• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 16:15
CET 22:15
KST 06:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Clem wins HomeStory Cup 286HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info3herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational14SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 26-Feb 1): herO, Clem, ByuN, Classic win2RSL Season 4 announced for March-April7Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win3Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8
StarCraft 2
General
Clem wins HomeStory Cup 28 HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview Stellar Fest "01" Jersey Charity Auction StarCraft 2 Not at the Esports World Cup 2026 Weekly Cups (Jan 26-Feb 1): herO, Clem, ByuN, Classic win
Tourneys
HomeStory Cup 28 $5,000 WardiTV Winter Championship 2026 RSL Season 4 announced for March-April PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 510 Safety Violation Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report
Brood War
General
StarCraft player reflex TE scores [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates Can someone share very abbreviated BW cliffnotes? 2024 BoxeR's birthday message Liquipedia.net NEEDS editors for Brood War
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Strategy
Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Diablo 2 thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread EVE Corporation Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Play, Watch, Drink: Esports …
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1397 users

[G] TvP 2 Rax - Page 3

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Complete
Profile Joined October 2009
United States1864 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-01 00:51:07
June 01 2012 00:43 GMT
#41
This build is actually really really REALLY good, speaking from a protoss point of view who has studied 1g FE's extensively. Very few 1g FE variations can hold a non-proxied, quick, properly executed 2rax, and that's only if the 1g FE BO is executed perfectly. Anybody saying different (hint, people in this thread) hasn't done the actual math. Most 2raxes aren't executed effectively and quick enough and that's why they seem so easily defeatable sometimes.

Seconds matter with this build though, so I recommend practicing the BO a lot and knowing exactly what you're doing/when you're pushing out/placing bulidings close to the ramp. Always bring an scv or 2 for bunkers just in case.

I can't imagine any 1g FE can hold this build with 1 rax proxied if unscouted/the BO is perfectly executed.

BioTech
Profile Joined March 2011
Australia264 Posts
June 01 2012 00:45 GMT
#42
Personally I do a hyper aggressive 3 rax version of this with a +1 and stim timing at 9:30. It got me into Masters. The key difference is that I build a reaper and during the main assault on the exp i send him to the main workers. A +1 reaper 2-shots probes - its deadly beyond belief! I have racked up double digit kills quite a few times. At the very least it will distract from your main assault OR he goes unnoticed and KILLS!!!
I actually played the original WarCraft - Orcs v Humans back in 1995!
aintthatfunny
Profile Joined April 2012
193 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-01 01:47:12
June 01 2012 01:44 GMT
#43
On May 31 2012 22:27 vBr wrote:
Myself I call this build "Korean 2 rax" to not confuse it with a standard gasless 2 rax build.

This is a nice build to have in your arsenal, but a warning finger to most players: This build requires a certain amount of control. You can not just 1a your units in and expect results unless your opponent went for a specifically greedy build. It is a build that is generally employed by players such as MKP and Polt because they have the control required to deal the damage required and then to proceed into a macro game. This is the reason why you see few foreigners doing it (and why I call it korean 2 rax)

Day9 did a daily on this build and showcased a game where the terran player straight out won against White-Ra in a dominating fashion. It was a really poor replay to showcase, because White-Ra did everything wrong there. In fact, this build very rarely ends the game, unless the protoss player simply leaves because you managed to kill his expand, not realising that you are still on one base.

In my humble experience (1200 highmaster terran EU), you will only deal game-winning damage if the opponent did something greedy, such as not throwing down the standard three gateways after nexus or not chronoboosting the warpgate research at least 3 times. Unfortunatly, this is not the case most of the time. Generally, when I deploy this build, the protoss retreats up his ramp and lets me hammer away at the shield on the nexus until his warpgate research finishes (6:30~). Then he proceeds to go down and chase me away.

Nevertheless, despite all this, let me emphasize that this is not a bad build. You will not kill the nexus most of the time, but you will create a situation where you can possibly dictate the pace of the game. The protoss player will, after chasing you away, be forced to keep producing units (unless this is shakuras, where I don't recommend doing this build unless you followup with an all in, more on that in a second) which is not something a protoss player generally want. If you are unfamiliar with the workings of current PvT, the protoss player wants to get away with as few units as possible until he achieves his tech goal - generally colossus or templars. By doing a build such as this one, his gameplan is likely to change and you will continuely be able to threaten his front, forcing him to produce more units than he would really prefer.

