrote:
I will expand on my points earlier on. The problem is not your plat/diamond league, I am not having a too big big trouble against terran at diamond league either with just ling micro and good defense against drop and I am playing a ling baneling hydra combo into ultra viper.

The main issue is the lower league who doesn't try to donate the mine before entering first AND the GM/Pro level where the balance issue really shines.

This is what I heard from Ret when I was watching from his stream, something along this line:
you can get dropped to death and zerg can't put on aggression back onto the terran because they have total map control with the new medivac. They also have a great defensive capability because of the mines. Korean Zerg basically beat mines by having really good ling control and drop defense.

Spines will do nothing against marauder drops/run by which can snipe a hatch within around 10 seconds. Every spine you lose is losing one more drone and one less larva that needed for something else.

What he means is that in order to shut down drops and have some form of map control, you can only rely on muta but even with muta, it is much harder to kill medivac, making the eventually bio mine push much more powerful because a high medivac, mine and upgraded bio can *only* be beaten but a strong hive tech army backed with infestors.

Not to mention nowadays terrans are relatively safe to do a quick in base 3rd CC. With no ability to put back pressure onto the terran due to reaper, hellions, big maps and eventually the mines and drops, zerg will be at a macro disadvantage.


This is exactly how I feel. Muta/ling/bling for me is completely lacking in sustainability and if you don't open up a window for you to secure your 7/8th gas and transition into ultralisk it's going to be very difficult for you to win.

What is the most aggravating about the new medivac is that if terran controls well then the drop cannot be punished. They can simply pick up and fly away! Even if you have mutas chasing the drop down - the medivac will manage to get more than halfway across the map before the mutas can even BEGIN to catch up with it at normal move speed (which opens up your ling/bling to a push from bio/mine). This, in combination with bio/mine allowing terran to take map control against your much more fragile composition, means that terran can easily expand on par with the zerg player.

This is where it gets frustrating. For a zerg to compete, he needs to be up a base or more. If terran is on an equal number of bases (4+ is the rage inducing number), which they CAN take with bio/mine, then mules enable them to have a severe macro advantage and snowball out of control.

"Think of the hysteria following the realization that they consciously consume babies and raise the dead people from their graves" - N0
ManiacTheZealot
Profile Joined December 2009
United States490 Posts
April 21 2013 05:40 GMT
#40
On April 21 2013 13:05 AlexanderDebois wrote:
As a terran player I would simply stim my 2-2, or worse 3-3, maruaders with a medivac or two up to the spines. They then die in about .5 seconds. I don't really know how you would stop this..if there are mines right behind the marauders good luck getting close to them and they would probably kill the spines before you could react anyway. Interesting theory crafting but I do no think it could work.


Do you know what else also dies in .5 seconds? All your marines and marauders while they try to kill off the spines. Why would the zerg let you walk up to his spines and kill them all for free? This sounds like a mistake from the zerg, not a good play by the terran.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Invitational
21:00
WardiTV Not-Summer Championshi
WardiTV460
TaKeTV 189
Liquipedia
Sparkling Tuna Cup
19:00
Weekly #153 (SHIN Mod Edition)
ByuN vs PercivalLIVE!
CranKy Ducklings179
CranKy Ducklings SOOP13
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko312
IndyStarCraft 118
SHIN 27
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 6737
Shuttle 1858
Bisu 1418
Horang2 1039
Soma 485
Mini 437
firebathero 287
FanTaSy 245
Rush 228
Last 150
[ Show more ]
Mind 112
scan(afreeca) 107
actioN 88
Soulkey 81
ToSsGirL 56
Barracks 34
Shinee 34
Killer 30
Classic 27
soO 27
Movie 20
sorry 20
yabsab 18
910 16
zelot 16
Hm[arnc] 13
ajuk12(nOOB) 12
Shine 11
Icarus 1
Dota 2
Gorgc2010
monkeys_forever225
Counter-Strike
fl0m2257
Other Games
B2W.Neo1487
DeMusliM482
ArmadaUGS72
QueenE40
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL28745
Other Games
ComeBackTV 415
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 9
[ Show 9 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Response 3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
Epic.LAN
2m
IPSL
3h 2m
eOnzErG vs McRibbed
LancerX vs StRyKeR
AI Arena Tournament
4h 2m
OSC
1d 1h
Yamato Cup
1d 2h
IPSL
1d 4h
Artosis vs RiceHat
Kyrie vs Sony
Map Test Tournament
1d 10h
WardiTV Weekly
1d 23h
Ultimate Battle
1d 23h
Rush vs BeSt
Replay Cast
2 days
Rogue vs Classic
[ Show More ]
Patches Events
3 days
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
KCM Race Survival
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-30
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

1xBet Invitational
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.