• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:53
CEST 21:53
KST 04:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play0Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview8
Community News
[TLMC] Summer 2026 Ladder Map Rotation05.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start)59ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo26Weekly Cups (June 8-14): Clem and Solar double, PTR tested0RSL: S6 Finals played at BlizzCon 202611
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start) HackErIsTop take on Patch 5.0.16 Possible bug in the new patch? ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted
Tourneys
INu's Battles#17 <BO.9> RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament GSL CK #4 20-21th June Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery Mutation # 530 One For All Mutation # 529 Opportunities Unleashed
Brood War
General
ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool [BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June BSL Season 22 BW General Discussion STARCRAFT MOVIE - Last Night at the Command center
Tourneys
[BSL22] GosuLeague Casts - Tue & Thu 22:00 CEST [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSLAN 4 is Coming! Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Why doesn't anyone use restoration? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Relatively freeroll strategies Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Games for Kids Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread [H]Internet/Gaming Cafe Tips and Tricks
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club! The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How To Predict Tilt in Espor…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8698 users

[G] TvP 2 Rax - Page 3

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Complete
Profile Joined October 2009
United States1864 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-01 00:51:07
June 01 2012 00:43 GMT
#41
This build is actually really really REALLY good, speaking from a protoss point of view who has studied 1g FE's extensively. Very few 1g FE variations can hold a non-proxied, quick, properly executed 2rax, and that's only if the 1g FE BO is executed perfectly. Anybody saying different (hint, people in this thread) hasn't done the actual math. Most 2raxes aren't executed effectively and quick enough and that's why they seem so easily defeatable sometimes.

Seconds matter with this build though, so I recommend practicing the BO a lot and knowing exactly what you're doing/when you're pushing out/placing bulidings close to the ramp. Always bring an scv or 2 for bunkers just in case.

I can't imagine any 1g FE can hold this build with 1 rax proxied if unscouted/the BO is perfectly executed.

BioTech
Profile Joined March 2011
Australia264 Posts
June 01 2012 00:45 GMT
#42
Personally I do a hyper aggressive 3 rax version of this with a +1 and stim timing at 9:30. It got me into Masters. The key difference is that I build a reaper and during the main assault on the exp i send him to the main workers. A +1 reaper 2-shots probes - its deadly beyond belief! I have racked up double digit kills quite a few times. At the very least it will distract from your main assault OR he goes unnoticed and KILLS!!!
I actually played the original WarCraft - Orcs v Humans back in 1995!
aintthatfunny
Profile Joined April 2012
193 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-01 01:47:12
June 01 2012 01:44 GMT
#43
On May 31 2012 22:27 vBr wrote:
Myself I call this build "Korean 2 rax" to not confuse it with a standard gasless 2 rax build.

This is a nice build to have in your arsenal, but a warning finger to most players: This build requires a certain amount of control. You can not just 1a your units in and expect results unless your opponent went for a specifically greedy build. It is a build that is generally employed by players such as MKP and Polt because they have the control required to deal the damage required and then to proceed into a macro game. This is the reason why you see few foreigners doing it (and why I call it korean 2 rax)

Day9 did a daily on this build and showcased a game where the terran player straight out won against White-Ra in a dominating fashion. It was a really poor replay to showcase, because White-Ra did everything wrong there. In fact, this build very rarely ends the game, unless the protoss player simply leaves because you managed to kill his expand, not realising that you are still on one base.

In my humble experience (1200 highmaster terran EU), you will only deal game-winning damage if the opponent did something greedy, such as not throwing down the standard three gateways after nexus or not chronoboosting the warpgate research at least 3 times. Unfortunatly, this is not the case most of the time. Generally, when I deploy this build, the protoss retreats up his ramp and lets me hammer away at the shield on the nexus until his warpgate research finishes (6:30~). Then he proceeds to go down and chase me away.

Nevertheless, despite all this, let me emphasize that this is not a bad build. You will not kill the nexus most of the time, but you will create a situation where you can possibly dictate the pace of the game. The protoss player will, after chasing you away, be forced to keep producing units (unless this is shakuras, where I don't recommend doing this build unless you followup with an all in, more on that in a second) which is not something a protoss player generally want. If you are unfamiliar with the workings of current PvT, the protoss player wants to get away with as few units as possible until he achieves his tech goal - generally colossus or templars. By doing a build such as this one, his gameplan is likely to change and you will continuely be able to threaten his front, forcing him to produce more units than he would really prefer.