This should be your mindset. Do not try to end the game and mindlessly throw away the units you have because then you are truly behind. Instead, you are to force units out of him and trade favourly until your medivacs are out when you can, hopefully, crush him.

An all-in that I often do is to throw up a second gas semi-early and skip a marauder for a really early factory (5 min~) and tech to 8 min medivacs. If you traded favourably at the front, the addition of 8 min medivacs along with stim instead of combatshield will definitely end the game in your favour.

Completely agree.
I'd like to add that if your opponent doesn't scout at all, I think it's a good build, but otherwise your really just hoping your opponent fucks up (in my experience).
I promise I'll behave.
Pigzyf5
Profile Joined November 2009
Australia131 Posts
June 01 2012 01:48 GMT
#44
i fined getting combat shield before stim is better, always. stim lets be aggressive which you wont be doing again till medivacs come out. Combat shield comes about faster, which can come out in time to help with the pressure, stim can't. Also combat shield is better against sustained pressure at ur nat which comes very often as allot of protoses will attempt a large counter push after ur early aggression ends.
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25558 Posts
June 01 2012 01:54 GMT
#45
On June 01 2012 09:31 Dingobloo wrote:
2rax is still good, but it's not very well suited to the current map pool, all the current maps are made to support FFE in PvZ, so are generally very closed, additionally most of them have reasonably long rush distances.

Still something you should learn, but not really standard at the moment. Great guide, good to see you're using anchors instead of spoiler tags to break up the guide!


Yeah I mean of the current ladder map pool these are the maps I 2 Rax on when laddering: Korhal Compound, Metalopolis, and Tal'Darim Altar. It's usable on other maps, but KC, Metal, and TDA are all unramped-nat or semi-unramped-nat maps. TDA in particular is awesome because there's no ramp into the main-- you can do some serious damage.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Fencar
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States2694 Posts
June 01 2012 20:44 GMT
#46
Very nice guide. You might want to include a link to the Day9 Daily VOD on 2 Barracks TvP.
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25558 Posts
June 01 2012 20:50 GMT
#47
On June 02 2012 05:44 Fencer710 wrote:
Very nice guide. You might want to include a link to the Day9 Daily VOD on 2 Barracks TvP.


Oh wow, that's a really great resource. I added a link and embedded Day9's youtube VoDs as well. Watching the daily presently :3
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
tuestresfat
Profile Joined December 2010
2555 Posts
June 01 2012 21:01 GMT
#48
On June 01 2012 09:43 Complete wrote:
This build is actually really really REALLY good, speaking from a protoss point of view who has studied 1g FE's extensively. Very few 1g FE variations can hold a non-proxied, quick, properly executed 2rax, and that's only if the 1g FE BO is executed perfectly. Anybody saying different (hint, people in this thread) hasn't done the actual math. Most 2raxes aren't executed effectively and quick enough and that's why they seem so easily defeatable sometimes.

Seconds matter with this build though, so I recommend practicing the BO a lot and knowing exactly what you're doing/when you're pushing out/placing bulidings close to the ramp. Always bring an scv or 2 for bunkers just in case.

I can't imagine any 1g FE can hold this build with 1 rax proxied if unscouted/the BO is perfectly executed.


so the majority of the 1gate FE's you studied extensively can't hold the most standard reactor-techlab that has been around for months? Where are you getting these build orders, battle.net forums?

most 2raxes are executed incorrectly and inefficiently? damn, those pros better practice harder. executing a build order up to mid 30 supply must be so hard.

I'm sorry to hear you have trouble executing a 1gate FE up to to the 6min mark despite the fact that you will be doing it every single game. That's really unfortunate, but I'm sure it's the build's fault not yours.
McTeazy
Profile Joined January 2012
Canada297 Posts
June 01 2012 21:08 GMT
#49
[QUOTE]On June 01 2012 10:44 aintthatfunny wrote:
[QUOTE]On May 31 2012 22:27 vBr wrote:
Myself I call this build "Korean 2 rax" to not confuse it with a standard gasless 2 rax build.

