hahaha right :D

anyway would have been kind of funny if it wasnt for the bm every game (even if your opponent doesnt bm) so i stopped watching after 3-4 replays, just too embarassing

same here, the bming was a bit too repetitive and embarasing

Klyberess

Sweden345 Posts

November 09 2011 03:20 GMT

#182

On November 09 2011 04:18 limubai wrote:
well gz on beeing able to reach top while beeing [insert bad word].

does this really deserve a threat for attentionwhoring tho ?
or is this supposed to be a guide ?

guess those who fail at everything else might feel inspired and try to "incorporate" that "strategie" in their play.

anyone else feels dumber after reading this :D ?

User was warned for this post

Yes. Yes I do.

Synk

United States297 Posts

November 09 2011 03:27 GMT

#183

Yea, I like that you have refined 6 pooling, I do think some of these replays are valuable and show that maybe some openings aren't as solid as people might think. However the really classless BM you insert into every game, and the attention whoring (asking/hoping players are streaming so you can get more attention) makes me dislike this entire thread. Your build does have counters, most of the replays you're just getting lucky from good players doing their openings a little bit sloppy. Furthermore most of these replays don't really showcase any micro at all, except the fact that you benefit from the fact that retreating drones and lings in the same hot-key has great synergy ( drones move slower, so they always tank for the lings once you stop to re-engage ). This whole thing could have been done so much better by yourself, and you would have gotten a lot of notoriety for doing something kinda cool( I think it's a really cool idea), instead you're just showing how much of a classless player you are in you're desperation for attention.

Please stop BM'ing people when you're winning, for your own sake. It really makes you look bad, in reality you're just fishing for pro players to BM you back because you're desperate for attention and it shows.

Banana223

United States7 Posts

November 09 2011 03:32 GMT

#184

What would be a much better achievement is learning proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Reading your tips is embarrassing.

SUSUGAM

United States177 Posts

November 09 2011 03:37 GMT

#185

On November 09 2011 12:04 dreamsmasher wrote:

Show nested quote +

what if he doens't care about that.

Everyone MUST play to become Flash 2.0.

babylon

8765 Posts

November 09 2011 03:38 GMT

#186

Wow. Say what you will about this guy, but that worker micro is pretty damn impressive, and he's clearly put a lot of thought into this. I'm impressed, though admittedly less than happy about the BM.

aintz

Canada5624 Posts

November 09 2011 03:42 GMT

#187

whats wrong with a lil bm, grow some thick skin. all the real pros said gg before they left, just saying.

ZorBa.G

Australia279 Posts

November 09 2011 03:43 GMT

#188

I don't see what players get out of cheese. I can understand why you would do it in tourney play. But not on ladder. What do you learn from this? When I first started playing SC2, I cheesed like my first 20 games lol..... then found it was the most boring thing one can do in this game wether if you win or lose.

Looking at your BM, I feel you just get kicks out of winning cheap games off classy players. Honestly, how the hell can you 6 pool to masters!?!?! Like yeah, of course you have shown it's possible, but god damn I'd be so bored of doing that build for a whole day.

DrunkDemon

4 Posts

November 09 2011 03:55 GMT

#189

The 11 overpool build is supposed to be very defensible against early pool builds. Have you been able to beat this build with your 7 pool or is it too difficult?

Perseverance

Japan2800 Posts

November 09 2011 04:06 GMT

#190

lol that's awesome. Funny how many strats can work well if executed properly.

United States1177 Posts

November 09 2011 04:11 GMT

#191

Been there, done that, made a post about it couple months ago.

Some guy already did an experiment 6 pool only on ladder to GM and made a TL post about it. Eventually he disappeared and now we have someone else doing the same exact thing, same experiment, same post.

BlazeTSR

United States218 Posts

November 09 2011 04:14 GMT

#192

Hmmm

ZeromuS

Canada13378 Posts

November 09 2011 04:21 GMT

#193

On November 09 2011 13:11 W2 wrote:
Been there, done that, made a post about it couple months ago.

Some guy already did an experiment 6 pool only on ladder to GM and made a TL post about it. Eventually he disappeared and now we have someone else doing the same exact thing, same experiment, same post.

But this has an interesting worker micro trick thrown in to boot which I feel will add a lot to early worker defense and attacks alike.

Maintain

United States22 Posts

November 09 2011 04:24 GMT

#194

I tried this and went 3-2 (vs 3x zergs 1x toss and 1x terran, the two losses were vs. Z and were both close by air) in plat on my alt acct lol... the bm you get is actually pretty hilarious.

Also something to take into consideration is these games are superrr quick... I played the 5 games in less than a half hour...

paintfive

785 Posts

November 09 2011 04:27 GMT

#195

A lot of negative comments in here, but this is a really informative post. Great work!

United States1177 Posts

November 09 2011 04:28 GMT

#196

On November 09 2011 13:21 ZeromuS wrote:

Show nested quote +

But this has an interesting worker micro trick thrown in to boot which I feel will add a lot to early worker defense and attacks alike.

Yeah that's great. Not saying he can't open a new thread, I was just taking a jab at the OP because he thinks he's hot shit when there are tons of "GET GM WITH 3rax/6pool/4gate GUIDE" floating around TL.

kofman

Andorra698 Posts

November 09 2011 04:36 GMT

#197

On November 09 2011 12:19 TuElite wrote:
6 pooling, one could say that it's a... ...bad habit.

Also, fuck you OP

Someone butthurt they got 6 pooled? :O

Raisauce

Canada864 Posts

November 09 2011 04:43 GMT

#198

You're like a good mannered Zerg version of CombatEX

Gomas

Poland311 Posts

November 09 2011 04:50 GMT

#199

The link between personality and strategy is strong with this one.

Someone should seriously explore this relationship, cause I can very very often tell from things people write in game, even at the start, how they will most likely play. Things like cheeses, very risky plays, or micro-intensive builds surprisingly often happen after the opponent is either really talkative or just mad for no reason.

VampireLady

Netherlands283 Posts

November 09 2011 04:55 GMT

#200

Thankyou very useful the little details u describe are something people really need to consider in alot of scenarios. It only shows the numerous roads that lead to Rome.