This should be your mindset. Do not try to end the game and mindlessly throw away the units you have because then you are truly behind. Instead, you are to force units out of him and trade favourly until your medivacs are out when you can, hopefully, crush him.

An all-in that I often do is to throw up a second gas semi-early and skip a marauder for a really early factory (5 min~) and tech to 8 min medivacs. If you traded favourably at the front, the addition of 8 min medivacs along with stim instead of combatshield will definitely end the game in your favour.

Completely agree.
I'd like to add that if your opponent doesn't scout at all, I think it's a good build, but otherwise your really just hoping your opponent fucks up (in my experience).
I promise I'll behave.
Pigzyf5
Profile Joined November 2009
Australia131 Posts
June 01 2012 01:48 GMT
#44
i fined getting combat shield before stim is better, always. stim lets be aggressive which you wont be doing again till medivacs come out. Combat shield comes about faster, which can come out in time to help with the pressure, stim can't. Also combat shield is better against sustained pressure at ur nat which comes very often as allot of protoses will attempt a large counter push after ur early aggression ends.
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25560 Posts
June 01 2012 01:54 GMT
#45
On June 01 2012 09:31 Dingobloo wrote:
2rax is still good, but it's not very well suited to the current map pool, all the current maps are made to support FFE in PvZ, so are generally very closed, additionally most of them have reasonably long rush distances.

Still something you should learn, but not really standard at the moment. Great guide, good to see you're using anchors instead of spoiler tags to break up the guide!


Yeah I mean of the current ladder map pool these are the maps I 2 Rax on when laddering: Korhal Compound, Metalopolis, and Tal'Darim Altar. It's usable on other maps, but KC, Metal, and TDA are all unramped-nat or semi-unramped-nat maps. TDA in particular is awesome because there's no ramp into the main-- you can do some serious damage.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Fencar
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States2694 Posts
June 01 2012 20:44 GMT
#46
Very nice guide. You might want to include a link to the Day9 Daily VOD on 2 Barracks TvP.
This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25560 Posts
June 01 2012 20:50 GMT
#47
On June 02 2012 05:44 Fencer710 wrote:
Very nice guide. You might want to include a link to the Day9 Daily VOD on 2 Barracks TvP.


Oh wow, that's a really great resource. I added a link and embedded Day9's youtube VoDs as well. Watching the daily presently :3
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
tuestresfat
Profile Joined December 2010
2555 Posts
June 01 2012 21:01 GMT
#48
On June 01 2012 09:43 Complete wrote:
This build is actually really really REALLY good, speaking from a protoss point of view who has studied 1g FE's extensively. Very few 1g FE variations can hold a non-proxied, quick, properly executed 2rax, and that's only if the 1g FE BO is executed perfectly. Anybody saying different (hint, people in this thread) hasn't done the actual math. Most 2raxes aren't executed effectively and quick enough and that's why they seem so easily defeatable sometimes.

Seconds matter with this build though, so I recommend practicing the BO a lot and knowing exactly what you're doing/when you're pushing out/placing bulidings close to the ramp. Always bring an scv or 2 for bunkers just in case.

I can't imagine any 1g FE can hold this build with 1 rax proxied if unscouted/the BO is perfectly executed.


so the majority of the 1gate FE's you studied extensively can't hold the most standard reactor-techlab that has been around for months? Where are you getting these build orders, battle.net forums?

most 2raxes are executed incorrectly and inefficiently? damn, those pros better practice harder. executing a build order up to mid 30 supply must be so hard.

I'm sorry to hear you have trouble executing a 1gate FE up to to the 6min mark despite the fact that you will be doing it every single game. That's really unfortunate, but I'm sure it's the build's fault not yours.
McTeazy
Profile Joined January 2012
Canada297 Posts
June 01 2012 21:08 GMT
#49
[QUOTE]On June 01 2012 10:44 aintthatfunny wrote:
[QUOTE]On May 31 2012 22:27 vBr wrote:
Myself I call this build "Korean 2 rax" to not confuse it with a standard gasless 2 rax build.