This is a nice build to have in your arsenal, but a warning finger to most players: This build requires a certain amount of control. You can not just 1a your units in and expect results unless your opponent went for a specifically greedy build. It is a build that is generally employed by players such as MKP and Polt because they have the control required to deal the damage required and then to proceed into a macro game. This is the reason why you see few foreigners doing it (and why I call it korean 2 rax)

Day9 did a daily on this build and showcased a game where the terran player straight out won against White-Ra in a dominating fashion. It was a really poor replay to showcase, because White-Ra did everything wrong there. In fact, this build very rarely ends the game, unless the protoss player simply leaves because you managed to kill his expand, not realising that you are still on one base.

In my humble experience (1200 highmaster terran EU), you will only deal game-winning damage if the opponent did something greedy, such as not throwing down the standard three gateways after nexus or not chronoboosting the warpgate research at least 3 times. Unfortunatly, this is not the case most of the time. Generally, when I deploy this build, the protoss retreats up his ramp and lets me hammer away at the shield on the nexus until his warpgate research finishes (6:30~). Then he proceeds to go down and chase me away.

Nevertheless, despite all this, let me emphasize that this is not a bad build. You will not kill the nexus most of the time, but you will create a situation where you can possibly dictate the pace of the game. The protoss player will, after chasing you away, be forced to keep producing units (unless this is shakuras, where I don't recommend doing this build unless you followup with an all in, more on that in a second) which is not something a protoss player generally want. If you are unfamiliar with the workings of current PvT, the protoss player wants to get away with as few units as possible until he achieves his tech goal - generally colossus or templars. By doing a build such as this one, his gameplan is likely to change and you will continuely be able to threaten his front, forcing him to produce more units than he would really prefer.

This should be your mindset. Do not try to end the game and mindlessly throw away the units you have because then you are truly behind. Instead, you are to force units out of him and trade favourly until your medivacs are out when you can, hopefully, crush him.

An all-in that I often do is to throw up a second gas semi-early and skip a marauder for a really early factory (5 min~) and tech to 8 min medivacs. If you traded favourably at the front, the addition of 8 min medivacs along with stim instead of combatshield will definitely end the game in your favour.[/QUOTE]

I agree with you if the protoss isn't playing a gateway pressure style (a la parting). If they are playing that style and hold this without economic damage, you are SO boned as his 2 base production will be able to a move up your ramp more likely than not.
a person is smart, people are stupid
c0sm0naut
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1229 Posts
June 01 2012 21:28 GMT
#50
i'm actually surprised people still do this,
zealot, stalker nexus, sentry
gateway gateway + 2nd gas

bio moves across the map, protoss warps in 3 stalkers and wins the game instantly because you can't have more units off 2 rax. idk i really dislike this build vs good protoss and i think the only way to make it good is to pull many workers and bunker rush the protoss
LlamaNamedOsama
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States1900 Posts
June 01 2012 21:32 GMT
#51
On June 02 2012 06:01 tuestresfat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2012 09:43 Complete wrote:
This build is actually really really REALLY good, speaking from a protoss point of view who has studied 1g FE's extensively. Very few 1g FE variations can hold a non-proxied, quick, properly executed 2rax, and that's only if the 1g FE BO is executed perfectly. Anybody saying different (hint, people in this thread) hasn't done the actual math. Most 2raxes aren't executed effectively and quick enough and that's why they seem so easily defeatable sometimes.

Seconds matter with this build though, so I recommend practicing the BO a lot and knowing exactly what you're doing/when you're pushing out/placing bulidings close to the ramp. Always bring an scv or 2 for bunkers just in case.

I can't imagine any 1g FE can hold this build with 1 rax proxied if unscouted/the BO is perfectly executed.


so the majority of the 1gate FE's you studied extensively can't hold the most standard reactor-techlab that has been around for months? Where are you getting these build orders, battle.net forums?

most 2raxes are executed incorrectly and inefficiently? damn, those pros better practice harder. executing a build order up to mid 30 supply must be so hard.

I'm sorry to hear you have trouble executing a 1gate FE up to to the 6min mark despite the fact that you will be doing it every single game. That's really unfortunate, but I'm sure it's the build's fault not yours.


Actually, the newer variant is different from the old Polt version of 2rax in a couple ways. This one has the 2nd rax before orbital, whereas Polt's has orbital and then 2nd rax, which gets your marauder and thus, your push, out a lot faster. This usually lets me hit well before warpgate is done. Of course, bringing an scv or two for a bunker is another key element - while earlier, it still isn't enough time alone to kill the nexus - it is, however, time enough to put up a bunker to prevent them from being able to come down and take out your push. The other difference is the quick reactor starport follow up (with all rax techlab upgrades) that makes for a deadly follow up - this delays the expansion, but often finishes the job (see the Day9 Daily).

This has been my main TvP opening for awhile now, and it is damn effective against 1g fe. I played 13 straight games against my protoss friend who wanted to practice his 1g fe defense against 2rax, and even though he was high master (top 8) and I was low master, I won 9 of the 13 games (3 of them were when I was trying the Polt timing instead of the MKP timing).
Dario Wünsch: I guess...Creator...met his maker *sunglasses*
vBr
Profile Joined July 2011
Sweden193 Posts
June 01 2012 22:36 GMT
#52
On June 01 2012 09:43 Complete wrote:
This build is actually really really REALLY good, speaking from a protoss point of view who has studied 1g FE's extensively. Very few 1g FE variations can hold a non-proxied, quick, properly executed 2rax, and that's only if the 1g FE BO is executed perfectly. Anybody saying different (hint, people in this thread) hasn't done the actual math. Most 2raxes aren't executed effectively and quick enough and that's why they seem so easily defeatable sometimes.

Seconds matter with this build though, so I recommend practicing the BO a lot and knowing exactly what you're doing/when you're pushing out/placing bulidings close to the ramp. Always bring an scv or 2 for bunkers just in case.

I can't imagine any 1g FE can hold this build with 1 rax proxied if unscouted/the BO is perfectly executed.




Based on what? I'm sorry but this is just not true. You need to provide further evidence with such a statement. Polt does this regularly and so does MKP and their win percentage from the opening is probably not even 15%. Myself? I stopped doing it because I rarely won a game that I opened this way. I do not claim to have the control that Polt or any korean has, which is why I stopped doing it, but I am a highmaster terran player who regularly plays GM players. Basically, the only games I straight-out won were games where the opponent did not play standard 1 gate exp.
vBr
Profile Joined July 2011
Sweden193 Posts
June 01 2012 22:39 GMT
#53
On June 02 2012 06:32 LlamaNamedOsama wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 02 2012 06:01 tuestresfat wrote:
On June 01 2012 09:43 Complete wrote:
This build is actually really really REALLY good, speaking from a protoss point of view who has studied 1g FE's extensively. Very few 1g FE variations can hold a non-proxied, quick, properly executed 2rax, and that's only if the 1g FE BO is executed perfectly. Anybody saying different (hint, people in this thread) hasn't done the actual math. Most 2raxes aren't executed effectively and quick enough and that's why they seem so easily defeatable sometimes.

Seconds matter with this build though, so I recommend practicing the BO a lot and knowing exactly what you're doing/when you're pushing out/placing bulidings close to the ramp. Always bring an scv or 2 for bunkers just in case.

I can't imagine any 1g FE can hold this build with 1 rax proxied if unscouted/the BO is perfectly executed.


so the majority of the 1gate FE's you studied extensively can't hold the most standard reactor-techlab that has been around for months? Where are you getting these build orders, battle.net forums?

most 2raxes are executed incorrectly and inefficiently? damn, those pros better practice harder. executing a build order up to mid 30 supply must be so hard.

I'm sorry to hear you have trouble executing a 1gate FE up to to the 6min mark despite the fact that you will be doing it every single game. That's really unfortunate, but I'm sure it's the build's fault not yours.