This is a nice build to have in your arsenal, but a warning finger to most players: This build requires a certain amount of control. You can not just 1a your units in and expect results unless your opponent went for a specifically greedy build. It is a build that is generally employed by players such as MKP and Polt because they have the control required to deal the damage required and then to proceed into a macro game. This is the reason why you see few foreigners doing it (and why I call it korean 2 rax)

Day9 did a daily on this build and showcased a game where the terran player straight out won against White-Ra in a dominating fashion. It was a really poor replay to showcase, because White-Ra did everything wrong there. In fact, this build very rarely ends the game, unless the protoss player simply leaves because you managed to kill his expand, not realising that you are still on one base.

In my humble experience (1200 highmaster terran EU), you will only deal game-winning damage if the opponent did something greedy, such as not throwing down the standard three gateways after nexus or not chronoboosting the warpgate research at least 3 times. Unfortunatly, this is not the case most of the time. Generally, when I deploy this build, the protoss retreats up his ramp and lets me hammer away at the shield on the nexus until his warpgate research finishes (6:30~). Then he proceeds to go down and chase me away.

Nevertheless, despite all this, let me emphasize that this is not a bad build. You will not kill the nexus most of the time, but you will create a situation where you can possibly dictate the pace of the game. The protoss player will, after chasing you away, be forced to keep producing units (unless this is shakuras, where I don't recommend doing this build unless you followup with an all in, more on that in a second) which is not something a protoss player generally want. If you are unfamiliar with the workings of current PvT, the protoss player wants to get away with as few units as possible until he achieves his tech goal - generally colossus or templars. By doing a build such as this one, his gameplan is likely to change and you will continuely be able to threaten his front, forcing him to produce more units than he would really prefer.

This should be your mindset. Do not try to end the game and mindlessly throw away the units you have because then you are truly behind. Instead, you are to force units out of him and trade favourly until your medivacs are out when you can, hopefully, crush him.

An all-in that I often do is to throw up a second gas semi-early and skip a marauder for a really early factory (5 min~) and tech to 8 min medivacs. If you traded favourably at the front, the addition of 8 min medivacs along with stim instead of combatshield will definitely end the game in your favour.[/QUOTE]

I agree with you if the protoss isn't playing a gateway pressure style (a la parting). If they are playing that style and hold this without economic damage, you are SO boned as his 2 base production will be able to a move up your ramp more likely than not.
a person is smart, people are stupid
c0sm0naut
Profile Joined April 2011
United States1229 Posts
June 01 2012 21:28 GMT
#50
i'm actually surprised people still do this,
zealot, stalker nexus, sentry
gateway gateway + 2nd gas

bio moves across the map, protoss warps in 3 stalkers and wins the game instantly because you can't have more units off 2 rax. idk i really dislike this build vs good protoss and i think the only way to make it good is to pull many workers and bunker rush the protoss
LlamaNamedOsama
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States1900 Posts
June 01 2012 21:32 GMT
#51
On June 02 2012 06:01 tuestresfat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 01 2012 09:43 Complete wrote:
This build is actually really really REALLY good, speaking from a protoss point of view who has studied 1g FE's extensively. Very few 1g FE variations can hold a non-proxied, quick, properly executed 2rax, and that's only if the 1g FE BO is executed perfectly. Anybody saying different (hint, people in this thread) hasn't done the actual math. Most 2raxes aren't executed effectively and quick enough and that's why they seem so easily defeatable sometimes.

Seconds matter with this build though, so I recommend practicing the BO a lot and knowing exactly what you're doing/when you're pushing out/placing bulidings close to the ramp. Always bring an scv or 2 for bunkers just in case.

I can't imagine any 1g FE can hold this build with 1 rax proxied if unscouted/the BO is perfectly executed.


so the majority of the 1gate FE's you studied extensively can't hold the most standard reactor-techlab that has been around for months? Where are you getting these build orders, battle.net forums?

most 2raxes are executed incorrectly and inefficiently? damn, those pros better practice harder. executing a build order up to mid 30 supply must be so hard.

I'm sorry to hear you have trouble executing a 1gate FE up to to the 6min mark despite the fact that you will be doing it every single game. That's really unfortunate, but I'm sure it's the build's fault not yours.