Actually, the newer variant is different from the old Polt version of 2rax in a couple ways. This one has the 2nd rax before orbital, whereas Polt's has orbital and then 2nd rax, which gets your marauder and thus, your push, out a lot faster. This usually lets me hit well before warpgate is done. Of course, bringing an scv or two for a bunker is another key element - while earlier, it still isn't enough time alone to kill the nexus - it is, however, time enough to put up a bunker to prevent them from being able to come down and take out your push. The other difference is the quick reactor starport follow up (with all rax techlab upgrades) that makes for a deadly follow up - this delays the expansion, but often finishes the job (see the Day9 Daily).

This has been my main TvP opening for awhile now, and it is damn effective against 1g fe. I played 13 straight games against my protoss friend who wanted to practice his 1g fe defense against 2rax, and even though he was high master (top 8) and I was low master, I won 9 of the 13 games (3 of them were when I was trying the Polt timing instead of the MKP timing).



Every 2 rax hits before warpgate is done, its fine. Let him hammer at the nexus, let it drop some shield, maybe half its health. Then go down and clean up.

Bringing scvs are good but bunker will NOT (repeat: NOT) finish intime. Bunker will be at most 50% done when your first warpin has happened.
vBr
Profile Joined July 2011
Sweden193 Posts
June 01 2012 22:40 GMT
#54
On June 02 2012 06:08 McTeazy wrote:
I agree with you if the protoss isn't playing a gateway pressure style (a la parting). If they are playing that style and hold this without economic damage, you are SO boned as his 2 base production will be able to a move up your ramp more likely than not.


Nice quote. And this is, unfortunatly, true.
LlamaNamedOsama
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States1900 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-01 23:03:19
June 01 2012 22:56 GMT
#55
On June 02 2012 07:39 vBr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 02 2012 06:32 LlamaNamedOsama wrote:
On June 02 2012 06:01 tuestresfat wrote:
On June 01 2012 09:43 Complete wrote:
This build is actually really really REALLY good, speaking from a protoss point of view who has studied 1g FE's extensively. Very few 1g FE variations can hold a non-proxied, quick, properly executed 2rax, and that's only if the 1g FE BO is executed perfectly. Anybody saying different (hint, people in this thread) hasn't done the actual math. Most 2raxes aren't executed effectively and quick enough and that's why they seem so easily defeatable sometimes.

Seconds matter with this build though, so I recommend practicing the BO a lot and knowing exactly what you're doing/when you're pushing out/placing bulidings close to the ramp. Always bring an scv or 2 for bunkers just in case.

I can't imagine any 1g FE can hold this build with 1 rax proxied if unscouted/the BO is perfectly executed.


so the majority of the 1gate FE's you studied extensively can't hold the most standard reactor-techlab that has been around for months? Where are you getting these build orders, battle.net forums?

most 2raxes are executed incorrectly and inefficiently? damn, those pros better practice harder. executing a build order up to mid 30 supply must be so hard.

I'm sorry to hear you have trouble executing a 1gate FE up to to the 6min mark despite the fact that you will be doing it every single game. That's really unfortunate, but I'm sure it's the build's fault not yours.


Actually, the newer variant is different from the old Polt version of 2rax in a couple ways. This one has the 2nd rax before orbital, whereas Polt's has orbital and then 2nd rax, which gets your marauder and thus, your push, out a lot faster. This usually lets me hit well before warpgate is done. Of course, bringing an scv or two for a bunker is another key element - while earlier, it still isn't enough time alone to kill the nexus - it is, however, time enough to put up a bunker to prevent them from being able to come down and take out your push. The other difference is the quick reactor starport follow up (with all rax techlab upgrades) that makes for a deadly follow up - this delays the expansion, but often finishes the job (see the Day9 Daily).

This has been my main TvP opening for awhile now, and it is damn effective against 1g fe. I played 13 straight games against my protoss friend who wanted to practice his 1g fe defense against 2rax, and even though he was high master (top 8) and I was low master, I won 9 of the 13 games (3 of them were when I was trying the Polt timing instead of the MKP timing).



Every 2 rax hits before warpgate is done, its fine. Let him hammer at the nexus, let it drop some shield, maybe half its health. Then go down and clean up.

Bringing scvs are good but bunker will NOT (repeat: NOT) finish intime. Bunker will be at most 50% done when your first warpin has happened.


The protoss won't have enough units with just one warp in. The usual scenario is pre-warpin they have 3 units, usually a zealot, stalker, and sentry. Assuming they have 4 gates, by the time warpin finishes they'll probably have 2 zealots, 1 sentry, and 4 stalkers (if they didn't have a sentry at the start, you can push inside main and kill some units/pressure probes and cause general havoc/damage). At that point, terran usually has at least 3 marauders and 8-9 marines, which is easily enough to beat that. So, protoss has to wait longer, and by that point the bunker is done.

[Edit] A good 2rax push should also take advantage of positioning in the natural, usually, both bunker and units would be placed in a good concave around the base of the ramp to take advantage of the superior positioning/the fact that protoss is being forced to come out to the terran.
Dario Wünsch: I guess...Creator...met his maker *sunglasses*
Gecko
Profile Joined August 2010
United States519 Posts
June 03 2012 21:24 GMT
#56
I really like using this build on maps where I feel like a 1rax FE is vulnerable. If you screw up the initial engagement against a protoss expand you are very far behind, but on the plus side you are far less vulnerable to allins if you choose this build. This is definitely a good build to know for smaller maps.
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
June 03 2012 21:41 GMT
#57
I think I'm one of the only ones that just gets a second gate, doesn't chrono any warpgate at all, and uses it all on my gateways instead, and manages to crush 2rax every single time without any probe drills and engaging IMMEDIATELY. Works far better with a Nex first admittedly, but still works regardless.
][Primarch][
Profile Joined February 2012
Sweden302 Posts
June 04 2012 00:46 GMT
#58
when it comes to these types of rush-builds every second seems to count, MKP many times don't even scout on 2 player maps when he does the 2 rax so that his rush hits just a bit faster. Also I'd like to see scv's pulled to bunker up and force down the natural.
Huge fan of Empire Kas, The Destroyer of Worlds, The Machine, The Second Terminator, The Supreme Robot!
vBr
Profile Joined July 2011
Sweden193 Posts
June 04 2012 10:56 GMT
#59
On June 02 2012 07:56 LlamaNamedOsama wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 02 2012 07:39 vBr wrote:
On June 02 2012 06:32 LlamaNamedOsama wrote:
On June 02 2012 06:01 tuestresfat wrote:
On June 01 2012 09:43 Complete wrote:
This build is actually really really REALLY good, speaking from a protoss point of view who has studied 1g FE's extensively. Very few 1g FE variations can hold a non-proxied, quick, properly executed 2rax, and that's only if the 1g FE BO is executed perfectly. Anybody saying different (hint, people in this thread) hasn't done the actual math. Most 2raxes aren't executed effectively and quick enough and that's why they seem so easily defeatable sometimes.

Seconds matter with this build though, so I recommend practicing the BO a lot and knowing exactly what you're doing/when you're pushing out/placing bulidings close to the ramp. Always bring an scv or 2 for bunkers just in case.

I can't imagine any 1g FE can hold this build with 1 rax proxied if unscouted/the BO is perfectly executed.


so the majority of the 1gate FE's you studied extensively can't hold the most standard reactor-techlab that has been around for months? Where are you getting these build orders, battle.net forums?

most 2raxes are executed incorrectly and inefficiently? damn, those pros better practice harder. executing a build order up to mid 30 supply must be so hard.

I'm sorry to hear you have trouble executing a 1gate FE up to to the 6min mark despite the fact that you will be doing it every single game. That's really unfortunate, but I'm sure it's the build's fault not yours.


Actually, the newer variant is different from the old Polt version of 2rax in a couple ways. This one has the 2nd rax before orbital, whereas Polt's has orbital and then 2nd rax, which gets your marauder and thus, your push, out a lot faster. This usually lets me hit well before warpgate is done. Of course, bringing an scv or two for a bunker is another key element - while earlier, it still isn't enough time alone to kill the nexus - it is, however, time enough to put up a bunker to prevent them from being able to come down and take out your push. The other difference is the quick reactor starport follow up (with all rax techlab upgrades) that makes for a deadly follow up - this delays the expansion, but often finishes the job (see the Day9 Daily).