Actually, the newer variant is different from the old Polt version of 2rax in a couple ways. This one has the 2nd rax before orbital, whereas Polt's has orbital and then 2nd rax, which gets your marauder and thus, your push, out a lot faster. This usually lets me hit well before warpgate is done. Of course, bringing an scv or two for a bunker is another key element - while earlier, it still isn't enough time alone to kill the nexus - it is, however, time enough to put up a bunker to prevent them from being able to come down and take out your push. The other difference is the quick reactor starport follow up (with all rax techlab upgrades) that makes for a deadly follow up - this delays the expansion, but often finishes the job (see the Day9 Daily).

This has been my main TvP opening for awhile now, and it is damn effective against 1g fe. I played 13 straight games against my protoss friend who wanted to practice his 1g fe defense against 2rax, and even though he was high master (top 8) and I was low master, I won 9 of the 13 games (3 of them were when I was trying the Polt timing instead of the MKP timing).
Dario Wünsch: I guess...Creator...met his maker *sunglasses*
vBr
Profile Joined July 2011
Sweden193 Posts
June 01 2012 22:36 GMT
#52
On June 01 2012 09:43 Complete wrote:
This build is actually really really REALLY good, speaking from a protoss point of view who has studied 1g FE's extensively. Very few 1g FE variations can hold a non-proxied, quick, properly executed 2rax, and that's only if the 1g FE BO is executed perfectly. Anybody saying different (hint, people in this thread) hasn't done the actual math. Most 2raxes aren't executed effectively and quick enough and that's why they seem so easily defeatable sometimes.

Seconds matter with this build though, so I recommend practicing the BO a lot and knowing exactly what you're doing/when you're pushing out/placing bulidings close to the ramp. Always bring an scv or 2 for bunkers just in case.

I can't imagine any 1g FE can hold this build with 1 rax proxied if unscouted/the BO is perfectly executed.




Based on what? I'm sorry but this is just not true. You need to provide further evidence with such a statement. Polt does this regularly and so does MKP and their win percentage from the opening is probably not even 15%. Myself? I stopped doing it because I rarely won a game that I opened this way. I do not claim to have the control that Polt or any korean has, which is why I stopped doing it, but I am a highmaster terran player who regularly plays GM players. Basically, the only games I straight-out won were games where the opponent did not play standard 1 gate exp.
vBr
Profile Joined July 2011
Sweden193 Posts
June 01 2012 22:39 GMT
#53
On June 02 2012 06:32 LlamaNamedOsama wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 02 2012 06:01 tuestresfat wrote:
On June 01 2012 09:43 Complete wrote:
This build is actually really really REALLY good, speaking from a protoss point of view who has studied 1g FE's extensively. Very few 1g FE variations can hold a non-proxied, quick, properly executed 2rax, and that's only if the 1g FE BO is executed perfectly. Anybody saying different (hint, people in this thread) hasn't done the actual math. Most 2raxes aren't executed effectively and quick enough and that's why they seem so easily defeatable sometimes.

Seconds matter with this build though, so I recommend practicing the BO a lot and knowing exactly what you're doing/when you're pushing out/placing bulidings close to the ramp. Always bring an scv or 2 for bunkers just in case.

I can't imagine any 1g FE can hold this build with 1 rax proxied if unscouted/the BO is perfectly executed.


so the majority of the 1gate FE's you studied extensively can't hold the most standard reactor-techlab that has been around for months? Where are you getting these build orders, battle.net forums?

most 2raxes are executed incorrectly and inefficiently? damn, those pros better practice harder. executing a build order up to mid 30 supply must be so hard.

I'm sorry to hear you have trouble executing a 1gate FE up to to the 6min mark despite the fact that you will be doing it every single game. That's really unfortunate, but I'm sure it's the build's fault not yours.


Actually, the newer variant is different from the old Polt version of 2rax in a couple ways. This one has the 2nd rax before orbital, whereas Polt's has orbital and then 2nd rax, which gets your marauder and thus, your push, out a lot faster. This usually lets me hit well before warpgate is done. Of course, bringing an scv or two for a bunker is another key element - while earlier, it still isn't enough time alone to kill the nexus - it is, however, time enough to put up a bunker to prevent them from being able to come down and take out your push. The other difference is the quick reactor starport follow up (with all rax techlab upgrades) that makes for a deadly follow up - this delays the expansion, but often finishes the job (see the Day9 Daily).

This has been my main TvP opening for awhile now, and it is damn effective against 1g fe. I played 13 straight games against my protoss friend who wanted to practice his 1g fe defense against 2rax, and even though he was high master (top 8) and I was low master, I won 9 of the 13 games (3 of them were when I was trying the Polt timing instead of the MKP timing).



Every 2 rax hits before warpgate is done, its fine. Let him hammer at the nexus, let it drop some shield, maybe half its health. Then go down and clean up.

Bringing scvs are good but bunker will NOT (repeat: NOT) finish intime. Bunker will be at most 50% done when your first warpin has happened.
vBr
Profile Joined July 2011
Sweden193 Posts
June 01 2012 22:40 GMT
#54
On June 02 2012 06:08 McTeazy wrote:
I agree with you if the protoss isn't playing a gateway pressure style (a la parting). If they are playing that style and hold this without economic damage, you are SO boned as his 2 base production will be able to a move up your ramp more likely than not.


Nice quote. And this is, unfortunatly, true.
LlamaNamedOsama
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States1900 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-01 23:03:19
June 01 2012 22:56 GMT
#55
On June 02 2012 07:39 vBr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 02 2012 06:32 LlamaNamedOsama wrote:
On June 02 2012 06:01 tuestresfat wrote:
On June 01 2012 09:43 Complete wrote:
This build is actually really really REALLY good, speaking from a protoss point of view who has studied 1g FE's extensively. Very few 1g FE variations can hold a non-proxied, quick, properly executed 2rax, and that's only if the 1g FE BO is executed perfectly. Anybody saying different (hint, people in this thread) hasn't done the actual math. Most 2raxes aren't executed effectively and quick enough and that's why they seem so easily defeatable sometimes.

Seconds matter with this build though, so I recommend practicing the BO a lot and knowing exactly what you're doing/when you're pushing out/placing bulidings close to the ramp. Always bring an scv or 2 for bunkers just in case.

I can't imagine any 1g FE can hold this build with 1 rax proxied if unscouted/the BO is perfectly executed.


so the majority of the 1gate FE's you studied extensively can't hold the most standard reactor-techlab that has been around for months? Where are you getting these build orders, battle.net forums?

most 2raxes are executed incorrectly and inefficiently? damn, those pros better practice harder. executing a build order up to mid 30 supply must be so hard.

I'm sorry to hear you have trouble executing a 1gate FE up to to the 6min mark despite the fact that you will be doing it every single game. That's really unfortunate, but I'm sure it's the build's fault not yours.


Actually, the newer variant is different from the old Polt version of 2rax in a couple ways. This one has the 2nd rax before orbital, whereas Polt's has orbital and then 2nd rax, which gets your marauder and thus, your push, out a lot faster. This usually lets me hit well before warpgate is done. Of course, bringing an scv or two for a bunker is another key element - while earlier, it still isn't enough time alone to kill the nexus - it is, however, time enough to put up a bunker to prevent them from being able to come down and take out your push. The other difference is the quick reactor starport follow up (with all rax techlab upgrades) that makes for a deadly follow up - this delays the expansion, but often finishes the job (see the Day9 Daily).

This has been my main TvP opening for awhile now, and it is damn effective against 1g fe. I played 13 straight games against my protoss friend who wanted to practice his 1g fe defense against 2rax, and even though he was high master (top 8) and I was low master, I won 9 of the 13 games (3 of them were when I was trying the Polt timing instead of the MKP timing).



Every 2 rax hits before warpgate is done, its fine. Let him hammer at the nexus, let it drop some shield, maybe half its health. Then go down and clean up.

Bringing scvs are good but bunker will NOT (repeat: NOT) finish intime. Bunker will be at most 50% done when your first warpin has happened.