This has been my main TvP opening for awhile now, and it is damn effective against 1g fe. I played 13 straight games against my protoss friend who wanted to practice his 1g fe defense against 2rax, and even though he was high master (top 8) and I was low master, I won 9 of the 13 games (3 of them were when I was trying the Polt timing instead of the MKP timing).



Every 2 rax hits before warpgate is done, its fine. Let him hammer at the nexus, let it drop some shield, maybe half its health. Then go down and clean up.

Bringing scvs are good but bunker will NOT (repeat: NOT) finish intime. Bunker will be at most 50% done when your first warpin has happened.


The protoss won't have enough units with just one warp in. The usual scenario is pre-warpin they have 3 units, usually a zealot, stalker, and sentry. Assuming they have 4 gates, by the time warpin finishes they'll probably have 2 zealots, 1 sentry, and 4 stalkers (if they didn't have a sentry at the start, you can push inside main and kill some units/pressure probes and cause general havoc/damage). At that point, terran usually has at least 3 marauders and 8-9 marines, which is easily enough to beat that. So, protoss has to wait longer, and by that point the bunker is done.

[Edit] A good 2rax push should also take advantage of positioning in the natural, usually, both bunker and units would be placed in a good concave around the base of the ramp to take advantage of the superior positioning/the fact that protoss is being forced to come out to the terran.


First warpin is definitely enough. You will have, with 3 gates, 1 zealot, 1 sentry and 4 stalkers vs, just like you say, 2-3 marauders and 8-9 marines. However, the only really dangerous units are the marauders, all you need to do is to take out them. Focusfire the rauders, he can't kite because stalkers have the same range. Guardian shield on the sentry beforehand so the marines damage are minimal and you will end up in a scenario where there are only 6-7 rins present vs 2 stalkers and a sentry (assuming he controlled really well) and then your warpin is ready again. 3 Zealots or stalkers and the threat is removed. Then the scenario that I spoke about in my initial post occurs: He has the possibility to start trading decently, but under no condition should his 2 rax do more damage than this unless you were too greedy.

Your argument simply lacks evidence. This is a strategy that every master+ terran have used several times, perhaps over long periods of time. Additionally, every korean terran seems to have this strategy for a match here and there. If this strategy really dealt crippling damage every game, trust me, this would be the standard strategy of EVERY TvP.
michaelhasanalias
Profile Joined May 2010
Korea (South)1231 Posts
June 04 2012 12:05 GMT
#60
I just want to say that I hope your guide format becomes the new standard for guides written on TL.

In fact, you should write a guide on how to format a guide.
KR NsPMichael.805 | AM Michael.2640 | SEA Michael.523 | 엔에스피 New Star Players
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PiG Daily
20:50
Best Games
Maru vs Solar
Reynor vs TriGGeR
herO vs Solar
Clem vs TriGGeR
Maru vs TBD
PiGStarcraft113
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 275
UpATreeSC 152
PiGStarcraft113
ForJumy 50
Nathanias 39
EmSc Tv 30
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 1671
Shuttle 213
Hyuk 55
IntoTheRainbow 11
NaDa 10
ivOry 6
League of Legends
C9.Mang096
Counter-Strike
fl0m2170
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King108
Other Games
FrodaN4576
summit1g4014
Grubby3871
Beastyqt1022
RotterdaM518
ToD284
mouzStarbuck272
KnowMe237
Liquid`Hasu191
shahzam153
Harstem139
ArmadaUGS124
Trikslyr59
ZombieGrub25
JuggernautJason10
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1444
BasetradeTV123
StarCraft 2
angryscii 33
EmSc Tv 30
EmSc2Tv 30
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 49
• davetesta27
• Hupsaiya 23
• musti20045 8
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 31
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• imaqtpie2857
• TFBlade1240
• Stunt461
• Shiphtur428
• Scarra35
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
2h 46m
RongYI Cup
13h 46m
herO vs Maru
Replay Cast
1d 2h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 14h
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
The PondCast
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-02-05
HSC XXVIII
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Acropolis #4 - TS4
Escore Tournament S1: W7
Rongyi Cup S3
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W8
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
WardiTV Winter 2026
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.