The protoss won't have enough units with just one warp in. The usual scenario is pre-warpin they have 3 units, usually a zealot, stalker, and sentry. Assuming they have 4 gates, by the time warpin finishes they'll probably have 2 zealots, 1 sentry, and 4 stalkers (if they didn't have a sentry at the start, you can push inside main and kill some units/pressure probes and cause general havoc/damage). At that point, terran usually has at least 3 marauders and 8-9 marines, which is easily enough to beat that. So, protoss has to wait longer, and by that point the bunker is done.

[Edit] A good 2rax push should also take advantage of positioning in the natural, usually, both bunker and units would be placed in a good concave around the base of the ramp to take advantage of the superior positioning/the fact that protoss is being forced to come out to the terran.
Dario Wünsch: I guess...Creator...met his maker *sunglasses*
Gecko
Profile Joined August 2010
United States519 Posts
June 03 2012 21:24 GMT
#56
I really like using this build on maps where I feel like a 1rax FE is vulnerable. If you screw up the initial engagement against a protoss expand you are very far behind, but on the plus side you are far less vulnerable to allins if you choose this build. This is definitely a good build to know for smaller maps.
FabledIntegral
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States9232 Posts
June 03 2012 21:41 GMT
#57
I think I'm one of the only ones that just gets a second gate, doesn't chrono any warpgate at all, and uses it all on my gateways instead, and manages to crush 2rax every single time without any probe drills and engaging IMMEDIATELY. Works far better with a Nex first admittedly, but still works regardless.
][Primarch][
Profile Joined February 2012
Sweden302 Posts
June 04 2012 00:46 GMT
#58
when it comes to these types of rush-builds every second seems to count, MKP many times don't even scout on 2 player maps when he does the 2 rax so that his rush hits just a bit faster. Also I'd like to see scv's pulled to bunker up and force down the natural.
Huge fan of Empire Kas, The Destroyer of Worlds, The Machine, The Second Terminator, The Supreme Robot!
vBr
Profile Joined July 2011
Sweden193 Posts
June 04 2012 10:56 GMT
#59
On June 02 2012 07:56 LlamaNamedOsama wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 02 2012 07:39 vBr wrote:
On June 02 2012 06:32 LlamaNamedOsama wrote:
On June 02 2012 06:01 tuestresfat wrote:
On June 01 2012 09:43 Complete wrote:
This build is actually really really REALLY good, speaking from a protoss point of view who has studied 1g FE's extensively. Very few 1g FE variations can hold a non-proxied, quick, properly executed 2rax, and that's only if the 1g FE BO is executed perfectly. Anybody saying different (hint, people in this thread) hasn't done the actual math. Most 2raxes aren't executed effectively and quick enough and that's why they seem so easily defeatable sometimes.

Seconds matter with this build though, so I recommend practicing the BO a lot and knowing exactly what you're doing/when you're pushing out/placing bulidings close to the ramp. Always bring an scv or 2 for bunkers just in case.

I can't imagine any 1g FE can hold this build with 1 rax proxied if unscouted/the BO is perfectly executed.


so the majority of the 1gate FE's you studied extensively can't hold the most standard reactor-techlab that has been around for months? Where are you getting these build orders, battle.net forums?

most 2raxes are executed incorrectly and inefficiently? damn, those pros better practice harder. executing a build order up to mid 30 supply must be so hard.

I'm sorry to hear you have trouble executing a 1gate FE up to to the 6min mark despite the fact that you will be doing it every single game. That's really unfortunate, but I'm sure it's the build's fault not yours.


Actually, the newer variant is different from the old Polt version of 2rax in a couple ways. This one has the 2nd rax before orbital, whereas Polt's has orbital and then 2nd rax, which gets your marauder and thus, your push, out a lot faster. This usually lets me hit well before warpgate is done. Of course, bringing an scv or two for a bunker is another key element - while earlier, it still isn't enough time alone to kill the nexus - it is, however, time enough to put up a bunker to prevent them from being able to come down and take out your push. The other difference is the quick reactor starport follow up (with all rax techlab upgrades) that makes for a deadly follow up - this delays the expansion, but often finishes the job (see the Day9 Daily).

This has been my main TvP opening for awhile now, and it is damn effective against 1g fe. I played 13 straight games against my protoss friend who wanted to practice his 1g fe defense against 2rax, and even though he was high master (top 8) and I was low master, I won 9 of the 13 games (3 of them were when I was trying the Polt timing instead of the MKP timing).



Every 2 rax hits before warpgate is done, its fine. Let him hammer at the nexus, let it drop some shield, maybe half its health. Then go down and clean up.

Bringing scvs are good but bunker will NOT (repeat: NOT) finish intime. Bunker will be at most 50% done when your first warpin has happened.


The protoss won't have enough units with just one warp in. The usual scenario is pre-warpin they have 3 units, usually a zealot, stalker, and sentry. Assuming they have 4 gates, by the time warpin finishes they'll probably have 2 zealots, 1 sentry, and 4 stalkers (if they didn't have a sentry at the start, you can push inside main and kill some units/pressure probes and cause general havoc/damage). At that point, terran usually has at least 3 marauders and 8-9 marines, which is easily enough to beat that. So, protoss has to wait longer, and by that point the bunker is done.

[Edit] A good 2rax push should also take advantage of positioning in the natural, usually, both bunker and units would be placed in a good concave around the base of the ramp to take advantage of the superior positioning/the fact that protoss is being forced to come out to the terran.


First warpin is definitely enough. You will have, with 3 gates, 1 zealot, 1 sentry and 4 stalkers vs, just like you say, 2-3 marauders and 8-9 marines. However, the only really dangerous units are the marauders, all you need to do is to take out them. Focusfire the rauders, he can't kite because stalkers have the same range. Guardian shield on the sentry beforehand so the marines damage are minimal and you will end up in a scenario where there are only 6-7 rins present vs 2 stalkers and a sentry (assuming he controlled really well) and then your warpin is ready again. 3 Zealots or stalkers and the threat is removed. Then the scenario that I spoke about in my initial post occurs: He has the possibility to start trading decently, but under no condition should his 2 rax do more damage than this unless you were too greedy.

Your argument simply lacks evidence. This is a strategy that every master+ terran have used several times, perhaps over long periods of time. Additionally, every korean terran seems to have this strategy for a match here and there. If this strategy really dealt crippling damage every game, trust me, this would be the standard strategy of EVERY TvP.
michaelhasanalias
Profile Joined May 2010
Korea (South)1231 Posts
June 04 2012 12:05 GMT
#60
I just want to say that I hope your guide format becomes the new standard for guides written on TL.

In fact, you should write a guide on how to format a guide.
KR NsPMichael.805 | AM Michael.2640 | SEA Michael.523 | 엔에스피 New Star Players
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
17:00
Mid Season Playoffs
Solar vs ShoWTimELIVE!
Lambo vs Arrogfire
YoungYakov vs GgMaChine
Krystianer vs ArT
NightMare vs Iba
SteadfastSC366
IndyStarCraft 179
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 366
IndyStarCraft 179
ProTech167
Railgan 147
UpATreeSC 145
JuggernautJason42
BRAT_OK 38
EmSc Tv 15
MindelVK 5
Dota 2
syndereN378
420jenkins361
BananaSlamJamma231
Counter-Strike
byalli2309
pashabiceps1884
fl0m1869
summit1g1004
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu318
Other Games
Grubby3626
FrodaN730
Beastyqt710
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream241
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 15
EmSc2Tv 15
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH310
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix11
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis4438
• Jankos1708
Other Games
• imaqtpie885
• Shiphtur281
Upcoming Events
Douyu Cup 2020
9h 7m
Oliveira vs Trap
Jieshi vs XY
soO vs FanTaSy
TY vs Coffee
OSC
20h 7m
Douyu Cup 2020
1d 9h
Neeb vs Impact
MacSed vs Cyan
Scarlett vs Kelazhur
INnoVation vs Dear
Douyu Cup 2020
2 days
Maestros of the Game
2 days
herO vs Classic
Maru vs Serral
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
2 days
Douyu Cup 2020
3 days
BSL22 NKC (BSL vs China)
3 days
Online Event
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-06-19
WardiTV Spring 2026
Heroes Pulsing #2

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Season 21: Qualifier 1
SCTL 2026 Spring
Maestros of the Game 2
Murky Cup 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026

Upcoming

CSL Season 21: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Douyu Cup 2026
BCC 2026
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E1
Heroes Pulsing #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.